Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 3ARCHER 1009NCT01360554
ARCHER 1009 : A Study Of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) Vs. Erlotinib In The Treatment Of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) and Active Comparator (erlotinib) in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Pfizer at 224 sites in 23 countries.
Trial summary
This is a multinational, multicenter, randomized,double-blinded, Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of treatment with PF-00299804 to treatment with erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, previously treated with at least one prior regimen. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) and Active Comparator (erlotinib)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 878 participants
- Where
- 224 sitesin 23 countries
- Study dates
- 16 Jun 2011to 14 Sep 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Evidence of pathologically confirmed, advanced NSCLC (with known histology).
- Prior treatment with at least one and no more than two systemic therapy regimens (at least one must be standard chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC).
- Adequate tissue sample must be submitted prior to randomization for tumor biomarker analyses.
- Adequate renal, hematologic, liver function.
- ECOG PS of 0-2.
- Radiologically measurable disease.
Who cannot join
- Small cell histology.
- Symptomatic brain mets or known leptomeningeal mets.
- Prior therapy with agent known or proposed to be active by action on EGFR tyrosine kinase or other HER family proteins.
- Uncontrolled medical disorders.
Trial locations and contacts
224 sites in 23 countries.
224 sites in 23 countries
United States107 sites
Central Hematology Oncology Medical Group Inc.
Alhambra, California, 91801
UCLA Hematology Oncology-Alhambra
Alhambra, California, 91801
Illinois Cancer Specialists
Arlington Heights, Illinois, 60005
Emory University Hospital Midtown
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Emory Clinic
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers, P.C.
Austell, Georgia, 30106
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35249
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers, P.C.
Carrollton, Georgia, 30117
Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers, PC
Cartersville, Georgia, 30121
Ironwood physicians P C dba Ironwood Cancer & Research Centers
Chandler, Arizona, 85224
Ironwood Physicians P.C. dba Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers
Chandler, Arizona, 85224
Siteman Cancer Center-St. Peters
City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376-1645
John B. Amos Cancer Center
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
Good Samaritan Hospital Samaritan Ambulatory Infusion Services
Corvallis, Oregon, 97330
Samaritan Hematology & Oncology Consultants
Corvallis, Oregon, 97330
Samaritan Pharmacy Services
Corvallis, Oregon, 97330
Siteman Cancer Center-West County
Creve Coeur, Missouri, 63141
Atlanta Cancer Care
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Georgia Cancer Specialists
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
The Cancer Center at DeKalb Medical
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Oncology and Hematology Specialists, P.A.
Denville, New Jersey, 07834
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers, P.C.
Douglasville, Georgia, 30134
City of Hope
Duarte, California, 91010
Suburban Hematology-Oncology Associates, P.C.
Duluth, Georgia, 30096
Deaconess Clinic Downtown
Evansville, Indiana, 47713
Karmanos Cancer Institute at Farmington Hills
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48334
Highlands Oncology Group PA
Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703
Northwest Alabama Cancer Center
Florence, Alabama, 35630
St. Jude Heritage Healthcare
Fullerton, California, 92835
Northeast Georgia Medical Center
Gainesville, Georgia, 30501
Oncology Specialists of North Georgia, LLC
Gainesville, Georgia, 30501
The Longstreet Clinic Cancer Center
Gainesville, Georgia, 30501
Ironwood Physicians P.C. dba Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers
Gilbert, Arizona, 85297
Ingalls Memorial Hospital - In-Patient Pharmacy
Harvey, Illinois, 60426
Ingalls Memorial Hospital
Harvey, Illinois, 60426
Monroe Medical Associates
Harvey, Illinois, 60426
Kentucky Cancer Clinic
Hazard, Kentucky, 41701-9466
Carolina Oncology Specialists PA
Hickory, North Carolina, 28602
Kadlec Clinic Hematology and Oncology
Kennewick, Washington, 99336
Suburban Hematology-Oncology Associates, P.C.
