AzTrials
AzTrials

Focus of Study InsteadNCT01340560

Endometrial Injury Increases Implantation and Pregnancy Rates

A study testing Endometrial biopsy in people with Focus of Study Instead, run by Selcuk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Objective To evaluate the effect of local injury to the endometrium for implantation, pregnancy and live birth rates in ICSI -ET cycles with recurrent implantation failure. Design Randomized controlled clinical study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 36 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Focus of Study Instead
What is being tested?
Endometrial biopsy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
Sep 2010to Feb 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 36 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • women who applied to our clinic due to infertility and who undergone one or more failed fresh IVF cycles previously has been included in our study for ICSI-ET (intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer).

Who cannot join

  • women with factors as hydrosalpenx, trombophilia, submucous myoma and found to have a negative impact on implantation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Selcuk University Meram Medical Faculty

    Konya, 04220

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Local Injury to the Endometrium for Implantation and Pregnancy Rates in ICSI -ET Cycles With Recurrent Implantation Failure: a Randomised Controlled Study

Objective To evaluate the effect of local injury to the endometrium for implantation, pregnancy and live birth rates in ICSI -ET cycles with recurrent implantation failure.

Design Randomized controlled clinical study. Setting A clinical will assist reproductive center of Selcuk University Meram Medical Faculty Hospital in the Konya, Turkey.

Population A group of 100 women, who failed to conceive during one or more cycles of IVF and embryo transfer (ET), will treat with a long protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Methods The IVF treatment and ET will precede by repeated endometrial biopsies, in a randomly selected 50 of a total of 100 women.

Read the detailed description

The clinical study will take place in clinical assisted reproductive center of Selcuk University Meram Medical Faculty Hospital in the Konya, Turkey. A group of 100 women who apply to our clinic due to infertility and who undergo one or more failed fresh IVF cycles previously will be included in our study for ICSI-ET (intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer).

We will exclude women with factors as hydrosalpinx, trombophilia, submucous myoma and found to have a negative impact on implantation. Women will be given information about the study, and written informed consents will be obtained. Our study also received approval of ethic committee of our faculty.

Women of the study group (n=50) will randomly selected. The random allocation will base on computer generated random numbers. All 100 women will treate with long protocol for COH (control group=group 1, n=50 and study group=group 2, n=50.

On the other hand, the women in the study group (group 2, n=50) will undergo endometrial biopsies with one-week intervals at the luteal phase of nontransfer cycle. Endometrial biopsy will performe with biopsy catheter (Pipelle; de Cornier, Prodimed, Neuilly-en-Thelle, France). The catheter will be passed through the cervical os and will rotate in uterine cavity and apply 3-4 times after withdrawing the piston.

Treatment schedules Administration of Leuprolide acetate (Lucrin; Abbott, France) at a subcutaneous dose of 1 mg/day will be started at the 21st day of menstrual cycle on the patient selected for therapy. All of the women will be protected by one of non-hormonal contraception method during this cycle.

After administration of GnRH analog at 2nd-3rd day of next menstruation or at least for 14 days in women without menstruation, patients with criteria including serum estrogen (E2) level is below 50 pg/ml, endometrial thickness is <5mm, lack of observation of active follicle on transvaginal ultrasonography will be accepted as down regulation, and gonadotropin therapy [recFSH; Puregon (Organon), Gonal F (Serono), u-FSH/HMG; Merional (IBSA), Menogon (Ferring)] will be started at a properly adjusted dose for each patient. Estimated ovarian response will be considered for each case while determining initial dose. While starting SC/I.M. gonadotropin of average dose 225 IU/day, GnRH analog (Leuprolide acetate; Lucrin, Abbott) will be maintained until hCG day by reducing to 0.5 mg/day doze uninterruptedly. When leading follicle will become 18-20 mm or two of follicles will become 17 mm, ovulation will be triggered by administering 10.000 IU urinary hCG (Pregnyl amp; Organon, Turkey).

