GingivitisPAUNCT01307358
A Study Comparing the Interproximal Plaque and Gingivitis Effects of Three Interdental Cleaning Modalities
A study testing Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning Prototype in people with Gingivitis, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this research study is to compare the interproximal plaque removal ability of Philips Sonicare Interproximal Cleaning Device to floss (Crest Glide) and Waterpik Waterflosser. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Gingivitis
- What is being tested?
- Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning Prototype
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2011to Apr 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- are in good/excellent health
- are 18 - 70 years old
- have abstained from all oral care in the 12 hours prior to their scheduled appointment, but no more than 18 hours prior
- have abstained from consumption of apples and other sticky fruits in the 12 hours prior to their appointment
- have a minimum of 20 natural teeth (excluding 3rd molars)
- have 2 qualifying Interproximal Unit test sites in each posterior quadrant from 3 approximating teeth : The following are the IU test site qualifiers:
Show all 17Show fewer
- Each IU test site shall consist of two adjacent teeth with un-restored interproximal surfaces with a closed contact. (Note: restorations are permissible if they do not interfere with plaque and GCF sampling as determined by examiner discretion)
- IU test sites of choice are as follows in the order of preference:
- Molar/premolar
- Premolar/premolar
- Molar/molar
- molar/canine
- have PPD ≤ 4mm at all four sites within each interproximal unit test site
- have ≥ 20 bleeding sites (whole mouth) as determined by the Gingival Bleeding Index
- have provided written informed consent and are willing to participate and be available at all times required for participation
- are willing and able to fully understand and comply with the written and verbal study instructions provided in English
- agree to return all study materials at the final visit
Who cannot join
- have systemic diseases, Down's syndrome, or known AIDS/HIV;
- Have Diabetes
- are a smoker
- are pregnant or nursing by subject report;
- have a cardiac pacemaker or AICD
- are undergoing or require extensive dental or orthodontic treatment;
Show all 10Show fewer
- have had oral or gum surgery in the previous 2 months;
- require antibiotic treatment for dental appointments;
- have used antibiotics within 4 weeks of enrollment
- are currently using prescription-dose anti-inflammatory medications or anticoagulants (including aspirin)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
GO Health Center, University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Parallel Study Comparing the Interproximal Plaque and Gingivitis Effects of Three Interdental Cleaning Modalities
The purpose of this research study is to compare the interproximal plaque removal ability of Philips Sonicare Interproximal Cleaning Device to floss (Crest Glide) and Waterpik Waterflosser. In addition, we seek to learn more about the results of using this device on plaque accumulation and what biological processes influence the makeup of plaque and reduction of gingivitis.
Read the detailed description
Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint of this study is the residual protein concentration in posterior sites following single use treatment with either manual toothbrush, manual toothbrush + Sonicare IP cleaning prototype, manual toothbrush + Waterpik Ultra Water Flosser or manual toothbrush + floss.
Secondary Endpoints Gingival bleeding index and Modified gingival index following single use treatment with either MTB, MTB + IP cleaning prototype, MTB + Waterpik Waterflosser or MTB + floss.
Comparisons of the concentration levels of 272 different pathogens between treatment groups
Biomarker profiles following the different treatment modalities
Safety endpoints based on adverse events and intraoral exam (soft tissue evaluation).
IP cleaning satisfaction questionnaire following treatment with either MTB, MTB + IP cleaning prototype, MTB + Waterpik Waterflosser or MTB + floss.
Expected Duration of Study The planned duration of a subject's participation in this study is approximately 2 weeks.
Discontinuation Criteria/Stopping Rules If in the opinion of the investigator, the health or safety of a subject is affected adversely by participation in the study or non-compliance to at-home oral hygiene regimen adversely effects test product familiarization or plaque regrowth, the subject will be removed.
