Acute Myeloid LeukemiaPhase 2NCT01358734
A Study Being Conducted at Multiple Locations to Compare Safety and Efficacy of Three Different Regimens; (1) High-Dose Lenalidomide; (2) Lenalidomide + Azacitidine; or (3) Azacitidine in Subjects ≥ 65 Years With Newly-Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Phase 2 study testing Azacitidine and Lenalidomide in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, run by Celgene at 30 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The study aim is to compare safety and efficacy of high-dose lenalidomide regimen, sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide and an azacitidine in persons ≥65 years with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- Azacitidine and Lenalidomide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 88 participants
- Where
- 30 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 27 Apr 2012to 15 May 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), AML with antecedent hematologic disorder or therapy-related AML
- Male or female subjects aged ≥ 65
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
- White blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 10 x 10⁹/L at screening
Who cannot join
- Previous treatment with azacitidine, decitabine, cytarabine or lenalidomide
- Previous cytotoxic or biologic treatment of any kind for AML or prior use of targeted therapy agents.
- Suspected or proven acute promyelocytic leukemia
- Prior bone marrow or stem cell transplantation
- Candidate for allogeneic bone marrow or stem cell transplantation
- AML antecedent hematologic disorder such as chronic myelogenous leukemia or myeloproliferative neoplasms
- Presence of malignant disease within the previous 12 months with exceptions
Trial locations and contacts
30 sites in 2 countries.
30 sites in 2 countries
United States24 sites
(115) University of Colorado Anschultz Cancer Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
(150) Billings Clinic
Billings, Montana, 59101
(140) Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
(105) University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390-9179
(205) Greenville Hospital System
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
(180) University of California, San Diego
La Jolla, California, 92093-0960
(240) Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
(175) University Lousiville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
(135) University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
(145) Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
(235) University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
(230) Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
(195) Tulane University Hospital Tulane Cancer Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70072
(165) Mount Sinai Medical Center New York
New York, New York, 10029-65749
(215) Hematology Oncology Medical Group
Orange, California, 92868
(160) The Western Pennsylvania Hospital- Cancer Institute
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224-1791
(130) UC Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95857
(155) Cancer Care Centers of South Texas
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
(200) Coastal Integrative Cancer Care
San Luis Obispo, California, 93401
(120) Avera Cancer Institute
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105
(100) Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110-1093
(125) University of Stanford
Stanford, California, 94305
(210) University of Arizona Cancer Center
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
(185) The University of Kansas Cancer Center
Westwood, Kansas, 66205
Canada6 sites
(402) Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
(405) University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z1
(403) Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre - VG Site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9
(404) The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
(400) Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
(401) Cancer Care Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Study of a Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Regimen or a Sequential Azacitidine (Vidaza®) Plus Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Regimen Versus an Azacitidine (Vidaza®) Regimen for Therapy of Older Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
The study aim is to compare safety and efficacy of high-dose lenalidomide regimen, sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide and an azacitidine in persons ≥65 years with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Read the detailed description
On September 11, 2013, randomization into the continuous 50 mg lenalidomide only arm was temporarily suspended based on review of the data from the first 13 participants and a high rate of discontinuation (11/13 participants). The Data Monitoring Committee assessed the study data on September 20, 2013 and reported no safety concerns. The high rate of early discontinuation is inconsistent with the treatment duration required for testing the study primary endpoint of survival at one year. Consequently, Celgene has decided not to reopen the lenalidomide only arm.
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
- Being tested
- Azacitidine, Lenalidomide, Best Supportive Care (BSC)
- Keywords
- AML, elderly, acute myelogenous leukemia, vidaza, azacitidine, elderly AML, revlimid, lenalidomide
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AzacitidineDrug
Also called Vidaza
Azacitidine at 75 mg/m^2/day subcutaneous on Days 1-7
LenalidomideDrug
Also called Revlimid®, CC-5013
Lenalidomide 50 mg PO daily x 28 days for the first 2 cycles then 25 mg PO daily x 28 days for the next 2 cycles followed by continuous 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 10 mg PO daily
Best Supportive Care (BSC)Other
The use of BSC was considered as concomitant treatment and must be documented as concomitant medication.
