Lung CancerPhase 3NCT01336894
Surgery With or Without Internal Radiation Therapy Compared With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With High-Risk Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing therapeutic conventional surgery, iodine I 125 and stereotactic body radiation therapy in people with Lung Cancer, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 53 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Surgery with or without internal radiation therapy may be an effective treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. Internal radiation uses radioactive material placed directly into or near a tumor to kill tumor cells. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- therapeutic conventional surgery, iodine I 125 and stereotactic body radiation therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 53 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- May 2011to 27 Mar 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Lung nodule suspicious for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
- Biopsy confirmation is strongly recommended but not required; if biopsy is attempted and non-diagnostic, if the patient refuses biopsy, or if the risk of biopsy is considered too high, patients may be enrolled if the mass is suspicious for NSCLC based on two or more of the following criteria:
- Positive smoking history
- Absence of benign calcifications within suspicious nodule
- Activity on PET greater than normal tissue
- Evidence of growth compared to previous imaging
- Presence of spiculation
- Tumor ≤ 4 cm maximum diameter, clinical stage IA or selected IB (i.e., with visceral pleural involvement) by PET/CT scan of the chest and upper abdomen performed within 60 days prior to registration
- All clinically suspicious mediastinal N1, N2, or N3 lymph nodes (> 1 cm short-axis dimension on CT scan and/or positive on PET scan) confirmed negative for involvement with NSCLC by one of the following methods: mediastinoscopy, anterior mediastinotomy, endoscopic and/or endobronchial ultrasonography (EUS/EBUS)-guided needle aspiration, CT-guided, or video-assisted thoracoscopic or open lymph node biopsy
- Tumor verified by a thoracic surgeon to be in a location that will permit sublobar resection
- Tumor located peripherally within the lung, defined as not touching any surface within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree in all directions
- Patients with non-peripheral (central) tumors are NOT eligible
- No evidence of distant metastases
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- ECOG performance status (PS) 0, 1, or 2
- Patient at high-risk for surgery by meeting a minimum of one major criteria or two minor criteria as described below:
- Major criteria
- FEV1 ≤ 50% predicted
- DLCO ≤ 50% predicted
- Minor criteria
- Age ≥ 75 years
- FEV1 51-60% predicted
- DLCO 51-60% predicted
- Pulmonary hypertension (defined as a pulmonary artery systolic pressure greater than 40 mm Hg) as estimated by echocardiography or right heart catheterization
- Poor left ventricular function (defined as an ejection fraction of 40% or less)
- Resting or exercise arterial pO2 ≤ 55 mm Hg or SpO2 ≤ 88%
- pCO2 > 45 mm Hg
- Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) Dyspnea Scale ≥ 3
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative urine or serum pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- No prior invasive malignancy, unless disease-free for ≥ 3 years prior to registration (except non-melanoma skin cancer, in-situ cancers).
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- No prior intra-thoracic radiotherapy
- Prior radiotherapy as part of treatment for head and neck, breast, or other non-thoracic cancer is permitted
- Prior chemotherapy or surgical resection for the lung cancer being treated on this protocol is NOT permitted
Trial locations and contacts
53 sites in 2 countries.
