Cervical DystoniaANCHOR-CDNCT01314365
DYSPORT™ Clinical & Health Economics Outcomes Registry in Cervical Dystonia
An observational study of Cervical Dystonia, run by Ipsen at 45 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the protocol is to determine typical patient response to Dysport in the treatment of adult cervical dystonia (CD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Dystonia
- How many people
- 350 participants
- Where
- 45 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2011to Mar 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients with Cervical Dystonia treated with Dysport
Who may be able to join
- A diagnosis of idiopathic CD as determined by the enrolling investigator
- If previously treated with a neurotoxin for CD, at least a 12-week interval must have elapsed between the last injection of Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) or Botulinum toxin B (BoNT-B) and the first dose of Dysport injected in this study
- Patient is able to comply with the protocol (e.g., can visit the clinic as required and can complete questionnaires/telephone interviews)
- Provision of written informed consent prior to enrollment
Who cannot join
- Contraindications to treatment with any BoNT-A or BoNT-B preparations
- Based on Investigator opinion, patients in whom previous BoNT-A or BoNT-B therapy has failed to produce a clinical response or produced an intolerable adverse reaction
- Anticipated concomitant treatment with BoNT for other than cervical dystonia
- Secondary cervical dystonia
Trial locations and contacts
45 sites in 1 country.
45 sites in 1 country
United States45 sites
The Neuro Medical Center
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70810
East Bay Physicians Medical Group
Berkeley, California, 94705
Neurology Offices of South Florida
Boca Raton, Florida, 33428
Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center of Boca Raton
Boca Raton, Florida, 33486
Elks Rehab Hospital - Movement Disorders Center
Boise, Idaho, 83702
Rush University Medical Center Department of Neurological Sciences
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Riverhills Neuroscience
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
University Neurology, Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267
Cleveland Clinic Center for Neurological Restoration
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Colorado Springs Neurological Associates
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907
University of Colorado Denver
Denver, Colorado, 80045
Rehabilitation Consultants, PA
Eagan, Minnesota, 55121
Headache Center
Encinitas, California, 92024
The Parkinson's & Movement Disorder Institute
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Neuro-Pain Medical Center
Fresno, California, 93710
Capital Neurology Services & MS Institute
Gahanna, Ohio, 43230
Infinity Clinical Research, LLC
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Columbia Pain Management, PC
Hood River, Oregon, 97031
Methodist Rehabilitation Center
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
Evergreen Hospital Medical Center/Booth Gardner Parkinson's Care Center
Kirkland, Washington, 98034
Gundersen Clinic, Ltd.
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601
Coastal Neurological Medical Group, Inc.
La Jolla, California, 92037
Empire Neurology PC, the MS Center of Northeastern New York
Latham, New York, 12110
Baptist Neurology Center - Lexington
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
Valley Parkinson Clinic
Los Gatos, California, 95032
University of Miami, Dept. of Movement Disorders Clinic
Miami, Florida, 33136
Palm Beach Gardens Medical Center
North Palm Beach, Florida, 33408
Kansas City Bone & Joint Clinic, PA Overland Park
Overland Park, Kansas, 66211
Emerald Coast Center for Neurological Disorders
Pensacola, Florida, 32514
Allegheny General Hospital_Department of Neurology
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
Parkinson's Treatment Center of SW Florida
Port Charlotte, Florida, 33980
Coastal Neurology, PA
Port Royal, South Carolina, 29935
Raleigh Neurology Associates
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Harvinder S. Birk
Redding, California, 96001
University of Nevada School of Medicine
Reno, Nevada, 89502
Victorium Clinical Research
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Neurology Center of San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
Arizona Dystonia Institute
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258
The Parkinson's and Movement Disorders Center
Southfield, Michigan, 48034
South Puget Sound Neurology
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
USF HealthParkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Neurological Associates of Tulsa
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74137
Gershon Pain Specialists
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23454
Georgetown University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, 33331
About this study
Official title: DYSPORT™ for Injection AbobotulinumtoxinA Neurotoxin Clinical & Health Economics Outcomes Registry in Cervical Dystonia (ANCHOR-CD)
The purpose of the protocol is to determine typical patient response to Dysport in the treatment of adult cervical dystonia (CD).
