SepsisDYNAMICSNCT01355042
Studies of Blood DNA in Patients With Severe Infection DYNAMICS
An observational study of Sepsis and Shock, run by Alison Fox-Robichaud at 6 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
Severe sepsis (ie. life-threatening infections) is triggered by harmful microorganisms or their toxins in the blood or tissues. These harmful agents damage the lining of blood vessels which can lead to inflammation, blood clot formation, and vessel obstruction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- How many people
- 792 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to Sep 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients admitted to academic intensive care units
Who may be able to join
- admitted to an intensive care unit with either sepsis or other critical illness in previous 24 hrs
Who cannot join
- less than 18 yrs old
- not expected to survive 72 hrs
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
Canada6 sites
Alberta Health Services -- Foothills Hospital
Calgary, Alberta
Hamilton Health Sciences: General Site
Hamilton, Ontario
St Joseph's Health Care
Hamilton, Ontario
Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite Laval
Laval, Quebec
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6
About this study
Official title: DYNAMICS: DNA as a Prognostic Marker in ICU Patients Study
Severe sepsis (ie. life-threatening infections) is triggered by harmful microorganisms or their toxins in the blood or tissues. These harmful agents damage the lining of blood vessels which can lead to inflammation, blood clot formation, and vessel obstruction. In Canada, there are approximately 90,000 patients with severe sepsis each year. Of these, 30% to 50% will die. The identification of highly reliable outcome predictors in severe sepsis patients is important for several reasons including: to help describe the severity of sepsis, to classify patients for enrollment in clinical studies, and to monitor a patient's response to treatment and procedures. In the investigators lab, the investigators examined the incremental usefulness of adding multiple biomarkers to clinical scoring systems for predicting ICU mortality in patients with severe sepsis. In a preliminary study of 80 patients with sepsis, the investigators found that high levels of plasma DNA predicted ICU death better than any other clinical or biological factor. In this grant, the investigators propose to confirm these findings in an external group of 400 patients in a blinded fashion. The investigators also plan to study how plasma DNA levels change over time and whether high plasma DNA levels can be used to distinguish sepsis from other critically ill conditions. For this the investigators will compare the investigators septic patients to a cohort of 600 patients in the ICU with other conditions. The investigators believe this research has the potential to significantly improve the management and treatment of septic patients.
Read the detailed description
DYNAMICS STUDY (DNA as prognostic marker in ICU patients)
Principal Investigator: Patricia Liaw, PhD (McMaster University) Coinvestigator: Alison Fox-Robichaud, MD (McMaster University) Funding source: CIHR, 2010-2015 Budget: $794,086
One-page Protocol summary This is a new 5-year CIHR funded multi-centre prospective observational study. The overall objective is to gain insight into the pathophysiology of plasma DNA (ie. cell-free DNA) in severe sepsis patients and in other critically ill patients. In our pilot study of 80 severe sepsis patients, we found that plasma DNA had extremely high prognostic utility in this patient population. Using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves in a multivariate logistic model, we demonstrated that the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for plasma DNA is 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-1.00). Furthermore, plasma DNA levels obtained at "day 1" (ie. within 24 hours of meeting the inclusion criteria for severe sepsis) did not differ significantly from the levels measured in subsequent days. In other words, plasma DNA levels in nonsurvivors were high at "day 1" and remained high; plasma DNA levels in survivors were low at "day 1" and remained low. These finding suggests that at study inclusion for severe sepsis, the nonsurvivor patients had already reached "a point of no return" (with the standard of care available at the time the patients in the pilot study were recruited).
We plan to validate the prognostic utility of plasma DNA prospectively in an independent cohort of severe sepsis patients (n=400). We will also study a broad cohort of non-septic ICU patients (n=600) to determine if elevations in plasma DNA are specific to severe sepsis, or if it is more generally associated with high mortality risk. These non-septic ICU patients include the following: multiple trauma, shock on presentation, neurosurgery, aneurysm, intracranial hemorrhage, burns). The overall research coordinator for this study is Ellen McDonald. Participating centres include Hamilton (Patricia Liaw, Alison Fox-Robichaud, Deborah Cook), Ottawa (Laurlyn McIntyre), London (Claudio Martin, Doug Fraser), Vancouver (Peter Dodek), Toronto (John Marshall, Jennifer Tsang), Laval Quebec (Francois Lallouche), and Calgary (Brent Winston).