BSC includes, but is not limited to, treatment with Red Blood Celll (RBC) or whole blood transfusions, fresh frozen plasma transfusions, platelet transfusions, antibiotic or antifungal therapy, and nutritional support
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lenalidomide in combination with azacitidine | Experimental | Repeated cycles of azacitidine 75 mg/m^2/day subcutaneous (SC) on Days 1-7 and lenalidomide 50 mg/day by mouth (PO) on Days 8-28 followed by a 14-day break plus best supportive care Receives: Drug: Azacitidine; Drug: Lenalidomide; Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC) |
| Lenalidomide - single agent | Experimental | Lenalidomide 50 mg PO daily for 28 days for the first 2 cycles and lenalidomide 25 mg daily for 28 days for the next 2 cycles followed by continuous 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 10 mg daily PO plus best supportive care Receives: Drug: Lenalidomide; Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC) |
| Azacitidine-single agent | Experimental | Repeated cycles of azacitidine 75mg/m^2/day subcutaneous on Days 1-7 followed by a 21-day break plus best supportive care Receives: Drug: Azacitidine; Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Kaplan Meier Estimates for One Year Survival
One-year survival rate was defined as all deaths within one year from the date of randomization. All others censored at the at year 1 or date of discontinuation
Measured: Up to 24 months
Overall Survival
Overall Survival reported at the end of the study are for those participants who were alive at the end of the study
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of the first documented date of progression or date of death of any cause; the overall median follow-up for survivng participants was 4.1 months (range 0.2 to 54.8 months)
Secondary outcomes (10)
Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response or Morphologic Incomplete Response.
Based on IWG response criteria for AML. Complete remission (CR), morphologic complete remission (CR) was defined as < 5% bone marrow blasts, an absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1 x 10^9/L, platelets ≥100 x 10^9/L, and transfusion independence (no transfusions for 1 week prior to each assessment). No duration of these findings is required for confirmation of this response.
Morphologic CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) was defined as a morphologic complete remission but the ANC count may be <1 x 10^9/L and/or the platelet count may be <100 x 10^9/L. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.
Measured: Complete Response or Morphologic Incomplete Response data not analyzed.
Duration of Remission (DoR)
Duration of remission was defined as the time from the date of CR or CRi until relapse. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.
Measured: Duration of Remission (DoR) time frame not analyzed.
Cytogenetic Complete Remission Rate (CRc)
The CRc response category is comprised of the subset of participants who had abnormal cytogenetics at baseline and subsequently achieved CR during treatment in conjunction with a reversion to a normal karyotype. For the primary definition of CRc, a normal karyotype is defined as no clonal abnormalities after review of at least 10 metaphases using conventional cytogenetic techniques. Cytogenetic complete remission rate (CRc) 1) CR criteria met AND 2) Abnormal karyotype present at baseline AND 3) Reversion to normal karyotype at time of CR (based on ≥ 10 metaphases), where date of cytogenetic sample = date of BM sample used for the CR assessment. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.
Measured: Cytogenetic Complete Remission timeframe was not analyzed.
Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response Rate (CR +CRi+ PR)
Morphologic complete remission (CR) is defined as a leukemia-free state defined as less than 5% blasts in a one marrow aspirate with spicules and with at least 200 nucleated cells (there should be no blasts with auer rods) and ANC of ≥ 1 x 10^9/L, a platelet count ≥ 100 x 10^9/L, no transfusions for 1 week prior to each assessment. No duration of these findings is required for confirmation of this response. Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery was defined as a morphologic complete remission but the ANC may be < 1 x 10^9/L and/or the platelet count may be < 100 x 10^9/L. Partial remission was defined as an ANC > 1 x 10^9/L and platelet count ≥ 100 x 10^9/L with a > 50% decrease in the percentage of bone marrow blasts to 5% to 25% (a blast count value of ≤ 5% may also be considered a partial remission if auer rods are present). Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.
