AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 4REDEBUTNCT01332669

Drug-eluting Bead in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A Phase 4 study testing DebDox TACE in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, TACE using Lipiodol/anti cancer agent emulsion is the standard treatment and reported as a significantly better treatment through randomized comparison study like Llovet, etc. than conservative treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
What is being tested?
DebDox TACE
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Apr 2011to May 2015
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with confirmed diagnosis of HCC as stated below
  • Cirrhotic subjects: Clinical diagnosis by AASLD criteria
  • Non-cirrhotic subjects: histological confirmation is mandatory
  • Patient with HCC not suitable for radical therapies such as resection, liver transplantation or percutaneous therapies or patient is indicated for these therapies but there is a contraindication for them or patient himself rejects above treatments and wants to do TACE (Indication for hepatectomy, liver transplantation, local ablation is decided by doctors of each center)
  • Multinodular or single nodular tumor over 5cm, (In the case of single nodule less than 5cm, if curative treatment is contraindicated or the patient rejects curative treatment)
  • Hypervascular lesion showing contrast enhancement in the early stage at the contrast media bolus injection CT or MRI.
Show all 21Show fewer
  • At least one uni-dimensional lesion measurable according to the Modified RECIST criteria by CT-scan or MRI
  • No invasion in the blood vessel (hepatic portal, hepatic vein) or bile duct by the CT or MR
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status is 0 - 1
  • Child-Pugh classification is A or B7
  • Proper blood, liver, renal, heart function: testing result within 2 weeks from registry of this study is followed:
  • white blood cell number : > 3,000/mm2
  • platelet number : > 5 x 104/mm3
  • blood bilirubin : < 3.0 mg/dL
  • ASL, ALT is within 5 times of normal range of each organ
  • serum creatinine : < 1.5 mg/dL
  • hemoglobin : > 8.0 g/dL
  • Over 20 years old
  • Expected survival more than 6 months
  • Patients who are willing to do regular visit, laboratory test, and radiological exam
  • Prior written patient consent

Who cannot join

  • ECOG performance status 2 or more, Child-Pugh class B8 or more
  • Diffuse HCC or presence of vascular or biliary invasion or extrahepatic spread.
  • Vascular or biliary invasion
  • Extrahepatic metastasis (Any lymph nodes measuring ≥ 10mm along the short axis)
  • Tumor burden involving more than 50% of the liver
  • Patients previously treated with any anti-cancer therapy for HCC except hepatic resection or early recurrence within 1 year after resection
Show all 25Show fewer
  • Liver cancer rupture
  • History of biliary tract repair or endoscopic biliary tract treatment
  • Clinically important refractory ascites or pleural fluid
  • Any contraindications for hepatic embolization procedures
  • Known hepatofugal blood flow
  • Arterio-venous shunt
  • Impaired clotting test (platelet count < 5 x 104/mm3, PT-INR > 2.0)
  • Any contraindication for doxorubicin administration
  • Contrast media allergy contraindicating angiography
  • Acute or active following diseases
  • Heart failure can't control, angina pectoris and/or arrhythmia diseases
  • Myocardial infarction within the last 6months,
  • Renal failure
  • Active infection (virus infection can be accepted)
  • Active hemorrhage of digestive system
  • Other malignant tumor history
  • Hepatic coma or acute mental disease
  • Pregnant, nursing or childbearing age women and men who are actively sexually available and don't want to or can't do contraception
  • Safety concerns based on researcher's judge

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, 110-744

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Multicenter Registry of Chemoembolization Using Drug-eluting Bead in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

In unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, TACE using Lipiodol/anti cancer agent emulsion is the standard treatment and reported as a significantly better treatment through randomized comparison study like Llovet, etc. than conservative treatment. Recently, doctors do transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting bead, and it is proved less side effect and better efficacy than conventional TACE using Lipiodol in Precision V study by Dr. Lammer, etc. But, it could not defined improved survival rate as expected. This study's purpose is evaluating treatment efficacy, survival rate and safety of TACE using drug eluting bead by comparing to conventional TACE using doxorubicin/Lipiodol emulsion for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Read the detailed description

Comparison Between Drug-Eluting Bead vs conventional TACE.

Drug-eluting bead group : TACE using DC bead loading Doxorubicin. Conventional TACE group : TACE using Doxorubicin/Lipiodol emulsion and gelatin sponge/PVA particle.

cTACE group was chosen by concurrent matched patients (age, sex, tumor stage, and Child-Pugh class are matched)

