AzTrials
AzTrials

Bacterial InfectionsPhase 3NCT01341639

Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of V419 in Healthy Infants When Given at 2, 3, 4 and 12 Months (V419-007)

A Phase 3 study testing V419, INFANRIX™ hexa and RotaTeq in people with Bacterial Infections and Virus Diseases, run by MCM Vaccines B.V..

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will determine whether participants who receive the vaccine V419 at 2, 3, 4, and 12 months of age have an acceptable immune response to the vaccine. The study will also determine whether the immune response to V419 is similar to that of participants who receive a licensed vaccine control. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 46 to 74 daysHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Bacterial Infections, Virus Diseases
What is being tested?
V419, INFANRIX™ hexa and RotaTeq
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,250 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
26 May 2011to 13 Mar 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 46 to 74 days
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy infants able to attend all study visits
  • Parent(s)/legal representative able to read, understand, and complete study questionnaires

Who cannot join

  • History of congenital or acquired immunodeficiency
  • Received or is expected to receive immunosuppressive agents or systemic immunomodulatory steroids
  • History of leukemia, lymphoma, malignant melanoma, or myeloproliferative disorder
  • Hypersensitivity to any of the vaccine components or history of a life-threatening reaction to a vaccine containing the same substances as the study vaccines or concomitant study vaccines
  • Has any chronic illness that could interfere with study conduct or completion
  • Received any immune globulin, blood, or blood-derived products since birth
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Received a dose of hepatitis B vaccine prior to the study
  • Vaccinated with any acellular pertussis or whole cell pertussis based combination vaccines, Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate, poliovirus, pneumococcal conjugate or pneumococcal polysaccharide, rotavirus, measles, mumps, rubella, or varicella vaccines, or any combination thereof
  • Fever within 24 hours prior to enrollment
  • Received any non-study vaccine within 30 days prior to enrollment, except for inactivated influenza vaccine, which is permitted 14 days or more prior to enrollment
  • Has a coagulation disorder
  • Has developmental delay or neurological disorder
  • Participant or his/her mother has a medical history of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seropositivity
  • History of measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, Haemophilus influenzae type B, hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, rotavirus, invasive pneumococcal, or poliomyelitis infection

About this study

Official title: A Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Comparator Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of V419 in Healthy Infants When Given at 2, 3, 4, and 12 Months (V419-007-03)

This study will determine whether participants who receive the vaccine V419 at 2, 3, 4, and 12 months of age have an acceptable immune response to the vaccine. The study will also determine whether the immune response to V419 is similar to that of participants who receive a licensed vaccine control.

Being tested
V419, INFANRIX™ hexa, RotaTeq, Prevenar 13, ProQuad™
Keywords
combination vaccine, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, hepatitis B, Hep B, Haemophilus influenzae b, Hib, polio, poliovirus
Medical subject headings
Bacterial Infections, Virus Diseases, Diphtheria, Whooping Cough, Tetanus, Hepatitis B, Haemophilus Infections, Poliomyelitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • V419Biological

    V419 (Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis Adsorbed, Inactivated Poliovirus, Haemophilus b Conjugate [Meningococcal Outer Membrane Protein Complex], and Hepatitis B [Recombinant] Vaccine) 0.5 mL intramuscular injection at 2, 3, 4, and 12 months of age.

  • INFANRIX™ hexaBiological

    INFANRIX™ hexa 0.5 mL intramuscular injection at 2, 3, 4, and 12 months of age.

  • RotaTeqBiological

    RotaTeq (pentavalent combination live vaccine of 5 human-bovine reassortant rotavirus strains) 2 mL oral dose at 2, 3, and 4 months of age

  • Prevenar 13Biological

    Prevenar 13 0.5 mL intramuscular injection at 2, 3, 4,and 13 months of age

  • ProQuad™Biological

    ProQuad™ 0.5 mL subcutaneous injection at 12 and 13 months of age

Study groups in NCT01341639
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PR5IExperimentalV419 + RotaTeq + Prevenar 13 + ProQuad
Receives: Biological: V419; Biological: RotaTeq; Biological: Prevenar 13; Biological: ProQuad™
INFANRIX™ hexaActive comparatorINFANRIX™ hexa + RotaTeq + Prevenar 13 + ProQuad
Receives: Biological: INFANRIX™ hexa; Biological: RotaTeq; Biological: Prevenar 13; Biological: ProQuad™

