Secondary HyperparathyroidismPhase 3NCT01341782
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Paricalcitol Injection With Maxacalcitol Injection in Adult Japanese Chronic Kidney Disease Subjects Receiving Hemodialysis With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
A Phase 3 study testing paricalcitol and maxacalcitol in people with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and Hemodialysis, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott) at 45 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
This study is a comparison of the efficacy and safety of paricalcitol injection with maxacalcitol injection in adult Japanese chronic kidney disease patients receiving hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Secondary Hyperparathyroidism, Hemodialysis
- What is being tested?
- paricalcitol and maxacalcitol
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 255 participants
- Where
- 45 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- May 2011to Apr 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage 5 patients undergoing dialysis with stable dialysate calcium and phosphate binders
- On three times weekly hemodialysis for at least 3 months prior with intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) greater than or equal to 300 pg/mL, adjusted normalized serum total calcium (Ca) greater than or equal to 8.4 to less than 10.2 mg/dL, serum phosphorus (P) less than or equal to 6.5 mg/dL.
Who cannot join
- Patients with a recent history of severe cardiovascular or hepatic disease, uncontrolled hypertension or uncontrolled diabetes
- Patients who have received a parathyroidectomy or ethanol infusion within the prior year
- Patients taking drugs that affect iPTH, calcium or bone metabolism
- Patients who will need to take chronic doses (greater than or equal to 2 consecutive weeks) of cytochrome P450 inhibitors (e.g., clarithromycin, grapefruit products) or inducers (e.g., carbamazepine, rifampicin)
- Female patients who are pregnant, possibly pregnant, wish to become pregnant, or participate in breastfeeding during the study period.
Trial locations and contacts
45 sites in 1 country.
45 sites in 1 country
Japan45 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 53485
Aichi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51571
Chiba
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52963
Chiba
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52966
Chiba
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51578
Gifu
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52965
Gunma
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 53782
Hadano
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 57483
Himeji
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 57487
Hokkaido
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 53484
Hyōgo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 54385
Ibaraki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51581
Kagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59164
Kagoshima
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51574
Kanagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51575
Kanagawa
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52751
Kodaira
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 62025
Koga
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 54384
Matsumoto
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52745
Midori
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51569
Mito
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52964
Nagano
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 53483
Nagano
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51582
Nagasaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 54388
Nagoya
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51576
Niigata
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51577
Niigata
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51580
Osaka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52747
Osaka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52748
Osaka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52750
Osaka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51570
Saitama
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 54387
Sakai
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52746
Sapporo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51579
Shizuoka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 62024
Takasaki
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 51572
Tokyo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52752
Tokyo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 53482
Tokyo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59162
Tokyo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59966
Tokyo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 53783
Tomakomai-shi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 54383
Toyama
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52749
Wakayama
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 52962
Yachiyoshi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59163
Yokohama
About this study
This study is a comparison of the efficacy and safety of paricalcitol injection with maxacalcitol injection in adult Japanese chronic kidney disease patients receiving hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism. The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of paricalcitol injection in reducing levels of parathyroid hormone without clinically significant hypercalcemia, compared to maxacalcitol injection.
