AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Myeloid LeukemiaPhase 2NCT01358734

A Study Being Conducted at Multiple Locations to Compare Safety and Efficacy of Three Different Regimens; (1) High-Dose Lenalidomide; (2) Lenalidomide + Azacitidine; or (3) Azacitidine in Subjects ≥ 65 Years With Newly-Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

A Phase 2 study testing Azacitidine and Lenalidomide in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, run by Celgene at 30 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study aim is to compare safety and efficacy of high-dose lenalidomide regimen, sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide and an azacitidine in persons ≥65 years with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
What is being tested?
Azacitidine and Lenalidomide
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
88 participants
Where
30 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
27 Apr 2012to 15 May 2018
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), AML with antecedent hematologic disorder or therapy-related AML
  • Male or female subjects aged ≥ 65
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
  • White blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 10 x 10⁹/L at screening

Who cannot join

  • Previous treatment with azacitidine, decitabine, cytarabine or lenalidomide
  • Previous cytotoxic or biologic treatment of any kind for AML or prior use of targeted therapy agents.
  • Suspected or proven acute promyelocytic leukemia
  • Prior bone marrow or stem cell transplantation
  • Candidate for allogeneic bone marrow or stem cell transplantation
  • AML antecedent hematologic disorder such as chronic myelogenous leukemia or myeloproliferative neoplasms
  • Presence of malignant disease within the previous 12 months with exceptions

Trial locations and contacts

30 sites in 2 countries.

30 sites in 2 countries

United States24 sites
  • (115) University of Colorado Anschultz Cancer Center

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • (150) Billings Clinic

    Billings, Montana, 59101

  • (140) Rush University Medical Center

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • (105) University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75390-9179

  • (205) Greenville Hospital System

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29605

  • (180) University of California, San Diego

    La Jolla, California, 92093-0960

  • (240) Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • (175) University Lousiville

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40202

  • (135) University of Wisconsin

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

  • (145) Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Miami Beach, Florida, 33140

  • (235) University of Minnesota

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

  • (230) Tennessee Oncology, PLLC

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • (195) Tulane University Hospital Tulane Cancer Center

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70072

  • (165) Mount Sinai Medical Center New York

    New York, New York, 10029-65749

  • (215) Hematology Oncology Medical Group

    Orange, California, 92868

  • (160) The Western Pennsylvania Hospital- Cancer Institute

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224-1791

  • (130) UC Davis Medical Center

    Sacramento, California, 95857

  • (155) Cancer Care Centers of South Texas

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • (200) Coastal Integrative Cancer Care

    San Luis Obispo, California, 93401

  • (120) Avera Cancer Institute

    Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105

  • (100) Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110-1093

  • (125) University of Stanford

    Stanford, California, 94305

  • (210) University of Arizona Cancer Center

    Tucson, Arizona, 85724

  • (185) The University of Kansas Cancer Center

    Westwood, Kansas, 66205

Other trials in United States

Canada6 sites
  • (402) Tom Baker Cancer Centre

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2

  • (405) University of Alberta Hospital

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z1

  • (403) Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre - VG Site

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9

  • (404) The Ottawa Hospital

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6

  • (400) Princess Margaret Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9

  • (401) Cancer Care Manitoba

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Study of a Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Regimen or a Sequential Azacitidine (Vidaza®) Plus Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Regimen Versus an Azacitidine (Vidaza®) Regimen for Therapy of Older Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The study aim is to compare safety and efficacy of high-dose lenalidomide regimen, sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide and an azacitidine in persons ≥65 years with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Read the detailed description

On September 11, 2013, randomization into the continuous 50 mg lenalidomide only arm was temporarily suspended based on review of the data from the first 13 participants and a high rate of discontinuation (11/13 participants). The Data Monitoring Committee assessed the study data on September 20, 2013 and reported no safety concerns. The high rate of early discontinuation is inconsistent with the treatment duration required for testing the study primary endpoint of survival at one year. Consequently, Celgene has decided not to reopen the lenalidomide only arm.

Being tested
Azacitidine, Lenalidomide, Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Keywords
AML, elderly, acute myelogenous leukemia, vidaza, azacitidine, elderly AML, revlimid, lenalidomide
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AzacitidineDrug

    Also called Vidaza

    Azacitidine at 75 mg/m^2/day subcutaneous on Days 1-7

  • LenalidomideDrug

    Also called Revlimid®, CC-5013

    Lenalidomide 50 mg PO daily x 28 days for the first 2 cycles then 25 mg PO daily x 28 days for the next 2 cycles followed by continuous 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 10 mg PO daily

  • Best Supportive Care (BSC)Other

    The use of BSC was considered as concomitant treatment and must be documented as concomitant medication.

    BSC includes, but is not limited to, treatment with Red Blood Celll (RBC) or whole blood transfusions, fresh frozen plasma transfusions, platelet transfusions, antibiotic or antifungal therapy, and nutritional support

Study groups in NCT01358734
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lenalidomide in combination with azacitidineExperimentalRepeated cycles of azacitidine 75 mg/m^2/day subcutaneous (SC) on Days 1-7 and lenalidomide 50 mg/day by mouth (PO) on Days 8-28 followed by a 14-day break plus best supportive care
Receives: Drug: Azacitidine; Drug: Lenalidomide; Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Lenalidomide - single agentExperimentalLenalidomide 50 mg PO daily for 28 days for the first 2 cycles and lenalidomide 25 mg daily for 28 days for the next 2 cycles followed by continuous 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 10 mg daily PO plus best supportive care
Receives: Drug: Lenalidomide; Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Azacitidine-single agentExperimentalRepeated cycles of azacitidine 75mg/m^2/day subcutaneous on Days 1-7 followed by a 21-day break plus best supportive care
Receives: Drug: Azacitidine; Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Kaplan Meier Estimates for One Year Survival

    One-year survival rate was defined as all deaths within one year from the date of randomization. All others censored at the at year 1 or date of discontinuation

    Measured: Up to 24 months

  2. Overall Survival

    Overall Survival reported at the end of the study are for those participants who were alive at the end of the study

    Measured: From date of randomization until the date of the first documented date of progression or date of death of any cause; the overall median follow-up for survivng participants was 4.1 months (range 0.2 to 54.8 months)

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response or Morphologic Incomplete Response.

