Laparoscopic CholecystectomyNCT01312025
Conventional Versus Modified Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
A study testing conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and modified laparoscopic cholecystectomy in people with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, run by Mansoura University.
Trial summary
In conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the cystic duct and artery are clipped by metal clips. we propose a new method in which the cystic duct is ligated and the cystic artery is cauterized. the investigators compare both methods. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
- What is being tested?
- conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and modified laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- Not given
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Start not givento not given
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 to 90 years
- All sexes
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones
Who cannot join
- Conversion to laparotomy
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Between The Conventional Technique of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and A Proposed Modified Technique
In conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the cystic duct and artery are clipped by metal clips. we propose a new method in which the cystic duct is ligated and the cystic artery is cauterized. the investigators compare both methods.
- Conditions
- Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
- Being tested
- conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, modified laparoscopic cholecystectomy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomyProcedure or surgery
modified laparoscopic cholecystectomyProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| modified laparoscopic cholecystectomy | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: modified laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Mar 2011 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Laparoscopic CholecystectomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01312025
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TIE123AR
- Status last verified
- Aug 2009
- First submitted
- 9 Mar 2011
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2011
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Between The Conventional Technique of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and A Proposed Modified Technique
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01312025
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TIE123AR
- Conditions
- Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- First posted
- 10 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the cystic duct and artery are clipped by metal clips. we propose a new method in which the cystic duct is ligated and the cystic artery is cauterized. the investigators compare both methods.
Study design
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy | Placebo comparator | Procedure: conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| modified laparoscopic cholecystectomy | Active comparator | Procedure: modified laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Conversion to laparotomy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy | Procedure or surgery | conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| modified laparoscopic cholecystectomy | Procedure or surgery | modified laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2011.
Related trials for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Not yet recruiting
Two Bupivacaine Concentrations for Recto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Block After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Postoperative Pain, Acute Pain
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Analgesic Strategies for Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC)
Gallstones, Pain
Active, not recruiting
Comparison of Intertransverse Process and Erector Spinae Plane Blocks in Acute Postoperative Analgesia Management for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Patients
Acut Postoperative Pain, Erector Spinae Plane Block
RecruitingObservational study
Electrosurgical Patterns and Learning Curve in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholelithiasis
Not yet recruiting
Binaural Beats and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and modified laparoscopic cholecystectomy in people with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, run by Mansoura University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2011.