Aneurysmal Subarachnoid HemorrhageABCSAHNCT01357057
Admission Bio-clinical Score to Predict One-year Outcomes in Coiled Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH)
An observational study of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to develop and validate a predictive score of 1-year outcomes in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients receiving aneurism coiling. Using our database filled up prospectively, the investigators plan to collect clinical, biological and radiological admission characteristics of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
- How many people
- 530 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Jan 2003to Sep 2011
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult coiled SAH after ICU admission
Who may be able to join
- Older than 18 years old
- Acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
- Decision of coiling intervention
- Admission and ICU management in our center.
Who cannot join
- Other intervention than coiling (surgery of nor surgery, nor coiling intervention)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site
Neuro-réanimation Chirurgicale Babinski - Hopital Pitié Salpetriere
Paris, 75013
About this study
Official title: Biological Markers in Patients Presenting Aneurism Coiling for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
The goal of this observational study is to develop and validate a predictive score of 1-year outcomes in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients receiving aneurism coiling.
Using our database filled up prospectively, the investigators plan to collect clinical, biological and radiological admission characteristics of coiled SAH cases and their 1-year Rankin outcome score during 5 years (2003-2007). The investigators plan to confirm our score in a validation cohort (from 2008 to 2009).
Read the detailed description
The investigators plan to screen all patients who were consecutively admitted from January 1, 2003 to our neurosurgical intensive care unit after a clinical diagnosis of SAH confirmed by cerebral angiography and treated with a coiling procedure. Patients for whom a decision was made by the treating physician to either forego any invasive treatment or to perform open surgical clipping were excluded. Clinical, biological and radiological characteristics will be recorded during the course of hospitalization. This observational study will be performed according to standard procedure.
Admission characteristics. At admission, the investigators plan to anonymously record age, sex, GCS, presence of motor deficit, presence of clinical seizure and WFNS score. The GCS refers to the value at admission before any treatment with sedative drugs. The cohort was divided into two groups, an admission coma group for patients with GCS<13 (WFNS 4 or 5), and a non-coma group for patients with GCS313 (WFNS 1 to 3).
Admission biological sampling of venous blood are routinely performed to measure S100beta and troponin per standard clinical practice in our ICU. Troponin I and S100beta levels will be considered high for values higher than 0.5 mg/L (corresponding to 5 times the maximum normal range) to be consistent with previous studies and to ensure high specificity.
Admission radiological characteristics are obtained from the admission CT-scan and the initial angiogram. The CT-scan will be reviewed by a neuro-radiologist and classified according to the modified Fisher score. Hydrocephalus and intraventricular hemorrhage at admission were also registered. Aneurysm site and number of aneurysms were obtained from the initial angiogram.
ICU Management. The ICU management will not be modified for this study. Briefly, a central venous line and an arterial catheter are routinely inserted at admission before coiling. An external ventricular drain (EVD) is inserted in patients with CT evidence of hydrocephalus, WFNS grade between III to V, or a transcranial Doppler pulsatility index greater than 1.2, suggestive of increased intracranial pressure. The EVD is routinely connected to an external pressure strain gauge to monitor ICP according to a recently published protocol.
After coiling, systolic arterial blood pressure is maintained between 130 and 150 mm Hg by a titration of IV norepinephrine. ICP elevation higher than 20 mm Hg is treated by cerebra-spinal fluid drainage, increased minute volume by mechanical ventilation when not already implemented, deepening of sedation and, rarely, moderate hypothermia (target core temperature between 35.5 to 36.5°C). An additional CT was performed whenever the clinical status deteriorated. Acetaminophen and insulin are used as needed to avoid hyperthermia and hyperglycemia, respectively. For ventilated patients, arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2) was maintained between 35 and 40 mm Hg and peripheral oxygen saturation (SPO2) above 97%, when deemed possible. Oral or enteral nutrition was started as soon as possible. All patients received seizure prophylaxis from admission.
Cerebral Vasospasm management strategy. The investigators used our standard strategy for cerebral vasospasm management. To summarize, all patients receive IV nimodipine at 2 mg/hr from admission until the end of the second week after admission, except during periods of uncontrolled hypoxia and ICP elevation. Patients are switched to oral nimodipine (60 mg orally every 4 hrs) at the time of ICU discharge to the ward, for a total treatment period of 21 days. The neurologic and hemodynamic status are assessed at least every 4 hours. TCD was performed at least once a day during the first 10 days. In unsedated patients, in the event of clinical deterioration, new symptoms (uncontrolled cephalalgia, confusion, seizure, motor deficit), mean TCD velocities above 120 cm/s or a greater than 50 cm/s change in mean TCD velocity (ref) or after an increase in S100(, cerebral angiogram was performed. As is standard practice, cerebral angiogram was performed after CT-scan ruled out other complications. In sedated patients, since clinical symptoms are not able to be assessed; only the TCD and S100( criteria were used to evaluate the need for cerebral angiogram. Each vasospasm episode is treated by intra-arterial nimodipine administration, followed by intra-arterial milrinone 2 mg if necessary (ref), and repeated each day if necessary. Mechanical angioplasty is used as second-line treatment when necessary. Additionally, hypertensive therapy is reinforced with a target SBP between 160 and 180 mm Hg. Occurrences of vasospasm and of ischemic vasospasm (neurological symptoms directly linked to artery spasm) were recorded.
