Recurrent Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 3NCT01318200
Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) vs. CyberKnife for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
A Phase 3 study testing Transarterial Chemoembolization and CyberKnife SBRT in people with Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Accuray Incorporated at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To compare the efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) to CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with locally recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after TACE. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Transarterial Chemoembolization and CyberKnife SBRT
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2011to Feb 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma by one of the following:
- Histopathology
- One radiographic technique that confirms a lesion >2 cm with arterial enhancement with washout on delayed phase.
- Hepatic lesion in patients for whom surgical resection is not possible or would not result in an opportunity for cure.
- Radiographic evidence of persistent, progressive or recurrent disease in an area previously treated with TACE. This evaluation should be determined after 6 weeks of initial TACE.
- Multi-specialty evaluation whereby the recurrent liver lesion was deemed by both the attending radiation oncologist and interventional radiologist amenable to treatment by the respective modality
Show all 19Show fewer
- Eligible patients must undergo an IV contrast CT scan of the liver within 6 weeks of enrollment onto the study; a contrast enhanced liver MRI may be substituted for the contrast liver CT
- A recent serum AFP must be obtained within 4 weeks of enrollment.
- Unifocal liver tumors not to exceed 7.5 cm in greatest axial dimension. Multifocal lesions will be restricted to lesions that can be treated within a single target volume within the same liver segment and to an aggregate of 7.5 cm as long as the dose constraints to normal tissue can be met.
- Eastern Clinical Oncology Group performance status 0, 1 or 2 (Appendix I).
- Patients with liver disease classified as Child Pugh class A/B, if Child's class B, score must be 8 or less.
- Life expectancy >= 6 months
- Age >= 18 years old
- Albumin >= 2.5 g/dL
- Total Bilirubin <= 3 mg/dL
- INR <= 1.5
- Creatinine <= 2.0 mg/dL
- Both men and women and members of all races and ethnic groups are eligible for this study
- Ability of the research subject or authorized legal representative to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
Who cannot join
- Prior radiation for the recurrent liver tumor
- Prior radiotherapy to the upper abdomen
- Prior RFA to index lesion
- Liver transplant
- Tumors greater than 7.5 cm in greatest axial dimension
- Portal vein thrombus
Show all 15Show fewer
- Large varices within 2 cm of index lesion (seen on cross section imaging)
- Contraindication to receiving radiotherapy
- Active gastrointestinal bleed within 2 weeks of study enrollment
- Ascites refractory to medical therapy
- Women who are pregnant
- Administration of chemotherapy within the last 1 month
- Presence of multifocal lesions located in different lobes of the liver or extrahepatic metastases
- Participation in another concurrent systemic treatment protocol
- Prior history of malignancy other than HCC
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center
Stanford, California, 94305
About this study
Official title: International Randomized Study of Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus CyberKnife® for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
To compare the efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) to CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with locally recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after TACE.
Read the detailed description
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most deadly cancer in the world. It is primarily seen in areas where hepatitis is endemic, such as Asia, but other risk factors include alcoholic cirrhosis.
Surgical resection and/or transplantation remain the only curative options. However, more than 80% of patients present with unresectable disease. For these patients with unresectable tumors, a variety of treatment options are available, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), radioactive microspheres, microwave coagulation, laser-induced thermotherapy, and percutaneous alcohol injection, all of which have similar survival rates. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for unresectable HCC is a relatively new treatment option made available because of significant improvements in diagnostic imaging and radiation delivery techniques. Although follow-up is limited, results show encouraging local control rates. Some investigators have combined TACE with fractionated conventional radiotherapy as a means of intensifying local therapy, with evidence of efficacy.
TACE remains the dominant mode of local therapy for unresectable HCC. However, recurrence rates are high. Because SBRT is rapidly becoming an accepted local therapy for hepatic lesions, its role in treating HCC needs to be further defined. Moreover, once patients have recurred after initial TACE, it is unclear if additional TACE will be as effective or if another mode of local therapy such as SBRT would be preferable.
We propose to conduct a multicenter randomized study comparing TACE vs. SBRT using CyberKnife for locally recurrent HCC. Locally recurrent HCC will include lesions that persist, progress or recur minimum 3 months after initial TACE.
- Conditions
- Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Transarterial Chemoembolization, CyberKnife SBRT
- Keywords
- Primary liver cancer, Hepatocellular carcinoma, CyberKnife, Accuray, TACE, Transarterial chemoembolization
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transarterial ChemoembolizationProcedure or surgery
Transarterial Chemoembolization will be given within 12 weeks and up to 3 staged procedures, depending on the architecture of the tumor vasculature.
CyberKnife SBRTRadiation
Dose is 45 Gy (15 Gy in 3 fractions) or 36 Gy(12 Gy in 3 fractions). Tumors should receive the higher dose unless normal tissue constraints cannot be met.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Transarterial Chemoembolization | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Transarterial Chemoembolization |
| CyberKnife SBRT | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Radiation: CyberKnife SBRT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Freedom from local progression
Freedom from local progression at time T is defined as lack of local progression in the treated liver lesion in the set of patients alive and on study at time T and without distant progression up to time T.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Progression-free survival
Progression-free survival will be defined as subject alive and free from local progression, disease recurrence elsewhere in the liver, extrahepatic progression, or clinical deterioration unattributable to another underlying medical condition in the absence of clear radiographic findings of progressive disease.
Measured: 6, 12 and 18 months
Overall survival
Overall survival will be determined as a measure of time from diagnosis of initial recurrence until death from any cause.