Clinical data will be collected daily during the first week, then once a week thereafter for the duration of the patients' stay in the ICU. Blood sample will also be collected on the same schedule except that weekend blood samples will be skipped. Freezerworks Unlimited will be used for barcoding and tracking of all plasma samples. All samples will be shipped to Hamilton for biomarker analyses. Clinical data will be managed with the iDataFax software with statistical support from Janice Pogue at the Population Health and Research Institute (Hamilton). The primary outcome is ICU mortality. The secondary outcomes are (a) the temporal relationships between plasma DNA levels and other markers of inflammation and blood clotting, and (b) the temporal relationships between plasma DNA levels and clinical parameters (e.g. SOFA and MODS scores, interventions, use of blood products and plasma expanders).
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the Hamilton Health Sciences in November 2010. Deferred consent has been approved. Although we are not performing any DNA sequencing analyses on the patient samples (ie. we are simply quantifying how much DNA is in the plasma), we are also collecting Paxgene DNA tubes in the event that future as-yet-undetermined studies require DNA for gene sequencing studies. Our local Ethics Board has approved a separate Genetic Consent form to request and extra blood samples for Paxgene DNA tubes. As of May 2012 we have completed recruitment in the sepsis arm. We are starting to close some sites to enrolment as we near study completion
- Medical subject headings
- Sepsis, Shock, Wounds and Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock | Not described | |
| Other Critical Ill with or without Shock | Severe Trauma, Neurological Injury, Other Shock (not Septic) |
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 May 2011 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completionJun 2012
- Study completionSep 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SepsisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 792 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Alison Fox-Robichaud
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Alison Fox-Robichaud, Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
- Investigators
- Patricia Liaw, PhD, Principal investigator, Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01355042
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIHR-220268
- Acronym
- DYNAMICS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2017
- First submitted
- 16 May 2011
- Last updated
- 20 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Jackson Chornenki NL, Coke R, Kwong AC, Dwivedi DJ, Xu MK, McDonald E, Marshall JC, Fox-Robichaud AE, Charbonney E, Liaw PC. Comparison of the source and prognostic utility of cfDNA in trauma and sepsis. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019 May 22;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40635-019-0251-4.
PubMed 31119471Grin PM, Dwivedi DJ, Chathely KM, Trigatti BL, Prat A, Seidah NG, Liaw PC, Fox-Robichaud AE. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-dependent uptake of Gram-positive lipoteichoic acid and Gram-negative lipopolysaccharide occurs through LDL receptor. Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 12;8(1):10496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28777-0.
PubMed 30002483
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- DYNAMICS: DNA as a Prognostic Marker in ICU Patients Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01355042
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DYNAMICS / CIHR-220268
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 792 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Alison Fox-RobichaudUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 May 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Severe sepsis (ie. life-threatening infections) is triggered by harmful microorganisms or their toxins in the blood or tissues. These harmful agents damage the lining of blood vessels which can lead to inflammation, blood clot formation, and vessel obstruction. In Canada, there are approximately 90,000 patients with severe sepsis each year. Of these, 30% to 50% will die. The identification of highly reliable outcome predictors in severe sepsis patients is important for several reasons including: to help describe the severity of sepsis, to classify patients for enrollment in clinical studies, and to monitor a patient's response to treatment and procedures. In the investigators lab, the investigators examined the incremental usefulness of adding multiple biomarkers to clinical scoring systems for predicting ICU mortality in patients with severe sepsis. In a preliminary study of 80 patients with sepsis, the investigators found that high levels of plasma DNA predicted ICU death better than any other clinical or biological factor. In this grant, the investigators propose to confirm these findings in an external group of 400 patients in a blinded fashion. The investigators also plan to study how plasma DNA levels change over time and whether high plasma DNA levels can be used to distinguish sepsis from other critically ill conditions. For this the investigators will compare the investigators septic patients to a cohort of 600 patients in the ICU with other conditions. The investigators believe this research has the potential to significantly improve the management and treatment of septic patients.