Follicle aspiration and oocyte collection procedure will be performed at the range of 35th-37th hours following hCG administration.

Semen specimens will be collected on the day when follicle aspiration will be performed several hours before the procedure by masturbation method generally after sexual fasting of 2-4 days. Sperms of total 6 men, equally 3 men from each group, will be obtained by TESA/TESE method.

Microinjection procedure into suitable and adequate number of oocytes will be performed following oocyte collection procedure. Development of fertilized oocytes will be followed up under suitable laboratory conditions in culture dish (5% CO2, 95% humidity, 37º C temperature). Fertilization rates will be evaluated at the subsequent 18th hour and embryo development will be evaluated at 24th-48th-72nd hours. On 2nd-3rd or 4th day following oocyte collection, maximum 3 embryos having highest quality scores (grade 3 or 4 embryos will be considered to be good quality embryos) will be selected, and will be transferred into intrauterine cavity with accompaniment of ultrasonography. Wallace 23 mm soft catheter (Smiths, England) will be used as transfer catheter. Follicle aspiration and embryo transfer procedures will be performed by same physician in our study.

Luteal phase support will be started at the evening of follicle aspiration on all women. Use of intravaginal micronized progesterone 3x200 mg (Progeston soft capsule; Kocak ilac, Turkey), intramuscular progesterone 25 mg/day (Progeston in oil), prednisol tablet for 5 days in 16 mg/ day p.o. dose (Mustafa Nevzat, Turkey) and Estraderm TTS 100 (Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland) 100 microgram/ on alternate days will be recommended until pregnancy result became apparent.

Being tested
Endometrial biopsy
Keywords
Endometrium, local injury, implantation, pregnancy, in vitro fertilization

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endometrial biopsyProcedure or surgery

    Endometrial biopsy was performed with biopsy catheter

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Implantation ratio

    Implantation ratios were 30.88% in Group 1 and 34.67% in Group 2 (p =0.13). So there wasn't any significant difference for implantation ratios between two groups, but implantation ratio of 34.67% in Group 2 was evaluated as clinically significant

    Measured: Six months

  2. Clinical pregnancy ratio

    Cardiac activity on USG for clinical pregnancy were determined in seventeen women of the control group (34%) and 30 women of the study group (60%). The clinical pregnancy rate was significiantly higher in the study group with compared to control group (p=0.009)

    Measured: six months

  3. Live birth ratio

    Twenty two of the 30 pregnancies in the study group ended in the delivery of 27 healthy babies. This stituation represents a rate of live births in the study group that was significiantly higher than control group (44% and 24%) (p= 0.03)

    Measured: six months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Implantation ratio

    Implantation ratios were 30.88% in Group 1 and 34.67% in Group 2 (p =0.13). So there wasn't any significant difference for implantation ratios between two groups, but implantation ratio of 34.67% in Group 2 was evaluated as clinically significant

    Measured: six months

  2. Clinical pregnancy ratio

    Cardiac activity on USG for clinical pregnancy were determined in seventeen women of the control group (34%) and 30 women of the study group (60%). The clinical pregnancy rate was significiantly higher in the study group with compared to control group (p=0.009)

    Measured: six months

  3. Live birth ratio

    Twenty two of the 30 pregnancies in the study group ended in the delivery of 27 healthy babies. This stituation represents a rate of live births in the study group that was significiantly higher than control group (44% and 24%) (p= 0.03)

    Measured: six months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Apr 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2010
  3. Primary completionJan 2011
  4. Study completionFeb 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01340560
Sponsor's protocol ID
ref.no:2008-274
Status last verified
Apr 2011
First submitted
13 Apr 2011
Last updated
22 Apr 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Lensen SF, Armstrong S, Gibreel A, Nastri CO, Raine-Fenning N, Martins WP. Endometrial injury in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 10;6(6):CD009517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009517.pub4.

    PubMed 34110001

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Endometrial biopsy in people with Focus of Study Instead, run by Selcuk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Implantation ratio (time frame: Six months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01340560, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in