Coronary Artery DiseaseBIOFLOW-IINCT01356888
Study of the Orsiro Drug Eluting Stent System
A study testing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Abbott Laboratories - Xience Prime DES) and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Orsiro DES) in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Biotronik AG at 24 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the BIOTRONIK Orsiro Drug Eluting Stent System with the Abbott Xience Prime™ Drug Eluting Stent System with respect to in-stent Late Lumen Loss in a non-inferiority study in de novo coronary lesions at 9 months. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Abbott Laboratories - Xience Prime DES) and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Orsiro DES)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 452 participants
- Where
- 24 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- May 2011to Dec 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Main Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject has provided a written informed consent
- Single de novo lesion with ≥ 50% and <100% stenosis in up to 2 coronary arteries
- The target lesion length is ≤ 26 mm
- The target reference vessel diameter is ≥ 2.25 mm and ≤ 4.0 mm
Main Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of myocardial infarction within 72 hours prior to index procedure
- Unprotected left main coronary artery disease (stenosis >50%)
- Three-vessel coronary artery disease at time of procedure Thrombus in target vessel
- Target lesion involves a side branch > 2.0 mm in diameter
- Heavily calcified lesion
- Target lesion is located in or supplied by an arterial or venous bypass graft
Trial locations and contacts
24 sites in 8 countries.
24 sites in 8 countries
Germany9 sites
Heart Centre Bad Krozingen
Bad Krozingen, 79189
Heart- and Diabetescentre NRW
Bad Oeyenhausen, 32545
Segeberger Kliniken GmbH
Bad Segeberg, 23795
Charité Campus Mitte
Berlin, 10117
Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin
Berlin, 12203
Universityhospital Lübeck
Lübeck, 23538
Städtische Kliniken Neuss, Lukaskrankenhaus GmbH
Neuss, 41464
Klinikum Nuernberg Sued
Nuremberg, 90471
Universityhospital Rostock
Rostock, 18057
Switzerland5 sites
University Hospital of Bern (Inselspital)
Bern, 3010
University Hospital of Fribourg
Fribourg, 1708
University Hospital of Geneva
Geneva, 1211
Cantone Hospital of Lucerne
Lucerne, 6000
Cardiocentro Ticino
Lugano, Canton Ticino, 6900
France3 sites
Hospital Prive Jacques Cartier Massy
Massy, 91300
CHU - Hospital Arnaud de Villeneuve
Montpellier, 34295
Polyclinique les Fleurs Ollioules
Ollioules, 83192
Spain3 sites
Hospital Clínico y Provincial de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro de Majadahonda
Madrid, 28222
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Macarena
Seville, 41007
About this study
Official title: BIOTRONIK-Safety and Clinical PerFormance of the Drug ELuting Orsiro Stent in the Treatment of Subjects With Single de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions - II
The purpose of this study is to compare the BIOTRONIK Orsiro Drug Eluting Stent System with the Abbott Xience Prime™ Drug Eluting Stent System with respect to in-stent Late Lumen Loss in a non-inferiority study in de novo coronary lesions at 9 months.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Abbott Laboratories - Xience Prime DES), Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Orsiro DES)
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Abbott Laboratories - Xience Prime DES)Device
Stenting
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Orsiro DES)Device
stenting
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Abbott Laboratories - Xience Prime DES | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Abbott Laboratories - Xience Prime DES) |
| Biotronik - Orsiro DES | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Orsiro DES) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Late Lumen Loss
Measured: 9 months post index procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 May 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionJul 2013
- Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 452 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biotronik AG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stephan Windecker, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital (Inselspital) / Bern / SwitzerlandThierry Lefèvre, MD, Principal investigator, Institute Hospitalier Jaques Cartier / Massy / France
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01356888
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C1004
- Acronym
- BIOFLOW-II
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 18 May 2011
- Last updated
- 31 May 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lefevre T, Haude M, Neumann FJ, Stangl K, Skurk C, Slagboom T, Sabate M, Goicolea J, Barragan P, Cook S, Macia JC, Windecker S. Comparison of a Novel Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent: 5-Year Outcomes of the Randomized BIOFLOW-II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May 28;11(10):995-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.014.
