AzTrials
AzTrials

Accuracy of Non-invasive Hemoglobin MonitorNCT01304550

Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Masimo Pulse-Hemoglobin-Meter Monitor in Surgical Patients

An observational study of Accuracy of Non-invasive Hemoglobin Monitor, run by University of California, Davis.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a retrospective comparison of hemoglobin measurements obtained by arterial blood gas analysis and the Masimo Continuous Hemoglobin Monitor Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
How many people
48 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2009to Jul 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patience undergoing elect cardiac surgery.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who had indwelling arterial catheters placed for surgeries that involved major blood loss and who had serial hemoglobin concentration measurements for their surgeries, since January 2009. This will represent approximately 50 patients.

Who cannot join

  • Inclusion criteria are patients undergoing major surgery from January 2009 - April 2009, who had continuous hemoglobin pulse oximetry readings form the Masimo SpHb monitor and serial hemoglobin concentration measurement from the lab. Patient who did not have these studies will be excluded.

About this study

This is a retrospective comparison of hemoglobin measurements obtained by arterial blood gas analysis and the Masimo Continuous Hemoglobin Monitor

Read the detailed description

The chief objective of this study is to internally validate the accuracy of the Masimo SpHb (TM) technology as compared to our laboratory measurement of Hb. We have been using the Masimo SpHb monitor on patients who underwent open heart surgery, hepatic resection, kidney transplant and aortic aneurysm repair since January 2009. These patients also had hemoglobin concentration measurements as part of the arterial blood gas analysis performed by our laboratory to evaluate intraoperative ventilation and electrolyte changes. We will collate the laboratory measurements with the Masimo SpHb values documented in the anesthetic records.

Keywords
non-invasive, hemoglobin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy of Masimo Monitor

    365 Days

    Measured: 1 Year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Feb 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2009
  3. Primary completionJul 2010
  4. Study completionJul 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
48 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01304550
Sponsor's protocol ID
200917394
Other IDs
200917394-1
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
23 Feb 2011
Last updated
30 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Accuracy of Non-invasive Hemoglobin Monitor, run by University of California, Davis.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy of Masimo Monitor (time frame: 1 Year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in