AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisNCT01307787

Effects of a Rehabilitation Program on Physical Performance and Disease Self-management in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

A study testing experimental Fit-program in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by University Medical Center Groningen at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of a group-based exercise and educational program for people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) on physical performance and disease-self-management. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 66 years
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
experimental Fit-program
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
Apr 2005to May 2007
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 66 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • medical diagnosis of RA according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
  • between 18 and 66 years of age

Who cannot join

  • severe disease activity (Disease Activity Score:DAS-28 > 5.1)
  • cardiac or pulmonary diseases resulting in restrictions in their ability to follow a physical exercise program
  • a Steinbrocker classification of functional capacity in RA ≥ 3
  • no stable medication for the RA
  • intra-articular injections during the time of the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Rehabilitation

    Haren, Provincie Groningen, PO box 30 002

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Effects of a Group-based Exercise and Educational Program on Physical Performance and Disease Self-management in Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Randomized Controlled Study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of a group-based exercise and educational program for people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) on physical performance and disease-self-management.

Read the detailed description

Currently, the effectiveness of a program consisting of education to improve disease self-management combined with intensive exercises is not clear. In the present study the investigators developed a group-based program for people with RA consisting of physical exercise to increase physical performance (i.e. aerobic capacity and muscle strength) combined with an educational program to improve disease self-management (self-reported health status and self-efficacy). The investigators called it the 'FIT program'. The aim of the present randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to examine the effects of the FIT program on aerobic capacity, muscle strength, self-reported health status and self-efficacy, in a population of people with RA. The investigators hypothesized that the FIT-program would have beneficial effects on physical performance (ie. aerobic capacity and muscle strength) and disease self-management (i.e. perceived health status and self-efficacy components) compared to a waiting list control group (WLCgroup).

Being tested
experimental Fit-program, no intervention
Keywords
exercise, education, self-management, rehabilitation
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • experimental Fit-programOther

    Also called rehabilitation

    Participants in the intervention group followed an eight week multi-disciplinary group rehabilitation program, consisting of a physical exercise part and an educational component. The physical exercise part consisted of a muscle exercise circuit and bicycle training,sport and aqua jogging. The educational part consisted of a weekly sixty minutes session. A multi-disciplinary group of healthcare professionals gave specialist orientated informational advice about how to handle the consequences of RA. Special attention was paid to ensure adjusting the level of each patients activity level to the participants' actual energy level. Further information was given about body sensations, sports, food and energy, pain, fatigue, emotional changes, sleeping disturbance and daily routine.

  • no interventionOther

    Also called rehabilitation

    waiting list control group with no intervention

Study groups in NCT01307787
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
fit-programExperimentalParticipants in the intervention group followed an eight week multi-disciplinary group rehabilitation program, consisting of a physical exercise part and an educational component.
Receives: Other: experimental Fit-program
waiting list control groupOtherThe waiting-list control group was allowed to enter the FIT program for rehabilitation after the study period.
Receives: Other: no intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in VO2 Max, Maximum Oxygen Uptake in ml/Min/kg is the Standard Index of Cardio-respiratory Fitness

    maximum oxygen uptake(VO2max, in ml/min/kg)was determined using the Åstrand-Rhyming test.The workload on the cycle ergometer was increased every minute by 25 watts until a steady-state heart rate was achieved. Participants had to sustain cycling for about 6 minutes, the heart rate(HR) was taken every minute. Mean HR of the 5th and 6th minute was registered. With the given workload, observed HR and participants'weight, maximal oxygen uptake can be established using the Åstrand-Rhyming nomogram. Values vary from < 21( sedentary with disease) to > 57 ( very good physical condition).

    Measured: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Change in Self-efficacy Pain and Other Symptoms

    Self-efficacy was assessed by the Arthritis-Self-efficacy Scale Dutch version. This arthritis self-efficacy scale contains two sub scales: self-efficacy pain (5 items related to coping with pain, and self-efficacy other symptoms (6 items related to coping with other symptoms, such as depression, fatigue and frustrations.A five-point ordinal scale is used ranging from 'totally disagree' (1) to 'totally agree' (5). We computed a mean score of 11 items ranging from 1-5. A higher score refers to higher self-efficacy.

