Diabetes MellitusPhase 2NCT01354262
Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Hemoglobin A1c
A Phase 2 study testing Vitamin D in people with Diabetes Mellitus and Vitamin D Deficiency, run by Ascension Health at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, randomized, non-blinded interventional study that will investigate the effect of a vitamin D supplement on HbA1c in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and vitamin D deficiency. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 34 to 69 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Vitamin D Deficiency
- What is being tested?
- Vitamin D
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2011to Jun 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 34 to 69 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Hgb A1c greater then 7.0
- Adults aged 34 to 69 years.
Who cannot join
- known primary hyperparathyroidism, sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, cancer, potential terminal illness,
- history of serum creatinine more than 2.0 mg/dL,
- vitamin D supplement more than 200 IU/day
- history of inflammatory bowel disease, hypercalcemia or kidney stones
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Genesys East Flint Campus Clinic
Flint, Michigan, 48503
About this study
Official title: Does Vitamin D Supplement Alter Serum Level of Glycosylated Hemoglobin in Adult Patients Between 34-74 Years With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Vitamin D Deficiency?
This is a prospective, randomized, non-blinded interventional study that will investigate the effect of a vitamin D supplement on HbA1c in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and vitamin D deficiency. The goal is to investigate whether correcting vitamin D deficiency will alter the HbA1c level in patients with type 2 DM and lower than normal vitamin D level. My hypothesis is that correcting vitamin D deficiency decreases HbA1c levels in patients with type 2 DM and vitamin D deficiency.
Read the detailed description
The total number of study subjects expected to be enrolled in this study is about 150. Study subjects included in this study will be men and women between 34-69 years of age who have been diagnosed with type 2 DM based on at least one of the American Diabetic Association criteria. These criteria are 1) fasting blood glucose higher than 125 mg/dL once with symptoms of diabetes (increased urination, increased appetite, increased thirst) or two times without symptoms; 2) random blood glucose more than 200 mg/dL once with symptoms or two times without symptoms of diabetes; 3) two hour glucose tolerance test more than 200 mg/dL once with symptoms or two times without symptoms; or 4) a random glycosylated hemoglobin more than 6.5 % two times. The age group for this research was selected based on the review of the literature on diabetes and vitamin D. Patients with known primary hyperparathyroidism, sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, cancer, potential terminal illness, history of serum creatinine more than 2.0 mg/dL, vitamin D supplement more than 200 IU/day, inflammatory bowel disease and history of hypercalcemia and kidney stones will be excluded from this study. For this project, vitamin D deficiency is defined as serum vitamin D level lower than 30 ng/mL and uncontrolled diabetes is defined as HbA1C level above 7.0. Although there is more than one recommended normal level of vit. D in the blood, most experts agree that the optimum serum level of vitamin D should be above 30 ng/mL. All subjects will be receiving standard of care for DM offered to them by his or her physician.
The investigators will investigate if different but fixed doses of vitamin D (600 IU a day vs 50,000 IU once every other week) when given to patients with type 2 DM and vitamin D deficiency have different effects on HbA1c level at the end of 24 weeks. A baseline blood draw, and fasting blood draws will be taken at 12 and 24 weeks for blood sugar levels, Vit D levels, and HgbA1c. Subjects with vitamin D deficiency will be randomly assigned to either group 1 or 2 and will be supplemented with either 600 IU of vitamin D/day (Group 1) or 50,000 IU of vitamin D every 2 weeks for 24 weeks (Groups 2). Patients who are not vitamin D deficient will be followed as the control group (Group 3) and will not be given any vitamin D supplement.Research subjects will be advised not to take any vitamin D or multivitamin while participating in this study. Subjects will be given 100 tablets of 600 IU of vitamin D in a bottle if they belong to Group 1. If they have been advised to take vitamin D 50,000 IU once every 14 days (Group 2), they will be given altogether 13 tablets of 50,000 of vitamin D each in a separate brown envelope with date written on the envelop and subjects will be asked to take vitamin D only on the date written on the envelop.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Vitamin D Deficiency
- Being tested
- Vitamin D
- Keywords
- Diabetes, Vitamin D deficiency, Hemoglobin A1c
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Vitamin D Deficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vitamin DDietary supplement
600 IU daily oral supplementation
Vitamin DDietary supplement
50,000 IU supplementation bi-monthly
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lower dose vitamin D | Experimental | Fixed daily doses of 600 IU vitamin D oral supplementation. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D |
| Higher dose vitamin D | Experimental | 50,000 IU supplementation bi-monthly. Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D |
| Control Group | No intervention | Patients will be followed from baseline to 12 and 24 week follow up. Patients do not receive any research treatment or intervention beyond the standard care of their diabetes. This group are patients with normal levels of Vitamin D. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in serum levels of Hemoglobin A1c.
Serum levels of hemoglobin A1c will be tested in the laboratory from blood draws conducted at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks from a fasting blood sample.
Measured: Change from baseline assessed at 12 wk and 24 wk.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 May 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2011
- Primary completionJan 2012
- Study completionJun 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ascension Health
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prabhat Pokhrel, Ascension Health
- Investigators
- Prabhat K Pokhrel, MD, Principal investigator, Ascension HealthKimberly R Barber, PhD, Study director, Ascension Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01354262
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GRMC 10 0023
- Status last verified
- Apr 2015
- First submitted
- 13 May 2011
- Last updated
- 23 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Avenell A, Cook JA, MacLennan GS, McPherson GC; RECORD trial group. Vitamin D supplementation and type 2 diabetes: a substudy of a randomised placebo-controlled trial in older people (RECORD trial, ISRCTN 51647438). Age Ageing. 2009 Sep;38(5):606-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp109. Epub 2009 Jul 18. No abstract available.