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Vaccinated With PR5I With Acceptable Antibody (Ab) Response to Haemophilus Influenzae Type b, Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Poliovirus Types 1, 2 & 3, at 5 Months

    Antibody titres in the PR5I group were measured by Radioimmunoassay (RIA) for Haemophilus influenzae type b (PRP), Micrometabolic inhibition test (MIT) for diphtheria \& poliovirus, and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for tetanus. Percentage of participants with an Ab titre ≥0.15 μg/mL for Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) (polyribosylribitol phosphate, PRP); ≥0.01 IU/mL; for diphtheria \& tetanus; ≥8 (1/dil) for inactivated poliovirus types 1, 2 \& 3 (IPV1, 2 \& 3) are reported. 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated based on the exact binomial method by Clopper and Pearson. The immune response to PR5I vaccine was considered as acceptable if the lower bounds of the 2-sided 95% CI for the response rates were greater than the predetermined lower CI limits for PRP, diphtheria (80%), tetanus (90%), and IPV1, 2 \& 3 (90%).

    Measured: One month after post-dose 3 of PRI5 (5 months old)

  2. Percentage of Participants Vaccinated With PR5I With Acceptable Ab Response or Seroresponse Rates to All Antigens Contained in the PR5I Vaccine One Month After the Toddler Dose at 13 Months

    Antibody titres in the PR5I group were measured by RIA for PRP, MIT for diphtheria \& poliovirus, enhanced Chemiluminescence assay (ECi)) for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and ELISA for tetanus, Pertussis toxoid (PT), Filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA), Fimbriae types 2 \& 3 (FIM) \& Pertactin (PRN). Percentage of participants with an Ab titre ≥1.0 μg/mL for Hib (PRP); ≥0.1 IU/mL; for diphtheria \& tetanus; ≥10 mIU/mL HBsAg; ≥8 (1/dil) for IPV1, 2 \& 3, and seroresponse to PT, FHA, FIM and PRN are reported. 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated based on the exact binomial method by Clopper and Pearson. The immune response to PR5I vaccine was considered as acceptable if the lower bounds of the 2-sided 95% CI for the response rates were greater than the lower CI limits for PRP, PT, FHA, FIM, and PRN (75%); Diphtheria (80%); HBsAG, IPV 1, 2, 3 (90%).

    Measured: One month after Toddler dose of PRI5 (13 months old)

  3. Percentage of Participants Vaccinated With PR5I Compared With INFANRIX™ Hexa With Acceptable Ab Response to Haemophilus Influenzae Type b, Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Poliovirus Types 1, 2 & 3, at 5 Months

    Antibody titres were measured by RIA for PRP, MIT for diphtheria \& poliovirus, and ELISA for tetanus. Percentage of participants with an Ab titre ≥0.15 μg/mL for Hib) (PRP); ≥0.01 IU/mL; for diphtheria \& tetanus; ≥8 (1/dil) for inactivated poliovirus types 1, 2 \& 3 (IPV1, 2 \& 3) are reported. The estimated response rates are based on the method by Miettinen and Nurminen stratified by country.

    Measured: One month after post-dose 3 of PRI5 (5 months old)

  4. Percentage of Participants Vaccinated With PR5I Compared With INFANRIX™ Hexa With Acceptable Ab Response Rates to Hepatitis B and Seroresponse to Pertussis Antigens Pt, FHA and PRN One Month After the Toddler Dose at 13 Months Old

    Antibody titres were measured by ECi for HBsAg and ELISA for PT, FHA, \& PRN. Percentage of participants with an Ab titre ≥10 mIU/mL HBsAg; ≥8 (1/dil) for IPV1, 2 \& 3, and seroresponse to PT, FHA, and PRN are reported. The estimated response rates are based on the method by Miettinen and Nurminen stratified by country.

