AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary FibrosisPhase 3NCT01335464

Safety and Efficacy of BIBF 1120 at High Dose in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients

A Phase 3 study testing BIBF 1120 in people with Pulmonary Fibrosis, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 98 sites in 13 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic disease of unknown cause that results in scarring of the lung and there is a high unmet medical need for effective treatment to halt lung function decline, delay or avoid exacerbation (flare-ups), and ultimately to reduce the death rate. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Fibrosis
What is being tested?
BIBF 1120
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
515 participants
Where
98 sitesin 13 countries
Study dates
Apr 2011to Oct 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age >= 40 years;
  • IPF diagnosed, according to most recent American Thoracic Society (ATS), European Respiratory Society (ERS), Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS), Latin American Thoracic Association (ALAT) IPF guideline for diagnosis and management, within 5 years;
  • Combination of High Resolution Computerized Tomography (HRCT) pattern, and if available surgical lung biopsy pattern, as assessed by central reviewers, are consistent with diagnosis of IPF
  • Dlco (corrected for Hb): 30%-79% predicted of normal;
  • FVC>= 50% predicted of normal

Who cannot join

  • Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) > 1.5 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN)
  • Bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN;
  • Relevant airways obstruction (i.e. pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7);
  • Patient likely to have lung transplantation during study (being on transplantation list is acceptable for participation);
  • Myocardial infarction within 6 months;
  • Unstable angina within 1 month;
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Bleeding risk (genetic predisposition; fibrinolysis or full-dose therapeutic anticoagulation or high dose antiplatelet therapy; history of hemorrhagic CNS event within 12 months; haemoptysis or haematuria or active gastro-intestinal bleeding or ulcers or major injury or surgery within 3 months);
  • Thrombotic risk (inherited predisposition; history of thrombotic event (including stroke and transient ischemic attacks) within 12 months;
  • International normalised ratio (INR) > 2, prolongation of prothrombin time (PT) and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) by > 50% of institutional ULN);
  • N-ACetyl Cystein, prednisone > 15mg/day or equivalent received within 2 weeks of visit 1;
  • Pirfenidone, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine A received within 8 weeks of visit 1;

Trial locations and contacts

98 sites in 13 countries.

98 sites in 13 countries

United States24 sites
  • 1199.32.10007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • 1199.32.10004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio

  • 1199.32.10001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Council Bluffs, Iowa

  • 1199.32.10009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Dallas, Texas

  • 1199.32.10022 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Danbury, Connecticut

  • 1199.32.10021 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Falls Church, Virginia

  • 1199.32.10029 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Jasper, Alabama

  • 1199.32.10005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Los Angeles, California

  • 1199.32.10003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Lynchburg, Virginia

  • 1199.32.10018 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    McKinney, Texas

  • 1199.32.10016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Minneapolis, Minnesota

  • 1199.32.10015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Nashville, Tennessee

  • 1199.32.10024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    New Brunswich, New Jersey

  • 1199.32.10019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    New York, New York

  • 1199.32.10025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Newark, Delaware

  • 1199.32.10013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Phoenix, Arizona

  • 1199.32.10002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

  • 1199.32.10033 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

  • 1199.32.10020 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Portland, Oregon

  • 1199.32.10008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Providence, Rhode Island

  • 1199.32.10034 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shelbyville, Tennessee

  • 1199.32.10038 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Tacoma, Washington

  • 1199.32.10023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Weston, Florida

  • 1199.32.10028 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Wichita, Kansas

Other trials in United States

Italy12 sites
  • 1199.32.39012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Catania

  • 1199.32.39004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Chieti Scalo

  • 1199.32.39008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Forlì

  • 1199.32.39005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Milan

  • 1199.32.39001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Modena

  • 1199.32.39007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Monza

  • 1199.32.39011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Naples

  • 1199.32.39002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Padova

  • 1199.32.39006A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Pisa

  • 1199.32.39006B Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Pisa

  • 1199.32.39010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Roma

  • 1199.32.39009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Siena

Other trials in Italy

Japan12 sites
  • 1199.32.81005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo

  • 1199.32.81006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bunkyo-ku,Tokyo

  • 1199.32.81007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kiyose, Tokyo

  • 1199.32.81004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kumagaya, Saitama

  • 1199.32.81009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Minato-ku, Tokyo

  • 1199.32.81003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Naka-gun, Ibaraki

  • 1199.32.81011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ota-ku, Tokyo

  • 1199.32.81001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Sendai, Miyagi

  • 1199.32.81010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shibuya-ku, Tokyo

  • 1199.32.81002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shimotsuke,Tochigi

  • 1199.32.81008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo

  • 1199.32.81012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Yokohama, Kanagawa

Other trials in Japan

Germany8 sites
  • 1199.32.49008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bamberg

  • 1199.32.49005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Donaustauf

  • 1199.32.49001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Essen

  • 1199.32.49002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Freiburg/Breisgau

  • 1199.32.49006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Giessen

  • 1199.32.49003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Großhansdorf

  • 1199.32.49007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Heidelberg

  • 1199.32.49004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mainz

Other trials in Germany

United Kingdom8 sites
  • 1199.32.44006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Aberdeen

  • 1199.32.44003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Birmingham

  • 1199.32.44005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Birmingham

  • 1199.32.44009 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Leeds

  • 1199.32.44004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Liverpool

  • 1199.32.44002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    London

  • 1199.32.44008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Oxford

  • 1199.32.44001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Westbury on Trym

Other trials in United Kingdom

France7 sites
  • 1199.32.33002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Bobigny

  • 1199.32.33003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Nice

  • 1199.32.33001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Paris

  • 1199.32.33005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Paris

  • 1199.32.33006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Paris

  • 1199.32.33007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Reims

  • 1199.32.33004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Rennes

Other trials in France

China6 sites
  • 1199.32.86001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Beijing

  • 1199.32.86002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Beijing

  • 1199.32.86005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Changsha

  • 1199.32.86004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Chengdu

  • 1199.32.86003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Nanchang

  • 1199.32.86006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Xi'an

Other trials in China

Australia5 sites
  • 1199.32.61001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Camperdown, New South Wales

  • 1199.32.61002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Concord, New South Wales

  • 1199.32.61003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Daw Park, South Australia

  • 1199.32.61005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Frankston, Victoria

  • 1199.32.61004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Prahran, Victoria

Other trials in Australia

India5 sites
  • 1199.32.91003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ahmedabad

  • 1199.32.91002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Coimbatore

  • 1199.32.91006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Jaipur

  • 1199.32.91005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Kolkata

  • 1199.32.91001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Mumbai

Other trials in India

Belgium4 sites
  • 1199.32.32004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Brussels

  • 1199.32.32005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Jette

  • 1199.32.32001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Leuven

  • 1199.32.32002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Yvoir

Other trials in Belgium

Czechia3 sites
  • 1199.32.42002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Prague

  • 1199.32.42003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Prague

  • 1199.32.42001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Ústí nad Labem

Other trials in Czechia

Israel3 sites
  • 1199.32.97004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Haifa

  • 1199.32.97001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Petah Tikva

  • 1199.32.97002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Rehovot

Other trials in Israel

Ireland1 site
  • 1199.32.35301 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

    Dublin

Other trials in Ireland

About this study

Official title: A 52 Weeks, Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial Evaluating the Effect of Oral BIBF 1120, 150 mg Twice Daily, on Annual Forced Vital Capacity Decline, in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic disease of unknown cause that results in scarring of the lung and there is a high unmet medical need for effective treatment to halt lung function decline, delay or avoid exacerbation (flare-ups), and ultimately to reduce the death rate.

In a large Phase 2 trial (1199.30) (NCT00514683), investigating the effects of 52 weeks of treatment with BIBF 1120 in patients with IPF, a positive effect was seen on lung function of patients treated with high dose of BIBF 1120 compared to placebo.

Read more

Hence it is the purpose of this trial to investigate and confirm the efficacy and safety of BIBF 1120 at a high dose in treating patients with IPF, compared with placebo. The trial will be conducted as a prospective, randomised design with the aim to collect safety and efficacy data.