Lawrenceville, Georgia, 30046
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center /Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Carolina Oncology Specialists PA
Lenoir, North Carolina, 28645
Samaritan North Lincoln Hospital
Lincoln City, Oregon, 97367
Texas Oncology-Longview Cancer Center
Longview, Texas, 75601
Drug Management Only
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1772
Drug Managerrent Only:
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1772
UCLA West Medical Pharmacy
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1772
Administrative Address: UCLA Hematology Oncology-Clinical Research Unit (CRU)
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Drug Shipment Address: Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Drug Information Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Regulatory Management Only:
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Regulatory Management:
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
TORI Central Administration
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Westwood Bowyer Clinic, Peter Morton Medical Building
Los Angeles, California, 90095
University Medical Center, Inc.
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
University Medical Center, Inc
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Baptist Hospital East
Louisville, Kentucky, 40207
Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers, P.C.
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Desert Oncology Associates dba Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers
Mesa, Arizona, 85202
Ironwood Physicians P.C. dba Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers
Mesa, Arizona, 85206
University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute
Mobile, Alabama, 36604
University of South Alabama Medical Center
Mobile, Alabama, 36617
Monroe Medical Associates
Munster, Indiana, 46321
Northwest Alabama Cancer Center
Muscle Shoals, Alabama, 35661
Samaritan Pacific Communities Hospital
Newport, Oregon, 97365
Illinois Cancer Specialists
Niles, Illinois, 60714
Mercy clinic oklahoma communities, Inc. - Mercy clinic oncology/Hematology - Norman
Norman, Oklahoma, 73071
Norwalk Hospital
Norwalk, Connecticut, 06856
Mercy Physicians of Oklahoma-Communities, Inc. - Mercy Clinic Oncology/Hematology - McAuley
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120-8347
Mercy Hospital Oklahoma City - Oncology Infusion
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120
Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, 32803
Cancer Institute of Florida
Orlando, Florida, 32804
Hematology and Oncology Consultants, P.A.
Orlando, Florida, 32804
Investigational Drug Services, Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, 32804
UCLA/Pasadena Healthcare Hematology-Oncology
Pasadena, California, 91105
Central Hematology Oncology Medical Group, Inc.
Pasadena, California, 91107
Hematology Oncology Associates of the Treasure Coast
Port Saint Lucie, Florida, 34952
Cancer Care Associates Medical Group Inc.
Redondo Beach, California, 90277
Kadlec Medical Center
Richland, Washington, 99352
Outpatient Imaging Center
Richland, Washington, 99352
Highlands Oncology Group, PA
Rogers, Arkansas, 72758
Central Coast Medical Oncology Corporation
Santa Maria, California, 93454
UCLA Hematology Oncology-Parkside
Santa Monica, California, 90404
UCLA Hematology Oncology-Santa Monica
Santa Monica, California, 90404
UCLA Santa Monica Medical Center & Orthopedic Hospital
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Guthrie Clinic, Limited
Sayre, Pennsylvania, 18840
Robert Packer Hospital
Sayre, Pennsylvania, 18840
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
Seattle, Washington, 98109
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Suburban Hematology-Oncology Associates, P.C.
Snellville, Georgia, 30078
City of Hope South Pasadena Cancer Center
South Pasadena, California, 91030
Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110-1094
Washington University School of Medicine-IDS Pharmacy
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
North Mississippi Hematology and Oncology Associates, Ltd.
Starkville, Mississippi, 39759
Stony Brook University-Cancer Center
Stony Brook, New York, 11794-9447
Monroe Medical Associates
Tinley Park, Illinois, 60477
North Mississippi Hematology and Oncology Associates, Ltd.,
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
Texas Oncology-Tyler
Tyler, Texas, 75702
UCLA/Santa Clarita Valley Cancer Center
Valencia, California, 91355
Texas Oncology - Waco
Waco, Texas, 76712
Cedar Valley Medical Specialists, P.C.
