Cardiovascular DiseasePhase 4on-line-HDFNCT01327391
Tolerance of "on Line" Hemodiafiltration in Chronic Renal Failure Patients
A Phase 4 study testing On line Hemodiafiltration and Hemodialysis in people with Cardiovascular Disease, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to appreciate the tolerance of "on line" hemodiafiltration and its impact on morbidity and cardiovascular risk factors in chronic renal failure patient. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiovascular Disease
- What is being tested?
- On line Hemodiafiltration and Hemodialysis
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 415 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- May 2005to May 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient who has signed the written consent form
- Patient aged > 65 and < 90 years
- With creatinine clearance < 10 mL/min
- On dialysis for a minimum of 3 months, with 3 times a week hemodialysis sessions
- Erythropoietin dosage needed to maintain hemoglobin at a constant level (range of hemoglobin: 9-13 g/dL without any variation of more than 2g/dL for less than 3 months)
- Without any problem of vascular access
Who cannot join
- Patient aged < 65 and > 90 years
- Presence of severe malnutrition (albumin < 20 g/L)
- Unstable clinical condition
- Unipuncture or failed vascular access flow
- Known problems of coagulation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Tolerance of "on Line" Hemodiafiltration and Impact on Morbidity and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Chronic Renal Failure Patients
The aim of this study is to appreciate the tolerance of "on line" hemodiafiltration and its impact on morbidity and cardiovascular risk factors in chronic renal failure patient.
Read the detailed description
The aim of this study is to appreciate the tolerance of "on line" HDF treatment versus conventional high flux hemodialysis in term of adverse events occuring during dialysis sessions between day 30 and day 120 of treatment and to evaluate:
- Quality of life evaluated with the KDQOL questionnaire
- Incidence of cardiovascular events
- Influence of the technic on cardiovascular, inflammatory and infectious risk factors
- Mortality
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Being tested
- On line Hemodiafiltration, Hemodialysis
- Keywords
- on line hemodiafiltration, tolerance, quality of life, cardiovascular risk, Hemodialysis patients
- Medical subject headings
- Cardiovascular Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
On line HemodiafiltrationProcedure or surgery
Also called on line HDF, HDF
3 sessions/week; 3-4 hours per session
HemodialysisProcedure or surgery
Also called conventional hemodialysis
3 sessions/week; 3-4 hours per session; high flux dialyzers
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| On line Hemodiafiltration | Active comparator | Hemodialysis patients treated with on line hemodiafiltration technic Receives: Procedure: On line Hemodiafiltration |
| hemodialysis | Other | Hemodialysis patients treated with conventional hemodialysis technic using high flux dialyzers Receives: Procedure: Hemodialysis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
tolerance of "on line" HDF treatment versus conventional high flux hemodialysis in term of adverse events occuring during dialysis sessions
Measured: between day 30 and day 120 of treatment
Secondary outcomes (7)
Quality of life evaluated with the KDQOL questionnaire
Measured: day 0, 180, 365, 730
Incidence of cardiovascular events
Measured: day 180, 365, 730
Influence of the technic on mineral metabolism disturbances
measure of mineral metabolism parameters (Ca, PO4, PTH)
Measured: day 180, 365, 730
All cause and cardiovascular mortality
Measured: day 180, 365, 730
Influence of the technic on inflammatory parameters
measure of pro-inflammatory cytokines and acute phase reactant proteins
Measured: day 180, 365, 730
Influence of the technic on microbiological safety
measure of microbiological purity of dialysate
Measured: day 180, 365, 730
Influence of the technic on oxidative stress parameters
measure of oxidative stress markers (AOPP, AGE) and antioxidant systems (vitamin E)
Measured: day 180, 365, 730
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2005
- Primary completionMay 2013
- Study completionMay 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiovascular DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, MontpellierThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 415 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Montpellier
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Didier AGUILERA, Dr, Study chair, CHG Vichy FranceLynda AZZOUZ, Dr, Study chair, CH Roanne FranceJean-Marie BATHO, Dr, Study chair, CH privé Saint Martin Caen FranceFrancois COMBARNOUS, Dr, Study chair, Clinique du Tonkin Villeurbanne FranceLotfi CHALABI, Dr, Study chair, AIDER Montpellier FranceGuy DEGREMONT, Dr, Study chair, CHG Cambrai FranceMaxime HOFFMANN, Dr, Study chair, Clinique de la Louvière Lille FranceGérard DESCHODT, Dr, Study chair, AIDER Nimes France
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01327391
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 7753
- Acronym
- on-line-HDF
- Status last verified
- Mar 2011
- First submitted
- 14 Jan 2008
- Last updated
- 14 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Morena M, Jaussent A, Chalabi L, Leray-Moragues H, Chenine L, Debure A, Thibaudin D, Azzouz L, Patrier L, Maurice F, Nicoud P, Durand C, Seigneuric B, Dupuy AM, Picot MC, Cristol JP, Canaud B; FRENCHIE Study Investigators. Treatment tolerance and patient-reported outcomes favor online hemodiafiltration compared to high-flux hemodialysis in the elderly. Kidney Int. 2017 Jun;91(6):1495-1509. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
PubMed 28318624
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Tolerance of "on Line" Hemodiafiltration and Impact on Morbidity and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Chronic Renal Failure Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01327391
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- on-line-HDF / 7753
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Keywords
- on line hemodiafiltration, tolerance, quality of life, cardiovascular risk, Hemodialysis patients
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 415 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, MontpellierUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, France
- Study start
- May 2005
- Primary completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to appreciate the tolerance of "on line" hemodiafiltration and its impact on morbidity and cardiovascular risk factors in chronic renal failure patient.