Respiratory function is globally accepted for assessment of treatment effects in IPF patients. The chosen endpoint (Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) decline) is easy to obtain and is part of the usual examinations done in IPF patients.

Being tested
placebo, BIBF 1120
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Fibrosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • placeboDrug

    placebo matching BIBF1120, BID

  • BIBF 1120Drug

    BIBF1120 BID (twice daily)

Study groups in NCT01335464
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BIBF 1120Experimentalpatient receives capsules containing BIBF 1120 twice a day
Receives: Drug: BIBF 1120
placeboPlacebo comparatorpatient receives capsules identical to those containing active drug
Receives: Drug: placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Annual Rate of Decline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Over 52 Weeks

    Forced vital capacity (FVC) is the total amount of air exhaled during the lung function test.

    For this endpoint reported means represent the adjusted rate

    Measured: 52 weeks

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. Change From Baseline in Saint-George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 52 Weeks

    This is a key secondary endpoint.

    SGRQ is a health-related quality of life questionnaire divided into 3 components : symptoms, activity and impact.

    The total score (summed weights) can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health status.

    Means provided are the adjusted means based on all analyzed patients in the model (not only patients with a baseline and measurement at week 52).

    Measured: baseline and 52 weeks

  2. Time to First Acute Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) Exacerbation

    Due to rare events, the median of time to event is not calculable, thus the percentages of patients with (IPF) exacerbation are reported and represented as a key secondary endpoint. An acute exacerbation (reported as an AE by the investigator) was defined as follows:

    Otherwise unexplained clinical features including all of the following:

    • Unexplained worsening or development of dyspnoea within 30 days
    • New diffuse pulmonary infiltrates on chest X-ray, and/or new HRCT parenchymal abnormalities with no pneumothorax or pleural effusion (new ground-glass opacities) since the last visit
    • Exclusion of infection as per routine clinical practice and microbiological studies
    • Exclusion of alternative causes as per routine clinical practice including left heart failure, pulmonary embolism and identifiable cause of acute lung injury.

    Failure is the proportion of patients with at least one acute IPF exacerbation over 52 weeks, based on all investigator-reported AEs .

    Measured: 52 weeks

  3. Absolute Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Over 52 Weeks

    Means provided are the adjusted means and are based on all analysed patients in the model (not only patients with a change from baseline to week 52).

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  4. Relative Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Over 52 Weeks

    Percentage change from baseline in FVC over 52 weeks. Means provided are the adjusted means and are based on all analysed patients in the model (not only patients with a change from baseline to week 52).

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  5. Absolute Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (% Predicted) Over 52 Weeks

    Means provided are the adjusted means and are based on all analysed patients in the model (not only patients with a change from baseline to week 52).

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  6. Relative Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (% Predicted) Over 52 Weeks

    Percentage change from baseline in FVC (% predicted) at 52 weeks. Means provided are the adjusted means and are based on all analysed patients in the model (not only patients with a change from baseline to week 52).

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  7. Absolute Categorical Change of FVC (% Predicted) by Categories Over 52 Weeks - 5% Threshold

    Absolute categorical change of FVC (% predicted) by categories over 52 weeks - 5% threshold (decrease by >5%, increase by >5%, and change within ≤5%).

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  8. Absolute Categorical Change of FVC (% Predicted) by Categories Over 52 Weeks - 10% Threshold

    Absolute categorical change of FVC (% predicted) by categories over 52 weeks - 10% threshold (decrease by 10%, increase by >10%, and change within ≤10%)

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  9. FVC Responders Using 10% Threshold at 52 Weeks

    FVC responders using 10% threshold at 52 weeks, defined as patients with absolute decline in FVC% predicted no greater than 10% and with an FVC evaluation at 52 weeks.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  10. Proportion of FVC Responders Using 5% Threshold at 52 Weeks

    Proportion of FVC responders using 5% threshold at 52 weeks, defined as patients with absolute decline in FVC% predicted no greater than 5% and with an FVC evaluation at 52 weeks.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  11. Proportion of SGRQ Responders at 52 Weeks: Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)

    Proportion of SGRQ responders at 52 weeks

    Responders defined as <= -4 points change in change from baseline in SGRQ total score at 52 weeks.