    Based on IWG response criteria for AML. Complete remission (CR), morphologic complete remission (CR) was defined as < 5% bone marrow blasts, an absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1 x 10^9/L, platelets ≥100 x 10^9/L, and transfusion independence (no transfusions for 1 week prior to each assessment). No duration of these findings is required for confirmation of this response.

    Morphologic CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) was defined as a morphologic complete remission but the ANC count may be <1 x 10^9/L and/or the platelet count may be <100 x 10^9/L. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

    Measured: Complete Response or Morphologic Incomplete Response data not analyzed.

  2. Duration of Remission (DoR)

    Duration of remission was defined as the time from the date of CR or CRi until relapse. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

    Measured: Duration of Remission (DoR) time frame not analyzed.

  3. Cytogenetic Complete Remission Rate (CRc)

    The CRc response category is comprised of the subset of participants who had abnormal cytogenetics at baseline and subsequently achieved CR during treatment in conjunction with a reversion to a normal karyotype. For the primary definition of CRc, a normal karyotype is defined as no clonal abnormalities after review of at least 10 metaphases using conventional cytogenetic techniques. Cytogenetic complete remission rate (CRc) 1) CR criteria met AND 2) Abnormal karyotype present at baseline AND 3) Reversion to normal karyotype at time of CR (based on ≥ 10 metaphases), where date of cytogenetic sample = date of BM sample used for the CR assessment. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

    Measured: Cytogenetic Complete Remission timeframe was not analyzed.

  4. Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response Rate (CR +CRi+ PR)

    Morphologic complete remission (CR) is defined as a leukemia-free state defined as less than 5% blasts in a one marrow aspirate with spicules and with at least 200 nucleated cells (there should be no blasts with auer rods) and ANC of ≥ 1 x 10^9/L, a platelet count ≥ 100 x 10^9/L, no transfusions for 1 week prior to each assessment. No duration of these findings is required for confirmation of this response. Morphologic complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery was defined as a morphologic complete remission but the ANC may be < 1 x 10^9/L and/or the platelet count may be < 100 x 10^9/L. Partial remission was defined as an ANC > 1 x 10^9/L and platelet count ≥ 100 x 10^9/L with a > 50% decrease in the percentage of bone marrow blasts to 5% to 25% (a blast count value of ≤ 5% may also be considered a partial remission if auer rods are present). Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

    Measured: Overall response rate time frame was not analyzed.

  5. Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of documented disease progression or death from any cause whichever occurred first. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

    Measured: Progression-Free survival data and time frame was not analyzed.

  6. Event-Free Survival (EFS)

    EFS was defined as the interval from the date of randomization to the date of treatment failure, progressive disease, relapse after CR or CRi, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

    Measured: Event-Free survival time was not analyzed.

  7. Relapse-Free Survival (RFS)

    RFS is defined only for subjects that achieve CR and CRi and is measured as the interval from that date to the date of disease relapse, death from any cause, whichever occurs first, censoring at the last visit date for subjects alive in continuous CR/CRi. Because of a high rate of discontinuation in one of the investigational cohorts, secondary endpoints were not analyzed.

    Measured: Relapse-Free survival time frame was not analyzed.

  8. Percentage of Participants With 30-Day Treatment-Related Mortality

    30-day mortality rate was defined as death from any cause within 30 days after first dose.

    Measured: 30 days

  9. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)

    TEAEs were defined as those events that started on or after the first day of study drug up until 28 days after the last dose of study drug; Serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. Severity of AEs were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); and according to the scale: Grade (Gr) 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death

    Measured: From the first dose of study drug up to 28 days after the last dose of study drug; up to 15 May 2018

  10. Number of Participants With a Second Primary Malignancy

    Second primary malignancies were monitored as events of interest and reported as serious adverse events regardless of the treatment arm the participant was enrolled in.

    Measured: From randomization of the last participant up to a minimum of 4 years following discontinuation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 May 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study start27 Apr 2012
  3. Primary completion19 May 2015
  4. Study completion15 May 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
88 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01358734
Sponsor's protocol ID
CC-5013-AML-001
Status last verified
Jun 2019
First submitted
19 May 2011
Last updated
25 Jun 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Medeiros BC, McCaul K, Kambhampati S, Pollyea DA, Kumar R, Silverman LR, Kew A, Saini L, Beach CL, Vij R, Wang X, Zhong J, Gale RP. Randomized study of continuous high-dose lenalidomide, sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide, or azacitidine in persons 65 years and over with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2018 Jan;103(1):101-106. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.172353. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

    PubMed 29097499

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Azacitidine and Lenalidomide in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia, run by Celgene at 30 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 30 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Jul 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Kaplan Meier Estimates for One Year Survival (time frame: Up to 24 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01358734, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT01358734 | AzTrials