AzTrials
AzTrials

Reduction in Hypertrophic Skin ScarringPhase 2NCT01346969

Safety and Efficacy Study of EXC 001 to Improve the Appearance of Scars From Prior Breast Surgery

A Phase 2 study testing EXC 001 in people with Reduction in Hypertrophic Skin Scarring, run by Pfizer at 12 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study will investigate the efficacy of various doses and regimens of EXC 001 in reducing skin scarring in subjects undergoing revision of scars from prior surgery. The study will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of EXC 001 and placebo. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Reduction in Hypertrophic Skin Scarring
What is being tested?
EXC 001
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
68 participants
Where
12 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Jun 2011to 16 Apr 2012
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects must have previous had breast surgery resulting in unacceptable scars.
  • Subject has chosen to have breast scars revised.
  • Subject must not be pregnant or lactating.

Who cannot join

  • Currently pregnant or pregnant during the 6 months, prior to inclusion in the study or lactating.
  • Participation in another clinical trial within 30 days prior to the start of the study.
  • Any other condition or prior therapy, which, in the opinion of the PI, would make the subject unsuitable for the study.

Trial locations and contacts

12 sites in 1 country.

12 sites in 1 country

United States12 sites
  • Mark L. Jewell,MD Surgery Center

    Eugene, Oregon, 97401

  • Altus Research

    Lake Worth, Florida, 33461

  • Bayside Ambulatory Center

    Miami, Florida, 33133

  • Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Miami

    Miami, Florida, 33146

  • New Jersey Plastic Surgery

    Montclair, New Jersey, 07042

  • BAXTER Plastic Surgery

    Mountlake Terrace, Washington, 98043

  • Skin Deep Laser Medical Spa

    Pasadena, California, 91105

  • Endeavor Clinical Trials,P.A.

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Texas Plastic Surgery

    San Antonio, Texas, 78240-1670

  • Body Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

    St Louis, Missouri, 63141

  • Connall Consmetic Surgery

    Tualatin, Oregon, 97062

  • Bright Health Physicans Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine

    Whittier, California, 90602

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A PHASE 2, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, WITHIN-SUBJECT CONTROLLED STUDY TO EVALUATE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VARIOUS DOSES AND REGIMENS OF EXC 001 FOR THE AMELIORATION OF SCARRING FOLLOWING REVISION OF SCARS FROM PRIOR BREAST SURGERY IN ADULT SUBJECTS (LEGACY EXCALIARD PROTOCOL # EXC 001-204)

The study will investigate the efficacy of various doses and regimens of EXC 001 in reducing skin scarring in subjects undergoing revision of scars from prior surgery. The study will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of EXC 001 and placebo.

Being tested
EXC 001
Keywords
Skin scarring, cicatrix, breast scar
Medical subject headings
Cicatrix

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EXC 001Drug

    Single-dose administered by injection four different times

  • EXC 001Drug

    Single reduced dose compared to Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Group 1

  • EXC 001Drug

    Single reduced dose compared to Groups 1 and 2 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1 and 2

  • EXC 001Drug

    Same sinlge dose as Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1, 2, and 3

Study groups in NCT01346969
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: EXC 001
Group 2Placebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: EXC 001
Group 3Placebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: EXC 001
Group 4Placebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: EXC 001

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Physician Observer Scar Assessment Score at Week 24

    Physician assessment of scar was done using a valid published 10-point rating scale. Physician rated vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area and overall opinion for scar on a score of 1 = normal skin to 10 = worst scar imaginable, where lower scores indicated better outcome. Composite score was the sum of all the scores, except the overall opinion score, and range from 6 (best score) to 60 (worst score), where lower scores indicated better outcome. Within participant treatment difference was assessed between the treatment regimens each participant received.

    Measured: Week 24

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Physician Observer Scar Assessment Score

    Physician observer scar assessment score was done using a valid published 10-point rating scale. Physician rated vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area and overall opinion for a scar on a score of 1 = normal skin to 10 = worst scar imaginable, where lower scores indicated better outcome. Composite score was the sum of all the scores except the overall opinion score and range from 6 (best score) to 60 (worst score), where lower scores indicated better outcome. Within participant treatment difference was assessed between the treatment regimens each participant received.

    Measured: Week 11, 18

  2. Expert Panel Scar Assessment Score

    Scar assessment by an expert panel was done on blinded photographs using 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS) where a score of 0 = best possible scar and a score of 100 = worst possible scar, where lower scores indicated better outcome. The rater first marked a rating for the "worse" scar and then rated the other scar. The difference between these two ratings was the "improvement of scar severity." If there was no difference, the expert could check a box to indicate that determination. This method provided information on the absolute severity of the scars as well as the differences between the two scars in the pair.

    Measured: Week 11, 18, 24

  3. Subject Observer Scar Assessment Score

    Participants rated pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, and overall opinion of scar on 10-point scale. For pain and itching associated with scar: range = 1 (no, not at all) to 10 (yes, worst imaginable) and for other parameters associated with scar compared to normal skin: range = 1 (no, same as normal skin) to 10 (yes, very different). Composite score = sum of all scores except overall opinion and range 6 (best) to 60 (worst). Scar appearance composite score = sum of all scores except overall opinion, pain and itching, range 4 (best) to 40 (worst). Within participant treatment difference was assessed between the treatment regimens each participant received. A lower score indicated a better outcome.

    Measured: Week 24

  4. Number of Participants With Physician Photonumeric Guide Scar Assessment Score

    Physician rated severity of each scar using a photonumeric guide on a scale range from 1 to 5 (where 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe). Number of participants with different ratings of scar severity were reported. Same participant was reported twice, once for each breast's scar (dosing for 1 breast = 4 times EXC 001 and for other breast = 3 times).

    Measured: Week 24

  5. Number of Participants With Participant Photonumeric Guide Scar Assessment Score

    Participants rated severity of each scar using a photonumeric guide on a scale range from 1 to 5 (where 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe). Number of participants with different ratings of scar severity were reported. Same participant was reported twice, once for each breast's scar (dosing for 1 breast = 4 times EXC 001 and for other breast = 3 times).

    Measured: Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 May 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Jun 2011
  3. Primary completion16 Apr 2012
  4. Study completion16 Apr 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
68 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01346969
Sponsor's protocol ID
EXC 001-204
Other IDs
B5301004
Status last verified
Aug 2021
First submitted
1 May 2011
Last updated
9 Sep 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing EXC 001 in people with Reduction in Hypertrophic Skin Scarring, run by Pfizer at 12 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 12 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Sep 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Physician Observer Scar Assessment Score at Week 24 (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in