Clinical Outcome. The primary outcome is systematically assessed using the Rankin outcome scale at ICU-discharge and then 6 months and 1 year later. The GCS, WFNS, and the Fisher scores will be compared to our new score for the prediction of 1-year mortality and 1-year full recovery (defined as Rankin 0 to 1).
Statistical Analysis. To identify factors that independently predicted 1-year mortality, multivariable analysis will be performed using backward stepwise logistic regression to enter variables that yielded p < 0.05 in the univariate analyses. The investigators will use an approximation of the odds ratio from the significant values of the stepwise logistic regression to construct a new score.
The investigators will construct receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of this score and compared the areas under the ROC curves (AUC) of the ABC, the WFNS, the GCS and the Fisher score to predict 1-year mortality and 1-year full recovery (defined as Rankin score 0-1). Statistical analyses will be performed using STATA version 11 (StataCorp, Texas, USA).
- Conditions
- Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
- Keywords
- Medical records, Outcome scale, Biological biomarkers
- Medical subject headings
- Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Derivation cohort | Arm 1: Derivation cohort (from 2003 to 2007) | |
| Validation cohort | Arm 2: Validation cohort (from 2008 to 2009) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mortality and Full recovery (Rankin 0-1) at ICU discharge
Measured: at 1-year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Early cerebral complication
aneurysm rebleeding, intracranial hypertension, acute hydrocephalus, coiling complication
Measured: Within the first week of ICU stay
Delayed cerebral complication
vasospasm, ischemic vasospasms and chronic
Measured: for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks with an expected maximum of 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 May 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2003
- Primary completionJan 2011
- Study completionSep 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid HemorrhageStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 530 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Louis Puybasset, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01357057
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P04806
- Acronym
- ABCSAH
- Status last verified
- May 2011
- First submitted
- 16 May 2011
- Last updated
- 29 Dec 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Degos V, Apfel CC, Sanchez P, Colonne C, Renuit I, Clarencon F, Nouet A, Boch AL, Pourmohamad T, Kim H, Gourraud PA, Young WL, Puybasset L. An admission bioclinical score to predict 1-year outcomes in patients undergoing aneurysm coiling. Stroke. 2012 May;43(5):1253-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.638197. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
PubMed 22363051
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Dec 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Biological Markers in Patients Presenting Aneurism Coiling for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01357057
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ABCSAH / P04806
- Conditions
- Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
- Keywords
- Medical records, Outcome scale, Biological biomarkers
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 530 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2003
- Primary completion
- Jan 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 May 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to develop and validate a predictive score of 1-year outcomes in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients receiving aneurism coiling.
Using our database filled up prospectively, the investigators plan to collect clinical, biological and radiological admission characteristics of coiled SAH cases and their 1-year Rankin outcome score during 5 years (2003-2007). The investigators plan to confirm our score in a validation cohort (from 2008 to 2009).
Detailed description
The investigators plan to screen all patients who were consecutively admitted from January 1, 2003 to our neurosurgical intensive care unit after a clinical diagnosis of SAH confirmed by cerebral angiography and treated with a coiling procedure. Patients for whom a decision was made by the treating physician to either forego any invasive treatment or to perform open surgical clipping were excluded. Clinical, biological and radiological characteristics will be recorded during the course of hospitalization. This observational study will be performed according to standard procedure.
Admission characteristics. At admission, the investigators plan to anonymously record age, sex, GCS, presence of motor deficit, presence of clinical seizure and WFNS score. The GCS refers to the value at admission before any treatment with sedative drugs. The cohort was divided into two groups, an admission coma group for patients with GCS<13 (WFNS 4 or 5), and a non-coma group for patients with GCS313 (WFNS 1 to 3).
Admission biological sampling of venous blood are routinely performed to measure S100beta and troponin per standard clinical practice in our ICU. Troponin I and S100beta levels will be considered high for values higher than 0.5 mg/L (corresponding to 5 times the maximum normal range) to be consistent with previous studies and to ensure high specificity.
Admission radiological characteristics are obtained from the admission CT-scan and the initial angiogram. The CT-scan will be reviewed by a neuro-radiologist and classified according to the modified Fisher score. Hydrocephalus and intraventricular hemorrhage at admission were also registered. Aneurysm site and number of aneurysms were obtained from the initial angiogram.
ICU Management. The ICU management will not be modified for this study. Briefly, a central venous line and an arterial catheter are routinely inserted at admission before coiling. An external ventricular drain (EVD) is inserted in patients with CT evidence of hydrocephalus, WFNS grade between III to V, or a transcranial Doppler pulsatility index greater than 1.2, suggestive of increased intracranial pressure. The EVD is routinely connected to an external pressure strain gauge to monitor ICP according to a recently published protocol.
