Metastatic Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaPhase 3ONTRACNCT01360853
Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na in Previously Untreated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing ON 01910.Na and Gemcitabine in people with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, run by Traws Pharma, Inc. at 46 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
The question being asked in this study is: Will patients with advanced pancreatic cancer live significantly longer if they are treated with a combination of Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na than if they are treated with Gemcitabine alone? There are two parts to this study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
- What is being tested?
- ON 01910.Na and Gemcitabine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 46 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- May 2011to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients at least 18 years old presenting with histopathologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas; metastatic disease is defined as disease which has spread beyond the peri-pancreatic lymph nodes.
- Patients must have received no prior chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer, including adjuvant chemotherapy.
- Measurable disease, defined as lesions that can be accurately measured in at least 1 dimension with longest diameter (LD) ≥20 mm using conventional techniques or ≥10 mm with spiral computed tomography (CT) scan; measurable lymph nodes must be ≥15 mm in the short axis.
- ECOG Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2.
- Patients must have adequate renal function and serum creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dL.
- Patients must have adequate liver function as defined by total bilirubin ≤2.0 mg/dL and transaminase levels no higher than 3.0 times the institution's upper limit of normal (ULN). Patients with hepatic metastases may have transaminase levels of up to 5.0 times the ULN.
Show all 13Show fewer
- All patients must have a serum albumin ≥3.0 g/dL.
- Patients must have adequate bone marrow (BM) function as defined by a granulocyte count ≥1,500/mm3, a platelet count ≥100,000/mm3, and hemoglobin >9 g/dL.
- Disease-free period of more than 5 years from prior malignancies other than pancreas (except curatively treated basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma in situ of the cervix and ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS] breast disease).
- Adequate contraceptive regimen (including prescription oral contraceptives [birth control pills], contraceptive injections, intrauterine device [IUD], double-barrier method [spermicidal jelly or foam with condoms or diaphragm], contraceptive patch, or surgical sterilization) before entry and throughout the study for female patients of reproductive potential or female partners of male patients.
- Female patient with reproductive potential must have a negative urine beta human chorionic gonadotropin (bHCG) pregnancy test at Screening.
- Willing to adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions specified in this protocol.
- Patient must have signed an informed consent document.
Who cannot join
- Patients with unresectable locally advanced disease without evidence of disease elsewhere.
- Life expectancy of less than 12 weeks.
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, uncontrolled hypertension or seizure disorder.
- Active infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy.
- Symptomatic or clinically evident ascites.
- Serum sodium less than 130 mEq/L or conditions that may predispose patients to hyponatremia.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Female patients who are pregnant or lactating.
- Male patients with female sexual partners who are unwilling to follow the strict contraception requirements described in this protocol.
- Major surgery without full recovery or major surgery within 3 weeks of ON 01910.Na treatment start.
- Evidence of brain metastases.
- Any concurrent administration and/or prior administration within 4 weeks of the first dose of study drug, of radiotherapy, or immunotherapy.
- Psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit the patient's ability to tolerate and/or comply with study requirements, or inability to comply with study and/or follow-up procedures (e.g., drug addition, chronic non-compliance, etc.).
Trial locations and contacts
46 sites in 5 countries.