    Measured: One month after Toddler dose of PRI5 (13 months old)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Percentage of Participants Vaccinated With PR5I With Acceptable Ab Response to Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Varicella One Month After the Toddler Dose of ProQuad at 13 Months Old

    Ab titres were measured by ELISA, excepting the Ab to varicella which was determined by glycoprotein ELISA. Percentage of participants with an Ab titre ≥255 mIU/mL for measles, ≥10 Ab units/mL for mumps, ≥10 IU/mL for rubella, and ≥5 gpELISA units/mL for varicella are reported. 95% CI were calculated based on the exact binomial method by Clopper and Pearson. The immune response to ProQuad vaccine was considered as acceptable if the lower bounds of the 2-sided 95% CI for the response rates were greater than the predetermined lower CI limits: 90% for measles, mumps \& rubella, and 76% for varicella.

    Measured: One month after Toddler dose of PRI5 (13 months old)

  2. Percentage of Participants Vaccinated With PR5I Compared With INFANRIX™ Hexa With Acceptable Ab Response to Measles, Mumps, Rubella and Varicella One Month After the Toddler Dose of ProQuad at 13 Months Old

    Ab titres were measured by ELISA, excepting the Ab to varicella which was determined by glycoprotein ELISA. Percentage of participants with an Ab titre ≥255 mIU/mL for measles, ≥10 Ab units/mL for mumps, ≥10 IU/mL for rubella, and ≥5 gpELISA units/mL for varicella are reported. The estimated response rates are based on the method by Miettinen and Nurminen stratified by country.

    Measured: One month after Toddler dose of PRI5 (13 months old)

  3. Percentage of Participants With Injection-site and Systemic Adverse Events (AEs) From Day 1 to Day 15 After Any Vaccination

    Global safety was assessed by measuring injection-site and systemic AEs reported daily on the Vaccination Report Card (VRC) by the parent(s) or legal representative from Day 1 to Day 15 (D1-D15) after each hexavalent vaccination. Solicited injection-site and systemic AEs were reported daily from Day 1 to Day 5 (D1-D5) after each hexavalent vaccination. AEs at injection sites were always considered as vaccine-related (Injection-Site Reactions (ISRs)). The investigator assessed whether systemic AEs were related (V-related) or not to the vaccine. All AEs (related and unrelated) are reported.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 15 after any vaccination

  4. Percentage of Participants Reporting Solicited ISRs From Day 1 to Day 5 After Any Vaccination

    Solicited ISRs were defined as injection-site erythema, injection-site pain, and injection-site swelling occurring from Day 1 (D1) to Day 5 (D5) after vaccination. AEs at injection sites were always considered as vaccine-related (Injection-Site Reactions (ISRs)).

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 5 after any vaccination

  5. Percentage of Participants Reporting Unsolicited ISRs From Day 1 to Day 15 After Any Vaccination

    Unsolicited ISRs with incidence ≥1% after any vaccination were reported daily on the VRC by the parent(s) or legal representative from (D1-D15). AEs at injection sites were always considered as vaccine-related ISRs

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 15 after any vaccination

  6. Percentage of Participants Reporting Solicited Systemic AE From Day 1 to Day 5 After Any Vaccination

    Solicited systemic AEs were defined as crying, decreased appetite, irritability, pyrexia (rectal temperature ≥38.0°C), somnolence, and vomiting occurring from D1 to D5 after vaccination. The investigator assessed whether these systemic AEs were related or not to the vaccines. All (related and unrelated) AEs are reported.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 5 after any vaccination

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Apr 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study start26 May 2011
  3. Primary completion13 Mar 2013
  4. Study completion13 Mar 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
1,250 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01341639
Sponsor's protocol ID
V419-007
Other IDs
2010-021490-37
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
22 Apr 2011
Last updated
30 Apr 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

Publications

  • Vesikari T, Becker T, Vertruyen AF, Poschet K, Flores SA, Pagnoni MF, Xu J, Liu GF, Stek JE, Boisnard F, Thomas S, Ziani E, Lee AW. A Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial of an Investigational Hexavalent Vaccine Given at Two, Three, Four and Twelve Months. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017 Feb;36(2):209-215. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001406.

    PubMed 27846055

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing V419, INFANRIX™ hexa and RotaTeq in people with Bacterial Infections and Virus Diseases, run by MCM Vaccines B.V..

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Vaccinated With PR5I With Acceptable Antibody (Ab) Response to Haemophilus Influenzae Type b, Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Poliovirus Types 1, 2 & 3, at 5 Months (time frame: One month after post-dose 3 of PRI5 (5 months old)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01341639, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in