AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-melanoma Skin CancerPhase 2NCT01359735

Healing Effects of HP802-247 Versus Antibiotic Ointment in Mohs Micrographic Surgery Patients

A Phase 2 study testing HP802-247 and Bacitracin Ointment in people with Non-melanoma Skin Cancer, run by Healthpoint at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study compares HP802-247 versus an antibiotic ointment for healing the wound after Mohs surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Non-melanoma Skin Cancer
What is being tested?
HP802-247 and Bacitracin Ointment
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
8 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2011to May 2012
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Provide informed consent.
  • Age ≥ 18 years and of either sex.
  • Type I, II, or III skin as assessed by the Fitzpatrick Scale.
  • Willing to comply with protocol instructions, including allowing all study assessments.
  • Scheduled to have head or neck non-melanoma skin cancers removed by Mohs micrographic surgery with final wound size of 8 mm to 20 mm in diameter or with 8 mm to 20 mm long axis if not circular.
  • Acceptable state of health and nutrition, in the opinion of the Investigator.

Who cannot join

  • History of anaphylaxis, serum sickness, or erythema multiforme reaction to aprotinin, bovine serum albumin or bovine serum proteins, penicillin, streptomycin, or amphotericin B.
  • Therapy with blood-thinning agents including aspirin within 14 days of the Baseline Visit (these may be resumed post-surgery).
  • Subjects with platelet or coagulation disorders.
  • Therapy with another investigational agent within thirty (30) days of Screening, or during the study.
  • Current systemic therapy with cytotoxic drugs.
  • Current therapy with chronic (> 10 days) oral corticosteroids.
  • In the opinion of the Investigator the subject has a current life expectancy of less than 1 year.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Derm Research PLC

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40217

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase II Randomized, Open-label Study Investigating the Healing Effects of HP802-247 Versus Antibiotic Ointment in Mohs Micrographic Surgery Patients

This study compares HP802-247 versus an antibiotic ointment for healing the wound after Mohs surgery.

Being tested
HP802-247, Bacitracin Ointment
Keywords
Wound, non-melanoma skin cancer, Mohs micrographic surgery, Head or neck
Medical subject headings
Wounds and Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HP802-247Biological

    High dose HP 802-247, applied at each visit (Week 1-13) or until healed

  • Bacitracin OintmentBiological

    One dose of Bacitracin ointment consists of 50 units/1 gram. This will be applied daily for 12 weeks (or until healed).

Study groups in NCT01359735
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HP802-247Active comparatorallogeneic, growth arrested keratinocytes and fibroblasts: final concentration of 5.0 M cells/mL with a ratio of 1:9 keratinocytes:fibroblasts, applied weekly
Receives: Biological: HP802-247
Bacitracin OintmentActive comparatorbacitracin antibiotic ointment
Receives: Biological: Bacitracin Ointment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Primary Efficacy Measure Was the Investigator's Global Assessment of Healing (IGAH).

    The IGAH is a four-point scale based on the following assessment scores: 0 = not effective, 1 = slightly effective, 2 = moderately effective, 3 = very effective. The descriptive statistics for both a continuous variable and a categorical variable were summarized for IGAH by treatment week and treatment endpoint. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to test the difference in IGAH score between HP802-247 and bacitracin ointment for each treatment week and treatment endpoint. Since this was a small and exploratory study, the P-value of a 1-sided test was reported.

    Measured: 13 weeks- The IGAH was measured at study Weeks 4 and 13

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. The Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure at Each Evaluation Visit.

    Complete wound closure was assessed at each evaluation visit.

    Measured: Over 12 weeks or until wound closure, which ever occurred first. Following completion of treatment subjects were followed for a further 4 weeks

  2. Time in Days to Wound Closure

    The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate the mean time in days to complete wound closure.

    Measured: Over the 12 week treatment period

  3. Investigator Reported Signs and Symptoms

    Investigator reported signs and/or symptoms, based on the following 12 items, each scored as none (=0), mild (=1), moderate (=2), or severe (=3): Erythema, Erosion, Ulceration, Swelling, Scarring, Infection, Crusting, Necrosis, Peeling, Contact Dermatitis, Hyper/Hypopigmentation. Item scores were averaged.

    Measured: At each evaluation visit: Weeks 3 and 12 post-surgery.

  4. Subject Reported Signs and Symptoms

    Subjects reported signs or symptoms, based on the following 6 items, each scored as none (=0), mild (=1), moderate (=2), or severe (=3): irritation, itchiness, burning, tenderness, pain, and stinging. Item scores were averaged.

    Measured: At each evaluation visit: Weeks 3, and 12 post-surgery.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 May 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2011
  3. Primary completionNov 2011
  4. Study completionMay 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
8 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01359735
Sponsor's protocol ID
802-247-09-022
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
23 May 2011
Last updated
29 Jun 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing HP802-247 and Bacitracin Ointment in people with Non-melanoma Skin Cancer, run by Healthpoint at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Jun 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Primary Efficacy Measure Was the Investigator's Global Assessment of Healing (IGAH). (time frame: 13 weeks- The IGAH was measured at study Weeks 4 and 13). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in