Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 3NCT01328951
A Study of First-line Maintenance Erlotinib Versus Erlotinib at Disease Progression in Participants With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Who Have Not Progressed Following Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
A Phase 3 study testing Erlotinib and Second-Line Chemotherapy in people with Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 155 sites in 20 countries.
Trial summary
This double-blind, placebo-controlled study will evaluate the benefit of first-line maintenance erlotinib (Tarceva) versus erlotinib at the time of disease progression in participants with advanced NSCLC who have not progressed following 4 cycles of platinum based-chemotherapy and whose tumor does not harbor an… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Erlotinib and Second-Line Chemotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 643 participants
- Where
- 155 sitesin 20 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2011to Jan 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults greater than or equal to (≥) 18 years of age, or legal age of consent if greater than 18
- Advanced or recurrent (Stage IIIB) or metastatic (Stage IV) NSCLC
- Completion of 4 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy without progression (end of last chemotherapy cycle less than or equal to [≤] 28 days prior to randomization)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1
Who cannot join
- Prior exposure to agents directed at human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) axis (e.g. erlotinib, gefitinib, cetuximab)
- Participants whose tumors harbor an EGFR-activating mutation
- Prior chemotherapy or therapy with systemic anti-neoplastic therapy for advanced disease before Screening
- Use of pemetrexed in maintenance setting (pemetrexed allowed during the chemotherapy run-in)
- Participants who have undergone complete tumor resection after responding to the platinum-based chemotherapy during the Screening phase
- Any other malignancies within 5 years, except for curatively resected carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal or squamous cell skin cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ, or organ-confined prostate cancer
Show all 9Show fewer
- Central nervous system (CNS) metastases or spinal cord compression that has not been definitely treated with surgery and/or radiation, or treated CNS metastases or spinal cord compression without stable disease for ≥2 months
- Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, or hepatitis C infection
- Any inflammatory changes of the surface of the eye
Trial locations and contacts
155 sites in 20 countries.
155 sites in 20 countries
China15 sites
Study site
Beijing, 100142
Study site
Beijing, 100730
Study site
Changchun, 130012
Study site
Fuzhou, 350014
Study site
Guangzhou, 510515
Study site
Guangzhou
Study site
Harbin, 150081
Study site
Shanghai, 200030
Study site
Shanghai, 200433
Study site
Shantou, 515041
Study site
Shenyang, 110001
Study site
Suzhou, 215004
Study site
Tianjin, 300060
Study site
Wuhan, 430071
Study site
Xi'an, 710061
Hungary14 sites
Study site
Budapest, 1121
Study site
Budapest, 1122
Study site
Budapest, 1125
Study site
Budapest, 1145
Study site
Deszk, 6772
Study site
Farkasgyepű, 8582
Study site
Győr, 9024
Study site
Gyula, 5703
Study site
Mátraháza, 3233
Study site
Miskolc, 3526
Study site
Székesfehérvár, 8000
Study site
Szolnok, 5000
Study site
Törökbálint, 2045
Study site
Zalaegerszeg, 8900
Italy12 sites
Study site
Avellino, Campania, 83100
Study site
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40138
Study site
Legnago, Lombardy, 37045
Study site
Livorno, Tuscany, 57124
Study site
Parma, Emilia-Romagna, 43100
Study site
Pisa, Tuscany, 56100
Study site
Rome, Lazio, 00144
Study site
Rome, Lazio, 00151
Study site
Rome, Lazio, 00168
Study site
S. Giovanni Rotondo, Apulia, 71013
Study site
Treviglio, Lombardy, 24047
Study site
Verona, Veneto, 37134
Romania12 sites
Study site
Baia Mare, 430031
Study site
Brăila, 810325
Study site
Brasov, 500091
Study site
Brasov, 500152
Study site
Bucharest, 010976
Study site
Bucharest, 022328
Study site
Cluj-Napoca, 400015
Study site
Cluj-Napoca, 400058
Study site
Cluj-Napoca, 400132
Study site
Oradea, 410167
Study site
Ploieşti, 100337
Study site
Târgu Mureş, 540136
Ukraine12 sites
Study site
Dnipropetrovsk, 49102
Study site
Donetsk, 83092
Study site
Kharkiv, 61024
Study site
Kirovograd, 25011
Study site
Kyiv, 03022
Study site
Kyiv, 03115
Study site
Kyiv, 04107