5.7 Technically considerable aspects of DC bead TACE group

  1. Planned dose of doxorubicin. Each vial of DC Bead (2 ml of beads) should be loaded with 70-75 mg doxorubicin (loading dose, 35-37.5 mg doxorubicin / ml of beads).
  • Early-stage HCC. As a general rule, each single treatment should include a planned dose of up to 75 mg doxorubicin loaded into one vial of DC Bead.
  • Medium-sized (less than 8cm) / multinodular HCC. As a general rule, each single treatment should include a planned dose of up to 150 mg doxorubicin loaded into two vials of DC Bead.
  • In large tumors (more than 8cm), even if unilobar, the separate treatment including two sessions 2-4 weeks apart is recommended.
  • In bilobar tumors, both hepatic lobes should be treated in separate treatment sessions 2-4 weeks apart, in the absence of complications requiring a longer time interval between the two sessions. Obtaining confirmation that the liver enzymes did return to baseline before performing the second treatment session is recommended.
  1. Choice of DC Bead size. Use of 100-300μm beads is recommended for a standard procedure. However, individual patient and tumor characteristics, particularly the identification of arterio-venous shunting, should be taken into account when the safety of the treatment and the choice of DC Bead size are determined.
  • In the case of significant arterio-portal or hepatic venous shunting, embolization of the shunt with gelfoam pledgets is recommended before proceeding with DEBDOX. Confirmation that the shunt is no longer present must be obtained before DEBDOX can safely be performed. But, this study excludes the patients with arterio-portal or hepatic venous shunts.
  • In large tumors, hepatic arterial flow does not reach 'near stasis' after injection of 2 vial of 100-300 μm DC beads. The recommendation is following: 2 vials of the 100-300 μm DC beads is best and then repeat 2 weeks later if the patient is doing well clinically.
  1. DC Bead dilution. Mix loaded DC Bead with a non-ionic contrast medium. At least 5-10 ml of non-ionic contrast should be used per 1 ml of DC Bead (i.e., 10-20 ml are required to dilute one vial of DC Bead) prior to injection.
  2. Catheter positioning. A superselective (i.e., segmental or subsegmental) approach should be used whenever possible by using a microcatheter. Use of 3D / MPR obtained from C-arm rotational angiography with a flat-panel detector system (cone-beam CT) is recommended, if available, to improve the accuracy in identifying tumor-feeding arteries. Such imaging allows for accurate targeting of the tumor. In addition, repeat cone beam CT should be performed after successful delivery of the DC Bead to confirm adequate targeting and saturation of the tumor(s).
  • Segmental / subsegmental approach. Place the microcatheter into the segmental / subsegmental vessel feeding the tumor as distally as possible - but avoiding wedging the catheter to avoid reflux along the catheter shaft. Flow within the artery must be preserved.
  • Lobar approach. Place the catheter as selectively as possible in the right or left hepatic artery. Pay attention to identifying the origin of the cystic artery as well as other arteries supplying flow to extra-hepatic organs such as the right gastric artery, para-esophageal or omental vessels among others. If identified, these vessels must be either embolized using coils or avoided by placing the catheter tip well beyond the origin of these vessels. In addition, forward flow into the desired vessel must be maintained as inadvertent administration of even a few DC Beads into these extra-hepatic vessels could have dire consequences.
  1. Injection. The injection must be very slow. An injection rate of 1 ml of the contrast agent - DC Bead suspension per minute is recommended. Thus, it takes 10-20 minutes to infusion 1 vial of DC bead. Care should be taken to avoid sedimentation of the beads in the syringe by rotating the syringes or using a 3-way stopcock to gently suspend the beads in the solution.
  2. Embolisation endpoint. Injection should be continued until "near stasis" is observed in the artery directly feeding the tumor (i.e., the contrast the contrast column should clear within 2-5 heart beats). At that point, injection should be stopped - regardless of the amount of beads that have been actually administered - to avoid reflux of embolic material. Once the embolisation endpoint has been achieved, no additional embolic material should be injected. If the "near stasis" endpoint is not obtained after injection of the scheduled volume of beads, no additional embolization should be performed. This patient is likely to benefit from a second course after imaging follow-up.
  3. extrahepatic collateral vessels. In principle, DC bead is used for collateral arterial circulation (inferior phrenic artery, internal mammary artery, intercostal artery), but doctors can do bland embolization (PVC particle, gelatin sponge) based on their judgement.
  4. Repeated treatment. In principle, treatment with the same method is repeated for every 2 - 3 months as tumor progression is observed. But, even if tumor progression is not observed, the treatment can be repeated for tumor repression. If there is no tumor left, contrast enhancement CT or MRI can be performed for every 2- 3 months as follow up.

5.8. Dose in study Dose of DC bead, anti cancer agent for TACE dose is decided by tumor size. So, this study just set up the maximum dose.

Drug-eluting bead group DC bead : 2 bottles DC bead absorbs 70-75mg per bottle. Doxorubicin loading to DC bead needs to be done 1.5 hours before using. The size of DC bead is 100-300 micrometer, and it can be used up to 2 bottles.