PubMed 29798778Mankerious N, Toelg R, Abdelghani M, Garcia-Garcia HM, Farhan S, Allali A, Windecker S, Lefevre T, Saito S, Kandzari DE, Waksman R, Richardt G, Hemetsberger R. Impact of coronary artery tortuosity on outcomes following stenting with newer-generation drug-eluting stents. An analysis of the randomized BIOFLOW trials. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2025 Aug;78(8):682-691. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2024.12.009. Epub 2025 Jan 4. English, Spanish.
PubMed 39761745Hemetsberger R, Mankerious N, Toelg R, Abdelghani M, Farhan S, Garcia-Garica HM, Allali A, Windecker S, Lefevre T, Saito S, Kandzari D, Waksman R, Richardt G. Patients with higher-atherothrombotic risk vs. lower-atherothrombotic risk undergoing coronary intervention with newer-generation drug-eluting stents: an analysis from the randomized BIOFLOW trials. Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Sep;112(9):1278-1287. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02205-4. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
PubMed 37062047Hemetsberger R, Abdelghani M, Toelg R, Garcia-Garcia HM, Farhan S, Mankerious N, Elbasha K, Allali A, Windecker S, Lefevre T, Saito S, Kandzari D, Waksman R, Richardt G. Complex vs. non-complex percutaneous coronary intervention with newer-generation drug-eluting stents: an analysis from the randomized BIOFLOW trials. Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Jul;111(7):795-805. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-01994-4. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
PubMed 35212802Hemetsberger R, Abdelghani M, Toelg R, Mankerious N, Allali A, Garcia-Garcia HM, Windecker S, Lefevre T, Saito S, Slagboom T, Kandzari D, Koolen J, Waksman R, Richardt G. Impact of Coronary Calcification on Clinical Outcomes After Implantation of Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jun 15;10(12):e019815. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019815. Epub 2021 May 29.
PubMed 34056911Dan K, Garcia-Garcia HM, Kolm P, Windecker S, Saito S, Kandzari DE, Waksman R. Comparison of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Calcified or Small Vessel Lesions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep;13(9):e009189. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009189. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
PubMed 32895004Toelg R, Slagboom T, Waltenberger J, Lefevre T, Saito S, Kandzari DE, Koolen J, Richardt G. Individual patient data analysis of the BIOFLOW study program comparing safety and efficacy of a bioresorbable polymer sirolimus eluting stent to a durable polymer everolimus eluting stent. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 1;98(5):848-856. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29254. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
PubMed 32890442Windecker S, Haude M, Neumann FJ, Stangl K, Witzenbichler B, Slagboom T, Sabate M, Goicolea J, Barragan P, Cook S, Piot C, Richardt G, Merkely B, Schneider H, Bilger J, Erne P, Waksman R, Zaugg S, Juni P, Lefevre T. Comparison of a novel biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: results of the randomized BIOFLOW-II trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Feb;8(2):e001441. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001441.