53 sites in 2 countries
United States49 sites
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-0942
DeCesaris Cancer Institute at Anne Arundel Medical Center
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401
Emory Crawford Long Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Greenebaum Cancer Center at University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
St. Agnes Hospital Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21229
UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Tufts Medical Center Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Boston University Cancer Research Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Hollings Cancer Center at Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
University of Virginia Cancer Center
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637-1470
Charles M. Barrett Cancer Center at University Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1240
Baylor University Medical Center - Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center - Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Geisinger Cancer Institute at Geisinger Health
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822-0001
Providence Regional Cancer Partnership
Everett, Washington, 98201
Baptist Cancer Institute - Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
Gundersen Lutheran Center for Cancer and Blood
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601
Lucille P. Markey Cancer Center at University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0093
James Graham Brown Cancer Center at University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Milwaukee
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53295
St. Luke's - Roosevelt Hospital Center - St.Luke's Division
New York, New York, 10025
Sentara Cancer Institute at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at Orlando
Orlando, Florida, 32806
OSF St. Francis Medical Center
Peoria, Illinois, 61637
Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107-5541
Mayo Clinic Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85054
Allegheny Cancer Center at Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
Providence Cancer Center at Providence Portland Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, 97213-2967
Valley Hospital - Ridgewood
Ridgewood, New Jersey, 07450
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
James P. Wilmot Cancer Center at University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
William Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak Campus
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
University of California Davis Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95817
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, California, 94115
Curtis and Elizabeth Anderson Cancer Institute at Memorial Health University Medical Center
Savannah, Georgia, 31403-3089
Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259-5499
Swedish Cancer Institute at Swedish Medical Center - First Hill Campus
Seattle, Washington, 98122-4307
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Saint Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Stanford Cancer Center
Stanford, California, 94305-5824
Stony Brook University Cancer Center
Stony Brook, New York, 11794-9446
SUNY Upstate Medical University Hospital
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Waukesha Memorial Hospital Regional Cancer Center
Waukesha, Wisconsin, 53188
Wake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1096
York Cancer Center at Apple Hill Medical Center
York, Pennsylvania, 17405
Canada4 sites
London Regional Cancer Program at London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6
Hopital Notre-Dame du CHUM
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1
Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre - General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection (+/- Brachytherapy) Versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in High Risk Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
RATIONALE: Surgery with or without internal radiation therapy may be an effective treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. Internal radiation uses radioactive material placed directly into or near a tumor to kill tumor cells. Stereotactic body radiation therapy may be able to send x-rays directly to the tumor and cause less damage to normal tissue. It is not yet known whether stereotactic body radiation therapy is more effective than surgery with or without internal radiation therapy in treating non-small cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well surgery with or without internal radiation therapy works compared with stereotactic body radiation therapy in treating patients with high-risk stage IA or stage IB non-small cell lung cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To ascertain whether patients treated by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have a 3-year overall survival (OS) rate that is no more than 10% less than patients treated with sublobar resection (SR).
Secondary
- To compare loco-regional recurrence-free survival between study arms.
- To compare disease-free survival between study arms.
- To compare grade 3 or higher specific adverse event profiles between study arms at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-therapy.
- To compare pulmonary function between patients treated with SBRT and patients treated with SR.
- To compare the adverse events and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in each arm for patients with low or high Charlson comorbidity index scores, including a test interaction between Charlson comorbidity index scores (low vs high) and treatment arm.
Tertiary
- To compare the quality-adjusted survival between the SBRT and SR treatments in terms of time to death (primary) and time until recurrence (secondary).
- To examine whether pre-operative and post-operative clinically significant deficits in previously identified prognostic PRO domains (overall quality of life [QOL], fatigue, anxiety, and dyspnea) are associated with shorter patient survival in this patient population and to compare the relative effectiveness of each treatment (SBRT and SR).
- To contribute to an ACOSOG bank of normative data in order to improve short/long-term outcomes of cancer patients by identifying patients experiencing clinically significant deficits in patient-reported outcomes and the relationship to genetic variables.
- To explore whether blood-based biomarkers, including osteopontins, will be able to predict which patients will be at high risk for recurrence by treatment with either SBRT or SR. (exploratory)
- To explore whether blood-based biomarkers, including TGF-β1, will be able to predict which patients will be at high risk for pulmonary complications by treatment with either SBRT or SR. (exploratory)
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to planned brachytherapy (yes vs no) and ECOG performance status (0 vs 1 vs 2). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients undergo sublobar resection comprising either a wedge resection or anatomical segmentectomy with or without intraoperative brachytherapy* comprising an iodine I 125 implant at the resection margin.
- Arm II: Patients undergo 3 fractions of stereotactic body radiation therapy at 2-8 days apart.
NOTE: *Patients may receive brachytherapy at the discretion of treating physician.
Patients may undergo blood sample collection at baseline and periodically during study for correlative studies. Tumor tissue samples may also be collected from patients who undergo resection.
Patients complete the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), the Linear Analogue Self-Assessment (LASA), and the UCDS Shortness of Breath quality-of-life questionnaires at baseline and periodically during study and follow-up.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 30 days, every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 1 year, and then yearly for 2 years.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- therapeutic conventional surgery, iodine I 125, stereotactic body radiation therapy
- Keywords
- stage IA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IB non-small cell lung cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
therapeutic conventional surgeryProcedure or surgery
Undergo surgery
iodine I 125Radiation
Undergo seed implant radiotherapy
stereotactic body radiation therapyRadiation
Undergo radiotherapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I (SR+Brachytherapy) | Active comparator | Patients undergo sublobar resection comprising either a wedge resection or anatomical segmentectomy with or without intraoperative brachytherapy comprising an iodine I 125 implant at the resection margin. Receives: Procedure: therapeutic conventional surgery; Radiation: iodine I 125 |
| Arm II (SBRT) | Experimental | Patients undergo 3 fractions of stereotactic body radiation therapy at 2-8 days apart. Receives: Radiation: stereotactic body radiation therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
3-year Overall Survival (OS) Rate
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause.