After coiling, systolic arterial blood pressure is maintained between 130 and 150 mm Hg by a titration of IV norepinephrine. ICP elevation higher than 20 mm Hg is treated by cerebra-spinal fluid drainage, increased minute volume by mechanical ventilation when not already implemented, deepening of sedation and, rarely, moderate hypothermia (target core temperature between 35.5 to 36.5°C). An additional CT was performed whenever the clinical status deteriorated. Acetaminophen and insulin are used as needed to avoid hyperthermia and hyperglycemia, respectively. For ventilated patients, arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2) was maintained between 35 and 40 mm Hg and peripheral oxygen saturation (SPO2) above 97%, when deemed possible. Oral or enteral nutrition was started as soon as possible. All patients received seizure prophylaxis from admission.
Cerebral Vasospasm management strategy. The investigators used our standard strategy for cerebral vasospasm management. To summarize, all patients receive IV nimodipine at 2 mg/hr from admission until the end of the second week after admission, except during periods of uncontrolled hypoxia and ICP elevation. Patients are switched to oral nimodipine (60 mg orally every 4 hrs) at the time of ICU discharge to the ward, for a total treatment period of 21 days. The neurologic and hemodynamic status are assessed at least every 4 hours. TCD was performed at least once a day during the first 10 days. In unsedated patients, in the event of clinical deterioration, new symptoms (uncontrolled cephalalgia, confusion, seizure, motor deficit), mean TCD velocities above 120 cm/s or a greater than 50 cm/s change in mean TCD velocity (ref) or after an increase in S100(, cerebral angiogram was performed. As is standard practice, cerebral angiogram was performed after CT-scan ruled out other complications. In sedated patients, since clinical symptoms are not able to be assessed; only the TCD and S100( criteria were used to evaluate the need for cerebral angiogram. Each vasospasm episode is treated by intra-arterial nimodipine administration, followed by intra-arterial milrinone 2 mg if necessary (ref), and repeated each day if necessary. Mechanical angioplasty is used as second-line treatment when necessary. Additionally, hypertensive therapy is reinforced with a target SBP between 160 and 180 mm Hg. Occurrences of vasospasm and of ischemic vasospasm (neurological symptoms directly linked to artery spasm) were recorded.
Clinical Outcome. The primary outcome is systematically assessed using the Rankin outcome scale at ICU-discharge and then 6 months and 1 year later. The GCS, WFNS, and the Fisher scores will be compared to our new score for the prediction of 1-year mortality and 1-year full recovery (defined as Rankin 0 to 1).
Statistical Analysis. To identify factors that independently predicted 1-year mortality, multivariable analysis will be performed using backward stepwise logistic regression to enter variables that yielded p < 0.05 in the univariate analyses. The investigators will use an approximation of the odds ratio from the significant values of the stepwise logistic regression to construct a new score.
The investigators will construct receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of this score and compared the areas under the ROC curves (AUC) of the ABC, the WFNS, the GCS and the Fisher score to predict 1-year mortality and 1-year full recovery (defined as Rankin score 0-1). Statistical analyses will be performed using STATA version 11 (StataCorp, Texas, USA).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Derivation cohort | – | –Arm 1: Derivation cohort (from 2003 to 2007) |
| Validation cohort | – | –Arm 2: Validation cohort (from 2008 to 2009) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult coiled SAH after ICU admission
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Older than 18 years old
- Acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
- Decision of coiling intervention
- Admission and ICU management in our center.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Other intervention than coiling (surgery of nor surgery, nor coiling intervention)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Mortality and Full recovery (Rankin 0-1) at ICU discharge
Time frame: at 1-year
2 secondary outcomes
Early cerebral complication
Time frame: Within the first week of ICU stay
Delayed cerebral complication
Time frame: for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks with an expected maximum of 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Dec 2011.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22363051Degos V, Apfel CC, Sanchez P, Colonne C, Renuit I, Clarencon F, Nouet A, Boch AL, Pourmohamad T, Kim H, Gourraud PA, Young WL, Puybasset L. An admission bioclinical score to predict 1-year outcomes in patients undergoing aneurysm coiling. Stroke. 2012 May;43(5):1253-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.638197. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
Related trials for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
TicAgreLor Versus Placebo to Prevent Cerebral ISCHemia in anEuRysmal Low Grade SAH A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Study
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal, Brain Ischemia
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
RecruitingObservational study
Determining the Clinical Impact and Prevalence of Hemorrhagic Subtypes in Perimesencephalic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Spontaneous, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Induced Suppression of Platelet Activity in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Management-2 (iSPASM-2)
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
RecruitingPhase 2
Infusion of Lidocaine and Steroids in Middle Meningeal Artery for Pain in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal, Headache
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Louis Puybasset, MD, PhD principal investigator
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mortality and Full recovery (Rankin 0-1) at ICU discharge (time frame: at 1-year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01357057, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2011.