Waterloo, Iowa, 50701
UCLA Cancer Center
Westlake Village, California, 91361
Japan20 sites
Hyogo Cancer Center
Akashi, Hyōgo, 673-8558
National Hospital Organization Asahikawa Medical Center
Asahikawa, Hokkaido, 070-8644
National Cancer Center Hospital
Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 104-0045
National Hp. Org. Kyushu Medical Center
Fukuoka, 810-8563
National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center/Department of Thoracic Oncology
Fukuoka, 811-1395
Kyushu University Hospital Respiratory Medicine
Fukuoka, 812-8582
Kanazawa University Hospital
Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken, 9208641
National Cancer Center Hospital East
Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577
The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR
Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550
Kurashiki Central Hospital
Kurashiki, Okayama-ken, 710-8602
National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center
Matsuyama, Ehime, 791-0280
Aichi cancer center central hospital /Thoracic Oncology
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 464-8681
Okayama University Hospital
Okayama, Okayama-ken, 700-8558
Osaka City General Hospital Department of Clinical Oncology
Osaka, Osaka, 534-0021
Kinki University Hospital
Osakasayama-shi, Osaka, 589-8511
National Hospital Organization Kinki-chuo Chest Medical Center
Sakai-Shi, Osaka, 591-8555
Tohoku University Hospital
Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574
Shizuoka Cancer Center
Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777
National Hospital Organization, Yamaguchi-Ube Medical Center
Ube-shi, Yamaguchi, 755-0241
Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0051
Spain14 sites
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Barcelona, 08916
HOSPITAL DE LA SANTA CREU I SANT PAU - Pharmacy
Barcelona, 08025
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau - AGDAC
Barcelona, 08041
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau - Anatomia Patológica
Barcelona, 08041
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau - Diagnostic per la Imatge i Med. Nuclear
Barcelona, 08041
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau - Hospital de Día
Barcelona, 08041
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08041
Hospital Provincial de Castellon - Servicio de Oncologia
Castellon, Castellon, 12002
Hospital Provincial de Castellon (Farmacia)
Castellon
Hospital General Universitario de Elche - Edificio UIAE
Elche, Alicante, 03203
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre-Radiology
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre01
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Universitario Madrid Sanchinarro
Madrid, 28050
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio. Hospital General Planta Baja. Servicio de Oncologia.
Seville, 41013
Russia12 sites
City Hospital #2 Krasnodar Multi-Field Diagnostic and Treatment Association
Krasnodar, Krasnodarskiy Kray, 350012
Federal State Healthcare Clinical Hospital #101 of the Federal Biomedical Agency
Pyatigorsk, Stavropolskij Kraj, 357340
Pyatigorsk Oncology Center
Pyatigorsk, 357502
Clinic of Hospital Surgery
Saint Petersburg, 194044
Military Medical Academy n.a. S.M.Kirov
Saint Petersburg, 194044
City Clinical Oncology Dispensary
Saint Petersburg, 197022
St.-Petersburg State Medical University I.P.Pavlov of Roszdrav
Saint Petersburg, 197022
Research Institute of Pulmonology
Saint Petersburg, 197089
Russian Scientific Center of Radiology and Surgical Technologies
Saint Petersburg, 197758
City Clinical Oncology Dispensary
Saint Petersburg, 198255
Samara Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary
Samara, 443031
Oncology Center # 2
Sochi, Krasnodarskiy Kray, 354057
United Kingdom8 sites
North Middlesex NHS Trust
Edmonton, N18 1QX
Leicester Royal Infirmary
Leicester, LE1 5WW
Cancer Clinical Trials Unit
London, NW1 2PQ
Kent Oncology Centre
Maidstone, Kent, ME16 9QQ
Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Department of Medical Oncology
Manchester, M20 4BX
Christie Hospital NHS Trust
Manchester, M20 4BX
Lung and Melanoma Research Team
Manchester, M20 4BX
New Cross Hospital - Royal Wolverhampton Hospital NHS Trust
Wolverhampton, West Midlands, WV10 0QP
Hungary6 sites
Semmelweis Egyetem Pulmonologiai Klinika
Budapest, 1125
Debreceni Egyetem Orvos- es Egeszsegtudomanyi Centrum
Debrecen, 4032
Veszprem Megyei Onkormanyzat Tudogyogyintezete
Farkasgyepű, 8582
Pandy Kalman Megyei Korhaz, Aktiv Tudogyogyaszat
Gyula, 5703
Josa Andras Oktatokorhaz Egeszsegugyi Szolgaltato Nonprofit Kft.
