Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeEarly Phase 1NCT01313546
A Comparison of Sartorius Vs. Quadriceps Evoked Motor Response for Femoral Nerve to Prevent Secondary Catheter Failure
A Early Phase 1 study testing Stimulation of quariceps muscle in people with Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, run by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Objective: Continuous nerve block (freezing the nerve) is needed for knee replacement surgery to reduce pain, increase rehabilitation and discharge patients home fast. A lot of time, money and hospital resources are invested in inserting these catheters. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- What is being tested?
- Stimulation of quariceps muscle
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- May 2011to Sep 2012
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients having total knee arthroplasty AsA 1-3
Who cannot join
- patients with a history of significant medical or psychiatric problems, BMI > 40, allergy to local anesthetic drugs, prior surgery in the inguinal region, neurological disease with sensory or motor deficit, and diabetic neuropathy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
colin MCCARTNEY, FRCPC contact
Canada1 site
The Holland orthopedic and arthritic centre
Toronto, Ontario
imad awad
About this study
Objective: Continuous nerve block (freezing the nerve) is needed for knee replacement surgery to reduce pain, increase rehabilitation and discharge patients home fast. A lot of time, money and hospital resources are invested in inserting these catheters. The aim of this study is to compare two end points used for insertion of continuous femoral nerve block and to see which one results in fewer failures on the surgical ward.
Methodology: Patients having total knee replacement surgery will be recruited in this study. Patients will be randomized into two groups. The continuous femoral nerve block catheter will be inserted using ultrasound and nerve stimulation with two different end points (certain muscle contraction).
Patients will be followed on day 1 and 2 after surgery to observe which catheter fails, how much pain the patient suffers and how much painkiller the patients used.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Continuous femoral nerve block (c FNB) is a widely used regional anesthetic technique for many lower limb operations. It provides superior pain relief, faster ambulation, and shorter hospital stay and less risk of side effects when compared with patient controlled analgesia (PCA).
Stimulating catheters (SC): SC were introduced back in 1999 to provide an objective end point to guide the catheter position by maintaining the desired evoked muscle response.
Stimulating catheter for continuous femoral nerve block: Salinas et al compared stimulating catheters vs. non-stimulating catheter in volunteers having femoral nerve block. They maintained a quadriceps evoked muscle twitch < 0.5 mA through the stimulating catheter . They reported a block success of 100% via the stimulating catheters versus 85% via the non-stimulating catheters (P = 0.07) and a much dense motor block and pain scores with SC as compared to NSC.
Motor responses of the femoral nerve: With peripheral nerve stimulation of the femoral nerve, two responses may be elicited, sartorius muscle contraction (contraction of the sartorius muscle through stimulation of its muscular branch) or quadriceps muscle contraction or patella twitch (contraction of the quadriceps muscle through stimulation its respective muscular branches). The two divisions of the femoral nerve are in fact medial and lateral divisions rather than anterior and posterior . The medial division supplies the sartorius muscle and the lateral division supplies the quadriceps muscle and both divisions lay within close proximity in the same fascial plane. Several regional anesthesia texts states that the anterior branch, supplying a motor branch to sartorius is above the fascia iliaca and this is partly why this stimulation should not be sought for FNB because there would be inadequate spread around the femoral nerve. An anatomical study by Gustafson et al and other anatomical text have forfeited this theory , . Furthermore, the rectus femoris of quadriceps often gets part of its innervation from the same division supplying the sartorius muscle.
Most authors advocate preferentially searching the quadriceps muscle response as articular branches are derived from the posterior or lateral division of the femoral nerve . However, the success of femoral nerve block using either quadriceps or sartorius twitch has not been confirmed with randomised controlled trials.
Secondary catheter failure: is defined as the failure of the peripheral continuous nerve block to provide adequate pain relieve after the primary block was instituted. The incidence ranges from 10 - 40% depending on the definition used , , . A lot of time, money and hospital resources are invested in placing the peripheral nerve catheters with the objective of providing optimal pain management and faster recovery.
