HIV DiseasePhase 4P1094NCT01338025
Evaluation of 3TC or FTC Mono-therapy Compared to Continuing HAART as a Bridging Strategy
A Phase 4 study testing HAART regimen and 3TC or FTC monotherapy in people with HIV Disease, run by International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group at 17 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the use of lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) alone vs. continuing a failing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in HIV infected children, adolescents and young adults. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 24 years
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Disease
- What is being tested?
- HAART regimen and 3TC or FTC monotherapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2011to May 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 24 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Step 1 Inclusion Criteria:
- Age greater than or equal to 8 to less than 25 years of age, at study entry
- Documentation of HIV-1 infection defined as positive results from two samples collected at different time points
- Treatment experienced patients must have demonstrated failure on the current HAART regimen for 2 months or longer. These patients must have been on ARVs for at least a total of 6 months prior to entry. Thus, if the failing regimen was the first ARV regimen, then the patient must have been on that initial regimen for a minimum of 6 months total.
- CD4+ T cell count greater than or equal to 100 cells/mm3 (confirmed on at least two occasions within 6 months of study entry, including the screening value)
- Documentation of the M184V mutation on genotypic testing at any time prior to study entry
- In the best judgment of the clinical site team, concerns about the subject's ability to adhere made it unsuitable to initiate a new optimal HAART regimen for at least 6 months.
- Subject had not become adherent despite site's adherence interventions
- Female subjects of reproductive potential engaging in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy had to agree to avoid pregnancy during the entire 52 week trial and to consistently and appropriately use at least two of the following contraception methods: condoms, diaphragm or cervical cap with spermicide, IUD, hormonal-based contraception. A list of acceptable methods can be found at the FDA Birth Control Guide (http://www.fda.gov/womens).
- Parent/legal guardian or subject able and willing to provide signed informed consent when applicable
Step 1 Exclusion Criteria:
- Positive hepatitis B surface antigen or known active hepatitis B infection.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Active malignancy within the past 2 years.
- Current immunosuppressive therapy, including the equivalent of greater than 1 mg/kg/per day or greater than 20 mg total daily dose of prednisone in the 2 weeks preceding screening. Subjects for whom long-term systemic corticosteroid therapy (greater than 2 weeks) was anticipated were excluded. [Note: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and inhaled, nasal, and topical corticosteroids were not excluded as immunosuppressive therapy.]
- Prior immunization with an HIV-specific vaccine
- Greater than or equal to 1 CDC class C event within the past 12 months.
- Renal disease (as defined by estimated creatinine clearance less than 50 mL/min/1.73m2 confirmed on two occasions within 3 months of screening).
- Active opportunistic infections, including active tuberculosis (TB).
- Current treatment for active systemic TB. If recent, infection must have completed treatment course. INH treatment for latent TB is allowed.
- Viral load greater than 250,000 copies/mL at screening.
- Known greater than or equal than Grade 3 of any of the following laboratory toxicities within 30 days prior to study entry: neutrophil count, hemoglobin, platelets, AST, ALT, lipase, serum creatinine. Note: Subjects could be re-screened and enrolled if repeat value was less than Grade 3 without signs or symptoms of related organ dysfunction.
- Known greater than or equal to Grade 4 laboratory toxicities within 30 days prior to study entry, except with approval of the study team.
- For subjects who were not taking 3TC or FTC at the time of screening: Documented prior intolerance or adverse effect reasonably attributed to 3TC or FTC that resulted in permanent discontinuation.
- Problems with non-adherence attributed to modifiable structural barriers, such as lack of resources (e.g., insurance, transportation).
Step 2 - Inclusion Criteria
- Met requirements for completion of Step 1
- Subject/guardian agree to continue participation in Step 2
- ViroSeq assay results had been received by site and reviewed by investigator
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 5 countries.
