Esophageal CancerPhase 2/3CONCORDENCT01348217
Radiochemotherapy With and Without Dose Escalation in Patients Presenting Locally Advanced or Inoperable Carcinoma of the Oesophagus
A Phase 2/3 study testing Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph node, Boost and chemotherapy: FOLFOX 4 in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by Centre Georges Francois Leclerc at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Exclusive concomitant radiochemotherapy (RCT) at a dose of 50 Gy delivered over 5 weeks, according to the RTOG 85-01 protocol, has led to improved 5-year survival in 25% of patients, whereas no patients survived for 5 years using radiotherapy alone for patients with esophageal cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph node, Boost and chemotherapy: FOLFOX 4
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 196 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 6 May 2011to 17 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age> or = 18 and < 75 ans
- WHO Status 0, 1 and 2
- Enteral or parenteral feeding (> or = 1500 KCal) planned before the start of treatment
- Histologically proven carcinoma of the oesophagus
- Histological Types: adenocarcinomas and epidermoid carcinomas
- T3, N0-N1-N2-N3, M0 (TNM version 7)
Show all 11Show fewer
- T1-T2, N0-N1-N2-N3, M0 with a contra-indication for surgery (TNM version 7)
- Absence of trachea-oesophageal fistula
- Written informed consent
- Woman under appropriate contraception
- Patient able to understand and complete, with help if necessary, a quality of life questionnaire
Who cannot join
- Evolutive heart failure or myocardial necrosis for less than 6 months
- Myocardial infarction of more than 6 months with ischemic sequelae on myocardial scintigraphy.
- Patient cannot absorb at least 1500kcal/j before and/or during treatment
- Left heart failure.
- Stage II to IV arteriopathy in the Leriche and Fontaine classification
- Creatinine > or = 1.25x N
Show all 18Show fewer
- PNN < 1,5.109 /l
- Platelets < 100. 109 /l
- Albumin < 30g/l
- TP < 60% without anticoagulant
- VEMS < 1l
- History of cancer (except baso-cellular cutaneous epithelioma or in situ epithelioma of the cervix) that has relapsed in the 5 years preceding recruitment for the trial
- Patient already enrolled in another therapeutic trial with an experimental molecule
- Women who are pregnant or likely to be so, or who are breastfeeding
- People who are in custody or under guardianship
- Impossibility to adhere to the medical follow up for the trial for geographical,social or psychiatric reasons.
- Presence of a history of radiotherapy to the chest or upper abdomen for another tumour
- Peripheral neuropathy > or = grade 1 (CTC v3.0)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prodige 26: Radiochemotherapy With and Without Dose Escalation in Patients Presenting Locally Advanced or Inoperable Carcinoma of the Oesophagus
Exclusive concomitant radiochemotherapy (RCT) at a dose of 50 Gy delivered over 5 weeks, according to the RTOG 85-01 protocol, has led to improved 5-year survival in 25% of patients, whereas no patients survived for 5 years using radiotherapy alone for patients with esophageal cancer. Surgery, even when combined with preoperative RCT, also gives disappointing results for locally advanced tumors, which casts serious doubts on the usefulness of preoperative radiotherapy. By varying the fractionation schedule, the length of treatment or the radiotherapy volumes, it has become possible to obtain levels of loco-regional relapse of around 35 to 45%. After reviewing the results for loco-regional relapse according to the dose of radiation and the recommended radiotherapy volumes, we aimed to investigate why increasing the dose of radiation has no impact in esophageal cancers. Although INT-0123 phase III trial showed no benefit of dose escalation in esophageal cancer, some issues remain unclear as most of the patients who died in the experimental arm were treated above 50Gy. Moreover, only the tumor was treated up to 64Gy while involved nodes were not considered for dose escalation in this trial. In the RTOG 85-01phase III trial, an elective nodal irradiation from subclavicular fossa up to the esophagogastric junction was performed with a 2D technique, delivering 30Gy which could be considered as not appropriate.