46 sites in 5 countries
United States30 sites
University of Colorado Cancer Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Billings Clinic Cancer Center
Billings, Montana, 59101
St. Alexis Medical Center-Mid Dakota Clinic PC
Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, 14263
University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Medical University of South Carolina - Hollings Cancer Center
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Levine Cancer Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
University of Cincinnati Cancer Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Kaiser Permanente Colorado
Denver, Colorado, 80205
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
McLeod Regional Medical Center
Florence, South Carolina, 29506
Poudre Valley Cancer Center of the Rockies
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80528
Cone Health Cancer Center
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27403
Hendersonville Hematology and Oncology at Pardee
Hendersonville, North Carolina, 28971
University of Hawaii Cancer Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
UCSD Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92037
Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Yale Cancer Center
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519
New York University Langone Medical Center
New York, New York, 10016
Desert Comprehensive Cancer Center
Palm Springs, California, 92262
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111
Kaiser Permanente NW
Portland, Oregon, 97227
Rex Cancer Center UNC Healthcare
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
Pacific Cancer Care
Salinas, California, 93901
Premiere Oncology
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
Seattle, Washington, 98109
University of Kansas Cancer Center
Westwood, Kansas, 66205
UMASS Medical School
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
India6 sites
Lifeline Multispeciality Hospitals
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600096
Basavatarakam Indo-American Cancer Hospital
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500034
Jaslok Hospital & Research Centre
Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400026
Shatabdi Superspeciality Hospital
Nashik, Maharashtra, 422005
Ruby Hall Clinic
Pune, Maharashtra, 411001
Regional Cancer Center
Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695001
Russia6 sites
State Budget Medical Institution of the Arkhangelsk Region
Arkhangelsk, 163045
Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Oncology Center
Chelyabinsk, 454087
State Budget Medical Institution Clinical Oncology Center 1
Krasnodar, 350040
Budget Medical Institution of the Omsk Region: Clinical Oncology Center
Omsk, 644013
State Budget Medical Institution: Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital
Saint Petersburg, 194291
State Medical Institution: Tula Regional Oncology Center
Tula, 300053
Hungary3 sites
Semmelweis University Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Oncotherapy
Budapest, 1078
Semmelweis University, 3rd Department of Internal Medicine
Budapest, 1125
Hetenyi Geza Hospital 5004, Szolnok, Hungary
Szolnok, 5004
Ukraine1 site
Zakarpattia Regional Clinical Oncology Center Department of Chemotherapy
Uzhhorod, 88014
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Gemcitabine Alone vs. ON 01910.Na Combined With Gemcitabine in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
The question being asked in this study is: Will patients with advanced pancreatic cancer live significantly longer if they are treated with a combination of Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na than if they are treated with Gemcitabine alone? There are two parts to this study. In the first part of the study, patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have received no prior chemotherapy for this disease will be assigned by chance either to the group that will be treated with both Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na (about 100 patients will be in this group) or, to the group that will be treated with Gemcitabine only (about 50 patients will be in this group). How long patients survive in the 2 groups will be compared. If it looks like there is no difference between the groups, the study will stop. If it looks like patients in the group that were treated with both Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na survive longer, the study will continue into a second part where more patients will be treated in order to confirm and better understand the findings of the first part of the study.
Read the detailed description
This will be a Phase III study with sample size recalculation after 100 events have occurred. The study will be open-label, randomized, controlled, multi-center and will be conducted at approximately 200 to 300 study sites (60 to 80 study sites in the first portion of the trial).
In the first portion of the study, a total of 150 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have received no prior chemotherapy for this disease will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion to 1 of the 2 following treatment regimens:
- Arm A: Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle + ON 01910.Na 1800 mg/m2 via 2 hr continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) infusions administered twice weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle (approximately 100 patients)
- Arm B: Gemcitabine only, 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle (approximately 50 patients).
Patients will be stratified at entry using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (ECOG scores of 0 1 vs. ECOG scores of 2; patients with higher scores will not be enrolled).
Patients will remain on study until disease progression or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Moreover, after treatment discontinuation for any cause, all patients will be followed until death.
After 150 patients have been enrolled, accrual will pause and patients will be followed until 100 deaths have occurred. At that time, the Data Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) will oversee a formal interim analysis to compare overall survival (OS) between the 2 groups and may recommend early stopping for futility. If the study continues after interim analysis, then the randomization scheme will continue up to 364 patients or the newly-calculated sample size. The maximum number of enrolled patients will be 650. The number of clinical sites may be expanded up to approximately 200 to 300 centers.
Patients in the gemcitabine-only arm (Arm B) will not be allowed to cross over to the combined treatment arm (Arm A). In addition, no palliative radiotherapy will be allowed during the trial.
The primary analysis will compare OS in the ON 01910.Na + gemcitabine arm (Arm A) vs. gemcitabine-only arm (Arm B) once an appropriate number of events has been reached. There are 2 secondary efficacy outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response.
Toxicity will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03. Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities and > Grade 2 non-hematologic toxicities will be monitored.
- Conditions
- Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
- Being tested
- ON 01910.Na, Gemcitabine
- Keywords
- pancreatic cancer, gemcitabine, ON 01910.Na, rigosertib sodium
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ON 01910.NaDrug
Also called rigosertib sodium
ON 01910.Na, 1800 mg/m2 via 2 hr CIV infusions administered twice weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle.
GemcitabineDrug
Also called Gemzar, Gemcitabine HCl
Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle.
