Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 3ASPECT2NCT01313572
Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Apadenoson for Detection of Myocardial Perfusion Defects Using SPECT MPI
A Phase 3 study testing Apadenoson SPECT-MPI and Adenosine SPECT-MPI in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Forest Laboratories at 86 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to see whether apadenoson is as effective as adenosine when used as a pharmacological stress agent in myocardial SPECT-imaging (SPECT-MPI)to detect defects in the supply of blood to the heart muscle (myocardial perfusion defects). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Apadenoson SPECT-MPI and Adenosine SPECT-MPI
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 197 participants
- Where
- 86 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- Aug 2011to Apr 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Referred for a clinically indicated rest/pharmacologic stress SPECT-MPI test
- High pretest probability (90% or greater) of CAD based on the ACC/AHA guidelines for relative risk, or past medical h/o CAD
Who cannot join
- Acute MI, new onset of ischemia or PCI within 30 days prior to SPECT-MPI at either Period 1 or Period 2; or CABG within 90 days prior to SPECT-MPI at either Period 1 or Period 2
- Active severe asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) which, in the Investigator's opinion, places the subject at risk for severe bronchoconstriction
- History or evidence of clinically significant cardiac condition and rhythm disorder, in the absence of a functioning permanently implanted pacemaker
- Hemodynamically significant valvular disease, outflow tract obstruction, or uncontrolled severe hypertension
- Known history of cerebral vascular accident or suspected transient ischemic attack within 30 days prior to signed informed consent
- Current significant medical, surgical, psychiatric, or other illness or pathology that could potentiate any adverse pharmacological event associated with an investigational drug
Trial locations and contacts
86 sites in 5 countries.
86 sites in 5 countries
United States45 sites
Forest Investigative Site 125
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108
Forest Investigative Site 124
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401
Forest Investigative Site 121
Auburn, Maine, 04210
Forest Investigative Site 148
Beverly Hills, California, 90210
Forest Investigative Site 153
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, 17011
Forest Investigative Site 101
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Forest Investigative Site 166
Covington, Louisiana, 70433
Forest Investigative Site 118
Cumming, Georgia, 30041
Forest Investigative Site 163
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32117
Forest Investigative Site 156
Denver, Colorado, 80206
Forest Investigative Site 104
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Forest Investigative Site 134
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Forest Investigative Site 135
Edgewater, Florida, 32141
Forest Investigative Site 109
Hammond, Louisiana, 70403
Forest Investigative Site 149
Hollywood, Maryland, 20636
Forest Investigative Site 107
Houston, Texas, 77024
Forest Investigative Site 129
Houston, Texas, 77070
Forest Investigative Site 102
Inverness, Florida, 34452
Forest Investigative Site 151
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209
Forest Investigative Site 145
Johnson City, Tennessee, 37604
Forest Investigative Site 142
Kansas City, Missouri, 64114
Forest Investigative Site 113
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72204
Forest Investigative Site 154
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Forest Investigative Site 105
Melbourne, Florida, 32901
Forest Investigative Site 143
Melbourne, Florida, 32901
Forest Investigative Site 137
Miami, Florida, 33136
Forest Investigative Site 103
Miami, Florida, 33173
Forest Investigative Site 131
Mission Viejo, California, 92691
Forest Investigative Site 123
Naples, Florida, 34119
Forest Investigative Site 140
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Forest Investigative Site 162
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901
Forest Investigative Site 108
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Forest Investigative Site 110
New York, New York, 10032
Forest Investigative Site 111
Newark, Delaware, 19713
Forest Investigative Site 138
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Forest Investigative Site 146
Phoenix, Arizona, 85020
Forest Investigative Site 152
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Forest Investigative Site 115
Plano, Texas, 75024
Forest Investigative Site 144
Provo, Utah, 84604
Forest Investigative Site 159
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Forest Investigative Site 161
Safety Harbor, Florida, 34695
Forest Investigative Site 122
Slidell, Louisiana, 70458
Forest Investigative Site 150
Tomball, Texas, 77375
Forest Investigative Site 119
Tucker, Georgia, 30084
Forest Investigative Site 120
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610
Brazil16 sites
Forest Investigative Site 307
Belo Horizonte, 30130-100
Forest Investigative Site 308
Belo Horizonte, 30140-000
Forest Investigative Site 314
Curitiba, Paraná, 80010-030
Forest Investigative Site 312
Curitiba, Paraná, 80320-320
Forest Investigatie Site 301
Curitiba, 80050-010
Forest Investigative Site 306
Goiânia, 74823-470
Forest Investigative Site 310
Maceió, 57021-500
Forest Investigative Site 302
Porto Alegre, 90610-000
Forest Investigative Site 304
Recife, 52010-010
Forest Investigative Site 315
Rio de Janeiro, 22251-050
Forest Investigative Site 311
Rio de Janeiro, 22640-102
Forest Investigative Site 303
Salvador, 40050-410
Forest Investigative Site 309
São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15015-210
Forest Investigative Site 305
São José do Rio Preto, 15015-205
Forest Investigative Site 313
São Paulo, 04012-180
Forest Investigative Site 316
São Paulo, 05403-000
Argentina14 sites
Forest Investigative Site 209
Buenos Aires, 1177AEJ
Forest Investigative Site 212
Buenos Aires, 1201
Forest Investigative Site 205
