AzTrials
AzTrials

ArthritisNCT01312298

General vs. Intrathecal Anesthesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty

A study testing General anesthesia and Regional anesthesia in people with Arthritis, run by Region Skane at 1 site in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hypothesis: General anesthesia as compared to intrathecal (i.e. spinal anesthesia) anesthesia will result in shorter length of hospital stay for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Arthritis
What is being tested?
General anesthesia and Regional anesthesia
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
Aug 2011to Jan 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients with osteoarthritis scheduled for surgery
  • patients that will require Total Knee Arthroplasty
  • patients over 45 yrs and under 85 yrs
  • patients that understand the given information and are willing to participate in this study
  • patients who have signed the informed consent document

Who cannot join

  • prior surgery to the same knee
  • patients with a history of stroke or neurological or psychiatric disease that potentially could affect the perception of pain
  • obesity (BMI> 35)
  • active or suspected infection
  • patients taking opioids or steroids
  • patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis or have a immunological depression.
  • patients who are allergic to any of the drugs being used in this study
  • patients with other severe medical problems that could affect the perioperative course.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Dept orthopedic surgery at Hässleholm hospital

    Hässlehom, 28125

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: General vs. Intrathecal Anesthesia Fort Total Knee Arthroplasty; a Randomized Clinical Trial

Hypothesis: General anesthesia as compared to intrathecal (i.e. spinal anesthesia) anesthesia will result in shorter length of hospital stay for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Primary endpoint: time from end of surgery until the patient is "street ready"

Secondary endpoints: will general anesthesia produce less postoperative pain as compared to intrathecal anesthesia? Is there any difference in post operative "dizziness" between the groups.

Read the detailed description

Hypothesis: General anaesthesia compared to intrathecal anaesthesia will give shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Primary endpoint: time from end of surgery until the patient meets the discharge criteria.

Secondary endpoints:

  1. Will general anesthesia produce less post operative pain?
  2. Is there any difference in post operative orthostatic function (dizziness) between the groups?
  3. Time until the patient meets the discharge criteria from PACU
  4. How many patients will need at least one urinary bladder catheterization?
Conditions
Arthritis
Being tested
General anesthesia, Regional anesthesia
Keywords
Arthritis, General anaesthesia, Spinal anaesthesia
Medical subject headings
Arthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • General anesthesiaProcedure or surgery

    Also called Suxamethonium 50 mg/ml is used to fascilitate intubation. Ventilation is done using oxygen and air.

    Patients will receive general anesthesia using propofol 10 mg/ml and remifentanil 50 ug/ml

  • Regional anesthesiaProcedure or surgery

    Also called Patients will receive bupivacaine 5 mg/ml intrathecally. Also the will receive propofol 10 mg/ml to produce a ligth level of sedation.

    Patients will receive intrathecal anesthesia

Study groups in NCT01312298
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
General AnesthesiaExperimentalPatients allocated to this arm will receive general anesthesia using propofol 10 mg/ml and remifentanil 50 ug/ml in a Target Controlled Infusion (TCI)
Receives: Procedure: General anesthesia
Regional anesthesiaActive comparatorPatients will receive intrathecal anesthesia
Receives: Procedure: Regional anesthesia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. time from end of surgery until patient is "street ready"

    Time from end of surgery until the patient is street ready will be monitored. If the patient is street ready will be evaluated twice daily each day after the surgery.

    Measured: within 4 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Will general anesthesia produce less post operative pain as compared to intrathecal?

    Pain will be measured using a visual analogue scale. The patient's own evaluation (questionnaires about quality of life and knee function)

    • Time of post-op department, total time in hospital.
    • Evaluation of patient outcomes, clinical and radiographic evaluation will be done before surgery, after surgery, and after 3 months, after 1year
    • Data collection will be done through normal medical records and patient evaluations collected in a separate file in the clinic. Data is collected and processed by the Research Unit at the orthopedic clinic in Hässleholm.

    Measured: 48 hrs after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Mar 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2011
  3. Primary completionJun 2012
  4. Study completionJan 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01312298
Sponsor's protocol ID
OpHas2011/3
Other IDs
Copenhagen study 2011:1
Status last verified
Jan 2013
First submitted
8 Mar 2011
Last updated
7 Mar 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Fowler SJ, Symons J, Sabato S, Myles PS. Epidural analgesia compared with peripheral nerve blockade after major knee surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Feb;100(2):154-64. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem373.

    PubMed 18211990
  • Minto CF, Schnider TW, Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II. Model application. Anesthesiology. 1997 Jan;86(1):24-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199701000-00005.

    PubMed 9009936
  • Andersen LO, Husted H, Otte KS, Kristensen BB, Kehlet H. High-volume infiltration analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Nov;52(10):1331-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01777.x.

    PubMed 19025523

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing General anesthesia and Regional anesthesia in people with Arthritis, run by Region Skane at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

time from end of surgery until patient is "street ready" (time frame: within 4 days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01312298, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in