We hypothesized that the success of FNB using sartorius muscle twitch is equivalent to quadriceps muscle twitch response. To test this hypothesis, we will conduct a prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial comparing femoral nerve block at the inguinal crease using sartorius or quadriceps muscle twitch as an end point for stimulation via a stimulating catheter.
Methods:
With institutional ethical approval (Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada) and having obtained written informed consent, we plan to recruit 40 patients, aged 18-75, ASA I-III scheduled to undergo unilateral total knee arthroplastly in this prospective, randomised, single blinded controlled trial.
Exclusion criteria: patients with a history of significant medical or psychiatric problems, BMI > 40, allergy to local anesthetic drugs, prior surgery in the inguinal region, neurological disease with sensory or motor deficit, and diabetic neuropathy.
In the block room: patients will be premedicated with acetaminophen 1000 mg, celecoxib 400 mg and gabapentin 400 to 600 mg as part of out multimodal pain regimen. After an 18-gauge IV cannula is placed, patients will receive midazolam (0.03 mg/kg) for anxiolysis and routine monitors will be attached.
Randomization: Patients will be randomized with random computer allocation into 2 groups: group 1 = sartorius muscle twitch (SMT), group 2 = quadriceps muscle twitch (QMT).
Continuous Femoral Nerve block: After aseptic skin disinfection and sterile draping of the inguinal region, a 38 mm broadband 13-6 MHz linear array ultrasound (US) probe (Philips HD 11XE, Bothell, WA) will be placed on the skin to locate the position of the femoral nerve at the inguinal crease. The ultrasound transducer will be covered with a sterile, transparent dressing TegadermTM HP (3M Heath Care, St. Paul, MN). Sterile conductivity gel Ultra/Phonic (Pharmaceutical Innovations TM, Newark, NJ) will be used. In plane or out of plane approach will be used to guide the tuohy needle towards the femoral nerve. A skin wheal will be raised with 2 to 3 mLs of local anesthetic solution (1% lidocaine), peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) with an initial current output of 1mA (frequency 2Hz, pulse width 0.1ms) will be used to verify the type of evoked muscle response. The stimulating tuohy needle will be inserted at 45º angle to the skin, 1 cm lateral to the femoral artery pulsation towards the femoral nerve under ultrasound guidance. The anesthesiologist will seek either sartorius or quadriceps muscle evoked muscle response based on the random number allocation in sealed opaque envelopes. The stimulating needle will be adjusted and once the appropriate muscle twitch was obtained at a current of less than 0.4 mA, the catheter will be threaded 3-5 cm pass the needle tip while maintaining spread of local anesthetic solution in a short axis view. Plain ropivacaine 0.5% mixed with lidocaine 1% will be injected in increments of 5 mL after negative aspiration up to a total of 20 mL. To determine the spread of local anesthetic agent we divided the area around the femoral nerve into 8 pie-chart sectors with the femoral nerve in the middle. For documentation we will use a piece of transparency film with the pie chart of eight even sectors drawn on it . The film will be positioned over the US image such that the center of the pie chart is positioned on the middle of the femoral nerve and the upper edge of the film is parallel to the upper edge of the US image. Having done this, we could determine the local anesthetic spread and compare it between the two groups. Time to femoral nerve location (time needle entered the skin to localization of plexus with adequate twitch), time to catheter insertion (start to end of catheter insertion) and time to completion of drug injection (start to end of drug injection) will be documented.
