Alcohol DependenceNCT01312129
Effects of Sulfasalazine on BOLD Response to Alcohol Cues
A study testing Sulfasalazine in people with Alcohol Dependence, run by The Mind Research Network at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The overarching objective of this pilot study is to apply both neuroimaging and pharmacogenetic tools to the study of alcohol dependence. This proposed research will provide a mechanistic test of the function of the genetic variation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Alcohol Dependence
- What is being tested?
- Sulfasalazine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 23 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2010to Sep 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 21-55 years of age with
- Alcohol Dependence
Who cannot join
- Medical or MRI Contraindications
- Pregnancy
- Allergy to Sulfa medications
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
The Mind Research Network
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
About this study
The overarching objective of this pilot study is to apply both neuroimaging and pharmacogenetic tools to the study of alcohol dependence. This proposed research will provide a mechanistic test of the function of the genetic variation. The specific aims and hypotheses are to test whether Sulfasalazine, as compared to placebo, diminishes blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) response to alcohol cues in the striatum and prefrontal cortex (PFC). To test the hypothesis, we will compare Sulfasalazine treatment with placebo treatment on BOLD difference maps for the contrast alcohol minus control. We will also explore whether specific genetic variations influence this effect. A double-blind, placebo-controlled 2 (Medication: Sulfasalazine 1500 mg vs. placebo control) x 2 (Cue: Alcohol Cue vs. Control cue) within-subjects, crossover design will be used to test the hypothesis that Sulfasalazine reduces the BOLD response in the striatum and prefrontal cortex after exposure to alcohol cues. Twenty alcohol-dependent participants will complete two rounds of the study medication followed by an functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan, during which they will complete an alcohol cue-exposure task. The order of the medication condition will be counterbalanced such that subjects will be randomly assigned to receive either Sulfasalazine (1500 mg) in the first session and placebo in the second session one week later (or vice versa). This pilot study will help to determine whether NMDA receptors play a role in cue-elicited activation of key areas of the brain implicated in the development and maintenance of substance use disorders. Furthermore, if Sulfasalazine reduces cue-elicited activation of these brain regions, as hypothesized; this study will lay the groundwork for a larger trial on the efficacy of Sulfasalazine as a treatment for substance use disorders.
Read the detailed description
The overarching objective of this pilot study is to apply both neuroimaging and pharmacogenetic tools to the study of alcohol dependence. This proposed research will provide a mechanistic test of the function of the genetic variation. The specific aims and hypotheses are to test whether Sulfasalazine, as compared to placebo, diminishes blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) response to alcohol cues in the striatum and prefrontal cortex (PFC). To test the hypothesis, we will compare Sulfasalazine treatment with placebo treatment on BOLD difference maps for the contrast alcohol minus control. We will also explore whether specific genetic variations influence this effect.
Several recent studies support the premise that genetic differences may predict treatment outcomes. In an early study, an A to G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP; rs1799971) of the mu opiate receptor gene (OPRM1) predicted 12 week abstinence after treatment of alcohol dependence with naltrexone (Oslin et al 2003). The relationship was such that individuals with at least one copy of the G allele demonstrated lower relapse rates and longer time to return to heavy drinking when treated with naltrexone (Oslin et al 2003). These observations were recently replicated and extended in the multisite COMBINE study, such that individuals with the G allele demonstrated superior outcomes after treatment with naltrexone, in combination with medication management (Anton et al 2008). Laboratory studies have suggested that clinical effects may be related to a greater reduction in the acute rewarding effects of alcohol among individuals with the G allele (Ray \& Hutchison 2007) and suggest that the mechanism may be related to a blunting of dopamine release in the VTA (Ramchandani et al 2009). In addition, recent studies with other medications (e.g., topiramate, olanzapine) have found that genetic variables predict treatment outcomes (e.g., Hutchison et al 2006; Hutchison 2008; Seneviratne et al 2009). It is important to note that these gene by treatment interactions are not limited to pharmacological treatments, as recent studies have also suggested that genetic variation may predict responses to psychosocial interventions as well (Feldstein Ewing et al 2009; Hutchison et al 2006).
We decided to evaluate the clinical effects of Sulfasalazine because our work to date suggests that genetic variations with downstream function implications for glutamate function, specifically cysteine/glutamate exchange and glutamate transport, are strongly associated with BOLD response in the striatum and prefrontal cortex after exposure to alcohol cues. Sulfasalazine is a medication with a well characterized safety profile that has been used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and several types of arthritis, particularly rheumatoid arthritis for many years. Most recently, it has been suggested that Sulfasalazine may have beneficial effects in the brain, specifically by blocking N-methyl D-aspartate receptor-mediated excitotoxicity resulting in reduced neuronal death (Bo Rum Ryu et al, 2003). This pilot study will help to determine whether NMDA receptors play a role in cue-elicited activation of key areas of the brain implicated in the development and maintenance of substance use disorders. Furthermore, if Sulfasalazine reduces cue-elicited activation of these brain regions, as hypothesized; this study will lay the groundwork for a larger trial on the efficacy of Sulfasalazine as a treatment for substance use disorders.
