Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus AureusDERAIL_MRSANCT01302210
Detection, Education, Research and Decolonization Without Isolation in Long-term Care Facilities
An observational study of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, run by Endeavor Health at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Our hypothesis for the DERAIL MRSA program is that one can safely remove the colonization risk from nearly all residents (patients) in a way that does not interfere with the desired life-style for persons in these facilities and thereby reduce the risk of infection and lower the cost of care by avoiding preventable… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
- What is being tested?
- Decolonization
- How many people
- 22,302 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2010to Nov 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients in 18 LTCF nursing units randomly selected as intervention or control units
Who cannot join
- Patients that choose not to be included in the program
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
NorthShore University HealthSystem Research Institute
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
About this study
Official title: Detection, Education, Research and Decolonization Without Isolation in Long-term Care to Control(DERAIL)MRSA
Our hypothesis for the DERAIL MRSA program is that one can safely remove the colonization risk from nearly all residents (patients) in a way that does not interfere with the desired life-style for persons in these facilities and thereby reduce the risk of infection and lower the cost of care by avoiding preventable disease.
Read the detailed description
The primary endpoint will be measuring the reduction in MRSA colonization prevalence (percentage rate) in the intervention arm as compared to the control arm. One secondary endpoint is to compare the rate of MRSA disease (number of infections per 1,000 patients and 10,000 patient days) in the intervention and control arms. The other secondary endpoint is to determine the cost of MRSA screening and decolonization and compare it to the cost of MRSA disease treatment (both medication cost and the expense of any needed hospitalization for therapy of MRSA infection therapy) in the control arm. Achieving our primary goal of MRSA control will also demonstrate two secondary goals wthe investigators aim to achieve: one being that a scientific, planned approach to the issue of specific healthcare-associated infection in LTCFs can resolve these problems and the other that a partnership between acute and long-term care (e.g., ongoing relationship spanning at least 5 years) is beneficial in dealing with patient safety and quality practices across the United Sates Healthcare continuum.
- Being tested
- Decolonization
- Keywords
- MRSA, Cluster Randomized Trial, Infection Control Intervention
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DecolonizationDrug
Also called Mupirocin
5 day regimen of mupirocin calcium 2% twice daily to the nares and any open wound plus bath or shower with 4% chlorhexidine used as a liquid soap
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Active surveillance testing for MRSA and decolonization of positive subjects Receives: Drug: Decolonization | |
| control | Usual standard of care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To record the effectiveness of an admission testing and immediate decolonization of positive persons protocol for reducing MRSA colonization prevalence in long term care facilities (LTCF's)
Infection Control cluster randomized trial: measuring the reduction in MRSA colonization prevalence (rate) in the intervention arm as compared to the control arm
Measured: 12 months and 24 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
To further develop an Infection Control Outreach Program designed to provide expert guidance on infectious disease prevention specific to LTCF's
Compare the rate of MRSA disease in the intervention and control arms. Determine the cost of MRSA screening and decolonization and compare it to the cost of MRSA disease treatment (both medication cost and the expense of any needed hospitalization for therapy of MRSA infection therapy) in the control arm.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Feb 2011 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2010
- Primary completionDec 2013
- Study completionNov 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (75)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus AureusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Enrolment
- 22,302 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Endeavor Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lance R Peterson, MD, Principal investigator, Endeavor Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01302210
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AHRQ 1R18HSO19968-01
- Acronym
- DERAIL_MRSA
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 23 Feb 2011
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Capitano B, Leshem OA, Nightingale CH, Nicolau DP. Cost effect of managing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a long-term care facility. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jan;51(1):10-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-5215.2002.51003.x.
PubMed 12534839Kauffman CA, Terpenning MS, He X, Zarins LT, Ramsey MA, Jorgensen KA, Sottile WS, Bradley SF. Attempts to eradicate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from a long-term-care facility with the use of mupirocin ointment. Am J Med. 1993 Apr;94(4):371-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90147-h.
PubMed 8475930Vriens M, Blok H, Fluit A, Troelstra A, Van Der Werken C, Verhoef J. Costs associated with a strict policy to eradicate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Dutch University Medical Center: a 10-year survey. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002 Nov;21(11):782-6. doi: 10.1007/s10096-002-0811-4. Epub 2002 Nov 8.
PubMed 12461587Smith PW, Bennett G, Bradley S, Drinka P, Lautenbach E, Marx J, Mody L, Nicolle L, Stevenson K; SHEA; APIC. SHEA/APIC guideline: infection prevention and control in the long-term care facility, July 2008. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Sep;29(9):785-814. doi: 10.1086/592416. No abstract available.
