Prostatic NeoplasmsNCT01357512
Evaluation of Diagnostic Value of 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Suspected Prostate Cancer
A study testing magnetic resonance imaging, Siemens in people with Prostatic Neoplasms, run by University of Oulu at 1 site in Finland.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of suspected prostate cancer. Men with suspected prostate cancer based on serum prostate-specific antigen antigen (PSA) value are included. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 72 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- magnetic resonance imaging, Siemens
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 130 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFinland
- Study dates
- Apr 2011to Sep 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 72 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Informed consent
- Suspected prostate cancer based on PSA value (total PSA 2,5-10 ng/ml and PSA free to total ratio <=0.15, or total PSA 10-20 ng/ml)
- PSA and serum creatinine measurement less than 60 days before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies
- No evidence of PSA increase by non-cancerous factors (catheterization, bladder stones, urinary tract infection including bacterial prostatitis)
Who cannot join
- Previous prostate biopsies
- Previous prostate surgery
- Contraindication for MRI (such as pacemaker or inner ear implant)
- Claustrophobia
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <40 ml/min
- Suspected clinical T3-T4 prostate cancer based on digital rectal examination
- Contraindication for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies
- body mass index >30
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Diagnostic Value of 3-T MRI in Suspected Prostate Cancer
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of suspected prostate cancer. Men with suspected prostate cancer based on serum prostate-specific antigen antigen (PSA) value are included. Men are randomized to pre-biopsy MRI or no MRI groups in ratio 1:1. Standard transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies will be taken in addition to extra biopsies from lesions suspicious based on MRI evaluation. Hypothesis is that more prostate cancers will be found after MRI evaluation.
- Conditions
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Being tested
- magnetic resonance imaging, Siemens
- Keywords
- prostate cancer diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging, prostate biopsy
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
magnetic resonance imaging, SiemensDevice
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of prostate with Siemens 3-tesla device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MRI done | Experimental | Subjects with MRI prior prostate biopsies Receives: Device: magnetic resonance imaging, Siemens |
| no MRI | No intervention | No MRI before prostate biopsies |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Prostate Cancer Diagnoses in MRI and no MRI Groups
The number of patients with confirmed prostate cancer among men with MRI performed before biopsies are compared to the number of patients with prostate cancer confirmed in prostate biopsies without MRI. The number patients with prostate cancer are counted as total from cancers detected in random biopsies and in biopsies targeted based on suspicious MRI findings in MRI group, and from random biopsies in no MRI group.
Measured: at the end of the study (up to 1 year)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of Positive Biopsies in MRI and no MRI Groups
The number of biopsies with histology confirming prostate cancer are compared between MRI and no MRI groups. This measure will clarify if prostate cancer can be diagnosed more accurately, i.e. more biopsies with confirmed prostate cancer, after MRI. Ten or 12 biopsies will be taken from prostates below 30 grams, or equal or above 30 grams, respectively.
Measured: at the end of the study (up to 1 year)
Proportion of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancers Detected in MRI and no MRI Groups
Number of clinically significant prostate cancers detected with and without MRI. Clinically significant prostate cancer is determined by the Gleason grading and be the number of cancer-positive biopsy cores.
Measured: at the end of the study (up to 1 year)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 May 2011 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2011
- Primary completionDec 2014
- Study completionSep 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostatic NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oulu
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Oulu University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Markku Vaarala, MD, PhD, University of Oulu
- Investigators
- Markku Vaarala, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Oulu University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01357512
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PRODIAMRI
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 14 Apr 2011
- Last updated
- 2 Dec 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Tonttila PP, Lantto J, Paakko E, Piippo U, Kauppila S, Lammentausta E, Ohtonen P, Vaarala MH. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial. Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 May 29.
PubMed 26033153
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Dec 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Diagnostic Value of 3-T MRI in Suspected Prostate Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01357512
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRODIAMRI
- Conditions
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Keywords
- prostate cancer diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging, prostate biopsy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OuluUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Oulu University Hospital
- Study start
- Apr 2011
- Primary completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 May 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Jun 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of suspected prostate cancer. Men with suspected prostate cancer based on serum prostate-specific antigen antigen (PSA) value are included. Men are randomized to pre-biopsy MRI or no MRI groups in ratio 1:1. Standard transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies will be taken in addition to extra biopsies from lesions suspicious based on MRI evaluation. Hypothesis is that more prostate cancers will be found after MRI evaluation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MRI done | Experimental | Device: magnetic resonance imaging, SiemensSubjects with MRI prior prostate biopsies |
| no MRI | No intervention | –No MRI before prostate biopsies |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 72 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Informed consent
- Suspected prostate cancer based on PSA value (total PSA 2,5-10 ng/ml and PSA free to total ratio <=0.15, or total PSA 10-20 ng/ml)
- PSA and serum creatinine measurement less than 60 days before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies
- No evidence of PSA increase by non-cancerous factors (catheterization, bladder stones, urinary tract infection including bacterial prostatitis)
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Previous prostate biopsies
- Previous prostate surgery
- Contraindication for MRI (such as pacemaker or inner ear implant)
- Claustrophobia
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <40 ml/min
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| magnetic resonance imaging, SiemensMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of prostate with Siemens 3-tesla device | Device | MRI done |
Primary outcome
Number of Prostate Cancer Diagnoses in MRI and no MRI Groups
Time frame: at the end of the study (up to 1 year)
The number of patients with confirmed prostate cancer among men with MRI performed before biopsies are compared to the number of patients with prostate cancer confirmed in prostate biopsies without MRI. The number patients with prostate cancer are counted as total from cancers detected in random biopsies and in biopsies targeted based on suspicious MRI findings in MRI group, and from random biopsies in no MRI group.
2 secondary outcomes
Number of Positive Biopsies in MRI and no MRI Groups
Time frame: at the end of the study (up to 1 year)
Proportion of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancers Detected in MRI and no MRI Groups
Time frame: at the end of the study (up to 1 year)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Dec 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26033153Tonttila PP, Lantto J, Paakko E, Piippo U, Kauppila S, Lammentausta E, Ohtonen P, Vaarala MH. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial. Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 May 29.
Related trials for Prostatic Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Markku Vaarala, MD PhD principal investigator
Oulu University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing magnetic resonance imaging, Siemens in people with Prostatic Neoplasms, run by University of Oulu at 1 site in Finland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jun 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Prostate Cancer Diagnoses in MRI and no MRI Groups (time frame: at the end of the study (up to 1 year)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01357512, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2017.