17 sites in 5 countries
United States10 sites
Johns Hopkins University NICHD CRS (5092)
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Chicago Children's CRS (4001)
Chicago, Illinois, 60614
DUMC Ped. CRS (4701)
Durham, North Carolina, 27710-3499
University of Florida (5051)
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209
Univ of Miami Pediatric/Perinatal HIV/AIDS (4201)
Miami, Florida, 33136
Metropolitan Hospital (5003)
New York, New York, 10029
Univ. of California San Francisco NICHD CRS (5091)
San Francisco, California, 94117
SUNY Stony Brook NICHD CRS (5040)
Stony Brook, New York, 11794
Bronx-Lebanon Hospital (6901)
The Bronx, New York, 10457
Children's National Med. Ctr. Washington DC NICHD CRS (5015)
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Brazil3 sites
Hospital Geral De Nova Igaucu Brazil NICHD CRS (5097)
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 26030
Insituto de Infectologia Emilio Ribas NICHD CRS (5075)
São Paulo, 01246-900
Univ of Sao Paulo Brazil NICHD CRS (5074)
São Paulo, 14049-900
Thailand2 sites
Siriraj Hospital Mahidol University CRS (8251)
Bangkok, Ratchathewi,, 10700
Chiang Mai University Pediatrics-Obstetrics CRS (20101)
Chiang Mai, 50200
Argentina1 site
Hospital General de Agudos Buenos Aires Argentina NICHD CRS (5082)
Buenos Aires, C1221ADC
Puerto Rico1 site
University of Puerto Rico Pediatric HIV/AIDS Research (6601)
San Juan, 00936-5067
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of 3TC or FTC Mono-therapy Compared to Continuing HAART as a Bridging Antiretroviral Strategy in Persistently Non-adherent Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Who Are Failing HAART and Have the M184V Resistance Mutation.
The purpose of this study was to compare the use of lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) alone vs. continuing a failing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in HIV infected children, adolescents and young adults. The study was to see if there were changes in the HIV virus and if there were differences in immune function, viral load and medication side effects between the two groups over 28 weeks. Participants were assigned to either take 3TC or FTC alone or continue on his/her current failing HAART regimen. During the first 28 weeks of this study, if the participant was randomized to the continue HAART arm, he/she was not switched to a different or new, potentially suppressive HAART regimen, but continued on the current failing HAART regimen. However, if continuing HAART, the participant might be switched to a new regimen if their provider felt that it was clinically needed or the participant met certain study endpoints (e.g., drop in CD4, increase in viral load).
At the end of 28 weeks, the participant had the choice of remaining on the assigned study group medication(s) or starting a new HAART regimen prescribed by his/her doctor. Then, they would be followed for another 24 weeks to compare the difference in immune function, viral load and medication side effects between the different groups.
Read the detailed description
Currently, there is no clear consensus for managing virologic failure. Generally, failure of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based therapy due to non-adherence is associated with high rates of NNRTI resistance, while failure of protease inhibitor (PI)-based therapy due to non-adherence carries a much lower risk of PI resistance. In the setting of incomplete adherence and virologic failure despite adherence education, an optimal strategy would be one that effectively bridges the period between the cessation of the failing regimen of highly active antiretroviral (ARV) therapy and initiation of a new HAART regimen. This would provide time for interventions to improve adherence to be effective while minimizing accumulation of additional drug resistance mutations. Given the compelling need for an effective bridging strategy, the limited evidence for the safety and efficacy of this bridging regimen, and the high level of acceptability of studying 3TC or FTC monotherapy as an effective alternative, P1094 proposed to conduct a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing use of 3TC or FTC monotherapy as a short-term bridging regimen vs. continuation of non-suppressive HAART in non-adherent subjects.
This study closed early due to lack of accrual, with only 33 of the target 344 participants enrolled. Therefore analyses, including the analysis of the primary outcome, are descriptive. Only analyses for Step 1 could be done (Step 2 was observational). The following secondary analyses could not be performed:
Changes in Genotypic HIV Drug Resistance From Baseline Changes HIV Replication Capacity [Time Frame: 28 and 52 weeks] Changes in CD4 Percent and CD4+ T Cell Count [Time Frame: 52 weeks] Changes in HIV-1 RNA Levels [Time Frame: 52 Weeks] Changes in Immune Activation [Time Frame: 28 and 52 Weeks] Number and Percent of Subjects With Adverse Clinical Outcomes [Time Frame: 52 Weeks] Adherence as Measured by 3-day Recall [Time Frame: 52 Weeks]
- Conditions
- HIV Disease
- Being tested
- HAART regimen, 3TC or FTC monotherapy
- Keywords
- HIV, Bridging, Strategy
- Medical subject headings
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HAART regimenDrug
Also called Highly active antiretrovial therapy (HAART)
The study participant continued their non-suppressive HAART regimen as prescribed by their primary provider.