Study site
Lutsk, 63000
Study site
Sumy, 40005
Study site
Uzhhorod, 88000
Study site
Vinnytsia, 21029
Study site
Zaporizhzhya, 69040
Bulgaria11 sites
Study site
Gabrovo, 5300
Study site
Haskovo, 6300
Study site
Plovdiv, 4004
Study site
Rousse, 7000
Study site
Sofia, 1233
Study site
Sofia, 1303
Study site
Sofia, 1527
Study site
Sofia, 1606
Study site
Sofia, 1756
Study site
Sofia, 1784
Study site
Varna, 9010
United States9 sites
Study site
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404
Study site
Dayton, Ohio, 45420
Study site
Gilroy, California, 95020
Study site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64132
Study site
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Study site
Missoula, Montana, 59802
Study site
Spokane, Washington, 99218
Study site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Study site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Brazil9 sites
Study site
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30150-281
Study site
Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, 88034-000
Study site
Ijuí, Rondônia, 98700-000
Study site
Lajeado, Rio Grande do Sul, 95900-000
Study site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90020-090
Study site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-003
Study site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90430-090
Study site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90470340
Study site
Santo André, São Paulo, 09060-650
France8 sites
Study site
Bayonne, 64109
Study site
Compiègne, 60321
Study site
Gap, 05007
Study site
Libourne, 33505
Study site
Lille, 59020
Study site
Nantes, 44202
Study site
Saint-Brieuc, 22027
Study site
Villefranche-sur-Saône, 69655
Czechia7 sites
Study site
České Budějovice, 370 87
Study site
Jindřichův Hradec, 377 01
Study site
Nymburk, 288 01
Study site
Ostrava - Poruba, 708 52
Study site
Prague, 150 06
Study site
Prague, 180 81
Study site
Tábor, 390 03
Taiwan7 sites
Study site
Kaohsiung City, 00833
Study site
Taichung, 40447
Study site
Taichung, 40705
Study site
Taipei, 00112
Study site
Taipei, 100
Study site
Taipei, 112
Study site
Taipei, 11490
Slovakia6 sites
Study site
Banská Bystrica, 975 17
Study site
Bardejov, 085 01
Study site
Košice, 04001
Study site
Nové Zámky, 940 02
Study site
Poprad, 058 01
Study site
Rimavská Sobota, 97901
Netherlands5 sites
Study site
Arnhem, 6800 TA
Study site
Heerlen, 6419 PC
Study site
Hoorn, 1625 HV
Study site
Sittard-Geleen, 6162 BG
Study site
Zutphen, 7207 AE
Poland5 sites
Study site
Brzozów, 36-200
Study site
Krakow, 31-115
Study site
Poznan, 60-569
Study site
Wodzisław Śląski, 44-300
Study site
Zamość, 22-400
South Africa5 sites
Study site
Cape Town, 7570
Study site
Cape Town, 7700
Study site
George, 6530
Study site
Port Elizabeth, 6045
Study site
Pretoria, 0002
South Korea5 sites
Study site
Gyeonggi-do, 463-707
Study site
Seoul, 03722
Study site
Seoul, 06351
Study site
Seoul, 150-713
Study site
Suwon, 442-723
Canada4 sites
Study site
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
Study site
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G5
Study site
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4T 7T1
Study site
Windsor, Ontario, N8W 2X3
Thailand4 sites
Study site
Bangkok, 10700
Study site
Hat Yai, 90110
Study site
Muang, 50200
Study site
Muang, 57000
Latvia3 sites
Study site
Daugavpils, 5417
Study site
Riga, LV-1079
Study site
Riga, LV1002
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of First-Line Maintenance Tarceva Versus Tarceva at the Time of Disease Progression in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Who Have Not Progressed Following 4 Cycles of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
This double-blind, placebo-controlled study will evaluate the benefit of first-line maintenance erlotinib (Tarceva) versus erlotinib at the time of disease progression in participants with advanced NSCLC who have not progressed following 4 cycles of platinum based-chemotherapy and whose tumor does not harbor an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutation. Participants will be randomized to receive either erlotinib 150 milligrams (mg) orally (PO) once daily or placebo. Participants who progress on placebo will receive erlotinib 150 mg PO once daily as second-line therapy, and those who progress on erlotinib may switch to a non-investigational, second-line chemotherapy. Treatments will continue until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may also be entered into a final Survival Follow-Up (SFU) period upon treatment discontinuation.