Motor and Sensory assessment: Motor block of femoral nerve, and sensory block of the femoral, saphenous, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves will be evaluated by a blinded observer every 5 minutes for a period of 30 minutes post block insertion. A 22 G hypodermic needle will used to assess sensation in the femoral nerve distribution: middle third medial thigh, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve: lateral thigh, and saphenous nerve: anteriomedial middle third leg . Sensation will be graded as 0 = normal sensation, 1 = dull sensation, and 2 = no sensation. Motor block evaluation was graded as 0 = full power, 1= partial block (paresis), 2 = complete block (paralysis). The quadriceps muscle strength will be assessed by grading the ability or inability to extend the leg of the operated limb against gravity after the hip is passively flexed at 45°. Complete femoral nerve block will be defined as complete loss of a sharp sensation at middle third medial thigh with complete inability to extend the knee joint after hip flexion at 45º after 30 minutes post block insertion.
After the completion of the 30 minutes assessment period, each patient will receive a sciatic nerve block and spinal anesthesia. Sciatic nerve block will be performed using the subgluteal approach with 20ml of 0.5% plain ropivicaine. Spinal anesthesia will be performed in the lateral position with the operated side uppermost. Intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine 10 mg with 10 µg of fentanyl will be injected under sterile conditions using 25 G whitacre needle.
Postoperative period: patients will receive acetaminophen 1000mg q6 hourly, celexocib 200mg q12 hourly and gabapentin 200mg q8 hourly given orally. Patients will also receive hydromorphone contin 3mg q8 hourly and a hydromorphone patient controlled analgesia (PCA) for breakthrough postoperative pain. Visual analogue scale (VAS) will be assessed 4 hourly for the first 48 hours. Total hydromorphone consumption and time of first PCA dose will be recorded. The patient will be given a 24 h diary to record VAS on. The research assistant will interview the patient on postoperative day one and two. VAS scores will be documented from the patient diary and the nursing records.
The primary end point of our study will be the number of secondary femoral nerve block failure 24 hours past catheter insertion. A dull needle will be used to test the sensory dermatomes for femoral nerve (mid thigh medial aspect). Normal sensation compared with the non-operative site will be considered as failure of the catheter. Secondary catheter failure is defined as the lack of impaired sensory deficit on the medial and anterior aspect of the mid thigh. The study is designed as a pilot study to obtain estimates upon which to base a future larger trial. As such a rigorous sample size calculation is not provided. The goal will be to recruit a minimum of 12 subjects per group, which is the number, required to construct a confidence interval (Statistical Rules of Thumb by Gerald van Belle, 2002, John Wiley and Sons). To account for potential drop out, the number will be increased to 20 per group.
Secondary outcomes include; time to perform the block, VAS scores at 24 hours, total oral hydromorphone use and hydromorphone PCA, and spread of local anesthetic around the femoral nerve. Statistical analysis will be performed using SAS Version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).
Implications:
- Operating room efficiency: an average femoral nerve catheter technique takes around 20-25 minutes to complete. Part of the delay in the execution of this procedure is eliciting quadriceps twitch through the stimulating catheter. If this study proves that the two elicited twitches as equally efficacious, it can shorten the procedure time by 7-10 minutes.
- Potential nerve injury: minimal tuohy needle manipulation could potentially reduce the risk of nerve injury
- Patient discomfort: Minimal needle manipulations will lead to decrease patient discomfort.
Referenc
- Conditions
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Being tested
- Stimulation of quariceps muscle
- Keywords
- Femoral nerve block, total knee arthroplasty
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Stimulation of quariceps muscleOther
Also called Medial stimulation, patellar twitches
stimulation of quadriceps muscle through the stimulating catheter
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| quadriceps | Active comparator | quadriceps muscular contraction Receives: Other: Stimulation of quariceps muscle |
| sartorius | Active comparator | stimulation of sartorius muscle through femoral nerve Receives: Other: Stimulation of quariceps muscle |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the number of secondary catheter failures
to prevent the occurance of failed femoral nerve catheter on postoperative day 1
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
total morphine consumption
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionMay 2012 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2012 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- imad Awad, FFARCSI, Principal investigator, Sunnybrook Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01313546
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Sunnybrook_Women's
- Status last verified
- Mar 2011
- First submitted
- 10 Mar 2011
- Last updated
- 11 Mar 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Mar 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparison of Sartorius Vs. Quadriceps Evoked Motor Response for Femoral Nerve to Prevent Secondary Catheter Failure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01313546
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Sunnybrook_Women's
- Conditions
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Keywords
- Femoral nerve block, total knee arthroplasty
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2012 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2012 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objective: Continuous nerve block (freezing the nerve) is needed for knee replacement surgery to reduce pain, increase rehabilitation and discharge patients home fast. A lot of time, money and hospital resources are invested in inserting these catheters. The aim of this study is to compare two end points used for insertion of continuous femoral nerve block and to see which one results in fewer failures on the surgical ward.