3TC or FTC monotherapyDrug
Also called Lamivudine (3TC), emtricitabine (FTC)
The study participant was assigned to either 3TC or FTC monotherapy (the choice of 3TC or FTC was left to the provider.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A, non-suppressive HAART regimen | Active comparator | In Step 1, subjects were randomized to continue their non-suppressive HAART regimen.
In Step 2, subjects either began a new HAART regimen, continued randomized treatment, or discontinued therapy while remaining on follow-up, as decided by their provider. Receives: Drug: HAART regimen |
| Arm B, 3TC or FTC monotherapy | Active comparator | In step 1, subjects were randomized to receive 3TC or FTC (the choice of 3TC or FTC was left to the provider).
In Step 2, subjects either began a new HAART regimen, continued randomized treatment, or discontinued therapy while remaining on follow-up, as decided by their provider. Receives: Drug: 3TC or FTC monotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Immunologic Deterioration
Immunologic deterioration was declared for a participant if any one of the following conditions is observed within the first 28 weeks:
- greater than or equal to 30% decline in absolute CD4+ T cell count from entry, or
- development of CDC class C events.
Results report number of participants with immunologic deterioration at week 28 calculated.
Measured: From entry to week 28
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change in CD4+ T Cell Count
Change in CD4+ T cell count from entry to Week 28 (CD4+ at entry - CD4+ at Week 28).
Measured: Entry to week 28
Change in HIV-1 RNA Levels
Change in HIV-1 RNA levels from Entry to Week 28
Measured: 28 Weeks
Number of Participants Non-adherent as Measured by 3-day Recall
Number of participants reporting a missed medication dose in the past 3 days.
Measured: 28 Weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2011
- Primary completionMay 2013
- Study completionMay 2013
Why it stopped: Study was halted for lack of accrual
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Allison L. Agwu, MD, Sc.M., Study chair, Johns Hopkins University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01338025
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IMPAACT P1094
- Other IDs
- U01AI068632
- Acronym
- P1094
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 16 Apr 2011
- Last updated
- 13 Nov 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Agwu AL, Warshaw MG, McFarland EJ, Siberry GK, Melvin AJ, Wiznia AA, Fairlie L, Boyd S, Harding P, Spiegel HML, Abrams EJ, Carey VJ; P1094 Study Team. Decline in CD4 T lymphocytes with monotherapy bridging strategy for non-adherent adolescents living with HIV infection: Results of the IMPAACT P1094 randomized trial. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 12;12(6):e0178075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178075. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28604824
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Nov 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of 3TC or FTC Mono-therapy Compared to Continuing HAART as a Bridging Antiretroviral Strategy in Persistently Non-adherent Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Who Are Failing HAART and Have the M184V Resistance Mutation.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01338025
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P1094 / IMPAACT P1094
- Conditions
- HIV Disease
- Keywords
- HIV, Bridging, Strategy
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Study was halted for lack of accrual
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- Mar 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 May 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to compare the use of lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) alone vs. continuing a failing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen in HIV infected children, adolescents and young adults. The study was to see if there were changes in the HIV virus and if there were differences in immune function, viral load and medication side effects between the two groups over 28 weeks. Participants were assigned to either take 3TC or FTC alone or continue on his/her current failing HAART regimen. During the first 28 weeks of this study, if the participant was randomized to the continue HAART arm, he/she was not switched to a different or new, potentially suppressive HAART regimen, but continued on the current failing HAART regimen. However, if continuing HAART, the participant might be switched to a new regimen if their provider felt that it was clinically needed or the participant met certain study endpoints (e.g., drop in CD4, increase in viral load).
At the end of 28 weeks, the participant had the choice of remaining on the assigned study group medication(s) or starting a new HAART regimen prescribed by his/her doctor. Then, they would be followed for another 24 weeks to compare the difference in immune function, viral load and medication side effects between the different groups.
Detailed description
Currently, there is no clear consensus for managing virologic failure. Generally, failure of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based therapy due to non-adherence is associated with high rates of NNRTI resistance, while failure of protease inhibitor (PI)-based therapy due to non-adherence carries a much lower risk of PI resistance. In the setting of incomplete adherence and virologic failure despite adherence education, an optimal strategy would be one that effectively bridges the period between the cessation of the failing regimen of highly active antiretroviral (ARV) therapy and initiation of a new HAART regimen. This would provide time for interventions to improve adherence to be effective while minimizing accumulation of additional drug resistance mutations. Given the compelling need for an effective bridging strategy, the limited evidence for the safety and efficacy of this bridging regimen, and the high level of acceptability of studying 3TC or FTC monotherapy as an effective alternative, P1094 proposed to conduct a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing use of 3TC or FTC monotherapy as a short-term bridging regimen vs. continuation of non-suppressive HAART in non-adherent subjects.