GemcitabineDrug
Also called Gemzar, Gemcitabine HCl
Gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Combination | Experimental | Arm A: Gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle, + ON 01910.Na, 1800 mg/m2 via 2 hr CIV infusions administered twice weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle. Receives: Drug: ON 01910.Na; Drug: Gemcitabine |
| Arm B: Gemcitabine only | Active comparator | Arm B: Gemcitabine only, 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle. Receives: Drug: Gemcitabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Survival
This study's primary outcome is overall survival, defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. All patients will be followed until death. Patients lost to follow-up will be censored at the time last known alive.
Measured: 18 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Progression-free survival
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from the randomization to documented disease progression or death. Patients who are alive and do not have disease progression by the clinical cutoff will be censored at the dates of their last tumor evaluation. Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS will be compared using a stratified log-rank test (stratified by ECOG status: 0-1 vs. 2). Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals will be estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazards models.
Measured: 18 months
Tumor size
Objective tumor response rates using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST).
Measured: 18 months
Safety/tolerability
Toxicity will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v4.03
Measured: 18 months
QOL questionnaire
Quality of life (QOL) questionnaire, using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC) QLQ-C30 version 3.
Measured: 18 months
Biomarkers
In this study, archival tissue will be collected and analyzed in order to identify molecular characteristics of pancreas tumors, which may confer susceptibility or resistance to gemcitabine alone or in combination with ON 01910.Na.
Measured: 18 months
Population Pharmacokinetics
Measurement of ON 01910.Na in plasma of all patients in Arm A 1 hour after starting ON 01910.Na infusion at Day 1 and Day 15 in Cycle 1 only.
Measured: 18 months
Full Pharmacokinetics
At a limited number of sites, blood samples for measurement of ON 01910.Na and gemcitabine will be obtained at Cycle 1 Day 1 only, in a subset of 10 patients in Arm A, at the following 12 time-points: predose; 15 min after starting gemcitabine infusion; 30 min, immediately before ending gemcitabine infusion; 15 min after starting ON 01910.Na infusion; 30 min after ON 01910.Na infusion start; immediately before ending ON 01910.Na infusion; and, 15 min, 30 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, 4 hr and 8 hr after ending ON 01910.Na infusion.
Measured: 18 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 May 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionJun 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Metastatic Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Traws Pharma, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Academic GI Cancer Consortium (AGICC)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Wells Messersmith, MD, Study chair, Anschutz Cancer PavilionLawrence P. Leichman, MD, Study chair, Academic Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancer ConsortiumAntonio Jimeno, MD, PhD, Study chair, Anschutz Cancer Pavilion
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01360853
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 04-22
- Other IDs
- 11PAN01
- Acronym
- ONTRAC
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 24 May 2011
- Last updated
- 4 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Jimeno A, Chan A, Cusatis G, Zhang X, Wheelhouse J, Solomon A, Chan F, Zhao M, Cosenza SC, Ramana Reddy MV, Rudek MA, Kulesza P, Donehower RC, Reddy EP, Hidalgo M. Evaluation of the novel mitotic modulator ON 01910.Na in pancreatic cancer and preclinical development of an ex vivo predictive assay. Oncogene. 2009 Jan 29;28(4):610-8. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.424. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
PubMed 19029951Jimeno A, Li J, Messersmith WA, Laheru D, Rudek MA, Maniar M, Hidalgo M, Baker SD, Donehower RC. Phase I study of ON 01910.Na, a novel modulator of the Polo-like kinase 1 pathway, in adult patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 1;26(34):5504-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9788. Epub 2008 Oct 27.
PubMed 18955447O'Neil BH, Scott AJ, Ma WW, Cohen SJ, Aisner DL, Menter AR, Tejani MA, Cho JK, Granfortuna J, Coveler AL, Olowokure OO, Baranda JC, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen DJ, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee AJ, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes CL, Messersmith WA. A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1180. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw095. Epub 2016 Mar 3. No abstract available.
PubMed 26945010O'Neil BH, Scott AJ, Ma WW, Cohen SJ, Leichman L, Aisner DL, Menter AR, Tejani MA, Cho JK, Granfortuna J, Coveler L, Olowokure OO, Baranda JC, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen DJ, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee AJ, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes CL, Messersmith WA. A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015 Dec;26(12):2505. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv477. Epub 2015 Oct 21. No abstract available.
