AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple MyelomaPhase 3NIMBUSNCT01311687

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Pomalidomide in Combination With Low-Dose Dexamethasone Versus High-Dose Dexamethasone in Subjects With Refractory Multiple Myeloma or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Companion Study

A Phase 3 study testing pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Celgene at 94 sites in 16 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of pomalidomide in combination with low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone in subjects with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Myeloma
What is being tested?
pomalidomide and Dexamethasone
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
455 participants
Where
94 sitesin 16 countries
Study dates
11 Mar 2011to 29 Aug 2017
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Must be ≥ 18 years of age
  • Subjects must have documented diagnosis of multiple myeloma and have measurable disease
  • Subjects must have undergone prior treatment with ≥ 2 treatment lines of anti-myeloma therapy
  • Subjects must have either refractory or relapsed and refractory disease defined as documented disease progression during or within 60 days of completing their last myeloma therapy
  • All subjects must have received at least 2 consecutive cycles of prior treatment that included lenalidomide and bortezomib
  • All subjects must have failed treatment with both lenalidomide and bortezomib in one of the following ways: 1) Documented progressive disease on or within 60 days of completing treatment with lenalidomide and/or bortezomib, or 2) In case of prior response [≥ partial response (PR)] to lenalidomide or bortezomib, subjects must have relapsed within 6 months after stopping treatment with lenalidomide and/or bortezomib-containing regimens, or 3) Subjects who have not had a ≥ minimal response (MR) and have developed intolerance/toxicity after a minimum of two cycles of lenalidomide- and/or bortezomib-containing regimen
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Patients must have received adequate prior alkylator therapy
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0, 1, or 2
  • Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must not become pregnant for 28 days prior to initiation of study drug, during the study, and for 28 days after discontinuation
  • Females must agree to abstain from breastfeeding during study participation and 28 days after study drug discontinuation
  • Males must agree to use a latex condom during any sexual during the study and for 28 days following discontinuation from this study
  • Males must also agree to refrain from donating semen or sperm while on pomalidomide and for 28 days after discontinuation from this study

Who cannot join

  • Any of the following laboratory abnormalities:
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1,000/μL
  • Platelet count < 75,000/ μL for subjects in whom < 50% of bone marrow nucleated cells are plasma cells
  • Creatinine clearance < 45 mL/min
  • Corrected serum calcium > 14 mg/dL
  • Hemoglobin ≤ 8 g/dL
Show all 24Show fewer
  • Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT)/ aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or transaminase, serum glutamic pyruvic (SGPT)/ alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Serum total bilirubin > 2.0 mg/dL
  • Previous therapy with pomalidomide
  • Hypersensitivity to thalidomide, lenalidomide, or dexamethasone
  • Resistance to high-dose dexamethasone used in the last line of therapy
  • Peripheral neuropathy ≥ Grade 2
  • Subjects who received an allogeneic bone marrow or allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplant
  • Subjects who are planning for or who are eligible for stem cell transplant
  • Subjects with any one of the following: 1) Congestive heart failure, 2) Myocardial infarction within 12 months prior to starting study treatment, 3) Unstable or poorly controlled angina pectoris, including Prinzmetal variant angina pectoris
  • Subjects who received any of the following within the last 14 days of initiation of study treatment: 1) Plasmapheresis, 2) Major surgery, 3) Radiation therapy, 4) Use of any anti-myeloma drug therapy
  • Use of any investigational agents within 28 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) of treatment
  • Subjects with conditions requiring chronic steroid or immunosuppressive treatment
  • Any condition including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study
  • Incidence of gastrointestinal disease that may significantly alter the absorption of pomalidomide
  • Subjects unable or unwilling to undergo antithrombotic prophylactic treatment
  • Any serious medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subjects from signing the informed consent form
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding females
  • Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity or active infectious hepatitis A, B, or C

Trial locations and contacts

94 sites in 16 countries.