To that end, a double-blind, placebo-controlled 2 (Medication: Sulfasalazine 1500 mg vs. placebo control) x 2 (Cue: Alcohol Cue vs. Control cue) within-subjects, crossover design will be used to test the hypothesis that Sulfasalazine reduces the BOLD response in the striatum and prefrontal cortex after exposure to alcohol cues. Twenty alcohol-dependent participants will complete two rounds of the study medication followed by an fMRI scan, during which they will complete an alcohol cue-exposure task. The order of the medication condition will be counterbalanced such that subjects will be randomly assigned to receive either Sulfasalazine (1500 mg) in the first session and placebo in the second session one week later (or vice versa).
- Conditions
- Alcohol Dependence
- Being tested
- Sulfasalazine, Placebo
- Keywords
- Alcohol, Sulfasalazine
- Medical subject headings
- Alcoholism
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SulfasalazineDrug
500mg capsules of Sulfasalazine x 3 doses 12 hours apart.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo capsule x 3 doses 12 hours apart
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sulfasalazine | Experimental | Sulfasalazine 1500 mg Receives: Drug: Sulfasalazine |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo capsule x 3 doses 12 hours apart Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
% BOLD Response Increase Above Baseline
Test whether Sulfasalazine, as compared to placebo, diminishes blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) response to alcohol cues in the striatum and prefrontal cortex (PFC). BOLD response refers to brain activation in response to the presence of oxygen in a particular part of the brain. To test the hypothesis, we will compare Sulfasalazine treatment with placebo treatment. During the fMRI scan session, participants will be presented with the alcohol cue task. We will compare the difference in BOLD response during the presence of alcohol vs. a novel substance during the alcohol cue task. Outcome data collected during the alcohol cue task will provide us with BOLD response data for each intervention period. We will analyze the outcome data using FSL (Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB) Software - a collection of functional and structural brain image analysis tools).
Measured: Over two weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2010
- Primary completionSep 2011
- Study completionSep 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Alcohol DependenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Mind Research Network
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kent Hutchison, Ph.D., The Mind Research Network
- Investigators
- Kent E Hutchison, PhD, Principal investigator, The Mind Research Network
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01312129
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20-381
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 9 Mar 2011
- Last updated
- 22 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Sulfasalazine on BOLD Response to Alcohol Cues
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01312129
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20-381
- Conditions
- Alcohol Dependence
- Keywords
- Alcohol, Sulfasalazine
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Mind Research NetworkUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2010
- Primary completion
- Sep 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Sep 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overarching objective of this pilot study is to apply both neuroimaging and pharmacogenetic tools to the study of alcohol dependence. This proposed research will provide a mechanistic test of the function of the genetic variation. The specific aims and hypotheses are to test whether Sulfasalazine, as compared to placebo, diminishes blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) response to alcohol cues in the striatum and prefrontal cortex (PFC). To test the hypothesis, we will compare Sulfasalazine treatment with placebo treatment on BOLD difference maps for the contrast alcohol minus control. We will also explore whether specific genetic variations influence this effect. A double-blind, placebo-controlled 2 (Medication: Sulfasalazine 1500 mg vs. placebo control) x 2 (Cue: Alcohol Cue vs. Control cue) within-subjects, crossover design will be used to test the hypothesis that Sulfasalazine reduces the BOLD response in the striatum and prefrontal cortex after exposure to alcohol cues. Twenty alcohol-dependent participants will complete two rounds of the study medication followed by an functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan, during which they will complete an alcohol cue-exposure task. The order of the medication condition will be counterbalanced such that subjects will be randomly assigned to receive either Sulfasalazine (1500 mg) in the first session and placebo in the second session one week later (or vice versa). This pilot study will help to determine whether NMDA receptors play a role in cue-elicited activation of key areas of the brain implicated in the development and maintenance of substance use disorders. Furthermore, if Sulfasalazine reduces cue-elicited activation of these brain regions, as hypothesized; this study will lay the groundwork for a larger trial on the efficacy of Sulfasalazine as a treatment for substance use disorders.
Detailed description
The overarching objective of this pilot study is to apply both neuroimaging and pharmacogenetic tools to the study of alcohol dependence. This proposed research will provide a mechanistic test of the function of the genetic variation. The specific aims and hypotheses are to test whether Sulfasalazine, as compared to placebo, diminishes blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) response to alcohol cues in the striatum and prefrontal cortex (PFC). To test the hypothesis, we will compare Sulfasalazine treatment with placebo treatment on BOLD difference maps for the contrast alcohol minus control. We will also explore whether specific genetic variations influence this effect.
