Hazardous DrinkingPhase 2TOPASNCT01311245
Testing Alcohol Interventions Among Job-seekers
A Phase 2 study testing Stage-tailored intervention and Non-stage-tailored Intervention in people with Hazardous Drinking, run by University Medicine Greifswald at 3 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
The aim of the randomized controlled trial was to test two behavioral interventions among job-seekers with risky drinking. The interventions differed in their theoretical background: Intervention A was tailored to the stage of change, and Intervention B was non-stage-tailored. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hazardous Drinking
- What is being tested?
- Stage-tailored intervention and Non-stage-tailored Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,243 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Jul 2008to Mar 2011
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Job-seekers with risky drinking (AUDIT-C ≥ 4/5 [women/men] and AUDIT < 20)
Who cannot join
- Job-seekers already asked to participate during an earlier visit at the job agency
- Job-seekers not intending to talk to a job-agent/ without waiting time
- Job-seekers physically or mentally not capable of participating in the study
- Job-seekers with insufficient language/ reading skills
- Job-seekers with more severe alcohol problems (AUDIT ≥ 20)
- Job-seekers employed at the department conducting the study
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Germany3 sites
Agentur für Arbeit
Greifswald, 17489
Agentur für Arbeit
Stralsund, 18437
Arbeitsgemeinschaft
Stralsund, 18437
About this study
Official title: Testing Stage Tailored vs. Non-stage Tailored Interventions Among Job-seekers With Risky Drinking
The aim of the randomized controlled trial was to test two behavioral interventions among job-seekers with risky drinking. The interventions differed in their theoretical background: Intervention A was tailored to the stage of change, and Intervention B was non-stage-tailored. Over 12 months, job-seekers were pro-actively screened for risky drinking at three job-agencies. Job-seekers with risky drinking were asked to participate in the study. All three groups were assessed at baseline, and 3, 6 and 15 months later. The baseline assessment was self-administered using handheld computers. The follow-up assessments by interviews on the phone, primarily. Both intervention groups received individualized computer generated feedback letters at baseline and 3 months later.
- Conditions
- Hazardous Drinking
- Being tested
- Stage-tailored intervention, Non-stage-tailored Intervention
- Keywords
- Risky drinking, Brief intervention, Computer-generated feedback, Stage-tailored, Non-stage-tailored
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Stage-tailored interventionBehavioural
Based on the Trans-Theoretical Model of intentional behavior change (TTM). According to their stage of change, participants received two computer generated feedback letters on their risky drinking, stage of change, processes of change, self-efficacy, and decisional balance. The first letter included normative feedback (interpersonal comparison with other individuals in the same stage), and was sent out by mail after baseline. The second letter included normative and ipsative feedback (intrapersonal comparisons: baseline vs. 3 months later), and was sent out by mail three months later.
Non-stage-tailored InterventionBehavioural
Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Participants received two computer generated feedback letters on their risky drinking, beliefs (behavioral, normative, control), attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, intention, and they were asked to fill in a where-when-how to change plan. The first letter included normative feedback (interpersonal comparison with other women/ men), and was sent out by mail after baseline. The second letter included normative and ipsative feedback, and was sent out by mail three months later.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stage-tailored | Experimental | At baseline and three months later Receives: Behavioral: Stage-tailored intervention |
| Non-stage-tailored | Experimental | At baseline and three months later Receives: Behavioral: Non-stage-tailored Intervention |
| Control group | No intervention | Assessment only |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Risky drinking
Determined by using average alcohol consumption per day, heavy occasional drinking, the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumtion (AUDIT-C) score
Measured: 6 and 15 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Motivation to reduce drinking
Assessed by the Readiness to Change Questionnaire
Measured: 6 and 15 months
Attempts to reduce drinking
Measured: 6 and 15 months
Knowledge about drinking limits
Measured: 6 and 15 months
Alcohol related problems
Measured: 6 and 15 months
Self-rated health
Measured: 6 and months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2008
- Primary completionDec 2010
- Study completionMar 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hazardous DrinkingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 1,243 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Medicine Greifswald
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- German Research Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Jennis Freyer-Adam, University Medicine Greifswald
- Investigators
- Jennis Freyer-Adam, PhD, Principal investigator, Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01311245
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DM5-IESO03
- Other IDs
- FR2661/1-1, FR2661/1-2, DM5-IESO05
- Acronym
- TOPAS
- Status last verified
- Dec 2015
- First submitted
- 7 Mar 2011
- Last updated
- 3 Dec 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Freyer-Adam J, Gaertner B, Tobschall S, John U. Health risk factors and self-rated health among job-seekers. BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 19;11:659. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-659.