94 sites in 16 countries

France13 sites
  • CHU d'Angers

    Angers, 49033

  • Centre Hospitalier de la cote basque

    Bayonne, 64109

  • Centre Hospitalier Departemental

    La Roche-sur-Yon, 85025

  • CHRU de Lille FR

    Lille, 59037

  • Institut Paoli-Calmettes

    Marseille, 13009

  • CHRU Nantes

    Nantes, 44093

  • Hopital Saint-Louis

    Paris, 75475

  • CHU Hôpital St-Antoine

    Paris, 75571

  • CHRU - Hopital du Haut Leveque

    Pessac, 33604

  • Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

    Pierre-Bénite, 69310

  • Hopital Bretonneau

    Tours, 37044

  • Hopital Purpan

    Tulouse Cedex 9, 31059

  • CHU Nancy

    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511

Other trials in France

Australia10 sites
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital

    Adelaide, South Australia, 5000

  • Princess Alexandra Hospital

    Brisbane, QLD4102

  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

    Camperdown, 2050

  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute

    East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002

  • Frankston Hospital

    Frankston, Victoria, 3199

  • Alfred hospital

    Melbourne, 3004

  • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

    Nedlands, 6009

  • Calvary Mater Hospital

    Waratah, NSW 2298

  • Border Medical Oncology

    Wodonga, 3690

  • Wollongong Hospital

    Wollongong, 2500

Other trials in Australia

Canada10 sites
  • Tom Baker Cancer Center

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2

  • Cross Cancer Institute

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

  • James Cancer Hospital

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9

  • Juravinski Cancer Centre

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2

  • London Health Sciences Centre

    London, Ontario, N6C 6B5

  • Maisonneuve Rosemont

    Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4

  • Royal Victoria Hospital McGill Department of Oncology(RVH)

    Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1

  • Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish Genl

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2

  • University Health Network

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9

  • British Columbia Cancer Agency

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6

Other trials in Canada

United Kingdom10 sites
  • Royal Bournemouth Hospital

    Bournemouth, BH7 7DW

  • St James's University Hospital

    Leeds, LS9 7TF

  • St.Bartholomew's Hospital

    London, EC1A 7BE

  • King's College Hospital

    London, SE5 9RS

  • Freeman Hospital

    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN

  • Nottingham City Hospital

    Nottingham, NG5 1PB

  • Derriford Hospital

    Plymouth, PL6 8DH

  • Royal Hallamshire HospitalSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

    Sheffield, S10 2JF

  • The Royal Marsden Hospital

    Sutton-Surrey, SM2 5PT

  • The Royal Wolverhampton Hospital NHS Trust

    Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP

Other trials in United Kingdom

Germany9 sites
  • Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus

    Dresden, 01307

  • Universitatsklinikum Essen

    Essen, 45122

  • Askepios Klinik St. Georg

    Hamburg, 20099

  • Universitatsklinikum Heidelberg

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Universitatsklinikum Jena

    Jena, 07740

  • Universitatsklinikum Leipzig

    Leipzig, 04103

  • University of Tubingen

    Tübingen, 72076

  • Universitatsklinikum Ulm

    Ulm, 89081

  • Universitatsklinikum Wurzburg

    Würzburg, 97080

Other trials in Germany

Italy9 sites
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna - Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi

    Bologna, 40138

  • Clinica Ematologica- A.O.U. San Martino

    Genova, 16132

  • Oncoematologia, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale

    Naples, 80131

  • AOU San Luigi Gonzaga

    Orbassano, 10043

  • Universita degli Studi di Padova

    Padova, 35128

  • Hospital Clinic

    Placenza, 29100

  • Servizio di Ematologia, A.O. - Arcispedale S.Maria Nuova

    Reggio Emilia, 42100

  • Univerita La Sapienza Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia

    Rome, 00161

  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Battista

    Torino, 10126

Other trials in Italy

Spain8 sites
  • Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol

    Badalona (Barcelona), 08916

  • Hospital Clinic Provincial de Barcelona

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Hospital de La Princesa

    Madrid, 28006

  • Hospital 12 de Octubre

    Madrid, 28041

  • Hospital Universitario de Salamanca

    Salamanca, 37007

  • Hospital Donostia

    San Sebastián (Guipuzcoa), 20014

  • Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla

    Santander, 39008

  • Hospital de la Fe

    Valencia, 46009

Other trials in Spain

Sweden5 sites
  • Department of Hematology Hematology Centre

    Gothenburg, S-413 45

  • University Hospital in Lund

    Lund, 221 85

  • Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge

    Stockholm, SE 17176

  • Karolinska University Hospital

    Stockholm, SE-171 76

  • Overlakare Medocomcentrum, hematologi

    Uppsala, 75185

Other trials in Sweden

Denmark4 sites
  • Hæmatologisk afd. B Aalborg Sygehus Syd

    Aalborg, 9000

  • Aarhus University Hospital

    Arhus C, DK-8000

  • Odense Universitetshospital

    Odense C, 5000

  • Vejle Hospital

    Vejle, 7100

Other trials in Denmark

Russia4 sites
  • State Institution Hematological Research, Centre of Russian Academy of Medical Science

    Moscow, 125167

  • State Institution Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute

    Moscow, 125284

  • St. Petersburg Research Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion

    Saint Petersburg, 191024

  • State Educational Institution, Saint Petersburg State Medical University

    Saint Petersburg, 197022

Other trials in Russia

Belgium3 sites
  • UZ Gent

    Ghent, 9000

  • UZ Leuven

    Leuven, 3000

  • CHU UCL Mont-Godinne-Dinant asbl

    Yvoir, B-5530

Other trials in Belgium

Netherlands3 sites
  • VU University Medical Center

    Amsterdam, 1081 HV

  • Erasmus Medical Center

    Rotterdam, 3015 CE

  • University Medical Center Utrecht

    Utrecht, 3584 CX

Other trials in Netherlands

Switzerland3 sites
  • Medizinische Universitatsklinik

    Bern, CH - 3010

  • Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve-HUG

    Geneva, 1205

  • UniversitatSspital Zurich

    Zurich, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

United States1 site
  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

Other trials in United States

Czechia1 site
  • Charles University General Hospital

    Prague, 128 08

Other trials in Czechia

Greece1 site
  • Alexandra General Hospital of Athens

    Athens, 11528

Other trials in Greece

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Muticenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Pomalidomide in Combination With Low-dose Dexamethasone Versus High-dose Dexamethasone in Subjects With Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of pomalidomide in combination with low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone in subjects with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Keywords
Myeloma, Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma, Refractory Myeloma, Resistant Multiple Myeloma, Treatment-resistant Multiple Myeloma, Pomalidomide, Lenalidomide-resistant, Bortezomib-resistant
Medical subject headings
Multiple Myeloma, Neoplasms, Plasma Cell, Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • pomalidomideDrug

    Also called CC-4047, Pomalyst®

    4 mg pomalidomide capsules administered orally

  • DexamethasoneDrug

    40 mg dexamethasone (or 20 mg for participants > 75 years of age) tablets administered orally

Study groups in NCT01311687
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pomalidomide + Low-Dose DexamethasoneExperimentalParticipants received 4 mg pomalidomide administered by mouth on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle and 40 mg dexamethasone (or 20 mg for participants > 75 years of age) administered by mouth once per day on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression.
Receives: Drug: pomalidomide; Drug: Dexamethasone
High-Dose DexamethasoneActive comparatorParticipants received 40 mg dexamethasone (or 20 mg for participants > 75 years of age) administered by mouth once per day on Days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 17 to 20 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression.
Receives: Drug: Dexamethasone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Primary Analysis

    Progression-free survival was calculated as the time from randomization to disease progression as determined by the Independent Response Adjudication Committee based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG), or death on study, whichever occurred earlier. Progressive disease required 1 of the following: • Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: o Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); o Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); o Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % ≥ 10%); • Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; • Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 07 September 2012. Maximum duration of follow-up for PFS assessments was 57 weeks.

  2. Progression-free Survival (PFS) With a Later Cut-off Date

    Progression-free survival was calculated as the time from randomization to disease progression as determined by the Independent Response Adjudication Committee based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG), or death on study, whichever occurred earlier. Progressive disease requires 1 of the following: • Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: o Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); o Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); o Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % ≥ 10%); • Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; • Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum duration of follow-up for PFS assessments was 74 weeks.