In this randomized phase II/III trial, we aim to test an exclusive concomitant chemoradiotherapy for patients with non resectable esophageal cancer with a dose escalation up to 66Gy on the primary tumor as well as the involved nodes using a 3D conformal technique combined with a 40 Gy elective nodal irradiation on lymph node stations (as defined by the RTOG) with a risk of microscopic involvement ≥ 20%.
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Being tested
- Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph node, Boost, chemotherapy: FOLFOX 4
- Keywords
- unoperated cancers, oesophagus, radiochemotherapy, with and without increased doses
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph nodeRadiation
40 Gy in 20 fractions / 5 weeks, PTV (1cm in every direction)
BoostRadiation
Boost 10 Gy in 5 fr, PTV = +1cm.
BoostRadiation
Boost 26 Gy in 13 fr, PTV = +1cm.
chemotherapy: FOLFOX 4Drug
6 treatments with 4 courses concomitant to radiotherapy (D1, D15, D29, D43) arm B or 3 courses concomitant to radiotherapy (D1, D15, D29) arm A.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ARM A | Active comparator | Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph nodes:
1. Radiotherapy 40 Gy, in 20 fractions / 4 weeks: PTV (1cm in every direction)
2. Boost 10 Gy in 5 fr: PTV = +1cm.
3. Chemotherapy FOLFOX 4: 6 treatments in 3 courses concomitant to the radiotherapy (D1, D15, D29) Receives: Radiation: Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph node; Radiation: Boost; Drug: chemotherapy: FOLFOX 4 |
| ARM B | Experimental | Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph nodes:
1. 40 Gy in 20 fractions / 4 weeks, PTV (1cm in every direction)
2. Boost 26 Gy in 13 fr: PTV = +1cm.
3. Chemotherapy: FOLFOX 4: 6 treatments with 4 courses concomitant to radiotherapy (D1, D15, D29, D43). Receives: Radiation: Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph node; Radiation: Boost; Drug: chemotherapy: FOLFOX 4 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluate the rate of acute toxicity leading to cessation or temporary interruption of treatment of more than a total of 14 days or of 7 consecutive days during the whole treatment.
Measured: end of phase II (january 2014)
Evaluate the rate of completes endoscopic response at 3 months
Measured: for each patient 3 months after the end treatment
Survival without locoregional relapse at 2 years (time elapsed between date of randomisation and onset of local relapse and/or lymph node involvement)
Measured: after the end of phase III in january 2015 (anticipated)
Secondary outcomes (13)
Evaluate adherence
Measured: every 3 months until the end of phase II (january 2014)
Evaluate acute toxicity at 3 months
Measured: for each patient 3 months after the end treatment
Evaluate death due to toxicity
Measured: each month during all the study
Evaluate quality of life (QLQ-C30 [annex n° 2] + OG25 [annex n° 3])
Measured: after the completion of phase II (january 2014)
Compare according to treatment arm :Quality of life (QLQ-C30 [annex n° 2] + OG 25 [annex n° 3])
Measured: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
Compare according to treatment arm :Overall survival
Measured: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
Compare according to treatment arm :Disease-free survival
Measured: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
Compare according to treatment arm :Acute and late toxicity according to the CTCAE version 3.0 scale
Measured: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
Compare according to treatment arm :The number of palliative interventions, the time to the first palliative intervention
Measured: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
Compare according to treatment arm :The rate of dysphagia according to Atkinson's criteria
Measured: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)
Compare according to treatment arm :Survival without local recurrence in responders
Measured: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)
Compare according to treatment arm :Progression-free survival in non-responding patients
Measured: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)
Evaluation of the post-operative morbi-mortalities
Evaluation of the post-operative morbi-mortalities (in 30 days) of the group of patients which will benefit from of a surgery of the tumoral residue.