Detailed description
DYNAMICS STUDY (DNA as prognostic marker in ICU patients)
Principal Investigator: Patricia Liaw, PhD (McMaster University) Coinvestigator: Alison Fox-Robichaud, MD (McMaster University) Funding source: CIHR, 2010-2015 Budget: $794,086
One-page Protocol summary This is a new 5-year CIHR funded multi-centre prospective observational study. The overall objective is to gain insight into the pathophysiology of plasma DNA (ie. cell-free DNA) in severe sepsis patients and in other critically ill patients. In our pilot study of 80 severe sepsis patients, we found that plasma DNA had extremely high prognostic utility in this patient population. Using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves in a multivariate logistic model, we demonstrated that the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for plasma DNA is 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-1.00). Furthermore, plasma DNA levels obtained at "day 1" (ie. within 24 hours of meeting the inclusion criteria for severe sepsis) did not differ significantly from the levels measured in subsequent days. In other words, plasma DNA levels in nonsurvivors were high at "day 1" and remained high; plasma DNA levels in survivors were low at "day 1" and remained low. These finding suggests that at study inclusion for severe sepsis, the nonsurvivor patients had already reached "a point of no return" (with the standard of care available at the time the patients in the pilot study were recruited).
We plan to validate the prognostic utility of plasma DNA prospectively in an independent cohort of severe sepsis patients (n=400). We will also study a broad cohort of non-septic ICU patients (n=600) to determine if elevations in plasma DNA are specific to severe sepsis, or if it is more generally associated with high mortality risk. These non-septic ICU patients include the following: multiple trauma, shock on presentation, neurosurgery, aneurysm, intracranial hemorrhage, burns). The overall research coordinator for this study is Ellen McDonald. Participating centres include Hamilton (Patricia Liaw, Alison Fox-Robichaud, Deborah Cook), Ottawa (Laurlyn McIntyre), London (Claudio Martin, Doug Fraser), Vancouver (Peter Dodek), Toronto (John Marshall, Jennifer Tsang), Laval Quebec (Francois Lallouche), and Calgary (Brent Winston).
Clinical data will be collected daily during the first week, then once a week thereafter for the duration of the patients' stay in the ICU. Blood sample will also be collected on the same schedule except that weekend blood samples will be skipped. Freezerworks Unlimited will be used for barcoding and tracking of all plasma samples. All samples will be shipped to Hamilton for biomarker analyses. Clinical data will be managed with the iDataFax software with statistical support from Janice Pogue at the Population Health and Research Institute (Hamilton). The primary outcome is ICU mortality. The secondary outcomes are (a) the temporal relationships between plasma DNA levels and other markers of inflammation and blood clotting, and (b) the temporal relationships between plasma DNA levels and clinical parameters (e.g. SOFA and MODS scores, interventions, use of blood products and plasma expanders).
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the Hamilton Health Sciences in November 2010. Deferred consent has been approved. Although we are not performing any DNA sequencing analyses on the patient samples (ie. we are simply quantifying how much DNA is in the plasma), we are also collecting Paxgene DNA tubes in the event that future as-yet-undetermined studies require DNA for gene sequencing studies. Our local Ethics Board has approved a separate Genetic Consent form to request and extra blood samples for Paxgene DNA tubes. As of May 2012 we have completed recruitment in the sepsis arm. We are starting to close some sites to enrolment as we near study completion
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock | – | – |
| Other Critical Ill with or without Shock | – | –Severe Trauma, Neurological Injury, Other Shock (not Septic) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients admitted to academic intensive care units
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- admitted to an intensive care unit with either sepsis or other critical illness in previous 24 hrs
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- less than 18 yrs old
- not expected to survive 72 hrs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Sep 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31119471Jackson Chornenki NL, Coke R, Kwong AC, Dwivedi DJ, Xu MK, McDonald E, Marshall JC, Fox-Robichaud AE, Charbonney E, Liaw PC. Comparison of the source and prognostic utility of cfDNA in trauma and sepsis. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019 May 22;7(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40635-019-0251-4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30002483Grin PM, Dwivedi DJ, Chathely KM, Trigatti BL, Prat A, Seidah NG, Liaw PC, Fox-Robichaud AE. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-dependent uptake of Gram-positive lipoteichoic acid and Gram-negative lipopolysaccharide occurs through LDL receptor. Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 12;8(1):10496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28777-0.
Related trials for Sepsis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Extended and Intermittent Infusion of Beta-lactams in Critically Ill Paediatric Patients
Infection, Sepsis
Not yet recruiting
Double Plasma Separation and Adsorption in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (DPMAS-ACLF Trial)
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Thymosin Alpha 1 and IgM Levels in Sepsis
Sepsis, Septic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Patricia Liaw, PhD principal investigator
Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Sepsis and Shock, run by Alison Fox-Robichaud at 6 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01355042, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2017.