Nyíregyháza, 4412
Zala Megyei Korhaz, Pulmonologiai Osztaly
Zalaegerszeg-Pozva, 8900
Belgium5 sites
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, 1000
Laboratoire de la Porte de Hall
Brussels, 1000
Grand Hopital de Charleroi Oncologie-Hematologie
Charleroi, 6000
CHU Ambroise Parre- Service Biologie Clinique
Mons, 7000
Heilig Hart Ziekenhuis Roeselare-Menen
Roeselare, 8800
China5 sites
Jilin Provincial Cancer Hospital
Changchun, Jilin, 130012
West China Hospital of Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041
Tumour Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
Nanning, Guangxi, 530021
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital
Shanghai, 200433
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology/Cancer Center
Wuhan, Hubei, 430023
France5 sites
Centre Georges Francois Leclerc
Dijon, 21079
Hopital Albert Michallon
Grenoble, 38043
Hôpital Paris Saint Joseph
Paris, 75014
CHU de Poitiers
Poitiers, 86021
Institut de Cancerologie de lOuest - Rene Gauducheau
Saint-Herblain, 44805
Germany5 sites
Universitaetsklinikum Aachen
Aachen, 52074
Asklepios Fachkliniken Muenchen-Gauting
Gauting, 82131
Lungenfachklinik Immenhausen
Immenhausen, 34376
Universitaetsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet
Mainz, 55131
Krankenhaus Bethanien, Medizinische Klinik III
Moers, 47441
Switzerland5 sites
Kantonsspital Aarau
Aarau, 5001
Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana
Bellinzona, 06500
Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve
Geneva, 1211
Ospedale Regionale di Locarno La Carita
Locarno, 06600
Kantonsspital St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen, 9007
India4 sites
Vedanta Institute of Medical Sciences
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 380 009
Manipal Hospital
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560017
Tata Memorial Centre
Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012
Ruby Hall Clinic
Pune, Maharashtra, 411001
Ireland4 sites
St Vincent's University Hospital
Dublin, Leinster, Dublin 4
Beaumont Hospital
Dublin, Leinster, Dublin 9
St. James Hospital
Dublin, 8
Oncology Department
Waterford
Poland4 sites
Mazowieckie Centrum Leczenia Chorob Pluc i Gruzlicy
Otwock, Masovian Voivodeship, 05-400
Zoz All-Medi
Otwock, Masovian Voivodeship, 05-400
Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 02-781
Nukleomed
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 04-736
South Africa4 sites
Department of Oncotherapy
Bloemfontein, 9301
GVI Oncology Clinical Research Unit
Kraaifontein, Western Cape, 7570
WCR: Wits Clinical Research
Parktown,Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2193
GVI Oncology
Port Elizabeth, 6045
Greece3 sites
Sotiria General Hospital of Athens
Athens, 11527
University Hospital of Heraklion
Heraklion, 71110
University Hospital of Larissa
Larissa, Thessaly, 41110
Slovakia3 sites
Univerzitna Nemocnica Bratislava, Klinika pneumologie a ftizeologie I- Oddelenie klinickej onkologie
Bratislava, 826 06
Specializovana nemocnica sv. Svorada Zobor, n.o.