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  12. Change From Baseline in SGRQ Symptom Score at 52 Weeks: Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)

    SGRQ Symptom score is a sub-component of SGRQ total score and is concerned with the effect of respiratory symptoms, their frequency and severity. This score calculated as summed weights ranges from 0 to 100 with lower score denoting a better symptom-related quality of life.

    Means presented are the adjusted means and are based on all analyzed patients in the model (not only patients with a baseline and measurement at week 52).

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  13. Change From Baseline in SGRQ Impact Score at 52 Weeks (Points): Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)

    SGRQ Impact score is a sub-component of SGRQ total score and covers a range of aspects concerned with social functioning and psychological disturbances resulting from airway disease. This score calculated as summed weights ranges from 0 to 100 with lower score denoting a better impact-related quality of life.

    Means presented are the adjusted means and are based on all analyzed patients in the model (not only patients with a baseline and measurement at week 52).

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  14. Change From Baseline in SGRQ Activity Score at 52 Weeks (Points): Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)

    SGRQ Activity score is a sub-component of SGRQ total score and concerned with activities that cause or are limited by breathlessness. This score calculated as summed weights ranges from 0 to 100 with lower score denoting a better activity-related quality of life.

    Means presented are the adjusted means and are based on all analyzed patients in the model (not only patients with a baseline and measurement at week 52).

    Measured: baseline and 52 weeks

  15. Change From Baseline in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) Specific Version of SGRQ (SGRQ-I) Total Score at 52 Weeks (Points): Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)

    SGRQ-I is the IPF specific version of SGRQ comprises of selected items from the SGRQ divided into three components, Symptoms, Activity and Impact. Each component is scored separately. The weights for all items with a positive responses are summed and the weights from missed items are deducted from the maximum possible weight for the total score.

    The total score is calculated by dividing the summed weights from positive items in the questionnaire by maximum possible weight for all items in the questionnaire. The total score can range from 0 to 100 with a lower score denoting a better health-related quality of life. Change from baseline is calculated as the difference between total score at week 52 and total score at baseline as measured by the scale.

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  16. Change From Baseline in Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ) at 52 Weeks: Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)

    Shortness of Breath Questionnaire measures the shortness of breath. It comprises of 24 items. Each item is scored on a scale between 0-5 where 5 represents maximal breathlessness. The responses to all items are summed up to provide the overall score that can range from 0 (best outcome) to 120 (worst outcome).

    Means presented are the adjusted means and are based on all analyzed patients in the model (not only patients with a baseline and measurement at week 52).

    Measured: baseline and 52 weeks

  17. Change From Baseline in Cough Symptoms Score of the Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire (CASA-Q) Score at 52 Weeks: Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)

    The cough domains of the Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire (CASAQ(CD)) assess the frequency and severity of cough and sputum and their impact on everyday life. It contains 4 domains cough/sputum symptom and impact with each scale ranging from 0 to 100 with lower scores indicating higher symptoms/impact levels (worst outcome).

    Means presented are the adjusted means and are based on all analyzed patients in the model (not only patients with a baseline and measurement at week 52).

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  18. Change From Baseline in Cough Impact Score of the Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire (CASA-Q) Score at 52 Weeks : Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)

    The cough domains of the Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire (CASA-Q) assess the frequency and severity of cough and sputum and their impact on everyday life. It contains 4 domains cough/sputum symptom and impact with each scale ranging from 0 to 100 with lower scores indicating higher symptoms/impact levels (worst outcome).

    Means presented are the adjusted means and are based on all analyzed patients in the model (not only patients with a baseline and measurement at week 52).

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  19. Proportion of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Responders at 52 Weeks: Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)

    Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) responders are defined as 'Very much better'/ 'Much better'/ 'A little better'/ 'No change'.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  20. Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5-Dimensional Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Health State up to 52 Weeks : Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)

    The EuroQol 5-dimensional Health State is based on a visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) representing the general patient's health state labelled from 100 (best imaginable health state) to 0 (worst imaginable health state). A higher score indicating a better health state. Change from baseline is calculated as the difference between health state at week 12, 24 and 52 respectively and health state at baseline as measured by the scale.