- Conditions
- Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Placebo, Erlotinib, Second-Line Chemotherapy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo will be administered PO once daily as first-line maintenance until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity.
ErlotinibDrug
Also called Tarceva
Erlotinib will be administered as 150 mg PO once daily until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity, as first-line maintenance or as second-line therapy for those who progress while receiving placebo.
Second-Line ChemotherapyDrug
Participants who progress on first-line maintenance erlotinib may receive an approved second-line therapy (but not EGFR targeted therapies) until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. The selected chemotherapy will be non-investigational and chosen at the discretion of the Investigator.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Early Erlotinib | Experimental | Participants will receive blinded erlotinib as 150 mg PO once daily in the maintenance setting until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Those who demonstrate disease progression may be unblinded to receive an approved second-line therapy (but not EGFR targeted therapies) until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may be observed during a final SFU period after discontinuation from study treatment. Receives: Drug: Erlotinib; Drug: Second-Line Chemotherapy |
| Late Erlotinib | Placebo comparator | Participants will receive blinded placebo tablets PO once daily in the maintenance setting until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Those who demonstrate disease progression may be unblinded to receive second-line erlotinib as 150 mg PO once daily until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may be observed during a final SFU period after discontinuation from study treatment. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Erlotinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Who Died During the Overall Study
Participants were followed for survival until death or premature withdrawal. The percentage of participants who died during the Overall Study (BP, OLP, or SFU) was calculated.
Measured: Up to approximately 3.5 years (visits at Baseline and Weeks 6, 12, and 18 and every 12 weeks until/at disease progression during BP; per local standards during OLP; then every 12 weeks during SFU until death)
Overall Survival (OS) as Median Time to Event During the Overall Study
Participants were followed for survival until death or premature withdrawal. OS was defined as the interval between date of randomization and date of death from any cause. Median time to event during the Overall Study (BP, OLP, or SFU) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and expressed in months.
Measured: Up to approximately 3.5 years (visits at Baseline and Weeks 6, 12, and 18 and every 12 weeks until/at disease progression during BP; per local standards during OLP; then every 12 weeks during SFU until death)
Percentage of Participants Event-Free (Alive) at 1 Year During the Overall Study
Participants were followed for survival until death or premature withdrawal. The percentage of participants event-free (i.e., still alive) at 1 year during the Overall Study was calculated.
Measured: At 1 year
Secondary outcomes (6)
Percentage of Participants Who Died or Experienced Disease Progression During Blinded Treatment
Tumor response was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as a greater than or equal to (≥) 20 percent (%) and ≥5-millimeter (mm) increase in the sum of target lesion diameters in reference to the smallest sum on study and/or substantial worsening in non-target disease. The percentage of participants who died or experienced disease progression during the BP was calculated.
Measured: Up to approximately 3.5 years (visits at Baseline and Weeks 6, 12, and 18 and every 12 weeks until/at disease progression during BP)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Median Time to Event During Blinded Treatment
Tumor response was evaluated using RECIST version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as a ≥20% and ≥5-mm increase in the sum of target lesion diameters in reference to the smallest sum on study and/or substantial worsening in non-target disease. PFS was defined as the interval between date of randomization and date of first documented death or disease progression. Median time to event during the BP was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and expressed in weeks.
Measured: Up to approximately 3.5 years (visits at Baseline and Weeks 6, 12, and 18 and every 12 weeks until/at disease progression during BP)
Percentage of Participants Event-Free (Alive and No Disease Progression) at 6 Months During Blinded Treatment
Tumor response was evaluated using RECIST version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as a ≥20% and ≥5-mm increase in the sum of target lesion diameters in reference to the smallest sum on study and/or substantial worsening in non-target disease. The percentage of participants event-free (i.e., still alive and without disease progression) at 6 months during the BP was calculated.