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1122AAL
Forest Investigative Site 211
Córdoba, X5000AAX
Forest Investigative Site 207
Córdoba, X5000JJS
Forest Investigative Site 203
Córdoba, X5003FGG
Forest Investigative Site 201
Godoy Cruz, M5501AAJ
Forest Investigative Site 202
Godoy Cruz, M5501AAJ
Forest Investigative Site 214
La Plata, B1925XAC
Forest Investigative Site 210
Mar del Plata, B7600FZD
Forest Investigative Site 208
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000DIF
Forest Investigative Site 204
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000ODA
Forest Investigative Site 213
San Isidro, B1642CAD
Forest Investigative Site 206
Santa Fe, S3000AOL
Netherlands9 sites
Forest Investigative Site 407
Amsterdam, 1061 AE
Forest Investigative Site 403
Apeldoorn, Lukas, 7334 DZ
Forest Investigative Site 405
Delft, 2625 AD
Forest Investigative Site 401
Doetinchem, 7009 BL
Forest Investigative Site 402
Gouda, Bleuland, 2803 HH
Forest Investigative Site 408
Hengelo, 7555 DL
Forest Investigative Site 404
Hoogeveen, 7909 AA
Forest Investigative Site 406
Maastricht, 6229 HX
Forest Investigative Site 409
Rotterdam, 3045 PM
Belgium2 sites
Forest Investigative Site 501
Aalst, 9300
Forest Investigative Site 503
Brussels, 1200
About this study
Official title: The ASPECT2 Trial: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Apadenoson for the Detection of Myocardial Perfusion Defects Using Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI)
The purpose of this study is to see whether apadenoson is as effective as adenosine when used as a pharmacological stress agent in myocardial SPECT-imaging (SPECT-MPI)to detect defects in the supply of blood to the heart muscle (myocardial perfusion defects). The study will also look at whether apadenoson is better tolerated than adenosine when used in SPECT-MPI.
Read the detailed description
Adenosine is an effective vasodilator used in SPECT-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (SPECT-MPI). However, it produces transient symptoms that are poorly tolerated by most subjects. This is a multi-center, randomized double-blind study to compare the tolerability and effectiveness of apadenoson to adenosine (Adenoscan®) in SPECT-MPI. Subjects who are clinical candidates for SPECT-MPI will be enrolled to undergo two sequential SPECT-MPI studies. The first study will use adenosine as the stress agent in approximately 1250 subjects. Eligible subjects will then be randomized in a 1:1 assignment ratio to receive a second SPECT-MPI using either adenosine or apadenoson as the pharmacologic stress agent, with the goal of obtaining a total of 670 subjects who complete both studies. The agreement of the results from the two adenosine:adenosine stress tests will be compared to that from the adenosine:apadenoson tests to assess efficacy. The incidence and intensity of commonly reported side effects will be compared to evaluate improved tolerability.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Apadenoson SPECT-MPI, Adenosine SPECT-MPI
- Keywords
- Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Apadenoson SPECT-MPIDrug
Also called BMS068645, DPC-A78445-00, DPH-068645-01, ATL146e
Apadenoson single bolus IV injection 100 or 150 ug
Adenosine SPECT-MPIDrug
Also called Adenoscan
Single IV infusion for 6 minutes at a rate of 140 µg/kg body weight per minute
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Apadenoson | Experimental | In period 1, subjects will receive a clinically-indicated rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with adenosine. In period 2, subjects will receive a rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with apadenoson Receives: Drug: Apadenoson SPECT-MPI; Drug: Adenosine SPECT-MPI |
| Adenosine | Active comparator | In period 1, subjects will receive a clinically-indicated rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with adenosine. In period 2, subjects will receive a rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with the active comparator: adenosine. Receives: Drug: Apadenoson SPECT-MPI; Drug: Adenosine SPECT-MPI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Presence of myocardial perfusion defect based on SPECT-MPI
Measured: Up to 2 hours after study drug administration in Period 1 and Period 2
Secondary outcomes (1)
Incidence and subject rated intensity of most commonly reported side effects associated with use of adenosine compared to apadenoson in SPECT-MPI
Measured: Up to 2 hours after administration of study drug in Period 2
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2011
- Primary completionApr 2012
- Study completionApr 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 197 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Forest Laboratories
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- PPD Development, LP
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David B Bharucha, MD, PhD, FACC, Study director, Forest Laboratories
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01313572
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PGX-III-AP-002
- Acronym
- ASPECT2
- Status last verified
- Apr 2012
- First submitted
- 4 Mar 2011
- Last updated
- 1 May 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 May 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The ASPECT2 Trial: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Apadenoson for the Detection of Myocardial Perfusion Defects Using Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01313572
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ASPECT2 / PGX-III-AP-002
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 197 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Forest LaboratoriesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- PPD Development, LP
- Study start
- Aug 2011
- Primary completion
- Apr 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to see whether apadenoson is as effective as adenosine when used as a pharmacological stress agent in myocardial SPECT-imaging (SPECT-MPI)to detect defects in the supply of blood to the heart muscle (myocardial perfusion defects). The study will also look at whether apadenoson is better tolerated than adenosine when used in SPECT-MPI.