Measured: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 May 2011 (estimated)
- Study start6 May 2011
- Primary completion7 Jun 2011
- Study completion17 Dec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 196 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Georges Francois Leclerc
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute, France, UNICANCER, SFRO:French Society of Radiation Oncology, Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gilles Créhange, MD, Principal investigator, Centre Georges Francois Leclerc
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01348217
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0291-1crgi09
- Acronym
- CONCORDE
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 29 Apr 2011
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Bednarek C, Crehange G, Quivrin M, Cueff A, Vulquin N, Chevalier C, Cerda T, Petegnief Y, Mazoyer F, Maingon P, Bosset JF, Servagi Vernat S. Mapping of failures after radiochemotherapy in patients with non-metastatic esophageal cancer: A posteriori analysis of the dose distribution in the sites of loco-regional relapse. Radiother Oncol. 2015 Aug;116(2):252-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
PubMed 26228970
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prodige 26: Radiochemotherapy With and Without Dose Escalation in Patients Presenting Locally Advanced or Inoperable Carcinoma of the Oesophagus
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01348217
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CONCORDE / 0291-1crgi09
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Keywords
- unoperated cancers, oesophagus, radiochemotherapy, with and without increased doses
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 196 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Georges Francois LeclercUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute, France, UNICANCER, SFRO:French Society of Radiation Oncology, Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive
- Study start
- 6 May 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Jun 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 May 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Exclusive concomitant radiochemotherapy (RCT) at a dose of 50 Gy delivered over 5 weeks, according to the RTOG 85-01 protocol, has led to improved 5-year survival in 25% of patients, whereas no patients survived for 5 years using radiotherapy alone for patients with esophageal cancer. Surgery, even when combined with preoperative RCT, also gives disappointing results for locally advanced tumors, which casts serious doubts on the usefulness of preoperative radiotherapy. By varying the fractionation schedule, the length of treatment or the radiotherapy volumes, it has become possible to obtain levels of loco-regional relapse of around 35 to 45%. After reviewing the results for loco-regional relapse according to the dose of radiation and the recommended radiotherapy volumes, we aimed to investigate why increasing the dose of radiation has no impact in esophageal cancers. Although INT-0123 phase III trial showed no benefit of dose escalation in esophageal cancer, some issues remain unclear as most of the patients who died in the experimental arm were treated above 50Gy. Moreover, only the tumor was treated up to 64Gy while involved nodes were not considered for dose escalation in this trial. In the RTOG 85-01phase III trial, an elective nodal irradiation from subclavicular fossa up to the esophagogastric junction was performed with a 2D technique, delivering 30Gy which could be considered as not appropriate.
In this randomized phase II/III trial, we aim to test an exclusive concomitant chemoradiotherapy for patients with non resectable esophageal cancer with a dose escalation up to 66Gy on the primary tumor as well as the involved nodes using a 3D conformal technique combined with a 40 Gy elective nodal irradiation on lymph node stations (as defined by the RTOG) with a risk of microscopic involvement ≥ 20%.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ARM A | Active comparator | Radiation: Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph node, Radiation: Boost, Drug: chemotherapy: FOLFOX 4Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph nodes: 1. Radiotherapy 40 Gy, in 20 fractions / 4 weeks: PTV (1cm in every direction) 2. Boost 10 Gy in 5 fr: PTV = +1cm. 3. Chemotherapy FOLFOX 4: 6 treatments in 3 courses concomitant to the radiotherapy (D1, D15, D29) |
| ARM B | Experimental | Radiation: Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph node, Radiation: Boost, Drug: chemotherapy: FOLFOX 4Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph nodes: 1. 40 Gy in 20 fractions / 4 weeks, PTV (1cm in every direction) 2. Boost 26 Gy in 13 fr: PTV = +1cm. 3. Chemotherapy: FOLFOX 4: 6 treatments with 4 courses concomitant to radiotherapy (D1, D15, D29, D43). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Age> or = 18 and < 75 ans
- WHO Status 0, 1 and 2
- Enteral or parenteral feeding (> or = 1500 KCal) planned before the start of treatment
- Histologically proven carcinoma of the oesophagus
- Histological Types: adenocarcinomas and epidermoid carcinomas
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Evolutive heart failure or myocardial necrosis for less than 6 months
- Myocardial infarction of more than 6 months with ischemic sequelae on myocardial scintigraphy.
