Reduction in Hypertrophic Skin ScarringPhase 2NCT01346969
Safety and Efficacy Study of EXC 001 to Improve the Appearance of Scars From Prior Breast Surgery
A Phase 2 study testing EXC 001 in people with Reduction in Hypertrophic Skin Scarring, run by Pfizer at 12 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The study will investigate the efficacy of various doses and regimens of EXC 001 in reducing skin scarring in subjects undergoing revision of scars from prior surgery. The study will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of EXC 001 and placebo. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Reduction in Hypertrophic Skin Scarring
- What is being tested?
- EXC 001
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 68 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2011to 16 Apr 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must have previous had breast surgery resulting in unacceptable scars.
- Subject has chosen to have breast scars revised.
- Subject must not be pregnant or lactating.
Who cannot join
- Currently pregnant or pregnant during the 6 months, prior to inclusion in the study or lactating.
- Participation in another clinical trial within 30 days prior to the start of the study.
- Any other condition or prior therapy, which, in the opinion of the PI, would make the subject unsuitable for the study.
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country.
12 sites in 1 country
United States12 sites
Mark L. Jewell,MD Surgery Center
Eugene, Oregon, 97401
Altus Research
Lake Worth, Florida, 33461
Bayside Ambulatory Center
Miami, Florida, 33133
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Miami
Miami, Florida, 33146
New Jersey Plastic Surgery
Montclair, New Jersey, 07042
BAXTER Plastic Surgery
Mountlake Terrace, Washington, 98043
Skin Deep Laser Medical Spa
Pasadena, California, 91105
Endeavor Clinical Trials,P.A.
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Texas Plastic Surgery
San Antonio, Texas, 78240-1670
Body Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Connall Consmetic Surgery
Tualatin, Oregon, 97062
Bright Health Physicans Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
Whittier, California, 90602
About this study
Official title: A PHASE 2, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, WITHIN-SUBJECT CONTROLLED STUDY TO EVALUATE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VARIOUS DOSES AND REGIMENS OF EXC 001 FOR THE AMELIORATION OF SCARRING FOLLOWING REVISION OF SCARS FROM PRIOR BREAST SURGERY IN ADULT SUBJECTS (LEGACY EXCALIARD PROTOCOL # EXC 001-204)
The study will investigate the efficacy of various doses and regimens of EXC 001 in reducing skin scarring in subjects undergoing revision of scars from prior surgery. The study will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of EXC 001 and placebo.
- Conditions
- Reduction in Hypertrophic Skin Scarring
- Being tested
- EXC 001
- Keywords
- Skin scarring, cicatrix, breast scar
- Medical subject headings
- Cicatrix
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EXC 001Drug
Single-dose administered by injection four different times
EXC 001Drug
Single reduced dose compared to Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Group 1
EXC 001Drug
Single reduced dose compared to Groups 1 and 2 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1 and 2
EXC 001Drug
Same sinlge dose as Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1, 2, and 3
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: EXC 001 |
| Group 2 | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: EXC 001 |
| Group 3 | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: EXC 001 |
| Group 4 | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: EXC 001 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Physician Observer Scar Assessment Score at Week 24
Physician assessment of scar was done using a valid published 10-point rating scale. Physician rated vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area and overall opinion for scar on a score of 1 = normal skin to 10 = worst scar imaginable, where lower scores indicated better outcome. Composite score was the sum of all the scores, except the overall opinion score, and range from 6 (best score) to 60 (worst score), where lower scores indicated better outcome. Within participant treatment difference was assessed between the treatment regimens each participant received.
Measured: Week 24
Secondary outcomes (5)
Physician Observer Scar Assessment Score
Physician observer scar assessment score was done using a valid published 10-point rating scale. Physician rated vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area and overall opinion for a scar on a score of 1 = normal skin to 10 = worst scar imaginable, where lower scores indicated better outcome. Composite score was the sum of all the scores except the overall opinion score and range from 6 (best score) to 60 (worst score), where lower scores indicated better outcome. Within participant treatment difference was assessed between the treatment regimens each participant received.
Measured: Week 11, 18
Expert Panel Scar Assessment Score
Scar assessment by an expert panel was done on blinded photographs using 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS) where a score of 0 = best possible scar and a score of 100 = worst possible scar, where lower scores indicated better outcome. The rater first marked a rating for the "worse" scar and then rated the other scar. The difference between these two ratings was the "improvement of scar severity." If there was no difference, the expert could check a box to indicate that determination. This method provided information on the absolute severity of the scars as well as the differences between the two scars in the pair.