PubMed 25634905
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- BIOTRONIK-Safety and Clinical PerFormance of the Drug ELuting Orsiro Stent in the Treatment of Subjects With Single de Novo Coronary Artery Lesions - II
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01356888
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BIOFLOW-II / C1004
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 452 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Biotronik AGIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2011
- Primary completion
- Jul 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 May 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the BIOTRONIK Orsiro Drug Eluting Stent System with the Abbott Xience Prime™ Drug Eluting Stent System with respect to in-stent Late Lumen Loss in a non-inferiority study in de novo coronary lesions at 9 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Abbott Laboratories - Xience Prime DES | Active comparator | Device: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Abbott Laboratories - Xience Prime DES) |
| Biotronik - Orsiro DES | Experimental | Device: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Orsiro DES) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Abbott Laboratories - Xience Prime DES)Stenting | Device | Abbott Laboratories - Xience Prime DES |
| Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Orsiro DES)stenting | Device | Biotronik - Orsiro DES |
Primary outcome
Late Lumen Loss
Time frame: 9 months post index procedure
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 29798778Lefevre T, Haude M, Neumann FJ, Stangl K, Skurk C, Slagboom T, Sabate M, Goicolea J, Barragan P, Cook S, Macia JC, Windecker S. Comparison of a Novel Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With a Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent: 5-Year Outcomes of the Randomized BIOFLOW-II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May 28;11(10):995-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39761745Mankerious N, Toelg R, Abdelghani M, Garcia-Garcia HM, Farhan S, Allali A, Windecker S, Lefevre T, Saito S, Kandzari DE, Waksman R, Richardt G, Hemetsberger R. Impact of coronary artery tortuosity on outcomes following stenting with newer-generation drug-eluting stents. An analysis of the randomized BIOFLOW trials. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2025 Aug;78(8):682-691. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2024.12.009. Epub 2025 Jan 4. English, Spanish.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37062047Hemetsberger R, Mankerious N, Toelg R, Abdelghani M, Farhan S, Garcia-Garica HM, Allali A, Windecker S, Lefevre T, Saito S, Kandzari D, Waksman R, Richardt G. Patients with higher-atherothrombotic risk vs. lower-atherothrombotic risk undergoing coronary intervention with newer-generation drug-eluting stents: an analysis from the randomized BIOFLOW trials. Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Sep;112(9):1278-1287. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02205-4. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35212802Hemetsberger R, Abdelghani M, Toelg R, Garcia-Garcia HM, Farhan S, Mankerious N, Elbasha K, Allali A, Windecker S, Lefevre T, Saito S, Kandzari D, Waksman R, Richardt G. Complex vs. non-complex percutaneous coronary intervention with newer-generation drug-eluting stents: an analysis from the randomized BIOFLOW trials. Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Jul;111(7):795-805. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-01994-4. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34056911Hemetsberger R, Abdelghani M, Toelg R, Mankerious N, Allali A, Garcia-Garcia HM, Windecker S, Lefevre T, Saito S, Slagboom T, Kandzari D, Koolen J, Waksman R, Richardt G. Impact of Coronary Calcification on Clinical Outcomes After Implantation of Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jun 15;10(12):e019815. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019815. Epub 2021 May 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32895004Dan K, Garcia-Garcia HM, Kolm P, Windecker S, Saito S, Kandzari DE, Waksman R. Comparison of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Calcified or Small Vessel Lesions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep;13(9):e009189. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009189. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32890442Toelg R, Slagboom T, Waltenberger J, Lefevre T, Saito S, Kandzari DE, Koolen J, Richardt G. Individual patient data analysis of the BIOFLOW study program comparing safety and efficacy of a bioresorbable polymer sirolimus eluting stent to a durable polymer everolimus eluting stent. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 1;98(5):848-856. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29254. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25634905Windecker S, Haude M, Neumann FJ, Stangl K, Witzenbichler B, Slagboom T, Sabate M, Goicolea J, Barragan P, Cook S, Piot C, Richardt G, Merkely B, Schneider H, Bilger J, Erne P, Waksman R, Zaugg S, Juni P, Lefevre T. Comparison of a novel biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: results of the randomized BIOFLOW-II trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Feb;8(2):e001441. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001441.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephan Windecker, MD principal investigator
University Hospital (Inselspital) / Bern / Switzerland
Thierry Lefèvre, MD principal investigator
Institute Hospitalier Jaques Cartier / Massy / France
24 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Abbott Laboratories - Xience Prime DES) and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Orsiro DES) in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Biotronik AG at 24 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 24 sites in Germany, Switzerland, France, Spain, Austria and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Late Lumen Loss (time frame: 9 months post index procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01356888, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2018.