PubMed 26489442O'Neil BH, Scott AJ, Ma WW, Cohen SJ, Aisner DL, Menter AR, Tejani MA, Cho JK, Granfortuna J, Coveler L, Olowokure OO, Baranda JC, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen DJ, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee AJ, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes CL, Messersmith WA. A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1923-1929. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv264. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
PubMed 26091808
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Gemcitabine Alone vs. ON 01910.Na Combined With Gemcitabine in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01360853
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ONTRAC / 04-22
- Conditions
- Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
- Keywords
- pancreatic cancer, gemcitabine, ON 01910.Na, rigosertib sodium
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Traws Pharma, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Academic GI Cancer Consortium (AGICC)
- Study start
- May 2011
- Primary completion
- Jun 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 May 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The question being asked in this study is: Will patients with advanced pancreatic cancer live significantly longer if they are treated with a combination of Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na than if they are treated with Gemcitabine alone? There are two parts to this study. In the first part of the study, patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have received no prior chemotherapy for this disease will be assigned by chance either to the group that will be treated with both Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na (about 100 patients will be in this group) or, to the group that will be treated with Gemcitabine only (about 50 patients will be in this group). How long patients survive in the 2 groups will be compared. If it looks like there is no difference between the groups, the study will stop. If it looks like patients in the group that were treated with both Gemcitabine and ON 01910.Na survive longer, the study will continue into a second part where more patients will be treated in order to confirm and better understand the findings of the first part of the study.
Detailed description
This will be a Phase III study with sample size recalculation after 100 events have occurred. The study will be open-label, randomized, controlled, multi-center and will be conducted at approximately 200 to 300 study sites (60 to 80 study sites in the first portion of the trial).
In the first portion of the study, a total of 150 patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have received no prior chemotherapy for this disease will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion to 1 of the 2 following treatment regimens:
- Arm A: Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle + ON 01910.Na 1800 mg/m2 via 2 hr continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) infusions administered twice weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle (approximately 100 patients)
- Arm B: Gemcitabine only, 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle (approximately 50 patients).
Patients will be stratified at entry using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (ECOG scores of 0 1 vs. ECOG scores of 2; patients with higher scores will not be enrolled).
Patients will remain on study until disease progression or death from any cause, whichever comes first. Moreover, after treatment discontinuation for any cause, all patients will be followed until death.
After 150 patients have been enrolled, accrual will pause and patients will be followed until 100 deaths have occurred. At that time, the Data Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) will oversee a formal interim analysis to compare overall survival (OS) between the 2 groups and may recommend early stopping for futility. If the study continues after interim analysis, then the randomization scheme will continue up to 364 patients or the newly-calculated sample size. The maximum number of enrolled patients will be 650. The number of clinical sites may be expanded up to approximately 200 to 300 centers.
Patients in the gemcitabine-only arm (Arm B) will not be allowed to cross over to the combined treatment arm (Arm A). In addition, no palliative radiotherapy will be allowed during the trial.
The primary analysis will compare OS in the ON 01910.Na + gemcitabine arm (Arm A) vs. gemcitabine-only arm (Arm B) once an appropriate number of events has been reached. There are 2 secondary efficacy outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response.
Toxicity will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03. Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities and > Grade 2 non-hematologic toxicities will be monitored.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Combination | Experimental | Drug: ON 01910.Na, Drug: GemcitabineArm A: Gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle, + ON 01910.Na, 1800 mg/m2 via 2 hr CIV infusions administered twice weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle. |
| Arm B: Gemcitabine only | Active comparator | Drug: GemcitabineArm B: Gemcitabine only, 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patients at least 18 years old presenting with histopathologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas; metastatic disease is defined as disease which has spread beyond the peri-pancreatic lymph nodes.
- Patients must have received no prior chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer, including adjuvant chemotherapy.
- Measurable disease, defined as lesions that can be accurately measured in at least 1 dimension with longest diameter (LD) ≥20 mm using conventional techniques or ≥10 mm with spiral computed tomography (CT) scan; measurable lymph nodes must be ≥15 mm in the short axis.
- ECOG Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2.
- Patients must have adequate renal function and serum creatinine ≤2.0 mg/dL.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patients with unresectable locally advanced disease without evidence of disease elsewhere.
- Life expectancy of less than 12 weeks.
