Gastric CancerNCT01309256
Multi-institutional Study on the Assessment of Robotic Surgery for Gastric Cancer
An observational study of Gastric Cancer, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
Minimally invasive surgery revolutionized the field of gastric cancer surgery. The surgical robot was introduced to alleviate the difficulty of laparoscopic surgery. Although many studies have reported successful outcomes for robotic surgery, there is no multicenter prospective analysis regarding the advantage of the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastric Cancer
- How many people
- 1,650 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Mar 2011to Feb 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Gastric cancer patients
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have documented diagnosis of gastric cancer
- Patients receiving laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery without preoperative evidence of serosal invasion and distant lymph node metastasis as determined by preoperative CT-scan, upper endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound.
- Patients who have received comprehensive explanation about the planned study, understand and accept all the terms of the study and willingly give consent to participate in all the required elements of the study
- Any patients who underwent robotic gastrectomy in Korea
Who cannot join
- Patients without mental competence
- Patients who are illiterate
- Patients who are pregnant
- Patients < 20 years old
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Minimally invasive surgery revolutionized the field of gastric cancer surgery. The surgical robot was introduced to alleviate the difficulty of laparoscopic surgery. Although many studies have reported successful outcomes for robotic surgery, there is no multicenter prospective analysis regarding the advantage of the robotic gastrectomy. The aim of this study is to analyze the surgical outcomes of the robotic gastrectomy focusing on the learning curve, cost-effectiveness, quality of life, and acute-inflammatory reaction in comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy.
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer
- Keywords
- distal gastrectomy, Robotic gastrectomy, registry, learning curve, cost-effectiveness, quality of life, acute inflammatory reaction, Robotic and laparoscopic surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Stomach Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| R-robot group | retrospective robot group | |
| P-robot group | prospective robot group | |
| P-laparoscopic group | prospective laparoscopic group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Registration of all robotic gastrectomies performed in South Korea
Measured: at the end of the study
Learning curve (operation time and surgical outcome) of robotic gastrectomy
Measured: from the start of the operation to discharge of the patient (usually two weeks after the operation)
Cost-effectiveness comparison between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy
Measured: from admission to discharge of the patient (usually from two days before the operation until two weeks after the operation)
Quality of life after robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy
Measured: One day before operation, first OPD visit after the operation (two weeks after the operation), 3M, 12M, 36M, and 60M after the operation
Acute-inflammatory response after undergoing robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy
Measured: preop, 2hr, 24hr, 4days and 30 days after the operation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2011
- Primary completionFeb 2013
- Study completionFeb 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yonsei UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Enrolment
- 1,650 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yonsei University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01309256
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4-2010-0659
- Status last verified
- Jun 2013
- First submitted
- 4 Mar 2011
- Last updated
- 4 Jun 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg. 2009 Jun;249(6):927-32. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000351688.64999.73.
PubMed 19474671Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun;23(6):1204-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0351-4. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
PubMed 19263147Kim MC, Heo GU, Jung GJ. Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: surgical techniques and clinical merits. Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):610-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0618-9. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
PubMed 19688399Song J, Lee HJ, Cho GS, Han SU, Kim MC, Ryu SW, Kim W, Song KY, Kim HH, Hyung WJ; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Recurrence following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 1,417 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jul;17(7):1777-86. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0932-4. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
PubMed 20151217Lee HJ, Kim HH, Kim MC, Ryu SY, Kim W, Song KY, Cho GS, Han SU, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study Group. The impact of a high body mass index on laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2009 Nov;23(11):2473-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0419-1. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
PubMed 19343439Kim MC, Kim W, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Ryu SY, Song KY, Lee HJ, Cho GS, Han SU, Hyung WJ; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Risk factors associated with complication following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale korean multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Oct;15(10):2692-700. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0075-z. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
PubMed 18663532Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, Ryu SW, Lee HJ, Song KY. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):417-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b.
PubMed 20160637Kim MS, Kim WJ, Hyung WJ, Kim HI, Han SU, Kim YW, Ryu KW, Park S. Comprehensive Learning Curve of Robotic Surgery: Discovery From a Multicenter Prospective Trial of Robotic Gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2021 May 1;273(5):949-956. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003583.
PubMed 31503017Kim HI, Han SU, Yang HK, Kim YW, Lee HJ, Ryu KW, Park JM, An JY, Kim MC, Park S, Song KY, Oh SJ, Kong SH, Suh BJ, Yang DH, Ha TK, Kim YN, Hyung WJ. Multicenter Prospective Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):103-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001249.