Measured: Up to 3 years post-randomization
Secondary outcomes (6)
Loco-regional Recurrence-free Survival
Loco-regional recurrence is defined as recurrence within the same lobe or hilum (N1 nodes), or within 2 cm of the staple line or within 2 cm of the PTV after treatment effects such as scarring have subsided.
Measured: Up to 5 years post-randomization
Adverse Event Profiles at 1 Month Post-therapy
Adverse events are described and graded using the terminology and grading categories defined in the NCI's Common Toxicity Criteria (CTCAE), Version 4.0.
Grading: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Life-threatening, Grade 5=Death.
Measured: 1 month post-therapy
Adverse Event Profiles at 3 Months Post-therapy
Adverse events are described and graded using the terminology and grading categories defined in the NCI's Common Toxicity Criteria (CTCAE), Version 4.0.
Grading: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Life-threatening, Grade 5=Death.
Measured: 3 months post-therapy
Adverse Event Profiles at 12 Months Post-therapy
Adverse events are described and graded using the terminology and grading categories defined in the NCI's Common Toxicity Criteria (CTCAE), Version 4.0.
Grading: Grade 1=Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4=Life-threatening, Grade 5=Death.
Measured: 12 months post-therapy
Disease-free Survival
Disease free survival is defined as the time from randomization until documented disease recurrence or death, whichever occurs first. Patient who are disease free and alive at the time of analysis will be censored at the time of their last follow up.
Measured: Up to 5 years post-randomization
Pulmonary Function Test Values
Pulmonary function test values include forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1), carbon monoxide diffusion (DLCO) and forced vital capacity (FVC).
Measured: Up to 12 months post-therapy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionMay 2013
- Study completion27 Mar 2017
Why it stopped: recruiting or enrolling participants has halted prematurely and will not resume; participants are no longer being examined or treated
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hiran C. Fernando, MD, Principal investigator, Boston Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01336894
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Z4099
- Other IDs
- U10CA076001, NCI-2011-02667, CDR0000698986
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 15 Apr 2011
- Last updated
- 30 May 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Fernando HC, Timmerman R. American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4099/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 1021: a randomized study of sublobar resection compared with stereotactic body radiotherapy for high-risk stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Sep;144(3):S35-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
PubMed 22795435
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Phase III Study of Sublobar Resection (+/- Brachytherapy) Versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in High Risk Patients With Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01336894
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Z4099
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- stage IA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IB non-small cell lung cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: recruiting or enrolling participants has halted prematurely and will not resume; participants are no longer being examined or treated
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- May 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Mar 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 Mar 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Surgery with or without internal radiation therapy may be an effective treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. Internal radiation uses radioactive material placed directly into or near a tumor to kill tumor cells. Stereotactic body radiation therapy may be able to send x-rays directly to the tumor and cause less damage to normal tissue. It is not yet known whether stereotactic body radiation therapy is more effective than surgery with or without internal radiation therapy in treating non-small cell lung cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying how well surgery with or without internal radiation therapy works compared with stereotactic body radiation therapy in treating patients with high-risk stage IA or stage IB non-small cell lung cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To ascertain whether patients treated by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have a 3-year overall survival (OS) rate that is no more than 10% less than patients treated with sublobar resection (SR).
Secondary
- To compare loco-regional recurrence-free survival between study arms.
- To compare disease-free survival between study arms.
- To compare grade 3 or higher specific adverse event profiles between study arms at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-therapy.
- To compare pulmonary function between patients treated with SBRT and patients treated with SR.
- To compare the adverse events and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in each arm for patients with low or high Charlson comorbidity index scores, including a test interaction between Charlson comorbidity index scores (low vs high) and treatment arm.
Tertiary
- To compare the quality-adjusted survival between the SBRT and SR treatments in terms of time to death (primary) and time until recurrence (secondary).