Several recent studies support the premise that genetic differences may predict treatment outcomes. In an early study, an A to G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP; rs1799971) of the mu opiate receptor gene (OPRM1) predicted 12 week abstinence after treatment of alcohol dependence with naltrexone (Oslin et al 2003). The relationship was such that individuals with at least one copy of the G allele demonstrated lower relapse rates and longer time to return to heavy drinking when treated with naltrexone (Oslin et al 2003). These observations were recently replicated and extended in the multisite COMBINE study, such that individuals with the G allele demonstrated superior outcomes after treatment with naltrexone, in combination with medication management (Anton et al 2008). Laboratory studies have suggested that clinical effects may be related to a greater reduction in the acute rewarding effects of alcohol among individuals with the G allele (Ray \& Hutchison 2007) and suggest that the mechanism may be related to a blunting of dopamine release in the VTA (Ramchandani et al 2009). In addition, recent studies with other medications (e.g., topiramate, olanzapine) have found that genetic variables predict treatment outcomes (e.g., Hutchison et al 2006; Hutchison 2008; Seneviratne et al 2009). It is important to note that these gene by treatment interactions are not limited to pharmacological treatments, as recent studies have also suggested that genetic variation may predict responses to psychosocial interventions as well (Feldstein Ewing et al 2009; Hutchison et al 2006).
We decided to evaluate the clinical effects of Sulfasalazine because our work to date suggests that genetic variations with downstream function implications for glutamate function, specifically cysteine/glutamate exchange and glutamate transport, are strongly associated with BOLD response in the striatum and prefrontal cortex after exposure to alcohol cues. Sulfasalazine is a medication with a well characterized safety profile that has been used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and several types of arthritis, particularly rheumatoid arthritis for many years. Most recently, it has been suggested that Sulfasalazine may have beneficial effects in the brain, specifically by blocking N-methyl D-aspartate receptor-mediated excitotoxicity resulting in reduced neuronal death (Bo Rum Ryu et al, 2003). This pilot study will help to determine whether NMDA receptors play a role in cue-elicited activation of key areas of the brain implicated in the development and maintenance of substance use disorders. Furthermore, if Sulfasalazine reduces cue-elicited activation of these brain regions, as hypothesized; this study will lay the groundwork for a larger trial on the efficacy of Sulfasalazine as a treatment for substance use disorders.
To that end, a double-blind, placebo-controlled 2 (Medication: Sulfasalazine 1500 mg vs. placebo control) x 2 (Cue: Alcohol Cue vs. Control cue) within-subjects, crossover design will be used to test the hypothesis that Sulfasalazine reduces the BOLD response in the striatum and prefrontal cortex after exposure to alcohol cues. Twenty alcohol-dependent participants will complete two rounds of the study medication followed by an fMRI scan, during which they will complete an alcohol cue-exposure task. The order of the medication condition will be counterbalanced such that subjects will be randomly assigned to receive either Sulfasalazine (1500 mg) in the first session and placebo in the second session one week later (or vice versa).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sulfasalazine | Experimental | Drug: SulfasalazineSulfasalazine 1500 mg |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo capsule x 3 doses 12 hours apart |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- 21-55 years of age with
- Alcohol Dependence
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Medical or MRI Contraindications
- Pregnancy
- Allergy to Sulfa medications
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sulfasalazine500mg capsules of Sulfasalazine x 3 doses 12 hours apart. | Drug | Sulfasalazine |
| PlaceboPlacebo capsule x 3 doses 12 hours apart | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
% BOLD Response Increase Above Baseline
Time frame: Over two weeks
Test whether Sulfasalazine, as compared to placebo, diminishes blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) response to alcohol cues in the striatum and prefrontal cortex (PFC). BOLD response refers to brain activation in response to the presence of oxygen in a particular part of the brain. To test the hypothesis, we will compare Sulfasalazine treatment with placebo treatment. During the fMRI scan session, participants will be presented with the alcohol cue task. We will compare the difference in BOLD response during the presence of alcohol vs. a novel substance during the alcohol cue task. Outcome data collected during the alcohol cue task will provide us with BOLD response data for each intervention period. We will analyze the outcome data using FSL (Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB) Software - a collection of functional and structural brain image analysis tools).
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Sep 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Alcohol Dependence
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingPhase 1
Environment and Alcohol: A Pilot Study
Alcohol Use Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
SMART-r: Substance Monitoring and Active Relapse Tracking Repository
Alcoholism, Substance-Related Disorders
Not yet recruiting
A MRT to Optimize a JITAI for Alcohol Craving and Suicide Ideation
Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), Suicide Ideation
RecruitingPhase 2
Study on Thiamine Supplementation to REduce braiN Injury Associated With Chronic Alcohol Use in Outpatients With Alcohol Use Disorder
Alcohol Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kent E Hutchison, PhD principal investigator
The Mind Research Network
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sulfasalazine in people with Alcohol Dependence, run by The Mind Research Network at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Sep 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
% BOLD Response Increase Above Baseline (time frame: Over two weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2014.