PubMed 26020107
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jun 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multi-institutional Study on the Assessment of Robotic Surgery for Gastric Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01309256
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 4-2010-0659
- Conditions
- Gastric Cancer
- Keywords
- distal gastrectomy, Robotic gastrectomy, registry, learning curve, cost-effectiveness, quality of life, acute inflammatory reaction, Robotic and laparoscopic surgery
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,650 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yonsei UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2011
- Primary completion
- Feb 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Minimally invasive surgery revolutionized the field of gastric cancer surgery. The surgical robot was introduced to alleviate the difficulty of laparoscopic surgery. Although many studies have reported successful outcomes for robotic surgery, there is no multicenter prospective analysis regarding the advantage of the robotic gastrectomy. The aim of this study is to analyze the surgical outcomes of the robotic gastrectomy focusing on the learning curve, cost-effectiveness, quality of life, and acute-inflammatory reaction in comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| R-robot group | – | –retrospective robot group |
| P-robot group | – | –prospective robot group |
| P-laparoscopic group | – | –prospective laparoscopic group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Gastric cancer patients
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients must have documented diagnosis of gastric cancer
- Patients receiving laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery without preoperative evidence of serosal invasion and distant lymph node metastasis as determined by preoperative CT-scan, upper endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound.
- Patients who have received comprehensive explanation about the planned study, understand and accept all the terms of the study and willingly give consent to participate in all the required elements of the study
- Any patients who underwent robotic gastrectomy in Korea
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients without mental competence
- Patients who are illiterate
- Patients who are pregnant
- Patients < 20 years old
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Registration of all robotic gastrectomies performed in South Korea
Time frame: at the end of the study
Learning curve (operation time and surgical outcome) of robotic gastrectomy
Time frame: from the start of the operation to discharge of the patient (usually two weeks after the operation)
Cost-effectiveness comparison between robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy
Time frame: from admission to discharge of the patient (usually from two days before the operation until two weeks after the operation)
Quality of life after robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy
Time frame: One day before operation, first OPD visit after the operation (two weeks after the operation), 3M, 12M, 36M, and 60M after the operation
Acute-inflammatory response after undergoing robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy
Time frame: preop, 2hr, 24hr, 4days and 30 days after the operation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jun 2013.
- Background: PubMed 19474671Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg. 2009 Jun;249(6):927-32. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000351688.64999.73.
- Background: PubMed 19263147Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun;23(6):1204-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0351-4. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
- Background: PubMed 19688399Kim MC, Heo GU, Jung GJ. Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: surgical techniques and clinical merits. Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):610-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0618-9. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
- Background: PubMed 20151217Song J, Lee HJ, Cho GS, Han SU, Kim MC, Ryu SW, Kim W, Song KY, Kim HH, Hyung WJ; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Recurrence following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 1,417 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jul;17(7):1777-86. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0932-4. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
- Background: PubMed 19343439Lee HJ, Kim HH, Kim MC, Ryu SY, Kim W, Song KY, Cho GS, Han SU, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study Group. The impact of a high body mass index on laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2009 Nov;23(11):2473-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0419-1. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
- Background: PubMed 18663532Kim MC, Kim W, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Ryu SY, Song KY, Lee HJ, Cho GS, Han SU, Hyung WJ; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Risk factors associated with complication following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale korean multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Oct;15(10):2692-700. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0075-z. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
- Background: PubMed 20160637Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, Ryu SW, Lee HJ, Song KY. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):417-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31503017Kim MS, Kim WJ, Hyung WJ, Kim HI, Han SU, Kim YW, Ryu KW, Park S. Comprehensive Learning Curve of Robotic Surgery: Discovery From a Multicenter Prospective Trial of Robotic Gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2021 May 1;273(5):949-956. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003583.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26020107Kim HI, Han SU, Yang HK, Kim YW, Lee HJ, Ryu KW, Park JM, An JY, Kim MC, Park S, Song KY, Oh SJ, Kong SH, Suh BJ, Yang DH, Ha TK, Kim YN, Hyung WJ. Multicenter Prospective Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):103-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001249.
Related trials for Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
GK01 Cell Therapy in Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis
Gastric Cancer (GC)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Neoadjuvant-adjuvant Durvalumab and FLOT Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Durvalumab in Chinese Patients With Resectable GC/GEJC.
Gastric, Esophagogastric Junction
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Gastric Cancer, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Registration of all robotic gastrectomies performed in South Korea (time frame: at the end of the study). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01309256, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2013.