Nitra, 949 88
Fakultna nemocnica s poliklinikou
Nové Zámky, 94034
South Korea3 sites
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 110-744
Samsung Medical Center, Clinical Trial Center
Seoul, 135-710
Asan Medical Center, Department of Oncology
Seoul, 138-736
Finland2 sites
Helsingin yliopistollinen sairaala, Meilahden kolmiosairaala, keuhkosairauksien poliklinikka
Helsinki, 00290
Satakunnan keskussairaala/Keuhkosairauksien osasto A4
Pori, 28500
Sweden2 sites
KPE/Onkologikliniken
Karlstad, 651 85
Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset
Stockholm, 171 76
Austria1 site
Sozialmedizinisches Zentrum Baumgartner Hoehe - Otto Wagner Spital und Pflegezentrum
Vienna, 1140
About this study
Official title: Archer 1009:a Randomized, Double Blind Phase 3 Efficacy And Safety Study Of Pf-00299804 (Dacomitinib) Versus Erlotinib For The Treatment Of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Following Progression After, Or Intolerance To, At Least One Prior Chemotherapy
This is a multinational, multicenter, randomized,double-blinded, Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of treatment with PF-00299804 to treatment with erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, previously treated with at least one prior regimen. Analyses of primary objective (Progression Free Survival) will be done in two co-primary populations as defined in the protocol.
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), Active Comparator (erlotinib), Placebo erlotinib, Placebo PF00299804
- Keywords
- comparative study of PF-00299804 and Erlotinib, Double-Blind Phase 3 trial of TKI
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)Drug
Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) is provided as 45 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing
Active Comparator (erlotinib)Drug
Active comparator (erlotinib) provided as 150 mg tablet, continuous oral daily dosing
Placebo erlotinibDrug
placebo erlotinib, provided as 150 mg tablet, continuous oral daily dosing.
Placebo PF00299804Drug
placebo PF-00299804, provide as 45 mg tablet, continuous oral daily dosing
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Blinded active PF-00299804 + blinded placebo comparator (erlotinib) Receives: Drug: Dacomitinib (PF-00299804); Drug: Placebo erlotinib |
| B | Active comparator | Blinded active comparator (erlotinib) + blinded placebo PF-00299804 Receives: Drug: Active Comparator (erlotinib); Drug: Placebo PF00299804 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Radiologic Review.
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression as by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) v1.1 per Independent Radiologic Review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Radiologic Review in KRAS Wild-type (WT) Participants.
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression as by RECIST v1.1 per Independent Radiologic Review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions. Tumor tissue from participants' original diagnostic biopsies or recently obtained biopsies were analyzed to determine KRAS status.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
Secondary outcomes (15)
PFS Based on Investigator Review.
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression as by RECIST v1.1 per Investigator's Review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
PFS Based on Investigator Review in KRAS-WT Participants.
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression as by RECIST v1.1 per Investigator's Review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions. Tumor tissue from participants' original diagnostic biopsies or recently obtained biopsies were analyzed to determine KRAS status.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
Overall Survival (OS).
OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death for any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the patient was known to be alive (ie, at their last known alive date from long term follow-up).
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause or last date known to be alive, participants were followed up regardless of the reason for discontinuation from study treatment at intervals of no longer than every 2 months.
OS in KRAS-WT Participants.
OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death for any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored at the last date the patient was known to be alive (ie, at their last known alive date from long term follow-up). Tumor tissue from participants' original diagnostic biopsies or recently obtained biopsies were analyzed to determine KRAS status.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause or last date known to be alive, participants were followed up regardless of the reason for discontinuation from study treatment at intervals of no longer than every 2 months.
Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Independent Radiologic Review.
The BOR was the best response per RECIST (version 1.1) criteria as assessed by independent assessment recorded from randomization until disease progression. Per RECIST version 1.1: Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all pre-existing lesions except nodal disease, with all nodal lesions decreased to normal size (short axis<10 mm) and no appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; Partial Response (PR): >=30% decrease from baseline sum of diameters of all target lesions with no unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; Progressive Disease (PD): >=20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions above the smallest sum observed, with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions.
Measured: From date of randomization until progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy or death. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
BOR Per Investigator Review.
The BOR was the best response per RECIST (version 1.1) criteria as assessed by investigator assessment recorded from randomization until disease progression. Per RECIST version 1.1: CR: disappearance of all pre-existing lesions except nodal disease, with all nodal lesions decreased to normal size (short axis<10 mm) and no appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; PR: >=30% decrease from baseline sum of diameters of all target lesions with no unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; PD: >=20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions above the smallest sum observed, with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions.