Detailed description
Adenosine is an effective vasodilator used in SPECT-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (SPECT-MPI). However, it produces transient symptoms that are poorly tolerated by most subjects. This is a multi-center, randomized double-blind study to compare the tolerability and effectiveness of apadenoson to adenosine (Adenoscan®) in SPECT-MPI. Subjects who are clinical candidates for SPECT-MPI will be enrolled to undergo two sequential SPECT-MPI studies. The first study will use adenosine as the stress agent in approximately 1250 subjects. Eligible subjects will then be randomized in a 1:1 assignment ratio to receive a second SPECT-MPI using either adenosine or apadenoson as the pharmacologic stress agent, with the goal of obtaining a total of 670 subjects who complete both studies. The agreement of the results from the two adenosine:adenosine stress tests will be compared to that from the adenosine:apadenoson tests to assess efficacy. The incidence and intensity of commonly reported side effects will be compared to evaluate improved tolerability.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Apadenoson | Experimental | Drug: Apadenoson SPECT-MPI, Drug: Adenosine SPECT-MPIIn period 1, subjects will receive a clinically-indicated rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with adenosine. In period 2, subjects will receive a rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with apadenoson |
| Adenosine | Active comparator | Drug: Apadenoson SPECT-MPI, Drug: Adenosine SPECT-MPIIn period 1, subjects will receive a clinically-indicated rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with adenosine. In period 2, subjects will receive a rest/stress gated SPECT-MPI with the active comparator: adenosine. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Referred for a clinically indicated rest/pharmacologic stress SPECT-MPI test
- High pretest probability (90% or greater) of CAD based on the ACC/AHA guidelines for relative risk, or past medical h/o CAD
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Acute MI, new onset of ischemia or PCI within 30 days prior to SPECT-MPI at either Period 1 or Period 2; or CABG within 90 days prior to SPECT-MPI at either Period 1 or Period 2
- Active severe asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) which, in the Investigator's opinion, places the subject at risk for severe bronchoconstriction
- History or evidence of clinically significant cardiac condition and rhythm disorder, in the absence of a functioning permanently implanted pacemaker
- Hemodynamically significant valvular disease, outflow tract obstruction, or uncontrolled severe hypertension
- Known history of cerebral vascular accident or suspected transient ischemic attack within 30 days prior to signed informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Apadenoson SPECT-MPIAlso: BMS068645, DPC-A78445-00, DPH-068645-01, ATL146eApadenoson single bolus IV injection 100 or 150 ug | Drug | Adenosine, Apadenoson |
| Adenosine SPECT-MPIAlso: AdenoscanSingle IV infusion for 6 minutes at a rate of 140 µg/kg body weight per minute | Drug | Adenosine, Apadenoson |
Primary outcome
Presence of myocardial perfusion defect based on SPECT-MPI
Time frame: Up to 2 hours after study drug administration in Period 1 and Period 2
1 secondary outcome
Incidence and subject rated intensity of most commonly reported side effects associated with use of adenosine compared to apadenoson in SPECT-MPI
Time frame: Up to 2 hours after administration of study drug in Period 2
Results and safety
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 May 2012.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David B Bharucha, MD, PhD, FACC study director
Forest Laboratories
86 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Apadenoson SPECT-MPI and Adenosine SPECT-MPI in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Forest Laboratories at 86 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 86 sites in United States, Brazil, Argentina, Netherlands, Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early. Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Presence of myocardial perfusion defect based on SPECT-MPI (time frame: Up to 2 hours after study drug administration in Period 1 and Period 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2012.