Detailed description
The aim of this study is to appreciate the tolerance of "on line" HDF treatment versus conventional high flux hemodialysis in term of adverse events occuring during dialysis sessions between day 30 and day 120 of treatment and to evaluate:
- Quality of life evaluated with the KDQOL questionnaire
- Incidence of cardiovascular events
- Influence of the technic on cardiovascular, inflammatory and infectious risk factors
- Mortality
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| On line Hemodiafiltration | Active comparator | Procedure: On line HemodiafiltrationHemodialysis patients treated with on line hemodiafiltration technic |
| hemodialysis | Other | Procedure: HemodialysisHemodialysis patients treated with conventional hemodialysis technic using high flux dialyzers |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patient who has signed the written consent form
- Patient aged > 65 and < 90 years
- With creatinine clearance < 10 mL/min
- On dialysis for a minimum of 3 months, with 3 times a week hemodialysis sessions
- Erythropoietin dosage needed to maintain hemoglobin at a constant level (range of hemoglobin: 9-13 g/dL without any variation of more than 2g/dL for less than 3 months)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient aged < 65 and > 90 years
- Presence of severe malnutrition (albumin < 20 g/L)
- Unstable clinical condition
- Unipuncture or failed vascular access flow
- Known problems of coagulation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| On line HemodiafiltrationAlso: on line HDF, HDF3 sessions/week; 3-4 hours per session | Procedure or surgery | On line Hemodiafiltration |
| HemodialysisAlso: conventional hemodialysis3 sessions/week; 3-4 hours per session; high flux dialyzers | Procedure or surgery | hemodialysis |
Primary outcome
tolerance of "on line" HDF treatment versus conventional high flux hemodialysis in term of adverse events occuring during dialysis sessions
Time frame: between day 30 and day 120 of treatment
7 secondary outcomes
Quality of life evaluated with the KDQOL questionnaire
Time frame: day 0, 180, 365, 730
Incidence of cardiovascular events
Time frame: day 180, 365, 730
Influence of the technic on mineral metabolism disturbances
Time frame: day 180, 365, 730
All cause and cardiovascular mortality
Time frame: day 180, 365, 730
Influence of the technic on inflammatory parameters
Time frame: day 180, 365, 730
Influence of the technic on microbiological safety
Time frame: day 180, 365, 730
Influence of the technic on oxidative stress parameters
Time frame: day 180, 365, 730
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 28318624Morena M, Jaussent A, Chalabi L, Leray-Moragues H, Chenine L, Debure A, Thibaudin D, Azzouz L, Patrier L, Maurice F, Nicoud P, Durand C, Seigneuric B, Dupuy AM, Picot MC, Cristol JP, Canaud B; FRENCHIE Study Investigators. Treatment tolerance and patient-reported outcomes favor online hemodiafiltration compared to high-flux hemodialysis in the elderly. Kidney Int. 2017 Jun;91(6):1495-1509. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
Related trials for Cardiovascular Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
ENDOTHELION Study Group: Effect of Bosentan in NAION Patients
Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Didier AGUILERA, Dr study chair
CHG Vichy France
Lynda AZZOUZ, Dr study chair
CH Roanne France
Jean-Marie BATHO, Dr study chair
CH privé Saint Martin Caen France
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing On line Hemodiafiltration and Hemodialysis in people with Cardiovascular Disease, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
tolerance of "on line" HDF treatment versus conventional high flux hemodialysis in term of adverse events occuring during dialysis sessions (time frame: between day 30 and day 120 of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01327391, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2026.