    Measured: baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 52 weeks

  21. Risk of an Acute IPF Exacerbation Over 52 Weeks

    The incidence rate of exacerbations (calculated as the number of patients with at least 1 acute IPF exacerbation divided by the total number of years at risk in years*100)

    Measured: 52 weeks

  22. Time to Death Over 52 Weeks

    Due to rare events, the median of time to event is not calculable, thus the percentages of patients who did or did not experienced death before or at 372 days after randomisation or last contact date (whichever occurs first) are reported.

    Failure is the proportion of patients who died over 52 weeks (373 days time-period) .

    Measured: 52 weeks

  23. Time to Death Due to Respiratory Cause Over 52 Weeks (Adjudicated)

    Due to rare events, the median of time to event is not calculable, thus the percentages of participants who did or did not experienced death due to respiratory causes before or at 372 days after randomisation or last contact date (whichever occurs first) are reported.

    Failure is the the proportion of patients who died due to respiratory causes over 52 weeks (373 days time-period).

    Measured: 52 weeks

  24. Time to On-treatment Death

    Due to rare events, the median of time to event is not calculable, thus the percentages of participants who did or did not die before or at last trial medication intake + 28 days were censored at last trial medication intake + 28 days and reported.

    Failure is the the proportion of patients who died on-treatment.

    Measured: 52 weeks

  25. Time to Death or Lung Transplant Over 52 Weeks

    Due to rare events, the median of time to event is not calculable, thus the percentages of participants who did or did not experience event (death or lung transplant) before or at 372 days after randomisation or last contact date (whichever occurs first) are reported.

    Failure is the proportion of patients who died or had lung transplant over 52 weeks (373 days time-period).

    Measured: 52 weeks

  26. Time to Death or Lung Transplant or Qualifying for Lung Transplant Over 52 Weeks.

    Due to rare events, the median of time to event is not calculable, thus the percentages of participants who did or did not experienced death or lung transplant or qualifying for lung transplant over 52 weeks are reported. A patient was considered qualifying for lung transplant by the investigator if he or she fulfilled the following criteria:

    FVC <45% predicted or Carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DL(CO)) <30% pred or Oxygen saturation on pulse oximetry (SpO2) <88% at rest, at sea level (to be adapted for other heights).

    These criteria were evaluated by investigators judgement. Failure is the proportion of patients who died or had lung transplant or qualified for lung transplant over 52 weeks (373 days time-period).

    Measured: 52 weeks

  27. Change From Baseline in SpO2 (Oxygen Saturation, Expressed in Percent) at Rest up Over 52 Weeks

    Means presented are the adjusted means. Adjusted mean is based on all analyzed patients in the model (not only patients with a change from baseline to week 52)

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

  28. Change From Baseline in Carbon Monoxide Diffusion Capacity (DLCO) at Rest Over 52 Weeks

    Means provided are the adjusted means and are based on all analysed patients in the model (not only patients with a change from baseline to week 52).

    Measured: Baseline and 52 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Apr 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2011
  3. Primary completionOct 2013
  4. Study completionOct 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
515 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01335464
Sponsor's protocol ID
1199.32
Other IDs
2010-024251-87
Status last verified
Jun 2016
First submitted
13 Apr 2011
Last updated
25 Jul 2016

Publications

  • Glaspole I, Bonella F, Bargagli E, Glassberg MK, Caro F, Stansen W, Quaresma M, Orsatti L, Bendstrup E. Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who are elderly or have comorbidities. Respir Res. 2021 Apr 26;22(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01695-y.

    PubMed 33902584
  • Jouneau S, Crestani B, Thibault R, Lederlin M, Vernhet L, Valenzuela C, Wijsenbeek M, Kreuter M, Stansen W, Quaresma M, Cottin V. Analysis of body mass index, weight loss and progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res. 2020 Nov 25;21(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01528-4.