- To examine whether pre-operative and post-operative clinically significant deficits in previously identified prognostic PRO domains (overall quality of life [QOL], fatigue, anxiety, and dyspnea) are associated with shorter patient survival in this patient population and to compare the relative effectiveness of each treatment (SBRT and SR).
- To contribute to an ACOSOG bank of normative data in order to improve short/long-term outcomes of cancer patients by identifying patients experiencing clinically significant deficits in patient-reported outcomes and the relationship to genetic variables.
- To explore whether blood-based biomarkers, including osteopontins, will be able to predict which patients will be at high risk for recurrence by treatment with either SBRT or SR. (exploratory)
- To explore whether blood-based biomarkers, including TGF-β1, will be able to predict which patients will be at high risk for pulmonary complications by treatment with either SBRT or SR. (exploratory)
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to planned brachytherapy (yes vs no) and ECOG performance status (0 vs 1 vs 2). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients undergo sublobar resection comprising either a wedge resection or anatomical segmentectomy with or without intraoperative brachytherapy* comprising an iodine I 125 implant at the resection margin.
- Arm II: Patients undergo 3 fractions of stereotactic body radiation therapy at 2-8 days apart.
NOTE: *Patients may receive brachytherapy at the discretion of treating physician.
Patients may undergo blood sample collection at baseline and periodically during study for correlative studies. Tumor tissue samples may also be collected from patients who undergo resection.
Patients complete the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS), the Linear Analogue Self-Assessment (LASA), and the UCDS Shortness of Breath quality-of-life questionnaires at baseline and periodically during study and follow-up.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for 30 days, every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 1 year, and then yearly for 2 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm I (SR+Brachytherapy) | Active comparator | Procedure: therapeutic conventional surgery, Radiation: iodine I 125Patients undergo sublobar resection comprising either a wedge resection or anatomical segmentectomy with or without intraoperative brachytherapy comprising an iodine I 125 implant at the resection margin. |
| Arm II (SBRT) | Experimental | Radiation: stereotactic body radiation therapyPatients undergo 3 fractions of stereotactic body radiation therapy at 2-8 days apart. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| therapeutic conventional surgeryUndergo surgery | Procedure or surgery | Arm I (SR+Brachytherapy) |
| iodine I 125Undergo seed implant radiotherapy | Radiation | Arm I (SR+Brachytherapy) |
| stereotactic body radiation therapyUndergo radiotherapy | Radiation | Arm II (SBRT) |
Primary outcome
3-year Overall Survival (OS) Rate
Time frame: Up to 3 years post-randomization
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization until death from any cause.
6 secondary outcomes
Loco-regional Recurrence-free Survival
Time frame: Up to 5 years post-randomization
Adverse Event Profiles at 1 Month Post-therapy
Time frame: 1 month post-therapy
Adverse Event Profiles at 3 Months Post-therapy
Time frame: 3 months post-therapy
Adverse Event Profiles at 12 Months Post-therapy
Time frame: 12 months post-therapy
Disease-free Survival
Time frame: Up to 5 years post-randomization
Pulmonary Function Test Values
Time frame: Up to 12 months post-therapy
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 May 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 22795435Fernando HC, Timmerman R. American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4099/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 1021: a randomized study of sublobar resection compared with stereotactic body radiotherapy for high-risk stage I non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Sep;144(3):S35-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Investigate ALE.P02 as a Monotherapy or in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Adult Patients With Selected CLDN1+ Solid Tumors
Squamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy of Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Cemiplimab in Patients With Surgically Removed Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Not Received Prior Chemotherapy
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing Osimertinib as a Treatment for Lung Cancers With an EGFR Exon 20 Change
Advanced Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma, Recurrent Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
Master Protocol for the Study of Rilogrotug for the Treatment of Weight Loss and Anorexia in Patients With Cancer Cachexia and mCRC or mNSCLC
Cachexia; Cancer, Cachexia
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing the Impact of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Atezolizumab, After Surgery to Prevent Early Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer From Returning, AASI-NSCLC Trial
Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hiran C. Fernando, MD principal investigator
Boston Medical Center
53 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing therapeutic conventional surgery, iodine I 125 and stereotactic body radiation therapy in people with Lung Cancer, run by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology at 53 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 53 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Mar 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
3-year Overall Survival (OS) Rate (time frame: Up to 3 years post-randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01336894, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2017.