AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Musculoskeletal PainNCT01350492

Impact of Exercise Training on Pain and Brain Function in Gulf War Veterans

A study testing Resistance Exercise Training in people with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is intended to test the influence of weight training on physical symptoms, physical activity and brain structure and function in Gulf War Veterans with chronic widespread muscle pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 35 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain
What is being tested?
Resistance Exercise Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
77 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
16 Apr 2013to 18 Jun 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 35 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Veteran of the Persian Gulf War
  • Chronic muscle pain

Who cannot join

  • Regular participation in resistance exercise
  • Color blindness
  • Claustrophobia
  • Medical conditions that could explain the Veteran's pain
  • Use of exclusionary drugs 3 weeks prior to testing
  • Major depressive disorder with melancholic features
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Substance abuse
  • Schizophrenia
  • Bipolar disorder

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53705

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study is intended to test the influence of weight training on physical symptoms, physical activity and brain structure and function in Gulf War Veterans with chronic widespread muscle pain.

Read the detailed description

Musculoskeletal pain in soldiers who returned from the Persian Gulf War is a serious problem. Numerous studies have reported musculoskeletal pain as a primary symptom of sick Gulf Veterans (GVs), with ~100,000 Veterans (~15%) reporting unresolved pain affecting their social and professional lives. Pain and other symptoms are often disabling with 1 in 7 United States Veterans seeking care for war-related health concerns and ~12% receiving disability compensation. Thus, a significant number of military personnel are no longer able to perform their duties due to medically unexplained symptoms including pain, fatigue and cognitive problems. Importantly, recent evidence suggests that chronic pain complaints in most GVs have not resolved. Similar problems appear to be on the horizon for Veterans from Operations Enduring and Iraqi Freedom. Understanding the pathophysiological consequences of chronic muscle pain is important for better determining both the efficacy and mechanism of treatments aimed at decreasing debilitating symptoms and improving physical function among Veterans coping with chronic pain.

Given the dearth of experimental data in GVs with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP), we have patterned much of our research in GVs after our research in fibromyalgia (FM), a disorder with a primary symptom of muscle and joint pain in civilians. Our work and the work of others suggest that FM pain is produced and maintained by central nervous system (CNS) dysregulation of nociceptive and pain processes. Our work also suggests that phenomena similar to those observed in FM may be occurring in GVs with CMP. Like FM patients, GVs with CMP, 1) are more sensitive to experimental pain stimuli, 2) exhibit exaggerated pain responses following acute exercise, 3) experience more muscle pain during acute exercise and 4) show augmented brain responses to both painful and non-painful experimental stimuli. These data suggest that some of the same pathophysiological mechanisms involved in FM may be maintaining chronic widespread muscle pain in GVs. Critical unanswered questions include whether promising treatments for CMP in GVs can affect laboratory measures of pain sensitivity and pain regulation and whether these changes relate to clinical improvements. We intend to begin to answer these questions by examining perceptual and brain hemodynamic responses to standardized painful stimuli and documenting their relationships to clinical outcomes before, during and upon completion of a viable, novel treatment for CMP.

There are no known efficacious treatments for GVs suffering CMP. Efficacy studies are needed to begin determining effective treatments for our Veterans following their service of our country. In FM, exercise training (both aerobic and resistance modes) is widely recognized as one of the few consistently efficacious treatments, resulting in improved well-being, increased physical function and in some cases decreased pain. One large scale treatment trial of aerobic exercise in GVs with chronic multi-symptom illness showed only modest improvements in pain, fatigue and mental health. We believe this trial had several limitations that greatly attenuated the treatment's effectiveness; consequently, it is premature to discount exercise training as a treatment for GVs with CMP. Further, we propose a novel approach that employs progressive resistance exercise training (RET) to treat GVs with CMP, while obtaining objective measures of nociceptive function, brain white matter tract pathways and total physical activity.

In addition to exercise performed as part of a structured training program, physical activity behaviors are important determinants of physical and mental health. Greater total physical activity levels are associated with increased physical function, improved mental health, increased energy and decreased symptoms of chronic pain. To our knowledge, none of the exercise training trials in FM have actually measured the impact of the exercise training on physical activity behaviors during daytime hours outside the intervention. It is plausible that the adoption of a structured exercise training program reduces physical activities performed during the rest of the day, and that this change in total physical activity could affect health outcomes. Objective measurement of physical activity will allow us to determine whether RET increases, decreases or has no impact on total physical activity levels in GVs with CMP. This will allow us to begin to characterize sub-groups who benefit the most from RET (e.g. potentially those GVs that maintain or increase their extra-intervention physical activity). Thus, in addition to supervised RET, we will objectively measure total physical activity levels outside of the intervention using accelerometers before, during and following treatment.