Measured: Overall response rate time frame was not analyzed.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of documented disease progression or death from any cause whichever occurred first. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.
Measured: Progression-Free survival data and time frame was not analyzed.
Event-Free Survival (EFS)
EFS was defined as the interval from the date of randomization to the date of treatment failure, progressive disease, relapse after CR or CRi, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.
Measured: Event-Free survival time was not analyzed.
Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)
RFS is defined only for subjects that achieve CR and CRi and is measured as the interval from that date to the date of disease relapse, death from any cause, whichever occurs first, censoring at the last visit date for subjects alive in continuous CR/CRi. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.
Measured: Relapse-Free survival time frame was not analyzed.
Percentage of Participants With 30-Day Treatment-Related Mortality
30-day mortality rate was defined as death from any cause within 30 days after first dose.
Measured: 30 days
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
TEAEs were defined as those events that started on or after the first day of study drug up until 28 days after the last dose of study drug; Serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. Severity of AEs were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); and according to the scale: Grade (Gr) 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death
Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug; up to 15 May 2018
Number of Participants With a Second Primary Malignancy
Second primary malignancies were monitored as events of interest and reported as serious adverse events regardless of the treatment arm the participant was enrolled in.
Measured: From randomization of the last participant up to a minimum of 4 years following discontinuation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 May 2011 (estimated)
- Study start27 Apr 2012
- Primary completion19 May 2015
- Study completion15 May 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Myeloid LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by CelgeneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 88 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Celgene
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Robert Gale, MD, Study director, Celgene
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01358734
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CC-5013-AML-001
- Status last verified
- Jun 2019
- First submitted
- 19 May 2011
- Last updated
- 25 Jun 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Medeiros BC, McCaul K, Kambhampati S, Pollyea DA, Kumar R, Silverman LR, Kew A, Saini L, Beach CL, Vij R, Wang X, Zhong J, Gale RP. Randomized study of continuous high-dose lenalidomide, sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide, or azacitidine in persons 65 years and over with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2018 Jan;103(1):101-106. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.172353. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
PubMed 29097499
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jun 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Study of a Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Regimen or a Sequential Azacitidine (Vidaza®) Plus Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Regimen Versus an Azacitidine (Vidaza®) Regimen for Therapy of Older Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01358734
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CC-5013-AML-001
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myelogenous Leukemia
- Keywords
- AML, elderly, acute myelogenous leukemia, vidaza, azacitidine, elderly AML, revlimid, lenalidomide
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 88 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CelgeneIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 27 Apr 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 May 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 May 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 May 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 4 Jul 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study aim is to compare safety and efficacy of high-dose lenalidomide regimen, sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide and an azacitidine in persons ≥65 years with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Detailed description
On September 11, 2013, randomization into the continuous 50 mg lenalidomide only arm was temporarily suspended based on review of the data from the first 13 participants and a high rate of discontinuation (11/13 participants). The Data Monitoring Committee assessed the study data on September 20, 2013 and reported no safety concerns. The high rate of early discontinuation is inconsistent with the treatment duration required for testing the study primary endpoint of survival at one year. Consequently, Celgene has decided not to reopen the lenalidomide only arm.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lenalidomide in combination with azacitidine | Experimental | Drug: Azacitidine, Drug: Lenalidomide, Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC)Repeated cycles of azacitidine 75 mg/m^2/day subcutaneous (SC) on Days 1-7 and lenalidomide 50 mg/day by mouth (PO) on Days 8-28 followed by a 14-day break plus best supportive care |
| Lenalidomide - single agent | Experimental | Drug: Lenalidomide, Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC)Lenalidomide 50 mg PO daily for 28 days for the first 2 cycles and lenalidomide 25 mg daily for 28 days for the next 2 cycles followed by continuous 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 10 mg daily PO plus best supportive care |
| Azacitidine-single agent | Experimental | Drug: Azacitidine, Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC)Repeated cycles of azacitidine 75mg/m^2/day subcutaneous on Days 1-7 followed by a 21-day break plus best supportive care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), AML with antecedent hematologic disorder or therapy-related AML
- Male or female subjects aged ≥ 65
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
- White blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 10 x 10⁹/L at screening
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Previous treatment with azacitidine, decitabine, cytarabine or lenalidomide
- Previous cytotoxic or biologic treatment of any kind for AML or prior use of targeted therapy agents.