Measured: From date of randomization until progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy or death. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
Duration of Response (DR) Based on Independent Radiologic Review.
DR was defined as the time from first documentation of response assessed by independent review (CR or PR whichever occurred first) to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST version 1.1: CR: disappearance of all pre-existing lesions except nodal disease, with all nodal lesions decreased to normal size (short axis<10 mm) and no appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; PR: >=30% decrease from baseline sum of diameters of all target lesions with no unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; PD: >=20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions above the smallest sum observed, with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions.
Measured: From date of randomization until progression or death due to any cause. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
DR Based on Investigator Review.
DR was defined as the time from first documentation of response assessed by investigator review (CR or PR whichever occurred first) to date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST version 1.1: CR: disappearance of all pre-existing lesions except nodal disease, with all nodal lesions decreased to normal size (short axis<10 mm) and no appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; PR: >=30% decrease from baseline sum of diameters of all target lesions with no unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of new unequivocal malignant lesions; PD: >=20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions above the smallest sum observed, with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions or appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions.
Measured: From date of randomization until progression or death due to any cause. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib.
Mean Ctrough values of dacomitinib observed from Cycle 2 through 5, Day 1 for dose compliant participants.
Measured: Baseline up to Cycle 5 Day 1
Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of PF-05199265.
Mean Ctrough values of PF-05199265 observed from Cycle 2 through 5, Day 1 for dose compliant participants.
Measured: Baseline up to Cycle 5 Day 1
Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Pain, Dyspnea, Fatigue or Cough Patient Reported Disease Symptoms.
TTD defined as the time from first dose (baseline) to the first time a patient's score in pain, dyspnea, fatigue or cough from the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-LC13) increased by ≥10 points. A ≥10 point increase in score had to be maintained for ≥2 consecutive cycles for the symptom to be considered deteriorated. Participants were censored at the last time when they completed an assessment for pain, dyspnea, fatigue or cough if they had not deteriorated. A 10 point or higher change in the score is perceived by participants as clinically significant.
Measured: Data taken from Cycle 1 day 1 to the end of treatment or withdrawal.
Mean and Difference in Mean in Functioning and Global Quality of Life (QOL) as Assessed by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30)
EORTC QLQ-C30: included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties). Scores ranged from 0-100 where a higher score indicated a better level of quality of life. Overall scores present the mean score for that scale from all time-point data.
Measured: Data taken from Cycle 1 day 1 to the end of treatment or withdrawal, averaged (mean) to provide overall scores.
Mean and Difference in Mean in QLQ-C30 Symptoms as Assessed by the EORTC-QLQ-C30.
EORTC QLQ-C30: included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status, symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties). Scores ranged from 0-100 where a higher score indicated a greater degree of symptoms/problems. Overall scores present the mean score for that scale from all time-point data.
Measured: Data taken from Cycle 1 day 1 to the end of treatment or withdrawal, averaged (mean) to provide overall scores.
Mean and Difference in Mean in Lung Cancer Symptom Scores as Assessed by the EORTC QLQ- LC13.
The QLQ-LC13 included questions specific to the disease associated symptoms (dyspnea, cough, haemoptysis, and site specific pain), treatment-related symptoms (sore mouth, dysphagia, neuropathy, and alopecia), and analgesic use of lung cancer patients. Scores range from 0-100 and a higher score indicates greater degree of symptoms/problems. Overall scores present the mean score for that scale from all time-point data.
Measured: Data taken from Cycle 1 day 1 to the end of treatment or withdrawal, averaged (mean) to provide overall scores.