Methodology: Patients having total knee replacement surgery will be recruited in this study. Patients will be randomized into two groups. The continuous femoral nerve block catheter will be inserted using ultrasound and nerve stimulation with two different end points (certain muscle contraction).
Patients will be followed on day 1 and 2 after surgery to observe which catheter fails, how much pain the patient suffers and how much painkiller the patients used.
Detailed description
Background:
Continuous femoral nerve block (c FNB) is a widely used regional anesthetic technique for many lower limb operations. It provides superior pain relief, faster ambulation, and shorter hospital stay and less risk of side effects when compared with patient controlled analgesia (PCA).
Stimulating catheters (SC): SC were introduced back in 1999 to provide an objective end point to guide the catheter position by maintaining the desired evoked muscle response.
Stimulating catheter for continuous femoral nerve block: Salinas et al compared stimulating catheters vs. non-stimulating catheter in volunteers having femoral nerve block. They maintained a quadriceps evoked muscle twitch < 0.5 mA through the stimulating catheter . They reported a block success of 100% via the stimulating catheters versus 85% via the non-stimulating catheters (P = 0.07) and a much dense motor block and pain scores with SC as compared to NSC.
Motor responses of the femoral nerve: With peripheral nerve stimulation of the femoral nerve, two responses may be elicited, sartorius muscle contraction (contraction of the sartorius muscle through stimulation of its muscular branch) or quadriceps muscle contraction or patella twitch (contraction of the quadriceps muscle through stimulation its respective muscular branches). The two divisions of the femoral nerve are in fact medial and lateral divisions rather than anterior and posterior . The medial division supplies the sartorius muscle and the lateral division supplies the quadriceps muscle and both divisions lay within close proximity in the same fascial plane. Several regional anesthesia texts states that the anterior branch, supplying a motor branch to sartorius is above the fascia iliaca and this is partly why this stimulation should not be sought for FNB because there would be inadequate spread around the femoral nerve. An anatomical study by Gustafson et al and other anatomical text have forfeited this theory , . Furthermore, the rectus femoris of quadriceps often gets part of its innervation from the same division supplying the sartorius muscle.
Most authors advocate preferentially searching the quadriceps muscle response as articular branches are derived from the posterior or lateral division of the femoral nerve . However, the success of femoral nerve block using either quadriceps or sartorius twitch has not been confirmed with randomised controlled trials.
Secondary catheter failure: is defined as the failure of the peripheral continuous nerve block to provide adequate pain relieve after the primary block was instituted. The incidence ranges from 10 - 40% depending on the definition used , , . A lot of time, money and hospital resources are invested in placing the peripheral nerve catheters with the objective of providing optimal pain management and faster recovery.
We hypothesized that the success of FNB using sartorius muscle twitch is equivalent to quadriceps muscle twitch response. To test this hypothesis, we will conduct a prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial comparing femoral nerve block at the inguinal crease using sartorius or quadriceps muscle twitch as an end point for stimulation via a stimulating catheter.
Methods:
With institutional ethical approval (Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada) and having obtained written informed consent, we plan to recruit 40 patients, aged 18-75, ASA I-III scheduled to undergo unilateral total knee arthroplastly in this prospective, randomised, single blinded controlled trial.