- Suspected or proven acute promyelocytic leukemia
- Prior bone marrow or stem cell transplantation
- Candidate for allogeneic bone marrow or stem cell transplantation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AzacitidineAlso: VidazaAzacitidine at 75 mg/m^2/day subcutaneous on Days 1-7 | Drug | Azacitidine-single agent, Lenalidomide in combination with azacitidine |
| LenalidomideAlso: Revlimid®, CC-5013Lenalidomide 50 mg PO daily x 28 days for the first 2 cycles then 25 mg PO daily x 28 days for the next 2 cycles followed by continuous 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 10 mg PO daily | Drug | Lenalidomide - single agent, Lenalidomide in combination with azacitidine |
| Best Supportive Care (BSC)The use of BSC was considered as concomitant treatment and must be documented as concomitant medication. BSC includes, but is not limited to, treatment with Red Blood Celll (RBC) or whole blood transfusions, fresh frozen plasma transfusions, platelet transfusions, antibiotic or antifungal therapy, and nutritional support | Other | Azacitidine-single agent, Lenalidomide - single agent, Lenalidomide in combination with azacitidine |
Primary outcome
Kaplan Meier Estimates for One Year Survival
Time frame: Up to 24 months
One-year survival rate was defined as all deaths within one year from the date of randomization. All others censored at the at year 1 or date of discontinuation
Overall Survival
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of the first documented date of progression or date of death of any cause; the overall median follow-up for survivng participants was 4.1 months (range 0.2 to 54.8 months)
Overall Survival reported at the end of the study are for those participants who were alive at the end of the study
10 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response or Morphologic Incomplete Response.
Time frame: Complete Response or Morphologic Incomplete Response data not analyzed.
Duration of Remission (DoR)
Time frame: Duration of Remission (DoR) time frame not analyzed.
Cytogenetic Complete Remission Rate (CRc)
Time frame: Cytogenetic Complete Remission timeframe was not analyzed.
Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response Rate (CR +CRi+ PR)
Time frame: Overall response rate time frame was not analyzed.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Progression-Free survival data and time frame was not analyzed.
Event-Free Survival (EFS)
Time frame: Event-Free survival time was not analyzed.
Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)
Time frame: Relapse-Free survival time frame was not analyzed.
Percentage of Participants With 30-Day Treatment-Related Mortality
Time frame: 30 days
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug; up to 15 May 2018
Number of Participants With a Second Primary Malignancy
Time frame: From randomization of the last participant up to a minimum of 4 years following discontinuation
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jun 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29097499Medeiros BC, McCaul K, Kambhampati S, Pollyea DA, Kumar R, Silverman LR, Kew A, Saini L, Beach CL, Vij R, Wang X, Zhong J, Gale RP. Randomized study of continuous high-dose lenalidomide, sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide, or azacitidine in persons 65 years and over with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2018 Jan;103(1):101-106. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.172353. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
Related trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 3
Pivotal Open-label Phase 3 Clinical Study of QTX-2101 in Adult Patients With Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia
Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL), Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia
Active, not recruiting
High-Intensity Parent Intervention Program in Improving Learning and School Functioning in Latino Children With Acute Leukemia or Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 1
Study of REM-422 in Patients With AML or Higher Risk MDS
Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Higher Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Not yet recruiting
my.naviGATE: A Guide to After-Treatment Effects for Adolescents and Young Adults
Sarcoma, Osteosarcoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Robert Gale, MD study director
Celgene
30 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Azacitidine and Lenalidomide in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, run by Celgene at 30 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 30 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Jul 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Kaplan Meier Estimates for One Year Survival (time frame: Up to 24 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01358734, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2019.