Measured: At 6 months
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST During Blinded Treatment
Tumor response was evaluated using RECIST version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and short-axis reduction to less than (<) 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease in the sum of target lesion diameters in reference to the Baseline sum. The percentage of participants with a best overall response of either CR or PR (i.e., the objective response rate [ORR]) during the BP was calculated, and corresponding 95% CI was constructed using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Measured: Up to approximately 3.5 years (visits at Baseline and Weeks 6, 12, and 18 and every 12 weeks until/at disease progression during BP)
Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response According to RECIST During Blinded Treatment
Tumor response was evaluated using RECIST version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease in the sum of target lesion diameters in reference to the Baseline sum. Stable disease (SD) was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage in target lesions to qualify for PR nor sufficient growth to qualify for disease progression. Disease progression (progressive disease/PD) was defined as a ≥20% and ≥5-mm increase in the sum of target lesion diameters in reference to the smallest sum on study and/or substantial worsening in non-target disease. The percentage of participants with each level of best tumor response during the BP was calculated, and corresponding 95% CI was constructed using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Measured: Up to approximately 3.5 years (visits at Baseline and Weeks 6, 12, and 18 and every 12 weeks until/at disease progression during BP)
Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or SD According to RECIST During Blinded Treatment
Tumor response was evaluated using RECIST version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as a ≥30% decrease in the sum of target lesion diameters in reference to the Baseline sum. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage in target lesions to qualify for PR nor sufficient growth to qualify for disease progression. The percentage of participants with a best overall response of CR, PR, or SD (i.e., the disease control rate [DCR]) during the BP was calculated, and corresponding 95% CI was constructed using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Measured: Up to approximately 3.5 years (visits at Baseline and Weeks 6, 12, and 18 and every 12 weeks until/at disease progression during BP)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2011
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionJan 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 643 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01328951
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BO25460
- Status last verified
- Jun 2016
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2011
- Last updated
- 28 Oct 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Oct 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study of First-Line Maintenance Tarceva Versus Tarceva at the Time of Disease Progression in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Who Have Not Progressed Following 4 Cycles of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01328951
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BO25460
- Conditions
- Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 643 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2011
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Feb 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This double-blind, placebo-controlled study will evaluate the benefit of first-line maintenance erlotinib (Tarceva) versus erlotinib at the time of disease progression in participants with advanced NSCLC who have not progressed following 4 cycles of platinum based-chemotherapy and whose tumor does not harbor an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutation. Participants will be randomized to receive either erlotinib 150 milligrams (mg) orally (PO) once daily or placebo. Participants who progress on placebo will receive erlotinib 150 mg PO once daily as second-line therapy, and those who progress on erlotinib may switch to a non-investigational, second-line chemotherapy. Treatments will continue until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may also be entered into a final Survival Follow-Up (SFU) period upon treatment discontinuation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Early Erlotinib | Experimental | Drug: Erlotinib, Drug: Second-Line ChemotherapyParticipants will receive blinded erlotinib as 150 mg PO once daily in the maintenance setting until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Those who demonstrate disease progression may be unblinded to receive an approved second-line therapy (but not EGFR targeted therapies) until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may be observed during a final SFU period after discontinuation from study treatment. |
| Late Erlotinib | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo, Drug: ErlotinibParticipants will receive blinded placebo tablets PO once daily in the maintenance setting until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Those who demonstrate disease progression may be unblinded to receive second-line erlotinib as 150 mg PO once daily until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may be observed during a final SFU period after discontinuation from study treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults greater than or equal to (≥) 18 years of age, or legal age of consent if greater than 18