PubMed 19617604Aljabri KS, Bokhari SA, Khan MJ. Glycemic changes after vitamin D supplementation in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and vitamin D deficiency. Ann Saudi Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;30(6):454-8. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.72265.
PubMed 21060157
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does Vitamin D Supplement Alter Serum Level of Glycosylated Hemoglobin in Adult Patients Between 34-74 Years With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Vitamin D Deficiency?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01354262
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GRMC 10 0023
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Vitamin D Deficiency
- Keywords
- Diabetes, Vitamin D deficiency, Hemoglobin A1c
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ascension HealthIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2011
- Primary completion
- Jan 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 May 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, randomized, non-blinded interventional study that will investigate the effect of a vitamin D supplement on HbA1c in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and vitamin D deficiency. The goal is to investigate whether correcting vitamin D deficiency will alter the HbA1c level in patients with type 2 DM and lower than normal vitamin D level. My hypothesis is that correcting vitamin D deficiency decreases HbA1c levels in patients with type 2 DM and vitamin D deficiency.
Detailed description
The total number of study subjects expected to be enrolled in this study is about 150. Study subjects included in this study will be men and women between 34-69 years of age who have been diagnosed with type 2 DM based on at least one of the American Diabetic Association criteria. These criteria are 1) fasting blood glucose higher than 125 mg/dL once with symptoms of diabetes (increased urination, increased appetite, increased thirst) or two times without symptoms; 2) random blood glucose more than 200 mg/dL once with symptoms or two times without symptoms of diabetes; 3) two hour glucose tolerance test more than 200 mg/dL once with symptoms or two times without symptoms; or 4) a random glycosylated hemoglobin more than 6.5 % two times. The age group for this research was selected based on the review of the literature on diabetes and vitamin D. Patients with known primary hyperparathyroidism, sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, cancer, potential terminal illness, history of serum creatinine more than 2.0 mg/dL, vitamin D supplement more than 200 IU/day, inflammatory bowel disease and history of hypercalcemia and kidney stones will be excluded from this study. For this project, vitamin D deficiency is defined as serum vitamin D level lower than 30 ng/mL and uncontrolled diabetes is defined as HbA1C level above 7.0. Although there is more than one recommended normal level of vit. D in the blood, most experts agree that the optimum serum level of vitamin D should be above 30 ng/mL. All subjects will be receiving standard of care for DM offered to them by his or her physician.
The investigators will investigate if different but fixed doses of vitamin D (600 IU a day vs 50,000 IU once every other week) when given to patients with type 2 DM and vitamin D deficiency have different effects on HbA1c level at the end of 24 weeks. A baseline blood draw, and fasting blood draws will be taken at 12 and 24 weeks for blood sugar levels, Vit D levels, and HgbA1c. Subjects with vitamin D deficiency will be randomly assigned to either group 1 or 2 and will be supplemented with either 600 IU of vitamin D/day (Group 1) or 50,000 IU of vitamin D every 2 weeks for 24 weeks (Groups 2). Patients who are not vitamin D deficient will be followed as the control group (Group 3) and will not be given any vitamin D supplement.Research subjects will be advised not to take any vitamin D or multivitamin while participating in this study. Subjects will be given 100 tablets of 600 IU of vitamin D in a bottle if they belong to Group 1. If they have been advised to take vitamin D 50,000 IU once every 14 days (Group 2), they will be given altogether 13 tablets of 50,000 of vitamin D each in a separate brown envelope with date written on the envelop and subjects will be asked to take vitamin D only on the date written on the envelop.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lower dose vitamin D | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Vitamin DFixed daily doses of 600 IU vitamin D oral supplementation. |
| Higher dose vitamin D | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D50,000 IU supplementation bi-monthly. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –Patients will be followed from baseline to 12 and 24 week follow up. Patients do not receive any research treatment or intervention beyond the standard care of their diabetes. This group are patients with normal levels of Vitamin D. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 34 to 69 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Hgb A1c greater then 7.0
- Adults aged 34 to 69 years.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- known primary hyperparathyroidism, sarcoidosis, tuberculosis, cancer, potential terminal illness,
- history of serum creatinine more than 2.0 mg/dL,
- vitamin D supplement more than 200 IU/day
- history of inflammatory bowel disease, hypercalcemia or kidney stones
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D600 IU daily oral supplementation | Dietary supplement | Lower dose vitamin D |
| Vitamin D50,000 IU supplementation bi-monthly | Dietary supplement | Higher dose vitamin D |
Primary outcome
Change in serum levels of Hemoglobin A1c.
Time frame: Change from baseline assessed at 12 wk and 24 wk.
Serum levels of hemoglobin A1c will be tested in the laboratory from blood draws conducted at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks from a fasting blood sample.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Apr 2015.
- Background: PubMed 19617604Avenell A, Cook JA, MacLennan GS, McPherson GC; RECORD trial group. Vitamin D supplementation and type 2 diabetes: a substudy of a randomised placebo-controlled trial in older people (RECORD trial, ISRCTN 51647438). Age Ageing. 2009 Sep;38(5):606-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp109. Epub 2009 Jul 18. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21060157Aljabri KS, Bokhari SA, Khan MJ. Glycemic changes after vitamin D supplementation in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and vitamin D deficiency. Ann Saudi Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;30(6):454-8. doi: 10.4103/0256-4947.72265.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Prabhat K Pokhrel, MD principal investigator
Ascension Health
Kimberly R Barber, PhD study director
Ascension Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Vitamin D in people with Diabetes Mellitus and Vitamin D Deficiency, run by Ascension Health at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in serum levels of Hemoglobin A1c. (time frame: Change from baseline assessed at 12 wk and 24 wk.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01354262, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2015.