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, uncontrolled hypertension or seizure disorder.
- Active infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy.
- Symptomatic or clinically evident ascites.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ON 01910.NaAlso: rigosertib sodiumON 01910.Na, 1800 mg/m2 via 2 hr CIV infusions administered twice weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle. | Drug | Arm A: Combination |
| GemcitabineAlso: Gemzar, Gemcitabine HClGemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle. | Drug | Arm A: Combination |
| GemcitabineAlso: Gemzar, Gemcitabine HClGemcitabine, 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks of a 4 week cycle. | Drug | Arm B: Gemcitabine only |
Primary outcome
Survival
Time frame: 18 months
This study's primary outcome is overall survival, defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. All patients will be followed until death. Patients lost to follow-up will be censored at the time last known alive.
7 secondary outcomes
Progression-free survival
Time frame: 18 months
Tumor size
Time frame: 18 months
Safety/tolerability
Time frame: 18 months
QOL questionnaire
Time frame: 18 months
Biomarkers
Time frame: 18 months
Population Pharmacokinetics
Time frame: 18 months
Full Pharmacokinetics
Time frame: 18 Months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Aug 2016.
- Background: PubMed 19029951Jimeno A, Chan A, Cusatis G, Zhang X, Wheelhouse J, Solomon A, Chan F, Zhao M, Cosenza SC, Ramana Reddy MV, Rudek MA, Kulesza P, Donehower RC, Reddy EP, Hidalgo M. Evaluation of the novel mitotic modulator ON 01910.Na in pancreatic cancer and preclinical development of an ex vivo predictive assay. Oncogene. 2009 Jan 29;28(4):610-8. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.424. Epub 2008 Nov 24.
- Background: PubMed 18955447Jimeno A, Li J, Messersmith WA, Laheru D, Rudek MA, Maniar M, Hidalgo M, Baker SD, Donehower RC. Phase I study of ON 01910.Na, a novel modulator of the Polo-like kinase 1 pathway, in adult patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 1;26(34):5504-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.9788. Epub 2008 Oct 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 26945010O'Neil BH, Scott AJ, Ma WW, Cohen SJ, Aisner DL, Menter AR, Tejani MA, Cho JK, Granfortuna J, Coveler AL, Olowokure OO, Baranda JC, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen DJ, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee AJ, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes CL, Messersmith WA. A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016 Jun;27(6):1180. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw095. Epub 2016 Mar 3. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 26489442O'Neil BH, Scott AJ, Ma WW, Cohen SJ, Leichman L, Aisner DL, Menter AR, Tejani MA, Cho JK, Granfortuna J, Coveler L, Olowokure OO, Baranda JC, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen DJ, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee AJ, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes CL, Messersmith WA. A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015 Dec;26(12):2505. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv477. Epub 2015 Oct 21. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 26091808O'Neil BH, Scott AJ, Ma WW, Cohen SJ, Aisner DL, Menter AR, Tejani MA, Cho JK, Granfortuna J, Coveler L, Olowokure OO, Baranda JC, Cusnir M, Phillip P, Boles J, Nazemzadeh R, Rarick M, Cohen DJ, Radford J, Fehrenbacher L, Bajaj R, Bathini V, Fanta P, Berlin J, McRee AJ, Maguire R, Wilhelm F, Maniar M, Jimeno A, Gomes CL, Messersmith WA. A phase II/III randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of rigosertib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1923-1929. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv264. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
- Related information about Academic Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancer Consortium (AGICC).Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Zoldonrasib + Chemo of Investigator's Choice vs Placebo + Chemo of Investigator's Choice as First-line Treatment in Metastatic KRAS G12D-mutated Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ( RASolute 305 )
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of ERAS-0015 in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Metastatic Solid Tumors
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2 Study of VS-7375 in Patients With KRAS G12D-Mutated Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC), G12D Mutated KRAS
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wells Messersmith, MD study chair
Anschutz Cancer Pavilion
Lawrence P. Leichman, MD study chair
Academic Oncology Gastrointestinal Cancer Consortium
Antonio Jimeno, MD, PhD study chair
Anschutz Cancer Pavilion
46 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing ON 01910.Na and Gemcitabine in people with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, run by Traws Pharma, Inc. at 46 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 46 sites in United States, India, Russia, Hungary, Ukraine. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Survival (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01360853, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2016.