Exclusion criteria: patients with a history of significant medical or psychiatric problems, BMI > 40, allergy to local anesthetic drugs, prior surgery in the inguinal region, neurological disease with sensory or motor deficit, and diabetic neuropathy.
In the block room: patients will be premedicated with acetaminophen 1000 mg, celecoxib 400 mg and gabapentin 400 to 600 mg as part of out multimodal pain regimen. After an 18-gauge IV cannula is placed, patients will receive midazolam (0.03 mg/kg) for anxiolysis and routine monitors will be attached.
Randomization: Patients will be randomized with random computer allocation into 2 groups: group 1 = sartorius muscle twitch (SMT), group 2 = quadriceps muscle twitch (QMT).
Continuous Femoral Nerve block: After aseptic skin disinfection and sterile draping of the inguinal region, a 38 mm broadband 13-6 MHz linear array ultrasound (US) probe (Philips HD 11XE, Bothell, WA) will be placed on the skin to locate the position of the femoral nerve at the inguinal crease. The ultrasound transducer will be covered with a sterile, transparent dressing TegadermTM HP (3M Heath Care, St. Paul, MN). Sterile conductivity gel Ultra/Phonic (Pharmaceutical Innovations TM, Newark, NJ) will be used. In plane or out of plane approach will be used to guide the tuohy needle towards the femoral nerve. A skin wheal will be raised with 2 to 3 mLs of local anesthetic solution (1% lidocaine), peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) with an initial current output of 1mA (frequency 2Hz, pulse width 0.1ms) will be used to verify the type of evoked muscle response. The stimulating tuohy needle will be inserted at 45º angle to the skin, 1 cm lateral to the femoral artery pulsation towards the femoral nerve under ultrasound guidance. The anesthesiologist will seek either sartorius or quadriceps muscle evoked muscle response based on the random number allocation in sealed opaque envelopes. The stimulating needle will be adjusted and once the appropriate muscle twitch was obtained at a current of less than 0.4 mA, the catheter will be threaded 3-5 cm pass the needle tip while maintaining spread of local anesthetic solution in a short axis view. Plain ropivacaine 0.5% mixed with lidocaine 1% will be injected in increments of 5 mL after negative aspiration up to a total of 20 mL. To determine the spread of local anesthetic agent we divided the area around the femoral nerve into 8 pie-chart sectors with the femoral nerve in the middle. For documentation we will use a piece of transparency film with the pie chart of eight even sectors drawn on it . The film will be positioned over the US image such that the center of the pie chart is positioned on the middle of the femoral nerve and the upper edge of the film is parallel to the upper edge of the US image. Having done this, we could determine the local anesthetic spread and compare it between the two groups. Time to femoral nerve location (time needle entered the skin to localization of plexus with adequate twitch), time to catheter insertion (start to end of catheter insertion) and time to completion of drug injection (start to end of drug injection) will be documented.
Motor and Sensory assessment: Motor block of femoral nerve, and sensory block of the femoral, saphenous, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves will be evaluated by a blinded observer every 5 minutes for a period of 30 minutes post block insertion. A 22 G hypodermic needle will used to assess sensation in the femoral nerve distribution: middle third medial thigh, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve: lateral thigh, and saphenous nerve: anteriomedial middle third leg . Sensation will be graded as 0 = normal sensation, 1 = dull sensation, and 2 = no sensation. Motor block evaluation was graded as 0 = full power, 1= partial block (paresis), 2 = complete block (paralysis). The quadriceps muscle strength will be assessed by grading the ability or inability to extend the leg of the operated limb against gravity after the hip is passively flexed at 45°. Complete femoral nerve block will be defined as complete loss of a sharp sensation at middle third medial thigh with complete inability to extend the knee joint after hip flexion at 45º after 30 minutes post block insertion.
After the completion of the 30 minutes assessment period, each patient will receive a sciatic nerve block and spinal anesthesia. Sciatic nerve block will be performed using the subgluteal approach with 20ml of 0.5% plain ropivicaine. Spinal anesthesia will be performed in the lateral position with the operated side uppermost. Intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine 10 mg with 10 µg of fentanyl will be injected under sterile conditions using 25 G whitacre needle.