    Measured: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,

  2. Change in Self-efficacy Function

    Self-efficacy function was assessed by the Arthritis-Self-efficacy Scale Dutch version The subscale self-efficacy function contains 8 items related to physical function. A five-point ordinal scale is used ranging from 'totally disagree' (1) to 'totally agree' (5). A mean score of 8 items was computed ranging from 1-5. A higher score refers to higher self-efficacy.

    Measured: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,

  3. Change in Muscle Strength of the Upper Extremity

    Muscle strength was assessed using a hand-held dynamometer (Microfet, Hoggan health Industries Inc.USA).Maximal voluntary isometric muscle strength of the elbow-flexors, elbow-extensors, was tested and recorded three times for each muscle group. All tests were performed bilaterally. The mean value of three measurements was computed. In addition a sum score of the mean values of the flexors and extensors on both sides for the upper extremity (UE)was computed and taken for analyses.

    Measured: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,

  4. Change in Muscle Strength of the Lower Extremity

    Muscle strength was assessed using a hand-held dynamometer (Microfet, Hoggan health Industries Inc.USA).Maximal voluntary isometric muscle strength of the knee-flexor and knee-extensors, was tested and recorded three times for each muscle group. All tests were performed bilaterally. The mean value of three measurements was computed. In addition a sum score of the mean values of the flexors and extensors on both sides for the lower extremity (LE)was computed and taken for analyses.

    Measured: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,

  5. Change in Health Status: Physical Health

    Self-reported health status was assessed using the Arthritis Impact-Measurement Scale-2, the Dutch version (Dutch-AIMS2).The questionnaire contains 77 items which represent 5 dimensions: physical functioning, psychological functioning, symptoms, social interaction and role functioning. Responses are recorded on a 5-point scale. All responses were recoded and calculated to a 0-10 scale. Scores were modified according to the number of co-morbidity complaints, as was recommended in the Dutch-AIMS2 manual. A low score indicates better health.

    Measured: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,

  6. Change in Health Status: Psychological Health

    Self-reported health status was assessed using the Arthritis Impact-Measurement Scale-2, the Dutch version (Dutch-AIMS2).The questionnaire contains 77 items which represent 5 dimensions: physical functioning, psychological functioning, symptoms, social interaction and role functioning. Responses are recorded on a 5-point scale. All responses were recoded and calculated to a 0-10 scale. Scores were modified according to the number of co-morbidity complaints, as was recommended in the Dutch-AIMS2 manual. A low score indicates better health.

    Measured: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,

  7. Change in Health Status: Social Interaction

    Self-reported health status was assessed using the Arthritis Impact-Measurement Scale-2, the Dutch version (Dutch-AIMS2).The questionnaire contains 77 items which represent 5 dimensions: physical functioning, psychological functioning, symptoms, social interaction and role functioning. Responses are recorded on a 5-point scale. All responses were recoded and calculated to a 0-10 scale. Scores were modified according to the number of co-morbidity complaints, as was recommended in the Dutch-AIMS2 manual. A low score indicates better health.

    Measured: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks,

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Mar 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2005
  3. Primary completionMay 2007
  4. Study completionMay 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01307787
Sponsor's protocol ID
210.076
Status last verified
Jan 2022
First submitted
2 Mar 2011
Last updated
28 Jan 2022
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Breedland I, van Scheppingen C, Leijsma M, Verheij-Jansen NP, van Weert E. Effects of a group-based exercise and educational program on physical performance and disease self-management in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled study. Phys Ther. 2011 Jun;91(6):879-93. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090010. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

    PubMed 21474637

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing experimental Fit-program in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by University Medical Center Groningen at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 May 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in VO2 Max, Maximum Oxygen Uptake in ml/Min/kg is the Standard Index of Cardio-respiratory Fitness (time frame: baseline, postintervention at 9 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01307787, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in