PubMed 18767983Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L; Health Care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings. Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10 Suppl 2):S65-164. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.007. No abstract available.
PubMed 18068815Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW, Morgan WM, Emori TG. The nationwide nosocomial infection rate. A new need for vital statistics. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Feb;121(2):159-67. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113988.
PubMed 4014113Strausbaugh LJ, Joseph CL. The burden of infection in long-term care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;21(10):674-9. doi: 10.1086/501712.
PubMed 11083186Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW, Morgan WM, Emori TG, Munn VP, Hooton TM. The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Feb;121(2):182-205. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113990.
PubMed 4014115John JF Jr, Ribner BS. Antibiotic resistance in long-term care facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991 Apr;12(4):245-50. doi: 10.1086/646332. No abstract available.
PubMed 1905739Muder RR, Brennen C, Wagener MM, Vickers RM, Rihs JD, Hancock GA, Yee YC, Miller JM, Yu VL. Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal colonization and infection in a long-term care facility. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Jan 15;114(2):107-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-2-1-107.
PubMed 1984384Bradley SF, Terpenning MS, Ramsey MA, Zarins LT, Jorgensen KA, Sottile WS, Schaberg DR, Kauffman CA. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: colonization and infection in a long-term care facility. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Sep 15;115(6):417-22. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-115-6-417.
PubMed 1908198Strausbaugh LJ, Jacobson C, Sewell DL, Potter S, Ward TT. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in extended-care facilities: experiences in a Veterans' Affairs nursing home and a review of the literature. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991 Jan;12(1):36-45. doi: 10.1086/646236.
PubMed 1999642Boyce JM. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitals and long-term care facilities: microbiology, epidemiology, and preventive measures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992 Dec;13(12):725-37. doi: 10.1086/648346. No abstract available.
PubMed 1289400Trick WE, Weinstein RA, DeMarais PL, Kuehnert MJ, Tomaska W, Nathan C, Rice TW, McAllister SK, Carson LA, Jarvis WR. Colonization of skilled-care facility residents with antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Mar;49(3):270-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.4930270.x.
PubMed 11300237Stone ND, Lewis DR, Lowery HK, Darrow LA, Kroll CM, Gaynes RP, Jernigan JA, McGowan JE Jr, Tenover FC, Richards CL Jr. Importance of bacterial burden among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers in a long-term care facility. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;29(2):143-8. doi: 10.1086/526437.
PubMed 18179369
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Detection, Education, Research and Decolonization Without Isolation in Long-term Care to Control(DERAIL)MRSA
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01302210
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DERAIL_MRSA / AHRQ 1R18HSO19968-01
- Keywords
- MRSA, Cluster Randomized Trial, Infection Control Intervention
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 22,302 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Endeavor HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
- Study start
- Oct 2010
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Feb 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Our hypothesis for the DERAIL MRSA program is that one can safely remove the colonization risk from nearly all residents (patients) in a way that does not interfere with the desired life-style for persons in these facilities and thereby reduce the risk of infection and lower the cost of care by avoiding preventable disease.
Detailed description
The primary endpoint will be measuring the reduction in MRSA colonization prevalence (percentage rate) in the intervention arm as compared to the control arm. One secondary endpoint is to compare the rate of MRSA disease (number of infections per 1,000 patients and 10,000 patient days) in the intervention and control arms. The other secondary endpoint is to determine the cost of MRSA screening and decolonization and compare it to the cost of MRSA disease treatment (both medication cost and the expense of any needed hospitalization for therapy of MRSA infection therapy) in the control arm. Achieving our primary goal of MRSA control will also demonstrate two secondary goals wthe investigators aim to achieve: one being that a scientific, planned approach to the issue of specific healthcare-associated infection in LTCFs can resolve these problems and the other that a partnership between acute and long-term care (e.g., ongoing relationship spanning at least 5 years) is beneficial in dealing with patient safety and quality practices across the United Sates Healthcare continuum.