Mean and Difference in Mean of the EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
The EQ-5D is a validated and reliable self-report preference-based measure developed by the EuroQoL Group to assess health-related quality of life. It consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and a visual analogue scale-the EQ VAS. The EQ-5D descriptive system measures a participants' health state on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels, reflecting "no health problems," "moderate health problems," and "extreme health problems." The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
Measured: Data taken from Cycle 1 day 1 to the end of treatment or withdrawal, averaged (mean) to provide overall scores.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 May 2011 (estimated)
- Study start16 Jun 2011
- Primary completion30 Sep 2013
- Study completion14 Sep 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non-Small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 878 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01360554
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A7471009
- Other IDs
- 2010-022656-22
- Acronym
- ARCHER 1009
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 12 Apr 2011
- Last updated
- 24 May 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Breen DM, Joaquim S, Paulhus BL, Bennett D, Bernardo B, Collins S, Esquejo RM, Kim-Muller JY, Lin L, Peloquin M, Wu Z, Qiao S, Stansfield JC, Zhang BB, Rossulek MI. Targeting Cancer Cachexia: A Mechanistic Evaluation of Anti-GDF-15 Antibody-Based Combination Therapies. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2026 Jun;17(3):e70312. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.70312.
PubMed 42126170Ramalingam SS, O'Byrne K, Boyer M, Mok T, Janne PA, Zhang H, Liang J, Taylor I, Sbar EI, Paz-Ares L. Dacomitinib versus erlotinib in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): pooled subset analyses from two randomized trials. Ann Oncol. 2016 Mar;27(3):423-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv593. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
PubMed 26768165Ramalingam SS, Janne PA, Mok T, O'Byrne K, Boyer MJ, Von Pawel J, Pluzanski A, Shtivelband M, Docampo LI, Bennouna J, Zhang H, Liang JQ, Doherty JP, Taylor I, Mather CB, Goldberg Z, O'Connell J, Paz-Ares L. Dacomitinib versus erlotinib in patients with advanced-stage, previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1009): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):1369-78. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70452-8. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
PubMed 25439691
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Archer 1009:a Randomized, Double Blind Phase 3 Efficacy And Safety Study Of Pf-00299804 (Dacomitinib) Versus Erlotinib For The Treatment Of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Following Progression After, Or Intolerance To, At Least One Prior Chemotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01360554
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ARCHER 1009 / A7471009
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- comparative study of PF-00299804 and Erlotinib, Double-Blind Phase 3 trial of TKI
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 878 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 16 Jun 2011
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Sep 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 May 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 May 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a multinational, multicenter, randomized,double-blinded, Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of treatment with PF-00299804 to treatment with erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, previously treated with at least one prior regimen. Analyses of primary objective (Progression Free Survival) will be done in two co-primary populations as defined in the protocol.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Drug: Dacomitinib (PF-00299804), Drug: Placebo erlotinibBlinded active PF-00299804 + blinded placebo comparator (erlotinib) |
| B | Active comparator | Drug: Active Comparator (erlotinib), Drug: Placebo PF00299804Blinded active comparator (erlotinib) + blinded placebo PF-00299804 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Evidence of pathologically confirmed, advanced NSCLC (with known histology).
- Prior treatment with at least one and no more than two systemic therapy regimens (at least one must be standard chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC).
- Adequate tissue sample must be submitted prior to randomization for tumor biomarker analyses.
- Adequate renal, hematologic, liver function.
- ECOG PS of 0-2.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Small cell histology.
- Symptomatic brain mets or known leptomeningeal mets.
- Prior therapy with agent known or proposed to be active by action on EGFR tyrosine kinase or other HER family proteins.
- Uncontrolled medical disorders.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) is provided as 45 mg tablets, continuous oral daily dosing | Drug | A |
| Active Comparator (erlotinib)Active comparator (erlotinib) provided as 150 mg tablet, continuous oral daily dosing | Drug | B |
| Placebo erlotinibplacebo erlotinib, provided as 150 mg tablet, continuous oral daily dosing. | Drug | A |
| Placebo PF00299804placebo PF-00299804, provide as 45 mg tablet, continuous oral daily dosing | Drug | B |
Primary outcome
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Radiologic Review.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression as by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) v1.1 per Independent Radiologic Review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Radiologic Review in KRAS Wild-type (WT) Participants.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of disease progression as by RECIST v1.1 per Independent Radiologic Review or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Objective progression was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of any new unequivocal malignant lesions. Tumor tissue from participants' original diagnostic biopsies or recently obtained biopsies were analyzed to determine KRAS status.