Being tested
DebDox TACE
Keywords
hepatocellular carcinoma, chemoembolization, drug eluting beads, HCC, Liver cancer, Korea
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Liver Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DebDox TACEProcedure or surgery

    Also called chemoembolization using drug eluting beads, DC bead chemoembolization, DebDox, TACE

    HCC patients will receive chemoembolization (TACE) using DC beads containing Doxorubicin. The objective is to give 2 vials of DC Bead (2ml per vial) loaded with 70-75mg of Doxorubicin per vial (Each vial contain 2ml of DC Bead, thus doxorubicin concentration will be of 35-37.5mg per ml of DC Beads)

Study groups in NCT01332669
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
chemoembolizationActive comparatorHCC patients received chemoembolization
Receives: Procedure: DebDox TACE
Historical use of c-TACE using Lipiodiol and doxorubicinOtherThe control arm will be of the patients that have been treated historically in the centers with conventional TACE (that is Lipiodiol plus doxorubicin).
Receives: Procedure: DebDox TACE

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. tumor response

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. survival rate

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Incidence rate and grade of side effect

    Measured: 6months

  3. Time to progression

    Measured: 2 years

  4. Time to untreatable progression

    Measured: 2 years

  5. Number of treatment required to achieve objective response

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Apr 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2011
  3. Primary completionDec 2013
  4. Study completionMay 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01332669
Sponsor's protocol ID
Biocompatible-Korea
Acronym
REDEBUT
Status last verified
May 2015
First submitted
6 Feb 2011
Last updated
20 May 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Dhanasekaran R, Kooby DA, Staley CA, Kauh JS, Khanna V, Kim HS. Comparison of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and chemoembolization with doxorubicin drug eluting beads (DEB) for unresectable hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC). J Surg Oncol. 2010 May 1;101(6):476-80. doi: 10.1002/jso.21522.

    PubMed 20213741
  • Malagari K, Pomoni M, Kelekis A, Pomoni A, Dourakis S, Spyridopoulos T, Moschouris H, Emmanouil E, Rizos S, Kelekis D. Prospective randomized comparison of chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting beads and bland embolization with BeadBlock for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Jun;33(3):541-51. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9750-0. Epub 2009 Nov 24.

    PubMed 19937027
  • Malagari K, Pomoni M, Spyridopoulos TN, Moschouris H, Kelekis A, Dourakis S, Alexopoulou E, Koskinas J, Angelopoulos M, Kornezos J, Pomoni A, Tandeles S, Marinis A, Rizos S, Kelekis D. Safety profile of sequential transcatheter chemoembolization with DC Bead: results of 237 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011 Aug;34(4):774-85. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-0044-3. Epub 2010 Dec 24.

    PubMed 21184228
  • Nicolini A, Martinetti L, Crespi S, Maggioni M, Sangiovanni A. Transarterial chemoembolization with epirubicin-eluting beads versus transarterial embolization before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Mar;21(3):327-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.10.038. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

    PubMed 20097098
  • Poon RT, Tso WK, Pang RW, Ng KK, Woo R, Tai KS, Fan ST. A phase I/II trial of chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using a novel intra-arterial drug-eluting bead. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Sep;5(9):1100-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.021. Epub 2007 Jul 12.

    PubMed 17627902
  • Lammer J, Malagari K, Vogl T, Pilleul F, Denys A, Watkinson A, Pitton M, Sergent G, Pfammatter T, Terraz S, Benhamou Y, Avajon Y, Gruenberger T, Pomoni M, Langenberger H, Schuchmann M, Dumortier J, Mueller C, Chevallier P, Lencioni R; PRECISION V Investigators. Prospective randomized study of doxorubicin-eluting-bead embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the PRECISION V study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Feb;33(1):41-52. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9711-7. Epub 2009 Nov 12.

    PubMed 19908093
  • Takayasu K, Arii S, Ikai I, Omata M, Okita K, Ichida T, Matsuyama Y, Nakanuma Y, Kojiro M, Makuuchi M, Yamaoka Y; Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Prospective cohort study of transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in 8510 patients. Gastroenterology. 2006 Aug;131(2):461-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.05.021.

    PubMed 16890600
  • Llovet JM, Di Bisceglie AM, Bruix J, Kramer BS, Lencioni R, Zhu AX, Sherman M, Schwartz M, Lotze M, Talwalkar J, Gores GJ; Panel of Experts in HCC-Design Clinical Trials. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 May 21;100(10):698-711. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn134. Epub 2008 May 13.

    PubMed 18477802
  • Bruix J, Sherman M; Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2005 Nov;42(5):1208-36. doi: 10.1002/hep.20933. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16250051
  • Varela M, Real MI, Burrel M, Forner A, Sala M, Brunet M, Ayuso C, Castells L, Montana X, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with drug eluting beads: efficacy and doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. J Hepatol. 2007 Mar;46(3):474-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.10.020. Epub 2006 Nov 29.

    PubMed 17239480
  • Llovet JM, Real MI, Montana X, Planas R, Coll S, Aponte J, Ayuso C, Sala M, Muchart J, Sola R, Rodes J, Bruix J; Barcelona Liver Cancer Group. Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002 May 18;359(9319):1734-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08649-X.

    PubMed 12049862

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing DebDox TACE in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 21 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

tumor response (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01332669, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in