- Conditions
- Secondary Hyperparathyroidism, Hemodialysis
- Being tested
- paricalcitol, maxacalcitol, paricalcitol placebo, maxacalcitol placebo
- Keywords
- Secondary hyperparathyroidism, Paricalcitol, Hemodialysis, Maxacalcitol
- Medical subject headings
- Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
paricalcitolDrug
Also called ABT-358, Zemplar
maxacalcitolDrug
Also called oxarol
paricalcitol placeboDrug
maxacalcitol placeboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Paricalcitol | Experimental | Participants received paricalcitol at an initial dose of 2 µg, and maxacalcitol placebo administered 3 times per week at each hemodialysis via intravenous catheter for 12 weeks. After 2 weeks the dose could be adjusted ± 1 µg based on protocol-specified criteria up to a maximum of 7 µg. Receives: Drug: paricalcitol; Drug: maxacalcitol placebo |
| Maxacalcitol | Active comparator | Participants received maxacalcitol at an initial dose of 5 µg (iPTH < 500 pg/mL at Screening) or 10 µg (iPTH ≥ 500 pg/mL at Screening), and paricalcitol placebo administered 3 times per week at each hemodialysis via intravenous catheter for 12 weeks. After 2 weeks the dose could be adjusted ± 2.5 µg based on protocol-specified criteria up to a maximum of 20 µg. Receives: Drug: maxacalcitol; Drug: paricalcitol placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Target Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) and Without Hypercalcemia
The target iPTH range was 60-180 pg/mL, based on the average of the last 3 weeks of treatment, and with no hypercalcemia during the treatment phase. Hypercalcemia was defined as at least 1 corrected calcium value > 11.0 mg/dL or at least 2 corrected calcium values ≥ 10.5 mg/dL. iPTH was measured before the first dialysis session of each week and analyzed by the central laboratory.
Measured: iPTH measured during the last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13). Calcium measured throughout the study (Weeks 1-13).
Secondary outcomes (5)
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) From Baseline and With No Hypercalcemia
The percentage of participants with greater than or equal to 50% reduction in intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) from baseline to the average of the last 3 weeks of treatment and with no hypercalcemia during the treatment phase. iPTH was measured before the first dialysis session of each week and analyzed by the central laboratory. Hypercalcemia was defined as at least 1 corrected calcium value > 11.0 mg/dL or at least 2 corrected calcium values ≥ 10.5 mg/dL.
Measured: Baseline to the last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13) for iPTH. Calcium measured throughout the study (Weeks 1-13).
Percentage of Participants With Target Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH)
The target iPTH range was 60-180 pg/mL, based on the average of the last 3 weeks of treatment. iPTH was measured before the first dialysis session of each week and analyzed by the central laboratory.
Measured: The last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13)
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) From Baseline
The percentage of participants with a greater than or equal to 50% reduction in intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) from baseline to the average of the last 3 weeks of treatment. iPTH was measured before the first dialysis session of each week and analyzed by the central laboratory.
Measured: Baseline to the last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13)
Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved iPTH Control With ≥ 50% Reduction in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) From Baseline
iPTH control was defined as a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline. iPTH was measured before the first dialysis session of the week, each week during the treatment phase and analyzed by the central laboratory.
Measured: Weeks 2 to 13
Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved iPTH Control in the Target Range of 60 to 180 pg/mL
iPTH control was defined as being within the target range of 60 to 180 pg/mL. iPTH was measured before the first dialysis session of the week, once a week during the treatment phase and analyzed by the central laboratory.
Measured: Weeks 2 to 13
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionApr 2012
- Study completionApr 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Secondary HyperparathyroidismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 255 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kazuya Kobayashi, BA, Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01341782
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M11-517
- Status last verified
- Apr 2013
- First submitted
- 25 Apr 2011
- Last updated
- 6 Jun 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jun 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Paricalcitol Injection With Maxacalcitol Injection in Adult Japanese Chronic Kidney Disease Subjects Receiving Hemodialysis With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01341782
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M11-517
- Conditions
- Secondary Hyperparathyroidism, Hemodialysis
- Keywords
- Secondary hyperparathyroidism, Paricalcitol, Hemodialysis, Maxacalcitol
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 255 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2011
- Primary completion