15 secondary outcomes
PFS Based on Investigator Review.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
PFS Based on Investigator Review in KRAS-WT Participants.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
Overall Survival (OS).
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause or last date known to be alive, participants were followed up regardless of the reason for discontinuation from study treatment at intervals of no longer than every 2 months.
OS in KRAS-WT Participants.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause or last date known to be alive, participants were followed up regardless of the reason for discontinuation from study treatment at intervals of no longer than every 2 months.
Best Overall Response (BOR) Per Independent Radiologic Review.
Time frame: From date of randomization until progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy or death. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
BOR Per Investigator Review.
Time frame: From date of randomization until progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy or death. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
Duration of Response (DR) Based on Independent Radiologic Review.
Time frame: From date of randomization until progression or death due to any cause. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
DR Based on Investigator Review.
Time frame: From date of randomization until progression or death due to any cause. Participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.
Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib.
Time frame: Baseline up to Cycle 5 Day 1
Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) of PF-05199265.
Time frame: Baseline up to Cycle 5 Day 1
Time to Deterioration (TTD) in Pain, Dyspnea, Fatigue or Cough Patient Reported Disease Symptoms.
Time frame: Data taken from Cycle 1 day 1 to the end of treatment or withdrawal.
Mean and Difference in Mean in Functioning and Global Quality of Life (QOL) as Assessed by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30)
Time frame: Data taken from Cycle 1 day 1 to the end of treatment or withdrawal, averaged (mean) to provide overall scores.
Mean and Difference in Mean in QLQ-C30 Symptoms as Assessed by the EORTC-QLQ-C30.
Time frame: Data taken from Cycle 1 day 1 to the end of treatment or withdrawal, averaged (mean) to provide overall scores.
Mean and Difference in Mean in Lung Cancer Symptom Scores as Assessed by the EORTC QLQ- LC13.
Time frame: Data taken from Cycle 1 day 1 to the end of treatment or withdrawal, averaged (mean) to provide overall scores.
Mean and Difference in Mean of the EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Time frame: Data taken from Cycle 1 day 1 to the end of treatment or withdrawal, averaged (mean) to provide overall scores.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 May 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42126170Breen DM, Joaquim S, Paulhus BL, Bennett D, Bernardo B, Collins S, Esquejo RM, Kim-Muller JY, Lin L, Peloquin M, Wu Z, Qiao S, Stansfield JC, Zhang BB, Rossulek MI. Targeting Cancer Cachexia: A Mechanistic Evaluation of Anti-GDF-15 Antibody-Based Combination Therapies. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2026 Jun;17(3):e70312. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.70312.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26768165Ramalingam SS, O'Byrne K, Boyer M, Mok T, Janne PA, Zhang H, Liang J, Taylor I, Sbar EI, Paz-Ares L. Dacomitinib versus erlotinib in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): pooled subset analyses from two randomized trials. Ann Oncol. 2016 Mar;27(3):423-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv593. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25439691Ramalingam SS, Janne PA, Mok T, O'Byrne K, Boyer MJ, Von Pawel J, Pluzanski A, Shtivelband M, Docampo LI, Bennouna J, Zhang H, Liang JQ, Doherty JP, Taylor I, Mather CB, Goldberg Z, O'Connell J, Paz-Ares L. Dacomitinib versus erlotinib in patients with advanced-stage, previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1009): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):1369-78. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70452-8. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
224 sites in 23 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) and Active Comparator (erlotinib) in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Pfizer at 224 sites in 23 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 224 sites in United States, Japan, Spain, Russia, United Kingdom and 18 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Per Independent Radiologic Review. (time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, participants were followed up until progressive disease regardless of start of subsequent cancer therapy.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01360554, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2017.