Postoperative period: patients will receive acetaminophen 1000mg q6 hourly, celexocib 200mg q12 hourly and gabapentin 200mg q8 hourly given orally. Patients will also receive hydromorphone contin 3mg q8 hourly and a hydromorphone patient controlled analgesia (PCA) for breakthrough postoperative pain. Visual analogue scale (VAS) will be assessed 4 hourly for the first 48 hours. Total hydromorphone consumption and time of first PCA dose will be recorded. The patient will be given a 24 h diary to record VAS on. The research assistant will interview the patient on postoperative day one and two. VAS scores will be documented from the patient diary and the nursing records.
The primary end point of our study will be the number of secondary femoral nerve block failure 24 hours past catheter insertion. A dull needle will be used to test the sensory dermatomes for femoral nerve (mid thigh medial aspect). Normal sensation compared with the non-operative site will be considered as failure of the catheter. Secondary catheter failure is defined as the lack of impaired sensory deficit on the medial and anterior aspect of the mid thigh. The study is designed as a pilot study to obtain estimates upon which to base a future larger trial. As such a rigorous sample size calculation is not provided. The goal will be to recruit a minimum of 12 subjects per group, which is the number, required to construct a confidence interval (Statistical Rules of Thumb by Gerald van Belle, 2002, John Wiley and Sons). To account for potential drop out, the number will be increased to 20 per group.
Secondary outcomes include; time to perform the block, VAS scores at 24 hours, total oral hydromorphone use and hydromorphone PCA, and spread of local anesthetic around the femoral nerve. Statistical analysis will be performed using SAS Version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).
Implications:
- Operating room efficiency: an average femoral nerve catheter technique takes around 20-25 minutes to complete. Part of the delay in the execution of this procedure is eliciting quadriceps twitch through the stimulating catheter. If this study proves that the two elicited twitches as equally efficacious, it can shorten the procedure time by 7-10 minutes.
- Potential nerve injury: minimal tuohy needle manipulation could potentially reduce the risk of nerve injury
- Patient discomfort: Minimal needle manipulations will lead to decrease patient discomfort.
Referenc
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| quadriceps | Active comparator | Other: Stimulation of quariceps musclequadriceps muscular contraction |
| sartorius | Active comparator | Other: Stimulation of quariceps musclestimulation of sartorius muscle through femoral nerve |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients having total knee arthroplasty AsA 1-3
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients with a history of significant medical or psychiatric problems, BMI > 40, allergy to local anesthetic drugs, prior surgery in the inguinal region, neurological disease with sensory or motor deficit, and diabetic neuropathy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Stimulation of quariceps muscleAlso: Medial stimulation, patellar twitchesstimulation of quadriceps muscle through the stimulating catheter | Other | quadriceps, sartorius |
Primary outcome
the number of secondary catheter failures
Time frame: 12 months
to prevent the occurance of failed femoral nerve catheter on postoperative day 1
1 secondary outcome
total morphine consumption
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Mar 2011.
Related trials for Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Apixaban and Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Recruiting
SII Levels Following iPACK Block With Adductor Canal Block in Knee Arthroplasty
Knee Osteoarthritis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Persona SoluTion PPS Femur PMCF
Rhematoid Arthritis, Osteo Arthritis of the Knee
Recruiting
ACB and iPACK Blocks With Intravenous Dexamethasone and Perineural Dexmedetomidine in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Knee Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) for Venous Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adult Participants
Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
colin MCCARTNEY, FRCPC contact
imad Awad, FFARCSI principal investigator
Sunnybrook Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Stimulation of quariceps muscle in people with Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, run by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Mar 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact IMAD AWAD, MBChB (416 480 4864, imad.awad@sunnybrook.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the number of secondary catheter failures (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Mar 2011.