- Patient cannot absorb at least 1500kcal/j before and/or during treatment
- Left heart failure.
- Stage II to IV arteriopathy in the Leriche and Fontaine classification
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph node40 Gy in 20 fractions / 5 weeks, PTV (1cm in every direction) | Radiation | ARM A, ARM B |
| BoostBoost 10 Gy in 5 fr, PTV = +1cm. | Radiation | ARM A |
| BoostBoost 26 Gy in 13 fr, PTV = +1cm. | Radiation | ARM B |
| chemotherapy: FOLFOX 46 treatments with 4 courses concomitant to radiotherapy (D1, D15, D29, D43) arm B or 3 courses concomitant to radiotherapy (D1, D15, D29) arm A. | Drug | ARM A, ARM B |
Primary outcome
Evaluate the rate of acute toxicity leading to cessation or temporary interruption of treatment of more than a total of 14 days or of 7 consecutive days during the whole treatment.
Time frame: end of phase II (january 2014)
Evaluate the rate of completes endoscopic response at 3 months
Time frame: for each patient 3 months after the end treatment
Survival without locoregional relapse at 2 years (time elapsed between date of randomisation and onset of local relapse and/or lymph node involvement)
Time frame: after the end of phase III in january 2015 (anticipated)
13 secondary outcomes
Evaluate adherence
Time frame: every 3 months until the end of phase II (january 2014)
Evaluate acute toxicity at 3 months
Time frame: for each patient 3 months after the end treatment
Evaluate death due to toxicity
Time frame: each month during all the study
Evaluate quality of life (QLQ-C30 [annex n° 2] + OG25 [annex n° 3])
Time frame: after the completion of phase II (january 2014)
Compare according to treatment arm :Quality of life (QLQ-C30 [annex n° 2] + OG 25 [annex n° 3])
Time frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
Compare according to treatment arm :Overall survival
Time frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
Compare according to treatment arm :Disease-free survival
Time frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
Compare according to treatment arm :Acute and late toxicity according to the CTCAE version 3.0 scale
Time frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
Compare according to treatment arm :The number of palliative interventions, the time to the first palliative intervention
Time frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticpated)
Compare according to treatment arm :The rate of dysphagia according to Atkinson's criteria
Time frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)
Compare according to treatment arm :Survival without local recurrence in responders
Time frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)
Compare according to treatment arm :Progression-free survival in non-responding patients
Time frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)
Evaluation of the post-operative morbi-mortalities
Time frame: after the completion of phase III (january 2015-anticipated)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26228970Bednarek C, Crehange G, Quivrin M, Cueff A, Vulquin N, Chevalier C, Cerda T, Petegnief Y, Mazoyer F, Maingon P, Bosset JF, Servagi Vernat S. Mapping of failures after radiochemotherapy in patients with non-metastatic esophageal cancer: A posteriori analysis of the dose distribution in the sites of loco-regional relapse. Radiother Oncol. 2015 Aug;116(2):252-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
Related trials for Esophageal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gilles Créhange, MD principal investigator
Centre Georges Francois Leclerc
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Conformal 3D Radiotherapy with " ENI "-type prophylactic irradiation of the lymph node, Boost and chemotherapy: FOLFOX 4 in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by Centre Georges Francois Leclerc at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluate the rate of acute toxicity leading to cessation or temporary interruption of treatment of more than a total of 14 days or of 7 consecutive days during the whole treatment. (time frame: end of phase II (january 2014)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01348217, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2020.