- Conditions
- Cervical Dystonia
- Medical subject headings
- Torticollis
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of treatment responders using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity scale score
Measured: Cycle 1 - Baseline and week 4
Patient Global Impression of Change using the 7-point Likert scale
Measured: Cycle 1 - Baseline and week 4
Secondary outcomes (6)
Clinical Global Impression of Change using the 7-point Likert scale
Measured: Cycle 1 - Week 4 and early termination visit
Patient Global Impression of Change using the 7-point Likert scale
Measured: Cycle 1 - Week 4; Cycles 2 to 4 - Baseline, week 4 and termination visits
Time to Waning Effect of Dysport treatment/symptom re-emergence
Measured: Cycles 1 to 4 - Week 8 and at study termination visits
Patient-self-administered questionnaire (Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile-58)
Measured: Cycles 1 & 3: Baseline
Patient-reported assessment of pain using the Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Measured: Cycles 1 to 4 - Baseline, week 4 and at study termination visits
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)
Measured: Cycle 1 - Week 4; Cycles 2 to 4 - Baseline, week 4 and termination visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2011
- Primary completionNov 2013
- Study completionMar 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical DystoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IpsenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 350 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ipsen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ipsen Study Director, Study director, Ipsen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01314365
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A-TL-52120-156
- Acronym
- ANCHOR-CD
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 10 Mar 2011
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Trosch RM, Misra VP, Maisonobe P, Om S. Impact of abobotulinumtoxinA on the clinical features of cervical dystonia in routine practice. Clin Park Relat Disord. 2020 Jun 15;3:100063. doi: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2020.100063. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 34316644Espay AJ, Trosch R, Suarez G, Johnson J, Marchese D, Comella C. Minimal clinically important change in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018 Jul;52:94-97. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
PubMed 29530726
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- DYSPORT™ for Injection AbobotulinumtoxinA Neurotoxin Clinical & Health Economics Outcomes Registry in Cervical Dystonia (ANCHOR-CD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01314365
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ANCHOR-CD / A-TL-52120-156
- Conditions
- Cervical Dystonia
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 350 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IpsenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2011
- Primary completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the protocol is to determine typical patient response to Dysport in the treatment of adult cervical dystonia (CD).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients with Cervical Dystonia treated with Dysport
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- A diagnosis of idiopathic CD as determined by the enrolling investigator
- If previously treated with a neurotoxin for CD, at least a 12-week interval must have elapsed between the last injection of Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) or Botulinum toxin B (BoNT-B) and the first dose of Dysport injected in this study
- Patient is able to comply with the protocol (e.g., can visit the clinic as required and can complete questionnaires/telephone interviews)
- Provision of written informed consent prior to enrollment
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Contraindications to treatment with any BoNT-A or BoNT-B preparations
- Based on Investigator opinion, patients in whom previous BoNT-A or BoNT-B therapy has failed to produce a clinical response or produced an intolerable adverse reaction
- Anticipated concomitant treatment with BoNT for other than cervical dystonia
- Secondary cervical dystonia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Proportion of treatment responders using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity scale score
Time frame: Cycle 1 - Baseline and week 4
Patient Global Impression of Change using the 7-point Likert scale
Time frame: Cycle 1 - Baseline and week 4
6 secondary outcomes
Clinical Global Impression of Change using the 7-point Likert scale
Time frame: Cycle 1 - Week 4 and early termination visit
Patient Global Impression of Change using the 7-point Likert scale
Time frame: Cycle 1 - Week 4; Cycles 2 to 4 - Baseline, week 4 and termination visits
Time to Waning Effect of Dysport treatment/symptom re-emergence
Time frame: Cycles 1 to 4 - Week 8 and at study termination visits
Patient-self-administered questionnaire (Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile-58)
Time frame: Cycles 1 & 3: Baseline
Patient-reported assessment of pain using the Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time frame: Cycles 1 to 4 - Baseline, week 4 and at study termination visits
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM)
Time frame: Cycle 1 - Week 4; Cycles 2 to 4 - Baseline, week 4 and termination visit
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Nov 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34316644Trosch RM, Misra VP, Maisonobe P, Om S. Impact of abobotulinumtoxinA on the clinical features of cervical dystonia in routine practice. Clin Park Relat Disord. 2020 Jun 15;3:100063. doi: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2020.100063. eCollection 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29530726Espay AJ, Trosch R, Suarez G, Johnson J, Marchese D, Comella C. Minimal clinically important change in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018 Jul;52:94-97. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
Related trials for Cervical Dystonia
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
Accelerating TMS for Cervical Dystonia
Isolated Cervical Dystonia
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of VIM0423 in Individuals With Isolated Dystonia
Dystonia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessment of Cervical Range of Motion Restrictions in Infants With Arthrogenic Torticollis - A Feasibility Study
Torticollis (Arthrogenic)
Recruiting
Effect of Vibro-tactile Stimulation Intensity on Head Posture in Cervical Dystonia
Cervical Dystonia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
An Observational Study of Individuals With Isolated Dystonia
Isolated/Primary Dystonia That Affects More Than One Region of the Body
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ipsen Study Director study director
Ipsen
45 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cervical Dystonia, run by Ipsen at 45 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 45 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of treatment responders using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity scale score (time frame: Cycle 1 - Baseline and week 4). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01314365, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2020.