Secondary outcomes (22)
  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    An adverse event is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. A serious AE is any AE occurring at any dose that: • Results in death; • Is life-threatening; • Requires or prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization; • Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; • Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; • Constitutes an important medical event. The Investigator assessed the relationship of each AE to study drug and graded the severity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0): Grade 1 = Mild (no limitation in activity or intervention required); Grade 2 = Moderate (some limitation in activity; no/minimal medical intervention required); Grade 3 = Severe (marked limitation in activity; medical intervention required, hospitalization possible); Grade 4 = Life-threatening; Grade 5 = Death.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug through to 30 days after the last dose as of the end of the study (29 August 2017); maximum time on treatment was 297, 269, and 239 weeks in the Pomalidomide + LD-Dex, HD-Dex, and cross-over groups respectively.

  2. Overall Survival - Primary Analysis

    Overall survival is calculated as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Overall survival was censored at the last date that the participant was known to be alive for participants who were alive at the time of analysis and for participants who were lost to follow-up before death was documented.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 07 September 2012. Maximum time on follow-up for survival was 70 weeks.

  3. Overall Survival With a Later Cut-off Date

    Overall survival is calculated as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Overall survival was censored at the last date that the participant was known to be alive for participants who were alive at the time of analysis and for participants who were lost to follow-up before death was documented.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up for survival was 93 weeks.

  4. Overall Survival Based on the Final Dataset

    Overall survival is calculated as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Overall survival was censored at the last date that the participant was known to be alive for participants who were alive at the time of analysis and for participants who were lost to follow-up before death was documented.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 August 2017. Maximum time on follow-up for survival was 324 weeks.

  5. Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response According to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria

    Objective response is defined as a best overall response of stringent complete response (SCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) based on the Independent Response Adjudication Committee: SCR: CR and normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow; CR: Negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤ 5% plasma cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level < 100 mg/24 hours; PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg/24 hours. In addition to the above, if present at baseline a ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

  6. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Criteria

    Objective response defined as a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on the Independent Response Adjudication Committee: CR requires all of the following: - Absence of original monoclonal paraprotein in serum and urine by immunofixation maintained at least 42 days. - <5% plasma cell in bone marrow aspirate and on bone marrow biopsy, if performed. - No increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions. - Disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas. PR requires all of the following: - ≥ 50% reduction in level of serum monoclonal paraprotein, maintained at least 42 days. - Reduction in 24-hour urinary light chain extraction by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg, maintained at least 42 days. - For patients with non-secretory myeloma, ≥ 50% reduction in plasma cells in bone marrow aspirate and on biopsy, if performed, for at least 42 days. - ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. - No increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

  7. Time to Progression

    Time to progression (TTP) is calculated as the time from randomization to the first documented progression confirmed by a blinded, independent Response Adjudication Committee and based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG). Progressive disease requires 1 of the following: • Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: o Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); o Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); o Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % ≥ 10%); • Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; • Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

  8. Time to Response

    Time to response is calculated as the time from randomization to the initial documented response (partial response or better) based on IMWG criteria. SCR: CR and normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow; CR: Negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤ 5% plasma cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level < 100 mg/24 hours; PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥ 50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

  9. Duration of Response

    Duration of response (calculated for responders only) is defined as time from the initial documented response (partial response or better) to confirmed disease progression, based on IMWG criteria assessed by the Independent Response Adjudication Committee.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

  10. Time to the First Hemoglobin Improvement

    Time to increased hemoglobin, defined as the time from randomization to at least one category improvement from Baseline in common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade for hemoglobin level. Hemoglobin categories are: 1) Normal; 2) CTCAE Grade 1: < lower limit of normal (LLN) to 10.0 g/dL; 3) CTCAE Grade 2: < 10.0 to <8.0 g/dL. Participants with CTCAE Grade 3 anemia or worse at Baseline were excluded from the study.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