PubMed 21854611Baumann S, Gaertner B, Schnuerer I, Bischof G, John U, Freyer-Adam J. How well do TTM measures work among a sample of individuals with unhealthy alcohol use that is characterized by low readiness to change? Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Sep;27(3):573-83. doi: 10.1037/a0029368. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
PubMed 22867296Freyer-Adam J, Baumann S, Schnuerer I, Haberecht K, Bischof G, John U, Gaertner B. Does stage tailoring matter in brief alcohol interventions for job-seekers? A randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2014 Nov;109(11):1845-56. doi: 10.1111/add.12677. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
PubMed 24981701Haberecht K, Schnuerer I, Gaertner B, John U, Freyer-Adam J. The Stability of Social Desirability: A Latent Change Analysis. J Pers. 2015 Aug;83(4):404-12. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12112. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
PubMed 25041464Baumann S, Gaertner B, Schnuerer I, Haberecht K, John U, Freyer-Adam J. The impact of a stage tailored intervention on alcohol use trajectories among those who do not intend to change. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Feb 1;147:167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.11.020. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
PubMed 25500129Schnuerer I, Baumann S, Haberecht K, Gaertner B, John U, Freyer-Adam J. Patterns of health risk behaviors among job-seekers: a latent class analysis. Int J Public Health. 2015 Jan;60(1):111-9. doi: 10.1007/s00038-014-0623-1. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
PubMed 25532553Baumann S, Gaertner B, Schnuerer I, Haberecht K, John U, Freyer-Adam J. Belief incongruence and the intention-behavior gap in persons with at-risk alcohol use. Addict Behav. 2015 Sep;48:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
PubMed 25930010
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Dec 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Testing Stage Tailored vs. Non-stage Tailored Interventions Among Job-seekers With Risky Drinking
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01311245
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TOPAS / DM5-IESO03
- Conditions
- Hazardous Drinking
- Keywords
- Risky drinking, Brief intervention, Computer-generated feedback, Stage-tailored, Non-stage-tailored
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,243 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Medicine GreifswaldUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- German Research Foundation
- Study start
- Jul 2008
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the randomized controlled trial was to test two behavioral interventions among job-seekers with risky drinking. The interventions differed in their theoretical background: Intervention A was tailored to the stage of change, and Intervention B was non-stage-tailored. Over 12 months, job-seekers were pro-actively screened for risky drinking at three job-agencies. Job-seekers with risky drinking were asked to participate in the study. All three groups were assessed at baseline, and 3, 6 and 15 months later. The baseline assessment was self-administered using handheld computers. The follow-up assessments by interviews on the phone, primarily. Both intervention groups received individualized computer generated feedback letters at baseline and 3 months later.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stage-tailored | Experimental | Behavioral: Stage-tailored interventionAt baseline and three months later |
| Non-stage-tailored | Experimental | Behavioral: Non-stage-tailored InterventionAt baseline and three months later |
| Control group | No intervention | –Assessment only |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Job-seekers with risky drinking (AUDIT-C ≥ 4/5 [women/men] and AUDIT < 20)
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Job-seekers already asked to participate during an earlier visit at the job agency
- Job-seekers not intending to talk to a job-agent/ without waiting time
- Job-seekers physically or mentally not capable of participating in the study
- Job-seekers with insufficient language/ reading skills
- Job-seekers with more severe alcohol problems (AUDIT ≥ 20)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Stage-tailored interventionBased on the Trans-Theoretical Model of intentional behavior change (TTM). According to their stage of change, participants received two computer generated feedback letters on their risky drinking, stage of change, processes of change, self-efficacy, and decisional balance. The first letter included normative feedback (interpersonal comparison with other individuals in the same stage), and was sent out by mail after baseline. The second letter included normative and ipsative feedback (intrapersonal comparisons: baseline vs. 3 months later), and was sent out by mail three months later. | Behavioural | Stage-tailored |
| Non-stage-tailored InterventionBased on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Participants received two computer generated feedback letters on their risky drinking, beliefs (behavioral, normative, control), attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, intention, and they were asked to fill in a where-when-how to change plan. The first letter included normative feedback (interpersonal comparison with other women/ men), and was sent out by mail after baseline. The second letter included normative and ipsative feedback, and was sent out by mail three months later. | Behavioural | Non-stage-tailored |
Primary outcome
Risky drinking
Time frame: 6 and 15 months
Determined by using average alcohol consumption per day, heavy occasional drinking, the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumtion (AUDIT-C) score
5 secondary outcomes
Motivation to reduce drinking
Time frame: 6 and 15 months
Attempts to reduce drinking
Time frame: 6 and 15 months
Knowledge about drinking limits
Time frame: 6 and 15 months
Alcohol related problems
Time frame: 6 and 15 months
Self-rated health
Time frame: 6 and months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Dec 2015.