Controls to Minimize Bias All eligible subjects will be randomized at Visit 1. Randomization of Subjects and Balance of Test Groups Subjects will be randomized to one of the four treatment groups according to a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Randomization will be stratified by gender to complete with approximately 68 subjects.
Blinding The examiner and laboratory personnel will be blinded.
Maintenance of randomization Codes In order to minimize bias, this study will be randomized and single blind - the Examiners performing the interproximal plaque sampling and gingivitis assessment are the designated blinded personnel. Unblinding of study data will not occur until after all study procedures have been completed.
Experimental Regimen and Product Labeling The devices used in this study are subject only to Class I (general controls) and considered exempt from the premarket notification procedures and not subject to section 510(k), 515, or 520(m,) of the FDC Act in order to be legally marketed. Thus, the study does not meet the definition of an Applicable Clinical Trial.
Each subject will receive an ADA Reference manual toothbrush, timer, dentifrice and, if assigned, an IP cleaning device (either Sonicare Prototype, Crest Glide Floss or Waterpik Ultra Water Flosser (WP 100) with the Classic Jet Tip). Subjects are to brush twice daily for two minutes and, if assigned, use their IP cleaning device once daily, in the evening, after toothbrushing. The Directions for Use for all devices can be found in the protocol Appendices and should be reviewed with the subjects who shall demonstrate proper usage at the time of product assignment.
Methods and Treatments not Permitted on Study Once enrolled on-study, the use of any additional oral hygiene treatments and aids other than those prescribed is prohibited. A list of prohibited devices and aids includes but is not limited to mouthwash, chewing gum, whitening products, non-assigned interproximal cleaning aids/devices or breath films. The use of any dentifrice other than that dispensed at Visit 2 is prohibited. In the event that an enrolled subject requires dental care outside the scope of the study, he/she will be discontinued from the trial.
The use of antibiotics or antibacterial agents while participating on the study is also prohibited and subjects who are required to use them will be removed from the dataset for endpoint analysis. The use of prescription strength and repeat dose of non-steroidal anti-inflammatories and anticoagulants (including Aspirin) for longer than 2 days is also prohibited.
All deviations from the prescribed treatment will be documented and continued eligibility will be reassessed.
Determination of Sample Size Sample size justification is based on considerations of statistical power for detecting a difference in mean residual protein concentration (RPC) between the manual toothbrush group and the manual toothbrush + Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning Prototype group. A sample size of 17 per group at visit 3 (the anticipated sample size after allowance for dropout) will provide 80% power for detecting a difference in mean RPC between groups of 4.71 (µg/ml) assuming a subject-level standard error of the average of two RPC measurements of 4.76 (the square of this standard error is the variance determined from assuming an RPC IP site-specific standard deviation of 6.15, and an intramouth correlation of the two RPC measurements of 0.2, as estimated from a statistical model (see 8.6) for preliminary data that adjusts for baseline RPC).
- Conditions
- Gingivitis
- Being tested
- Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning Prototype
- Medical subject headings
- Gingivitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning PrototypeOther
Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning Prototype used to clean between the teeth 1 time a day in combination with brushing.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Toothbrush + Sonicare Interproximal Cleaning Prototype | Experimental | Manual Toothbrush + Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning Prototype Receives: Other: Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning Prototype |
| Manual Toothbrush | Active comparator | Manual Toothbrush Receives: Other: Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning Prototype |
| Manual Toothbrush + Floss | Active comparator | Manual Toothbrush + Floss Receives: Other: Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning Prototype |
| Manual Toothbrush + Waterpik Ultra Water Flosser | Active comparator | Manual Toothbrush + Waterpik Ultra Water Flosser Receives: Other: Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning Prototype |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
residual protein concentration in posterior sites
Measured: 2 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
GBI and MGI
GBI and MGI following single use treatment with either MTB, MTB + IP cleaning prototype, MTB + Waterpik Waterflosser or MTB + floss.