  11. Time to Improvement in Bone Pain

    Time to improvement in bone pain is defined as the time from randomization to at least one category improvement from Baseline in bone pain category. Bone pain was categorized (from best to worst) according to answers to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY20), Question 1, "Have you had bone aches or pain?": 1) Not at all, 2) A little, 3) Quite a bit, or 4) Very much.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

  12. Time to Improvement in Renal Function

    Time to improvement in renal function is defined as the time from randomization to at least one category improvement from Baseline in renal function. Renal Function was categorized as (from best to worst): - Normal: creatinine clearance ≥80 mL/min; - Grade 1: creatinine clearance ≥60 to <80 mL/min; - Grade 2 : creatinine clearance ≥45 to < 60 mL/min. Participants with creatinine clearance < 45 mL/min at baseline were excluded from the study.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

  13. Time to Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

    Time to improvement in ECOG performance status defined as the time from randomization until at least a one category improvement from Baseline in ECOG performance status score. The categories of the ECOG Performance Status Scale are as follows: -0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; -1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry our work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light housework, office work; -2: Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. Patients with a score of 3, 4 or 5 were excluded from participating in the study.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.

  14. Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

  15. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

  16. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.

    Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

  17. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate reduction in fatigue (i.e. improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increases in fatigue (i.e. worsening of symptom).

    Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

  18. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate reductions in pain (i.e. improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increases in pain (i.e. worsening of symptom).

    Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

  19. Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire for Patients with Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) is a 20-question tool used in clinical research to assess health-related quality of life in multiple myeloma patients. The QLQ-MY20 includes four domains (Disease Symptoms, Side-Effects of Treatment, Body Image and Future Perspective). The EORTC QLQ-MY20 Disease Symptoms Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score reflecting a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate reduction (i.e. improvement) in symptoms and positive values indicate increase (i.e. worsening) of symptoms.

    Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

  20. Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-MY20 Side Effects Domain

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire for Patients with Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) is a 20-question tool used in clinical research to assess health-related quality of life in multiple myeloma patients. The QLQ-MY20 includes four domains (Disease Symptoms, Side-Effects of Treatment, Body Image and Future Perspective). The EORTC QLQ-MY20 Side Effects Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score reflecting a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate reduction in side effects (i.e.improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increase in side effects (i.e. worsening of symptom).

    Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

  21. Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Utility Index Score

    EQ-5D is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses health-related quality of life (QOL). The EQ-5D descriptive health profile comprises five dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 3 levels of response: No problem (1), some problems (2), and extreme problems (3). A unique EQ-5D health state is defined by combining one level from each of the five dimensions into a single utility index score. EQ-5D index values range from -0.59 to 1.00 where an EQ-5D score of 1.00 equals "perfect health", a score of 0 equals "death" and a score of -0.59 equals worst imaginable health state. A positive change from Baseline score indicates improvement in health status. A negative change from Baseline score indicates worsening in health status. Negative scores represent the possible though unlikely situation that a patient's QOL is worse than death, i.e. they would rather be dead than living with that QOL

    Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

  22. Time to First Worsening of Quality of Life (QOL) Domains

    Time to worsening in quality of life domains was calculated as the time from Baseline to the first worsened minimally important difference (MID), defined as the smallest change in a QOL score considered important to patients that would lead the patient or clinician to consider a change in therapy. MID thresholds were calculated in Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) units using the Baseline QOL data. Based on the MID, participants were classified as worsened according to the following: For the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status and functional scales and the EQ-5D health utility score, participants were classified as worsened if their change from Baseline score was less than -1 SEM. For the EORTC QLQ-C30 symptom scores (fatigue and pain) and EORTC QLQ-MY20 disease symptoms and side effects scales, participants were classified as worsened if their change from Baseline score was greater than 1 SEM. See previous outcome measures for definitions of each scale.

    Measured: Assessed on Day 1 of the first 6 treatment cycles.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Mar 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study start11 Mar 2011
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2013
  4. Study completion29 Aug 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
455 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01311687
Sponsor's protocol ID
CC-4047-MM-003
Other IDs
2010-019820-30
Acronym
NIMBUS
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
8 Mar 2011
Last updated
24 Oct 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Moreau P, Weisel KC, Song KW, Gibson CJ, Saunders O, Sternas LA, Hong K, Zaki MH, Dimopoulos MA. Relationship of response and survival in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in the MM-003 trial randomized phase III trial (NIMBUS). Leuk Lymphoma. 2016 Dec;57(12):2839-2847. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1180685. Epub 2016 May 13.