Measured: Week 11, 18, 24
Subject Observer Scar Assessment Score
Participants rated pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, and overall opinion of scar on 10-point scale. For pain and itching associated with scar: range = 1 (no, not at all) to 10 (yes, worst imaginable) and for other parameters associated with scar compared to normal skin: range = 1 (no, same as normal skin) to 10 (yes, very different). Composite score = sum of all scores except overall opinion and range 6 (best) to 60 (worst). Scar appearance composite score = sum of all scores except overall opinion, pain and itching, range 4 (best) to 40 (worst). Within participant treatment difference was assessed between the treatment regimens each participant received. A lower score indicated a better outcome.
Measured: Week 24
Number of Participants With Physician Photonumeric Guide Scar Assessment Score
Physician rated severity of each scar using a photonumeric guide on a scale range from 1 to 5 (where 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe). Number of participants with different ratings of scar severity were reported. Same participant was reported twice, once for each breast's scar (dosing for 1 breast = 4 times EXC 001 and for other breast = 3 times).
Measured: Week 24
Number of Participants With Participant Photonumeric Guide Scar Assessment Score
Participants rated severity of each scar using a photonumeric guide on a scale range from 1 to 5 (where 1 = minimal, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe, 5 = very severe). Number of participants with different ratings of scar severity were reported. Same participant was reported twice, once for each breast's scar (dosing for 1 breast = 4 times EXC 001 and for other breast = 3 times).
Measured: Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 May 2011 (estimated)
- Study start1 Jun 2011
- Primary completion16 Apr 2012
- Study completion16 Apr 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Reduction in Hypertrophic Skin ScarringStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01346969
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EXC 001-204
- Other IDs
- B5301004
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 1 May 2011
- Last updated
- 9 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE 2, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, WITHIN-SUBJECT CONTROLLED STUDY TO EVALUATE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF VARIOUS DOSES AND REGIMENS OF EXC 001 FOR THE AMELIORATION OF SCARRING FOLLOWING REVISION OF SCARS FROM PRIOR BREAST SURGERY IN ADULT SUBJECTS (LEGACY EXCALIARD PROTOCOL # EXC 001-204)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01346969
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EXC 001-204
- Conditions
- Reduction in Hypertrophic Skin Scarring
- Keywords
- Skin scarring, cicatrix, breast scar
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Apr 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Apr 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 May 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Sep 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study will investigate the efficacy of various doses and regimens of EXC 001 in reducing skin scarring in subjects undergoing revision of scars from prior surgery. The study will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of EXC 001 and placebo.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Active comparator | Drug: EXC 001 |
| Group 2 | Placebo comparator | Drug: EXC 001 |
| Group 3 | Placebo comparator | Drug: EXC 001 |
| Group 4 | Placebo comparator | Drug: EXC 001 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subjects must have previous had breast surgery resulting in unacceptable scars.
- Subject has chosen to have breast scars revised.
- Subject must not be pregnant or lactating.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Currently pregnant or pregnant during the 6 months, prior to inclusion in the study or lactating.
- Participation in another clinical trial within 30 days prior to the start of the study.
- Any other condition or prior therapy, which, in the opinion of the PI, would make the subject unsuitable for the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EXC 001Single-dose administered by injection four different times | Drug | Group 1 |
| EXC 001Single reduced dose compared to Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Group 1 | Drug | Group 2 |
| EXC 001Single reduced dose compared to Groups 1 and 2 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1 and 2 | Drug | Group 3 |
| EXC 001Same sinlge dose as Group 1 administered by injection at the same four time periods as Groups 1, 2, and 3 | Drug | Group 4 |
Primary outcome
Physician Observer Scar Assessment Score at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Physician assessment of scar was done using a valid published 10-point rating scale. Physician rated vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area and overall opinion for scar on a score of 1 = normal skin to 10 = worst scar imaginable, where lower scores indicated better outcome. Composite score was the sum of all the scores, except the overall opinion score, and range from 6 (best score) to 60 (worst score), where lower scores indicated better outcome. Within participant treatment difference was assessed between the treatment regimens each participant received.
5 secondary outcomes
Physician Observer Scar Assessment Score
Time frame: Week 11, 18
Expert Panel Scar Assessment Score
Time frame: Week 11, 18, 24
Subject Observer Scar Assessment Score
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants With Physician Photonumeric Guide Scar Assessment Score
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants With Participant Photonumeric Guide Scar Assessment Score
Time frame: Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Sep 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing EXC 001 in people with Reduction in Hypertrophic Skin Scarring, run by Pfizer at 12 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Sep 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Physician Observer Scar Assessment Score at Week 24 (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2021.