- Results publication: PubMed 21854611Freyer-Adam J, Gaertner B, Tobschall S, John U. Health risk factors and self-rated health among job-seekers. BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 19;11:659. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-659.
- Results publication: PubMed 22867296Baumann S, Gaertner B, Schnuerer I, Bischof G, John U, Freyer-Adam J. How well do TTM measures work among a sample of individuals with unhealthy alcohol use that is characterized by low readiness to change? Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Sep;27(3):573-83. doi: 10.1037/a0029368. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 24981701Freyer-Adam J, Baumann S, Schnuerer I, Haberecht K, Bischof G, John U, Gaertner B. Does stage tailoring matter in brief alcohol interventions for job-seekers? A randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2014 Nov;109(11):1845-56. doi: 10.1111/add.12677. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 25041464Haberecht K, Schnuerer I, Gaertner B, John U, Freyer-Adam J. The Stability of Social Desirability: A Latent Change Analysis. J Pers. 2015 Aug;83(4):404-12. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12112. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
- Results publication: PubMed 25500129Baumann S, Gaertner B, Schnuerer I, Haberecht K, John U, Freyer-Adam J. The impact of a stage tailored intervention on alcohol use trajectories among those who do not intend to change. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Feb 1;147:167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.11.020. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 25532553Schnuerer I, Baumann S, Haberecht K, Gaertner B, John U, Freyer-Adam J. Patterns of health risk behaviors among job-seekers: a latent class analysis. Int J Public Health. 2015 Jan;60(1):111-9. doi: 10.1007/s00038-014-0623-1. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 25930010Baumann S, Gaertner B, Schnuerer I, Haberecht K, John U, Freyer-Adam J. Belief incongruence and the intention-behavior gap in persons with at-risk alcohol use. Addict Behav. 2015 Sep;48:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
- German Research FoundationLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Hazardous Drinking
Recruiting
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for HIV+ Hazardous Drinkers
HIV-1-infection, Alcohol Drinking
Active, not recruiting
Improving Help-seeking Propensity Through a Micro-intervention Targeting Common Concerns Among Individuals With Alcohol Problems: A Randomized Controlled Experiment
Alcohol Abuse, Harmful Alcohol Use
Not yet recruiting
Integrated Digital Health Approach to Reduce Hazardous Alcohol Use and Chronic Pain Among Rural Populations
Chronic Pain, Unhealthy Alcohol Use
Not yet recruiting
Telephone-Based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Young Adult Hazardous Drinkers
Hazardous Drinking, Harmful Alcohol Use
Recruiting
Affirmative Psychotherapy for Sexual Minority Women's Mental and Behavioral Health
Heavy Drinking, Mental Health Issue
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jennis Freyer-Adam, PhD principal investigator
Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Stage-tailored intervention and Non-stage-tailored Intervention in people with Hazardous Drinking, run by University Medicine Greifswald at 3 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Risky drinking (time frame: 6 and 15 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01311245, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2015.