- Apr 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Jun 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a comparison of the efficacy and safety of paricalcitol injection with maxacalcitol injection in adult Japanese chronic kidney disease patients receiving hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism. The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of paricalcitol injection in reducing levels of parathyroid hormone without clinically significant hypercalcemia, compared to maxacalcitol injection.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Paricalcitol | Experimental | Drug: paricalcitol, Drug: maxacalcitol placeboParticipants received paricalcitol at an initial dose of 2 µg, and maxacalcitol placebo administered 3 times per week at each hemodialysis via intravenous catheter for 12 weeks. After 2 weeks the dose could be adjusted ± 1 µg based on protocol-specified criteria up to a maximum of 7 µg. |
| Maxacalcitol | Active comparator | Drug: maxacalcitol, Drug: paricalcitol placeboParticipants received maxacalcitol at an initial dose of 5 µg (iPTH < 500 pg/mL at Screening) or 10 µg (iPTH ≥ 500 pg/mL at Screening), and paricalcitol placebo administered 3 times per week at each hemodialysis via intravenous catheter for 12 weeks. After 2 weeks the dose could be adjusted ± 2.5 µg based on protocol-specified criteria up to a maximum of 20 µg. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adult Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage 5 patients undergoing dialysis with stable dialysate calcium and phosphate binders
- On three times weekly hemodialysis for at least 3 months prior with intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) greater than or equal to 300 pg/mL, adjusted normalized serum total calcium (Ca) greater than or equal to 8.4 to less than 10.2 mg/dL, serum phosphorus (P) less than or equal to 6.5 mg/dL.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with a recent history of severe cardiovascular or hepatic disease, uncontrolled hypertension or uncontrolled diabetes
- Patients who have received a parathyroidectomy or ethanol infusion within the prior year
- Patients taking drugs that affect iPTH, calcium or bone metabolism
- Patients who will need to take chronic doses (greater than or equal to 2 consecutive weeks) of cytochrome P450 inhibitors (e.g., clarithromycin, grapefruit products) or inducers (e.g., carbamazepine, rifampicin)
- Female patients who are pregnant, possibly pregnant, wish to become pregnant, or participate in breastfeeding during the study period.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| paricalcitolAlso: ABT-358, Zemplar | Drug | Paricalcitol |
| maxacalcitolAlso: oxarol | Drug | Maxacalcitol |
| paricalcitol placebo | Drug | Maxacalcitol |
| maxacalcitol placebo | Drug | Paricalcitol |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Target Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) and Without Hypercalcemia
Time frame: iPTH measured during the last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13). Calcium measured throughout the study (Weeks 1-13).
The target iPTH range was 60-180 pg/mL, based on the average of the last 3 weeks of treatment, and with no hypercalcemia during the treatment phase. Hypercalcemia was defined as at least 1 corrected calcium value > 11.0 mg/dL or at least 2 corrected calcium values ≥ 10.5 mg/dL. iPTH was measured before the first dialysis session of each week and analyzed by the central laboratory.
5 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) From Baseline and With No Hypercalcemia
Time frame: Baseline to the last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13) for iPTH. Calcium measured throughout the study (Weeks 1-13).
Percentage of Participants With Target Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH)
Time frame: The last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13)
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline to the last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13)
Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved iPTH Control With ≥ 50% Reduction in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) From Baseline
Time frame: Weeks 2 to 13
Number of Visits at Which Participants Achieved iPTH Control in the Target Range of 60 to 180 pg/mL
Time frame: Weeks 2 to 13
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jun 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of MT1013 for the Treatment of Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
Secondary Hyperparathyroidism, Chronic Kidney Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of PLS240 in Pediatric Participants With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and Chronic Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hyperparathyroidism and Dialysis Adequacy in Hemodialysis Patients
Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary, Kidney Failure, Chronic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study of Etelcalcetide in Children With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Receiving Hemodialysis
Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
RecruitingPhase 2
Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Tolerability Evaluation of CTAP101 Extended-release Capsules in Pediatric Participants
CKD Stage 3, CKD Stage 4
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kazuya Kobayashi, BA study director
AbbVie
45 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing paricalcitol and maxacalcitol in people with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and Hemodialysis, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott) at 45 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 45 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jun 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Target Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTH) and Without Hypercalcemia (time frame: iPTH measured during the last three weeks of treatment (Weeks 11, 12, and 13). Calcium measured throughout the study (Weeks 1-13).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2013; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.