- Advanced or recurrent (Stage IIIB) or metastatic (Stage IV) NSCLC
- Completion of 4 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy without progression (end of last chemotherapy cycle less than or equal to [≤] 28 days prior to randomization)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Prior exposure to agents directed at human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) axis (e.g. erlotinib, gefitinib, cetuximab)
- Participants whose tumors harbor an EGFR-activating mutation
- Prior chemotherapy or therapy with systemic anti-neoplastic therapy for advanced disease before Screening
- Use of pemetrexed in maintenance setting (pemetrexed allowed during the chemotherapy run-in)
- Participants who have undergone complete tumor resection after responding to the platinum-based chemotherapy during the Screening phase
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PlaceboPlacebo will be administered PO once daily as first-line maintenance until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. | Drug | Late Erlotinib |
| ErlotinibAlso: TarcevaErlotinib will be administered as 150 mg PO once daily until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity, as first-line maintenance or as second-line therapy for those who progress while receiving placebo. | Drug | Early Erlotinib, Late Erlotinib |
| Second-Line ChemotherapyParticipants who progress on first-line maintenance erlotinib may receive an approved second-line therapy (but not EGFR targeted therapies) until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity. The selected chemotherapy will be non-investigational and chosen at the discretion of the Investigator. | Drug | Early Erlotinib |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Who Died During the Overall Study
Time frame: Up to approximately 3.5 years (visits at Baseline and Weeks 6, 12, and 18 and every 12 weeks until/at disease progression during BP; per local standards during OLP; then every 12 weeks during SFU until death)
Participants were followed for survival until death or premature withdrawal. The percentage of participants who died during the Overall Study (BP, OLP, or SFU) was calculated.
Overall Survival (OS) as Median Time to Event During the Overall Study
Time frame: Up to approximately 3.5 years (visits at Baseline and Weeks 6, 12, and 18 and every 12 weeks until/at disease progression during BP; per local standards during OLP; then every 12 weeks during SFU until death)
Participants were followed for survival until death or premature withdrawal. OS was defined as the interval between date of randomization and date of death from any cause. Median time to event during the Overall Study (BP, OLP, or SFU) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and expressed in months.
Percentage of Participants Event-Free (Alive) at 1 Year During the Overall Study
Time frame: At 1 year
Participants were followed for survival until death or premature withdrawal. The percentage of participants event-free (i.e., still alive) at 1 year during the Overall Study was calculated.
6 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Who Died or Experienced Disease Progression During Blinded Treatment
Time frame: Up to approximately 3.5 years (visits at Baseline and Weeks 6, 12, and 18 and every 12 weeks until/at disease progression during BP)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Median Time to Event During Blinded Treatment
Time frame: Up to approximately 3.5 years (visits at Baseline and Weeks 6, 12, and 18 and every 12 weeks until/at disease progression during BP)
Percentage of Participants Event-Free (Alive and No Disease Progression) at 6 Months During Blinded Treatment
Time frame: At 6 months
Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST During Blinded Treatment
Time frame: Up to approximately 3.5 years (visits at Baseline and Weeks 6, 12, and 18 and every 12 weeks until/at disease progression during BP)
Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response According to RECIST During Blinded Treatment
Time frame: Up to approximately 3.5 years (visits at Baseline and Weeks 6, 12, and 18 and every 12 weeks until/at disease progression during BP)
Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or SD According to RECIST During Blinded Treatment
Time frame: Up to approximately 3.5 years (visits at Baseline and Weeks 6, 12, and 18 and every 12 weeks until/at disease progression during BP)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Oct 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Phase II Study to Evaluate Telisotuzumab Adizutecan in Combination With RC148(ABBV-1480) as First-Line Treatment for Patients With Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Squamous NSCLC Requiring First-Line Treatment and no Driver Gene Alterations Confirmed by Histology or Cytology
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Carboplatin, Taxane And Ramucirumab for Patients With NSCLC After Pemetrexed or Pembrolizumab Maintenance
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
155 sites in 20 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Erlotinib and Second-Line Chemotherapy in people with Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 155 sites in 20 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 155 sites in China, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Ukraine and 15 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Who Died During the Overall Study (time frame: Up to approximately 3.5 years (visits at Baseline and Weeks 6, 12, and 18 and every 12 weeks until/at disease progression during BP; per local standards during OLP; then every 12 weeks during SFU until death)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2016.