Measured: Up to three years following therapy
Serum AFP levels
Serum AFP levels will be measured at specific points during the study. The 2 endpoints to be analyzed are:
- Initial AFP levels
- AFP response - the percent decrease in serum AFP levels from the initial result to the eventual nadir after therapy
These endpoints will be correlated to the clinical endpoints (freedom from local progression, progression free-survival, and overall survival).
Measured: 3, 6, 12 and 18 months
Freedom from local progression
Freedom from local progression at time T is defined as lack of local progression in the treated liver lesion in the set of patients alive and on study at time T and without distant progression up to time T.
Measured: 6 and 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2011
- Primary completionFeb 2014 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Recurrent Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Accuray Incorporated
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Stanford University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Albert Koong, MD, PhD, Study chair, Stanford Comprehensive Cancer CenterDaniel Chang, MD, Study chair, Stanford Comprehensive Cancer CenterNishita Kothary, MD, Study chair, Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01318200
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACCH001.0
- Status last verified
- Feb 2012
- First submitted
- 16 Mar 2011
- Last updated
- 20 Feb 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Feb 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- International Randomized Study of Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus CyberKnife® for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01318200
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACCH001.0
- Conditions
- Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Keywords
- Primary liver cancer, Hepatocellular carcinoma, CyberKnife, Accuray, TACE, Transarterial chemoembolization
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Withdrawn
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Accuray IncorporatedIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Stanford University
- Study start
- Feb 2011
- Primary completion
- Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare the efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) to CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with locally recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after TACE.
Detailed description
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most deadly cancer in the world. It is primarily seen in areas where hepatitis is endemic, such as Asia, but other risk factors include alcoholic cirrhosis.
Surgical resection and/or transplantation remain the only curative options. However, more than 80% of patients present with unresectable disease. For these patients with unresectable tumors, a variety of treatment options are available, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), radioactive microspheres, microwave coagulation, laser-induced thermotherapy, and percutaneous alcohol injection, all of which have similar survival rates. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for unresectable HCC is a relatively new treatment option made available because of significant improvements in diagnostic imaging and radiation delivery techniques. Although follow-up is limited, results show encouraging local control rates. Some investigators have combined TACE with fractionated conventional radiotherapy as a means of intensifying local therapy, with evidence of efficacy.
TACE remains the dominant mode of local therapy for unresectable HCC. However, recurrence rates are high. Because SBRT is rapidly becoming an accepted local therapy for hepatic lesions, its role in treating HCC needs to be further defined. Moreover, once patients have recurred after initial TACE, it is unclear if additional TACE will be as effective or if another mode of local therapy such as SBRT would be preferable.
We propose to conduct a multicenter randomized study comparing TACE vs. SBRT using CyberKnife for locally recurrent HCC. Locally recurrent HCC will include lesions that persist, progress or recur minimum 3 months after initial TACE.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Transarterial Chemoembolization | Active comparator | Procedure: Transarterial Chemoembolization |
| CyberKnife SBRT | Active comparator | Radiation: CyberKnife SBRT |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma by one of the following:
- Hepatic lesion in patients for whom surgical resection is not possible or would not result in an opportunity for cure.
- Radiographic evidence of persistent, progressive or recurrent disease in an area previously treated with TACE. This evaluation should be determined after 6 weeks of initial TACE.
- Multi-specialty evaluation whereby the recurrent liver lesion was deemed by both the attending radiation oncologist and interventional radiologist amenable to treatment by the respective modality
- Unifocal liver tumors not to exceed 7.5 cm in greatest axial dimension. Multifocal lesions will be restricted to lesions that can be treated within a single target volume within the same liver segment and to an aggregate of 7.5 cm as long as the dose constraints to normal tissue can be met.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Prior radiation for the recurrent liver tumor
- Prior radiotherapy to the upper abdomen
- Prior RFA to index lesion
- Liver transplant
- Tumors greater than 7.5 cm in greatest axial dimension
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transarterial ChemoembolizationTransarterial Chemoembolization will be given within 12 weeks and up to 3 staged procedures, depending on the architecture of the tumor vasculature. | Procedure or surgery | Transarterial Chemoembolization |
| CyberKnife SBRTDose is 45 Gy (15 Gy in 3 fractions) or 36 Gy(12 Gy in 3 fractions). Tumors should receive the higher dose unless normal tissue constraints cannot be met. | Radiation | CyberKnife SBRT |
Primary outcome
Freedom from local progression
Time frame: 12 months
Freedom from local progression at time T is defined as lack of local progression in the treated liver lesion in the set of patients alive and on study at time T and without distant progression up to time T.
4 secondary outcomes
Progression-free survival
Time frame: 6, 12 and 18 months
Overall survival
Time frame: Up to three years following therapy
Serum AFP levels
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 and 18 months
Freedom from local progression
Time frame: 6 and 18 months
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Feb 2012.
- Information on CyberKnifeLink provided by the sponsor.
- Sponsor websiteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
NIVO+IPI Neoadjuvant Therapy for Recurrent Resectable HCC
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), Recurrent Hepatocellular Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Detect and Expunge Concealed Tumors of the Liver
Liver Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Radiation Therapy With Protons or Photons in Treating Patients With Liver Cancer
Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Stage III Hepatocellular Carcinoma AJCC v7
RecruitingPhase 2
TACE or Ablation Combined With Sintilimab and Ipilimumab N01 as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Intermediate-High Recurrence Risk
Hepato Cellular Carcinoma (HCC)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of MDSY-1240, a STAT3 Degrader, for the Treatment of Hematologic Malignancies and Advanced Solid Tumors
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), Gastric Cancer (GC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Albert Koong, MD, PhD study chair
Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center
Daniel Chang, MD study chair
Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center
Nishita Kothary, MD study chair
Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Transarterial Chemoembolization and CyberKnife SBRT in people with Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Accuray Incorporated at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Freedom from local progression (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2012.