Comparisons of the concentration levels of 272 different pathogens between treatment groups Biomarker profiles following the different treatment modalities Safety endpoints based on adverse events and intraoral exam (soft tissue evaluation).
IP cleaning satisfaction questionnaire following treatment with either MTB, MTB + IP cleaning prototype, MTB + Waterpik Waterflosser or MTB + floss.
Measured: 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2011
- Primary completionApr 2011
- Study completionApr 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for GingivitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of North Carolina, Chapel HillThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Philips Oral Healthcare
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Steven Offenbacher, DDS,PhD,MMS, Principal investigator, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01307358
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DRC-0742
- Acronym
- PAU
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 28 Feb 2011
- Last updated
- 31 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Parallel Study Comparing the Interproximal Plaque and Gingivitis Effects of Three Interdental Cleaning Modalities
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01307358
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PAU / DRC-0742
- Conditions
- Gingivitis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel HillUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Philips Oral Healthcare
- Study start
- Feb 2011
- Primary completion
- Apr 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this research study is to compare the interproximal plaque removal ability of Philips Sonicare Interproximal Cleaning Device to floss (Crest Glide) and Waterpik Waterflosser. In addition, we seek to learn more about the results of using this device on plaque accumulation and what biological processes influence the makeup of plaque and reduction of gingivitis.
Detailed description
Primary Endpoint The primary endpoint of this study is the residual protein concentration in posterior sites following single use treatment with either manual toothbrush, manual toothbrush + Sonicare IP cleaning prototype, manual toothbrush + Waterpik Ultra Water Flosser or manual toothbrush + floss.
Secondary Endpoints Gingival bleeding index and Modified gingival index following single use treatment with either MTB, MTB + IP cleaning prototype, MTB + Waterpik Waterflosser or MTB + floss.
Comparisons of the concentration levels of 272 different pathogens between treatment groups
Biomarker profiles following the different treatment modalities
Safety endpoints based on adverse events and intraoral exam (soft tissue evaluation).
IP cleaning satisfaction questionnaire following treatment with either MTB, MTB + IP cleaning prototype, MTB + Waterpik Waterflosser or MTB + floss.
Expected Duration of Study The planned duration of a subject's participation in this study is approximately 2 weeks.
Discontinuation Criteria/Stopping Rules If in the opinion of the investigator, the health or safety of a subject is affected adversely by participation in the study or non-compliance to at-home oral hygiene regimen adversely effects test product familiarization or plaque regrowth, the subject will be removed.
Controls to Minimize Bias All eligible subjects will be randomized at Visit 1. Randomization of Subjects and Balance of Test Groups Subjects will be randomized to one of the four treatment groups according to a 1:1:1:1 ratio. Randomization will be stratified by gender to complete with approximately 68 subjects.
Blinding The examiner and laboratory personnel will be blinded.
Maintenance of randomization Codes In order to minimize bias, this study will be randomized and single blind - the Examiners performing the interproximal plaque sampling and gingivitis assessment are the designated blinded personnel. Unblinding of study data will not occur until after all study procedures have been completed.
Experimental Regimen and Product Labeling The devices used in this study are subject only to Class I (general controls) and considered exempt from the premarket notification procedures and not subject to section 510(k), 515, or 520(m,) of the FDC Act in order to be legally marketed. Thus, the study does not meet the definition of an Applicable Clinical Trial.
Each subject will receive an ADA Reference manual toothbrush, timer, dentifrice and, if assigned, an IP cleaning device (either Sonicare Prototype, Crest Glide Floss or Waterpik Ultra Water Flosser (WP 100) with the Classic Jet Tip). Subjects are to brush twice daily for two minutes and, if assigned, use their IP cleaning device once daily, in the evening, after toothbrushing. The Directions for Use for all devices can be found in the protocol Appendices and should be reviewed with the subjects who shall demonstrate proper usage at the time of product assignment.
