Distal Radius FractureDRFNCT01333371
Assessing Volar Locking Plates in Patients Under 65 With a Distal Radius Fracture
A study testing Surgical Repair of Distal Radius Fracture in people with Distal Radius Fracture, run by Hand and Upper Limb Clinic, Canada at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Patients will be randomized to volar plating with early ROM versus closed reduction with K-wires and 6 weeks of cast immobilization to determine if there is any advantage to volar plating in this subgroup of patients with distal radius fractures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Distal Radius Fracture
- What is being tested?
- Surgical Repair of Distal Radius Fracture
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Apr 2011to Mar 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Distal radius fracture - AO type A or C1
- Skeletally mature
- Age 18-65 years old
- Isolated injury
Who cannot join
- AO Type B or C2,3
- Other injuries involving affected or unaffected arm
- Skeletally immature
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Hand and Upper Limb Clinic, St Joseph's Health Care
London, Ontario, N6A4L6
James H Roth, MD, FRCSC, FACS, 519-646-6050, james.roth@sjhc.london.on.ca
Joy C MacDermid, MScPT, PhD, 519-646-6100 ext. 64636, joy.macdermid@sjhc.london.on.ca
About this study
Official title: Are Volar Locking Plates a Cost Effective Strategy for the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Patients <65 Years of Age?
Patients will be randomized to volar plating with early ROM versus closed reduction with K-wires and 6 weeks of cast immobilization to determine if there is any advantage to volar plating in this subgroup of patients with distal radius fractures.
Read the detailed description
This study has been designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial examining the cost effectiveness of treating distal radius fractures with open reduction and internal fixation with a volar locking plate (VLP) to closed reduction and k-wire fixation (K-Wires). All patients aged < 65 years with an isolated distal radius fracture (extra-articular or simple intra-articular, AO type A or C1) requiring operative fixation will be included in this study. Patients who have underlying osteoporosis, other injuries or complex intra-articular fractures will be excluded from this study.
Once eligibility is determined, patients will be randomized to one of two treatment arms. They will be treated with either a closed reduction with percutaneous k-wire fixation and 6 weeks of cast immobilization (K-wire) or open reduction internal fixation with a volar locked plate and early range of motion (beginning at 10-14 days) (VLP). All patients will undergo a standardized pre-operative evaluation. This will include classification of their fracture (based on the AO classification), a baseline PRWE and DASH score, a measure of their general health (SF-12) and a general health utility questionnaire (EQ-5d). Patients will be required to report the details of their occupational physical demands and the number of work days missed due to injury.
Patient testing will be incorporated into scheduled clinic visits. Data will be collected at the initial assessment, 2 weeks post-operatively, and then at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after the fracture. At each visit, AP and lateral wrist radiographs will also be obtained. The investigators will then examine the outcomes of each group based on range of motion, grip strength, and standardized patient rated pain and disability scores (PRWE and DASH). In order to capture differences between the 2 groups in the early phases of recovery - the investigators will administer 2 additional assessments at 4 and 9 weeks by either phone or email. These telephone assessments will include an assessment of patient rated pain and disability (DASH, PRWE) and patients will be asked to provide details on whether they have returned to work or their usual activities.
The primary outcome, patient rated pain and disability, will be quantified with the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) a tool which has been shown to be valid, reliable and highly responsive in the distal radius fracture population. Secondary outcomes will include range of motion, strength, Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH) and time to return to work. The cost analysis will include both direct and indirect costs, and will include: OR time, anesthesia time, surgeon fees, cost of outpatient visits, equipment costs (volar locked plates and k-wires), x-rays, casting, splints, number of work days missed and work disability costs. The investigators will also use the health utility score (EQ-5d) to determine the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) associated with each intervention.
Based on our sample size calculations, the investigators will need 28 patients in each treatment arm (power 80%, p = 0.05). Allowing for a 10-15% drop-out rate, 64 patients are required for enrollment. The secondary outcomes will include ROM, grip strength, union rate, mean time to union (weeks) and DASH score.
- Conditions
- Distal Radius Fracture
- Being tested
- Surgical Repair of Distal Radius Fracture
- Keywords
- Distal Radius, Volar locked plating, Cost Effectiveness, Randomization, Outcomes
- Medical subject headings
- Wrist Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Surgical Repair of Distal Radius FractureProcedure or surgery
2 surgical methods to treat Distal Radius Fracture
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| closed reduction with percutaneous k-wire fixation and casted | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Surgical Repair of Distal Radius Fracture |
| open reduction internal fixation with a volar locked plate | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Surgical Repair of Distal Radius Fracture |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation
Questionnaire administered to assess subjective levels of pain and function
Measured: Prior to randomization and at 3, 6, and 12 months following randomization
Secondary outcomes (1)
Objective measures
ROM, Strength and Dexterity will be assessed
Measured: 3, 6, and 12 months following surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2011
- Primary completionMar 2014 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2014 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Distal Radius FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hand and Upper Limb Clinic, Canada
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- Canadian Orthopaedic Foundation
- Investigators
- Ruby Grewal, MD, FRCSC, Principal investigator, Hand and Upper Limb Clinic, St. Joseph's Health Care
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01333371
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HULC drf-Volar Plate
- Other IDs
- 17545
- Acronym
- DRF
- Status last verified
- Apr 2011
- First submitted
- 8 Apr 2011
- Last updated
- 12 Apr 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Apr 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Are Volar Locking Plates a Cost Effective Strategy for the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Patients <65 Years of Age?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01333371
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DRF / HULC drf-Volar Plate
- Conditions
- Distal Radius Fracture
- Keywords
- Distal Radius, Volar locked plating, Cost Effectiveness, Randomization, Outcomes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hand and Upper Limb Clinic, CanadaResearch network
- Collaborators
- Canadian Orthopaedic Foundation
- Study start
- Apr 2011
- Primary completion
- Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2014 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients will be randomized to volar plating with early ROM versus closed reduction with K-wires and 6 weeks of cast immobilization to determine if there is any advantage to volar plating in this subgroup of patients with distal radius fractures.
