AzTrials
AzTrials

Primary Immunodeficiency DiseasePhase 3NGAM-05NCT01313507

High Infusion Rate Study of Immunoglobulin Intravenous (Human) 10% (NewGam)

A Phase 3 study testing NewGam in people with Primary Immunodeficiency Disease, run by Octapharma at 6 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This was a prospective, open-label, non-controlled, non-randomized multicenter Phase III study of 2 multiple-dose intravenous NewGam regimens (every 3 weeks or every 4 weeks, continuing the patient's infusion interval in the main study NCT01012323 [NGAM-01]) for 3 months. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Primary Immunodeficiency Disease
What is being tested?
NewGam
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
21 participants
Where
6 sitesUnited States
Study dates
May 2011to Sep 2012
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Completion of the main study NGAM-01.
  • At each of the last 3 infusions in the main study NGAM-01, administration of NewGam at the maximum infusion rate of 0.08 mL/kg/min and without the need for premedication.

Who cannot join

  • Any condition or circumstance that would have led to the exclusion of the subject from the NGAM-01 study.
  • Administration of any immunoglobulin infusion other than NewGam between conclusion of the NGAM-01 study and the beginning of the present study.
  • A deviation of the subject's treatment interval of more than 7 days between the last infusion of NewGam in the NGAM-01 study and the first infusion of NewGam in the present study.

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

6 sites in 1 country

United States6 sites
  • Immunoe Research Center

    Centennial, Colorado

  • Rush Universtity Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinois

  • University of California Irvine

    Irvine, California

  • Midlands Pediatrics

    Papillion, Nebraska

  • Seattle Children's Hospital

    Seattle, Washington

  • Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital

    St Louis, Missouri

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Immunoglobulin Intravenous (Human) 10% (NewGam) Administered at High Infusion Rates to Patients With Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases (Extension of Study NGAM-01)

This was a prospective, open-label, non-controlled, non-randomized multicenter Phase III study of 2 multiple-dose intravenous NewGam regimens (every 3 weeks or every 4 weeks, continuing the patient's infusion interval in the main study NCT01012323 [NGAM-01]) for 3 months. The primary objective of the study was to assess the safety and tolerability of high infusion rates of NewGam.

Read the detailed description

Patients received NewGam via an infusion pump to control precise infusion rates. All NewGam infusions started at a rate of 0.01 mL/kg/min (60 mg/kg/h) for the first 30 minutes followed by 0.03 mL/kg/min (180 mg/kg/h) for the next 15 minutes. If tolerated, further increments were made at predefined patterns with the following maximum rates: 0.10 mL/kg/min (600 mg/kg/h) in the first infusion; if this was tolerated, 0.12 mL/kg/min (720 mg/kg/h) in the second infusion; if this was tolerated, 0.14 mL/kg/min (840 mg/kg/h) in all subsequent infusions.

If an adverse event occurred during an infusion, the rate was reduced to half the rate at which the event occurred or the infusion was interrupted until symptoms subsided. The infusion was then resumed at a rate tolerated by the patient.

Being tested
NewGam
Keywords
Primary Immunodeficiency Disease, PID
Medical subject headings
Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NewGamBiological

    The initial dose and dosing interval for each participant was the dose and dosing interval the participant received at the end of the NGAM-01 study. The dose of NewGam, solvent/detergent treated human normal immunoglobulin 10%, remained the same throughout the study, as long as the minimum trough level of serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) was above 5 g/L. If the serum IgG trough level dropped to 5 g/L or less, the dose was to be adjusted at the investigator's discretion. NewGam was supplied as a solution for infusion.

Study groups in NCT01313507
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NewGamExperimentalParticipants received NewGam 200-800 mg/kg intravenously every 3 or 4 weeks for 3 months (5 or 4 total infusions, respectively).
Receives: Biological: NewGam

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least 1 Adverse Event Causally Related to the Administration of the Study Drug

    An adverse event was considered to be causally related to the administration of the study drug if it judged to be probably or possibly related to the study drug, as assessed by the investigator.

    Measured: Baseline (follow-up visit of study NGAM-01) to the end of the study (follow-up visit of study NGAM-05) (up to 4 months)

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least 1 Adverse Event Temporally Related to the Study Drug

    An adverse event was considered to be temporally related to the study drug if it started during an infusion or within 72 hours after the end of an infusion.

    Measured: Baseline (follow-up visit of study NGAM-01) to the end of the study (follow-up visit of study NGAM-05) (up to 4 months)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change From Baseline in the Quality of Life (QoL) at the End of the Study

    QoL was assessed with the Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF50), completed by a parent or guardian, in participants < 14 years of age at the start of the previous study NGAM-01 and with the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36-HS) in participants ≥ 14 years of age. The CHQ-PF50 consists of 50 items organized into 15 subscales.The 15 subscales could be combined into 2 summary scores, physical and psychosocial. The calculated scores were transformed so that each scale had a range of 0-100. A higher score indicates better health. The SF-36-HS is composed of 36 items. Responses to the 36 items were combined to create 8 scales. The 8 scales could be further combined into 2 scores: Physical component summary and mental component summary. The item and scale scores were transformed to a range of 0-100 with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in the general US population. A higher score indicates better health. For both instruments, a positive change indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline (follow-up visit of study NGAM-01) to the end of the study (follow-up visit of study NGAM-05) (up to 4 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Mar 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2011
  3. Primary completionSep 2012
  4. Study completionSep 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
21 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01313507
Sponsor's protocol ID
NGAM-05
Acronym
NGAM-05
Status last verified
Feb 2017
First submitted
9 Mar 2011
Last updated
29 Mar 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing NewGam in people with Primary Immunodeficiency Disease, run by Octapharma at 6 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Mar 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least 1 Adverse Event Causally Related to the Administration of the Study Drug (time frame: Baseline (follow-up visit of study NGAM-01) to the end of the study (follow-up visit of study NGAM-05) (up to 4 months)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in