In summary, we propose to determine the efficacy of RET for the treatment of CMP and associated symptoms in GVs. In addition, we will assess the influence of RET on total physical activity, pain sensitivity and regulation, and brain white matter tracts. By applying functional neuroimaging techniques in conjunction with pain psychophysics we will test how the brains of Veterans with CMP respond to sensory stimuli and whether these responses can be modified by exercise training. We plan to use blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) methods to evaluate the function of brain regions involved in pain processing and control and the microstructural properties of white matter tract pathways that connect these regions. In addition, we will determine the influence of RET on extra-intervention physical activity behaviors, testing a critical and unanswered question - whether total physical activity levels change as a result of engaging in a RET program in patients with CMP. The primary goals of this project will be accomplished by comparing GVs with CMP assigned to either RET or wait-list control (WLC) in a randomized controlled trial.

Being tested
Resistance Exercise Training
Keywords
pain, brain imaging, exercise
Medical subject headings
Pain, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Resistance Exercise TrainingBehavioural

    16 weeks of resistance exercise training for the treatment of chronic muscle pain compared to wait-list control

Study groups in NCT01350492
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1ExperimentalResistance exercise training
Receives: Behavioral: Resistance Exercise Training
Arm 2No interventionWaitlist Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

    The Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire VAS ranges from 0 (No pain) to 100 (Worst possible pain). The respondent was asked to report how bad their pain has been over the past week. A higher score indicates a greater severity of pain.

    Measured: 6 weeks, 11 weeks, 17 weeks and 6 and 12 months post intervention.

  2. Physical Component Score (PCS) From the Veterans Rand 36 Item Heath Survey (VR-36).

    The PCS is a composite summary score of items from the VR-36 related to physical health. Individual subscale scores are z transformed using US normative data, multiplied by a factor score coefficient, summed, and transformed to a T-score of a distribution (Mean = 50; Standard Deviation = 10). Higher scores represent better physical health.

    Measured: 6 weeks, 11 weeks, 17 weeks and 6 and 12 months post intervention.

  3. Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC).

    The PGIC is a 7-item, self-report scale indicating the degree to which a patient has experienced any change since starting treatment. Each respondent was asked to rate "...the change (if any) in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life." related to their pain since beginning treatment. Scores range from 1, "No change (or condition has got worse)" to 7, "A great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference." A higher score indicates greater improvement.

    Measured: 6 weeks, 11 weeks, 17 weeks and 6 and 12 months post intervention.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Physical Activity (Accelerometer)

    Physical activity is measured via accelerometer. The measure is a unit-less average of the number of counts per day. The higher the count, the greater the amount and intensity of physical activity accumulated over course of the day. Values range from 30,000 (sedentary) to 800,000 (highly active).

    Measured: 6 weeks, 11 weeks, 17 weeks and 6 and 12 months post intervention.

  2. Physical Activity (Self-report)

    Total weekly self-reported physical activity was quantified using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). The outcome is expressed as the number of metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes per week. One MET is defined as the amount of oxygen consumed while sitting at rest and is equal to 3.5 ml O2 per kg body weight x min, so 1 minute spent at rest is equal to 1 MET-minute. Respondents are only asked to report on physical activity of a light intensity or greater (≥3 METs, e.g., briskly walking). Higher values equal greater amount/intensity of activity.

    Measured: 6 weeks, 11 weeks, 17 weeks and 6 and 12 months post intervention.

  3. Brain Structure: White Matter Tract Integrity, Operationalized With Fractional Anisotropy (FA) Measures at the Body of the Corpus Callosum.

    Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a scalar value between 0 and 1 that describes the degree of anisotropy of a diffusion process. In the case of brain white matter integrity, it gives us an indication of the tract integrity at a particular region within the brain. 0 would indicate flow is completely unrestricted (no integrity), 1 that all flow is in the same direction (high integrity). In this instance we are using the FA at the body of the corpus callosum as an indicator of overall brain white matter integrity.

    Measured: 6 weeks, 11 weeks, 17 weeks and 6 and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 May 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study start16 Apr 2013
  3. Primary completion18 Jun 2019
  4. Study completion18 Jun 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
77 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01350492
Sponsor's protocol ID
SPLD-004-10S
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
5 May 2011
Last updated
20 Oct 2020
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Resistance Exercise Training in people with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jul 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Visual Analog Scale (VAS). (time frame: 6 weeks, 11 weeks, 17 weeks and 6 and 12 months post intervention.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in