    PubMed 27173785
  • Miguel JS, Weisel K, Moreau P, Lacy M, Song K, Delforge M, Karlin L, Goldschmidt H, Banos A, Oriol A, Alegre A, Chen C, Cavo M, Garderet L, Ivanova V, Martinez-Lopez J, Belch A, Palumbo A, Schey S, Sonneveld P, Yu X, Sternas L, Jacques C, Zaki M, Dimopoulos M. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone alone for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM-003): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):1055-1066. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70380-2. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

    PubMed 24007748
  • Siegel DS, Weisel KC, Dimopoulos MA, Baz R, Richardson P, Delforge M, Song KW, San Miguel JF, Moreau P, Goldschmidt H, Cavo M, Jagannath S, Yu X, Hong K, Sternas L, Zaki M, Palumbo A. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and moderate renal impairment: a pooled analysis of three clinical trials. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016 Dec;57(12):2833-2838. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1177181. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

    PubMed 27267105
  • Weisel KC, Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Lacy MQ, Song KW, Delforge M, Karlin L, Goldschmidt H, Banos A, Oriol A, Alegre A, Chen C, Cavo M, Garderet L, Ivanova V, Martinez-Lopez J, Knop S, Yu X, Hong K, Sternas L, Jacques C, Zaki MH, San Miguel J. Analysis of renal impairment in MM-003, a phase III study of pomalidomide + low - dose dexamethasone versus high - dose dexamethasone in refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2016 Jul;101(7):872-8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.137083. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

    PubMed 27081177
  • Dimopoulos MA, Weisel KC, Song KW, Delforge M, Karlin L, Goldschmidt H, Moreau P, Banos A, Oriol A, Garderet L, Cavo M, Ivanova V, Alegre A, Martinez-Lopez J, Chen C, Spencer A, Knop S, Bahlis NJ, Renner C, Yu X, Hong K, Sternas L, Jacques C, Zaki MH, San Miguel JF. Cytogenetics and long-term survival of patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone. Haematologica. 2015 Oct;100(10):1327-33. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.117077. Epub 2015 Aug 6.

    PubMed 26250580
  • San Miguel JF, Weisel KC, Song KW, Delforge M, Karlin L, Goldschmidt H, Moreau P, Banos A, Oriol A, Garderet L, Cavo M, Ivanova V, Alegre A, Martinez-Lopez J, Chen C, Renner C, Bahlis NJ, Yu X, Teasdale T, Sternas L, Jacques C, Zaki MH, Dimopoulos MA. Impact of prior treatment and depth of response on survival in MM-003, a randomized phase 3 study comparing pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2015 Oct;100(10):1334-9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.125864. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

    PubMed 26160879
  • Weisel K, Dimopoulos M, Song KW, Moreau P, Palumbo A, Belch A, Schey S, Sonneveld P, Sternas L, Yu X, Amatya R, Gibson CJ, Zaki M, Jacques C, San Miguel J. Pomalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone Improves Health-Related Quality of Life and Prolongs Time to Worsening in Relapsed/Refractory Patients With Multiple Myeloma Enrolled in the MM-003 Randomized Phase III Trial. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015 Sep;15(9):519-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

    PubMed 26149712
  • Song KW, Dimopoulos MA, Weisel KC, Moreau P, Palumbo A, Belch A, Schey S, Sonneveld P, Sternas L, Yu X, Amatya R, Monzini MS, Zaki M, Jacques C, San Miguel J. Health-related quality of life from the MM-003 trial of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2015 Feb;100(2):e63-7. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.112557. Epub 2014 Nov 25. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25425684

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Celgene at 94 sites in 16 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 94 sites in France, Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, Germany and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Apr 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Primary Analysis (time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 07 September 2012. Maximum duration of follow-up for PFS assessments was 57 weeks.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01311687, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Oct 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in