This study closed early due to lack of accrual, with only 33 of the target 344 participants enrolled. Therefore analyses, including the analysis of the primary outcome, are descriptive. Only analyses for Step 1 could be done (Step 2 was observational). The following secondary analyses could not be performed:
Changes in Genotypic HIV Drug Resistance From Baseline Changes HIV Replication Capacity [Time Frame: 28 and 52 weeks] Changes in CD4 Percent and CD4+ T Cell Count [Time Frame: 52 weeks] Changes in HIV-1 RNA Levels [Time Frame: 52 Weeks] Changes in Immune Activation [Time Frame: 28 and 52 Weeks] Number and Percent of Subjects With Adverse Clinical Outcomes [Time Frame: 52 Weeks] Adherence as Measured by 3-day Recall [Time Frame: 52 Weeks]
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A, non-suppressive HAART regimen | Active comparator | Drug: HAART regimenIn Step 1, subjects were randomized to continue their non-suppressive HAART regimen. In Step 2, subjects either began a new HAART regimen, continued randomized treatment, or discontinued therapy while remaining on follow-up, as decided by their provider. |
| Arm B, 3TC or FTC monotherapy | Active comparator | Drug: 3TC or FTC monotherapyIn step 1, subjects were randomized to receive 3TC or FTC (the choice of 3TC or FTC was left to the provider). In Step 2, subjects either began a new HAART regimen, continued randomized treatment, or discontinued therapy while remaining on follow-up, as decided by their provider. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 24 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HAART regimenAlso: Highly active antiretrovial therapy (HAART)The study participant continued their non-suppressive HAART regimen as prescribed by their primary provider. | Drug | Arm A, non-suppressive HAART regimen |
| 3TC or FTC monotherapyAlso: Lamivudine (3TC), emtricitabine (FTC)The study participant was assigned to either 3TC or FTC monotherapy (the choice of 3TC or FTC was left to the provider. | Drug | Arm B, 3TC or FTC monotherapy |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Immunologic Deterioration
Time frame: From entry to week 28
Immunologic deterioration was declared for a participant if any one of the following conditions is observed within the first 28 weeks: * greater than or equal to 30% decline in absolute CD4+ T cell count from entry, or * development of CDC class C events. Results report number of participants with immunologic deterioration at week 28 calculated.
3 secondary outcomes
Change in CD4+ T Cell Count
Time frame: Entry to week 28
Change in HIV-1 RNA Levels
Time frame: 28 Weeks
Number of Participants Non-adherent as Measured by 3-day Recall
Time frame: 28 Weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Nov 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28604824Agwu AL, Warshaw MG, McFarland EJ, Siberry GK, Melvin AJ, Wiznia AA, Fairlie L, Boyd S, Harding P, Spiegel HML, Abrams EJ, Carey VJ; P1094 Study Team. Decline in CD4 T lymphocytes with monotherapy bridging strategy for non-adherent adolescents living with HIV infection: Results of the IMPAACT P1094 randomized trial. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 12;12(6):e0178075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178075. eCollection 2017.
Related trials for HIV Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Adapting the ESTEEM Intervention to Improve Mental Health and PrEP Uptake Among Men at Risk of HIV
PrEP Use
RecruitingPhase 2
Evaluating the Safety and Immunogenicity of MTBVAC
HIV I Infection, Tuberculosis
Active, not recruiting
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Mobile HIV Prevention App to Increase HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) Testing and PrEP Initiation Among Rural Men Who Have Sex With Men
HIV Infections, STI
Not yet recruiting
PNF RCT to Decrease Alcohol Use and Increase HIV Prevention
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), Alcohol Misuse
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Allison L. Agwu, MD, Sc.M. study chair
Johns Hopkins University
17 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing HAART regimen and 3TC or FTC monotherapy in people with HIV Disease, run by International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group at 17 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in United States, Brazil, Thailand, Argentina, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 May 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Immunologic Deterioration (time frame: From entry to week 28). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01338025, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2015.