Study design
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | – | Drug: DecolonizationActive surveillance testing for MRSA and decolonization of positive subjects |
| control | – | –Usual standard of care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients in 18 LTCF nursing units randomly selected as intervention or control units
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients that choose not to be included in the program
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DecolonizationAlso: Mupirocin5 day regimen of mupirocin calcium 2% twice daily to the nares and any open wound plus bath or shower with 4% chlorhexidine used as a liquid soap | Drug | Intervention |
Primary outcome
To record the effectiveness of an admission testing and immediate decolonization of positive persons protocol for reducing MRSA colonization prevalence in long term care facilities (LTCF's)
Time frame: 12 months and 24 months
Infection Control cluster randomized trial: measuring the reduction in MRSA colonization prevalence (rate) in the intervention arm as compared to the control arm
1 secondary outcome
To further develop an Infection Control Outreach Program designed to provide expert guidance on infectious disease prevention specific to LTCF's
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2019.
- Background: PubMed 12534839Capitano B, Leshem OA, Nightingale CH, Nicolau DP. Cost effect of managing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a long-term care facility. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jan;51(1):10-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-5215.2002.51003.x.
- Background: PubMed 8475930Kauffman CA, Terpenning MS, He X, Zarins LT, Ramsey MA, Jorgensen KA, Sottile WS, Bradley SF. Attempts to eradicate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from a long-term-care facility with the use of mupirocin ointment. Am J Med. 1993 Apr;94(4):371-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90147-h.
- Background: PubMed 12461587Vriens M, Blok H, Fluit A, Troelstra A, Van Der Werken C, Verhoef J. Costs associated with a strict policy to eradicate methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Dutch University Medical Center: a 10-year survey. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002 Nov;21(11):782-6. doi: 10.1007/s10096-002-0811-4. Epub 2002 Nov 8.
- Background: PubMed 18767983Smith PW, Bennett G, Bradley S, Drinka P, Lautenbach E, Marx J, Mody L, Nicolle L, Stevenson K; SHEA; APIC. SHEA/APIC guideline: infection prevention and control in the long-term care facility, July 2008. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Sep;29(9):785-814. doi: 10.1086/592416. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 18068815Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L; Health Care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings. Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10 Suppl 2):S65-164. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.007. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 4014113Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW, Morgan WM, Emori TG. The nationwide nosocomial infection rate. A new need for vital statistics. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Feb;121(2):159-67. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113988.
- Background: PubMed 11083186Strausbaugh LJ, Joseph CL. The burden of infection in long-term care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;21(10):674-9. doi: 10.1086/501712.
- Background: PubMed 4014115Haley RW, Culver DH, White JW, Morgan WM, Emori TG, Munn VP, Hooton TM. The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Feb;121(2):182-205. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113990.
- Background: PubMed 1905739John JF Jr, Ribner BS. Antibiotic resistance in long-term care facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991 Apr;12(4):245-50. doi: 10.1086/646332. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 1984384Muder RR, Brennen C, Wagener MM, Vickers RM, Rihs JD, Hancock GA, Yee YC, Miller JM, Yu VL. Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal colonization and infection in a long-term care facility. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Jan 15;114(2):107-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-114-2-1-107.
- Background: PubMed 1908198Bradley SF, Terpenning MS, Ramsey MA, Zarins LT, Jorgensen KA, Sottile WS, Schaberg DR, Kauffman CA. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: colonization and infection in a long-term care facility. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Sep 15;115(6):417-22. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-115-6-417.
- Background: PubMed 1999642Strausbaugh LJ, Jacobson C, Sewell DL, Potter S, Ward TT. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in extended-care facilities: experiences in a Veterans' Affairs nursing home and a review of the literature. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1991 Jan;12(1):36-45. doi: 10.1086/646236.
- Last assessed March 21, 2010Link provided by the sponsor.
- World Health Organization. The Stop TB strategy. WHO 2006. Last accessed March 13,2010Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Not yet recruiting
Farm-originated Antimicrobial Resistance Modeling: Exploring Humans-to-Animal Dissemination
Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
RecruitingPhase 4
Daptomycin vs. Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin Resistant S. Aureus Bacteremia
Staphylococcus Aureus Septicemia, Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Gene Expression Analysis of Biofilm Formation and Antimicrobial Resistance in Clinical Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Staphylococcal Aureus Infection, Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of Resistant Potato Starch for Gut MDRO Decolonization
Clostridium Infections, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
RecruitingPhase 4
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole vs. Clindamycin for the Treatment of Children With Invasive MRSA Infections
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, Osteomyelitis Acute
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lance R Peterson, MD principal investigator
Endeavor Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, run by Endeavor Health at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To record the effectiveness of an admission testing and immediate decolonization of positive persons protocol for reducing MRSA colonization prevalence in long term care facilities (LTCF's) (time frame: 12 months and 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01302210, which also lists 75 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2019.