Detailed description
This study has been designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial examining the cost effectiveness of treating distal radius fractures with open reduction and internal fixation with a volar locking plate (VLP) to closed reduction and k-wire fixation (K-Wires). All patients aged < 65 years with an isolated distal radius fracture (extra-articular or simple intra-articular, AO type A or C1) requiring operative fixation will be included in this study. Patients who have underlying osteoporosis, other injuries or complex intra-articular fractures will be excluded from this study.
Once eligibility is determined, patients will be randomized to one of two treatment arms. They will be treated with either a closed reduction with percutaneous k-wire fixation and 6 weeks of cast immobilization (K-wire) or open reduction internal fixation with a volar locked plate and early range of motion (beginning at 10-14 days) (VLP). All patients will undergo a standardized pre-operative evaluation. This will include classification of their fracture (based on the AO classification), a baseline PRWE and DASH score, a measure of their general health (SF-12) and a general health utility questionnaire (EQ-5d). Patients will be required to report the details of their occupational physical demands and the number of work days missed due to injury.
Patient testing will be incorporated into scheduled clinic visits. Data will be collected at the initial assessment, 2 weeks post-operatively, and then at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after the fracture. At each visit, AP and lateral wrist radiographs will also be obtained. The investigators will then examine the outcomes of each group based on range of motion, grip strength, and standardized patient rated pain and disability scores (PRWE and DASH). In order to capture differences between the 2 groups in the early phases of recovery - the investigators will administer 2 additional assessments at 4 and 9 weeks by either phone or email. These telephone assessments will include an assessment of patient rated pain and disability (DASH, PRWE) and patients will be asked to provide details on whether they have returned to work or their usual activities.
The primary outcome, patient rated pain and disability, will be quantified with the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) a tool which has been shown to be valid, reliable and highly responsive in the distal radius fracture population. Secondary outcomes will include range of motion, strength, Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH) and time to return to work. The cost analysis will include both direct and indirect costs, and will include: OR time, anesthesia time, surgeon fees, cost of outpatient visits, equipment costs (volar locked plates and k-wires), x-rays, casting, splints, number of work days missed and work disability costs. The investigators will also use the health utility score (EQ-5d) to determine the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) associated with each intervention.
Based on our sample size calculations, the investigators will need 28 patients in each treatment arm (power 80%, p = 0.05). Allowing for a 10-15% drop-out rate, 64 patients are required for enrollment. The secondary outcomes will include ROM, grip strength, union rate, mean time to union (weeks) and DASH score.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| closed reduction with percutaneous k-wire fixation and casted | Active comparator | Procedure: Surgical Repair of Distal Radius Fracture |
| open reduction internal fixation with a volar locked plate | Active comparator | Procedure: Surgical Repair of Distal Radius Fracture |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Distal radius fracture - AO type A or C1
- Skeletally mature
- Age 18-65 years old
- Isolated injury
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- AO Type B or C2,3
- Other injuries involving affected or unaffected arm
- Skeletally immature
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical Repair of Distal Radius Fracture2 surgical methods to treat Distal Radius Fracture | Procedure or surgery | closed reduction with percutaneous k-wire fixation and casted, open reduction internal fixation with a volar locked plate |
Primary outcome
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation
Time frame: Prior to randomization and at 3, 6, and 12 months following randomization
Questionnaire administered to assess subjective levels of pain and function
1 secondary outcome
Objective measures
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months following surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Apr 2011.
Related trials for Distal Radius Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Alloy Scaffold With Controlled Degradation for Periarticular Bone Defects
Periarticular Bone Defect, Proximal Humerus Fracture
RecruitingPhase 1
Impact of Early ADL Education on Outcomes Post DRF ORIF
Distal Radius Fractures
Recruiting
Optimal Duration of Longitudinal Mechanical Traction in Displaced Radius Fractures: a Prospective Non-inferiority Study
Distal Radius Fracture
Recruiting
Home-Based Photobiomodulation Effects in the Postoperative Period of Distal Radius Fractures
Distal Radius Fracture
Not yet recruiting
X-BS Ortho Bone Graft Study
Orthopedic Disorder, Trauma Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ruby Grewal, MD, FRCSC principal investigator
Hand and Upper Limb Clinic, St. Joseph's Health Care
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Surgical Repair of Distal Radius Fracture in people with Distal Radius Fracture, run by Hand and Upper Limb Clinic, Canada at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Apr 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ruby Grewal, MD, FRCSC (519-646-6286, ruby.greal@sjhc.london.on.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (time frame: Prior to randomization and at 3, 6, and 12 months following randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Apr 2011.