    PubMed 33239000
  • Brown KK, Martinez FJ, Walsh SLF, Thannickal VJ, Prasse A, Schlenker-Herceg R, Goeldner RG, Clerisme-Beaty E, Tetzlaff K, Cottin V, Wells AU. The natural history of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. Eur Respir J. 2020 Jun 25;55(6):2000085. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00085-2020. Print 2020 Jun.

    PubMed 32217654
  • Richeldi L, Kolb M, Jouneau S, Wuyts WA, Schinzel B, Stowasser S, Quaresma M, Raghu G. Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in patients with advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Jan 8;20(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-1030-4.

    PubMed 31914963
  • Kreuter M, Koegler H, Trampisch M, Geier S, Richeldi L. Differing severities of acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF): insights from the INPULSIS(R) trials. Respir Res. 2019 Apr 11;20(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1037-7.

    PubMed 30971229
  • Xu Z, Li H, Wen F, Bai C, Chen P, Fan F, Hu N, Stowasser S, Kang J. Subgroup Analysis for Chinese Patients Included in the INPULSIS(R) Trials on Nintedanib in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Adv Ther. 2019 Mar;36(3):621-631. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-0887-1. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

    PubMed 30729456
  • Costabel U, Behr J, Crestani B, Stansen W, Schlenker-Herceg R, Stowasser S, Raghu G. Anti-acid therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: insights from the INPULSIS(R) trials. Respir Res. 2018 Sep 3;19(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0866-0.

    PubMed 30176872
  • Collard HR, Richeldi L, Kim DS, Taniguchi H, Tschoepe I, Luisetti M, Roman J, Tino G, Schlenker-Herceg R, Hallmann C, du Bois RM. Acute exacerbations in the INPULSIS trials of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2017 May 19;49(5):1601339. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01339-2016. Print 2017 May.

    PubMed 28526798
  • Paterniti MO, Bi Y, Rekic D, Wang Y, Karimi-Shah BA, Chowdhury BA. Acute Exacerbation and Decline in Forced Vital Capacity Are Associated with Increased Mortality in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Sep;14(9):1395-1402. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201606-458OC.

    PubMed 28388260
  • Rinciog C, Watkins M, Chang S, Maher TM, LeReun C, Esser D, Diamantopoulos A. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nintedanib in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in the UK. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Apr;35(4):479-491. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0480-2.

    PubMed 28039616
  • Kolb M, Richeldi L, Behr J, Maher TM, Tang W, Stowasser S, Hallmann C, du Bois RM. Nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and preserved lung volume. Thorax. 2017 Apr;72(4):340-346. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208710. Epub 2016 Sep 26.

    PubMed 27672117
  • Corte T, Bonella F, Crestani B, Demedts MG, Richeldi L, Coeck C, Pelling K, Quaresma M, Lasky JA. Safety, tolerability and appropriate use of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res. 2015 Sep 24;16:116. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0276-5.

    PubMed 26400368
  • Richeldi L, du Bois RM, Raghu G, Azuma A, Brown KK, Costabel U, Cottin V, Flaherty KR, Hansell DM, Inoue Y, Kim DS, Kolb M, Nicholson AG, Noble PW, Selman M, Taniguchi H, Brun M, Le Maulf F, Girard M, Stowasser S, Schlenker-Herceg R, Disse B, Collard HR; INPULSIS Trial Investigators. Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2014 May 29;370(22):2071-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402584. Epub 2014 May 18.

    PubMed 24836310
  • Richeldi L, Cottin V, Flaherty KR, Kolb M, Inoue Y, Raghu G, Taniguchi H, Hansell DM, Nicholson AG, Le Maulf F, Stowasser S, Collard HR. Design of the INPULSIS trials: two phase 3 trials of nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Med. 2014 Jul;108(7):1023-30. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

    PubMed 24834811

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing BIBF 1120 in people with Pulmonary Fibrosis, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 98 sites in 13 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 98 sites in United States, Italy, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom and 8 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Feb 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Annual Rate of Decline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Over 52 Weeks (time frame: 52 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01335464, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in