Methods and Treatments not Permitted on Study Once enrolled on-study, the use of any additional oral hygiene treatments and aids other than those prescribed is prohibited. A list of prohibited devices and aids includes but is not limited to mouthwash, chewing gum, whitening products, non-assigned interproximal cleaning aids/devices or breath films. The use of any dentifrice other than that dispensed at Visit 2 is prohibited. In the event that an enrolled subject requires dental care outside the scope of the study, he/she will be discontinued from the trial.
The use of antibiotics or antibacterial agents while participating on the study is also prohibited and subjects who are required to use them will be removed from the dataset for endpoint analysis. The use of prescription strength and repeat dose of non-steroidal anti-inflammatories and anticoagulants (including Aspirin) for longer than 2 days is also prohibited.
All deviations from the prescribed treatment will be documented and continued eligibility will be reassessed.
Determination of Sample Size Sample size justification is based on considerations of statistical power for detecting a difference in mean residual protein concentration (RPC) between the manual toothbrush group and the manual toothbrush + Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning Prototype group. A sample size of 17 per group at visit 3 (the anticipated sample size after allowance for dropout) will provide 80% power for detecting a difference in mean RPC between groups of 4.71 (µg/ml) assuming a subject-level standard error of the average of two RPC measurements of 4.76 (the square of this standard error is the variance determined from assuming an RPC IP site-specific standard deviation of 6.15, and an intramouth correlation of the two RPC measurements of 0.2, as estimated from a statistical model (see 8.6) for preliminary data that adjusts for baseline RPC).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (care provider)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Toothbrush + Sonicare Interproximal Cleaning Prototype | Experimental | Other: Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning PrototypeManual Toothbrush + Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning Prototype |
| Manual Toothbrush | Active comparator | Other: Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning PrototypeManual Toothbrush |
| Manual Toothbrush + Floss | Active comparator | Other: Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning PrototypeManual Toothbrush + Floss |
| Manual Toothbrush + Waterpik Ultra Water Flosser | Active comparator | Other: Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning PrototypeManual Toothbrush + Waterpik Ultra Water Flosser |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- are in good/excellent health
- are 18 - 70 years old
- have abstained from all oral care in the 12 hours prior to their scheduled appointment, but no more than 18 hours prior
- have abstained from consumption of apples and other sticky fruits in the 12 hours prior to their appointment
- have a minimum of 20 natural teeth (excluding 3rd molars)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- have systemic diseases, Down's syndrome, or known AIDS/HIV;
- Have Diabetes
- are a smoker
- are pregnant or nursing by subject report;
- have a cardiac pacemaker or AICD
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning PrototypeSonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning Prototype used to clean between the teeth 1 time a day in combination with brushing. | Other | Manual Toothbrush, Manual Toothbrush + Floss, Manual Toothbrush + Sonicare Interproximal Cleaning Prototype, Manual Toothbrush + Waterpik Ultra Water Flosser |
Primary outcome
residual protein concentration in posterior sites
Time frame: 2 weeks
1 secondary outcome
GBI and MGI
Time frame: 2 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Aug 2018.
Related trials for Gingivitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Periodontal Disease and Small Vulnerable Newborns in Rural Nepal: A Community-based Trial
Preterm Birth, Low Birth Weight
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Efficacy of Thymus Vulgaris Mouthwash in the Management of Biofilm-Induced Gingivitis
Plaque-Induced Gingivitis
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Oil Pulling Using Oils in Comparison With Mouthwash for Gingivitis
Gingivitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Circadian Clock Proteins in Gingival Crevicular Fluid of Individuals With and Without Circadian Rhythm Disruption
Gingivitis, Circadian Rhythm Disruption
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Saliva Characteristics and Oral Health in Pregnant and Non-pregnant Women
Plaque Induced Gingivitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Steven Offenbacher, DDS,PhD,MMS principal investigator
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sonicare Interproximal (IP) Cleaning Prototype in people with Gingivitis, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
residual protein concentration in posterior sites (time frame: 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2018.