AzTrials
AzTrials

Nonunion of Fracture [Pseudarthrosis], Site UnspecifiedRebone-testNCT01362413

Validation of Laboratory Test for Predicting Bone Tissue Regeneration

An observational study of Nonunion of Fracture [Pseudarthrosis], Site Unspecified, run by Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to determine whether the evaluation of pro-osteogenic activity of autologous serum may predict the effectiveness of platelet gel in regenerating bone tissue in patients with nonunions of long bones. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Jan 2011to Jun 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: primary care clinic

Who may be able to join

  • patients with aseptic nonunion of long bones and candidates for treatment with platelet gel and MSC in addition to fixation devices and bone grafting;
  • patients who have given their written consent to participate in the study.

Who cannot join

  • patients with bone infections;
  • patients with congenital disorders involving the skeletal development;
  • patients treated with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive agents;
  • patients suffering from mental or psychiatric disorders that preclude the possibility of correctly adhering to the protocol.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

    Bologna, Bologna, 40136

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Validation of Laboratory Test for Predicting Bone Tissue Regeneration in Patient Affected by Aseptic Pseudarthrosis and Treated With Platelet Gel

The aim of the study is to determine whether the evaluation of pro-osteogenic activity of autologous serum may predict the effectiveness of platelet gel in regenerating bone tissue in patients with nonunions of long bones.

Serum samples will be collected before the surgery, and their pro-osteogenic activity will be evaluated by using a bioactivity test (mineralization assay).

In order to determine whether the pro-osteogenic activity of the serum is able to discriminate between individuals who will achieve or will not achieve bone consolidation, the laboratory results will be correlated with clinical and radiographic results at 12 months, when patients will be considered as healed or not healed.

Read the detailed description

Pseudarthrosis (or 'nonunions') is defined as a bone movement which occurs after about 6 months from the traumatic event as consequence of the inadequate healing of a fracture. The use of regenerative medicine for treating recalcitrant pseudarthrosis is considered a promising strategy to promote bone consolidation. Among the various approaches used, the local cell therapy based on autologous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), combined with or without growth factors, has been extensively used. MSC reside within the stromal compartment of bone marrow which may be obtained from the iliac crest. Growth factors may be discharged from platelet gel (PG) which is obtained after activation of autologous platelet concentrates. Nevertheless, the results of recent clinical studies show that the above mentioned regenerative approach shows a failure rate of approximately 30% (Calori et al, 2008). The availability of a laboratory test which may predict the regenerative capacity of the PG may help the orthopaedic surgeon in addressing the decisions regarding the regenerative approach, e.g. to use or non use autologous platelet concentrates or to enhance the use of autologous derivatives with recombinant factors.The rationale for the use of platelet concentrates in pseudarthrosis is the significant reduction of osteoinductive growth factors observed at the lesion site (Gandhi et al., 2005). Platelet gel mimics what happens physiologically after any bone injury, when platelets are entrapped in a clot within a fibrin matrix. Platelet activation determines the release of various growth factors promoting bone healing. The optimal level and ratio of growth factors and their synergistic effects should be more efficient than single recombinant molecules, even though no data are available on the most relevant molecules and on their optimal amount. In this context, the in vitro mineralization assay could be a valid tool to assess the pro-osteogenic activity of platelet gel, thus obviating the measurement of the myriad of platelet-derived substances.

The aim of the study is to determine whether the evaluation of pro-osteogenic activity of autologous serum may predict the effectiveness of PG in the regeneration of bone tissue in patients with nonunions of long bones. The rationale is based on the following issues:

  • in 30% of long bone nonunions treated with PG, bone consolidation is not obtained (Calori et al, 2008);
  • the proportion of growth factors in serum is comparable to that observed in platelet gel after activation, even if the concentration is lower;
  • the autologous serum is able to support the 'in vitro' osteogenic differentiation of MSCs and the formation of mineral nodules (mineralization assay) (Granchi et al, 2010);
  • the correlation between 'in vitro' mineralization and regenerative capacity has been demonstrated in various experimental models (De Bari et al, 2008);
  • preliminary data obtained in our lab showed that in patients affected by congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia the presence of osteoinductive growth factors in serum is an essential requirement to warrant the effectiveness of the local cell therapy with MSC and PG (submitted paper).

In order to evaluate the ability of the autologous serum in inducing the mineralization in vitro the investigators will use a bioactivity test (mineralization assay). For this purpose serum samples of patients candidates to the treatment with MSC and PG will be collected the day before the surgery and used for cultivating normal MSC, whose ability to mineralize in vitro will be previously verified in standard culture conditions.

Further analysis will be conducted in order to determine whether the pro-osteogenic properties are maintained over time, and serum samples will be collected the 1 month before the surgery.

In order to determine whether the pro-osteogenic activity of the serum is able to predict and discriminate between individuals who achieve or not achieve bone consolidation, the laboratory results will be correlated with clinical and radiographic results at 12 months, when patients will be considered as healed or not healed.

Keywords
pseudarthrosis, mineralization, platelet-rich-plasma, serum
Medical subject headings
Pseudarthrosis, Calcinosis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Correlation between laboratory results at the surgery and clinical and radiographic results at 12 months, when patients will be considered as healed or not healed.

    The pro-osteogenic ability of autologous serum will be evaluated by using a bioactivity test (mineralization assay). For this purpose serum samples will be collected 1 day before the surgery and used for culturing osteogenic cells. The ability of inducing the mineralization will be assessed after 10 days of culture.

    At 12 months, clinical outcome will be evaluated as follows:

    • anteroposterior and lateral X-rays to assess the continuity of bone in the various plans;
    • semeiotics of the consolidation;
    • assessment of pain during loading (Visual Analogue Scale).

    Measured: 13 months, for each patient

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Assessment of the pro-osteogenic properties of serum over time.

    In order to determine whether the pro-osteogenic properties are maintained over time, we planned to collect other serum samples, namely preoperatively, 1 month before the surgery.

    The pro-osteogenic activity will be evaluated as previously described.

    Measured: 1 month before surgery

  2. Correlation between laboratory testing and timing of healing.

    Clinical and radiographic results will be assessed at intermediate end points, as previously described.

    Measured: 1, 3, 6, and 9 months postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 May 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2011
  3. Primary completionJun 2013
  4. Study completionJun 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01362413
Sponsor's protocol ID
IOR 65/10
Acronym
Rebone-test
Status last verified
Mar 2015
First submitted
26 May 2011
Last updated
30 Mar 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Gandhi A, Bibbo C, Pinzur M, Lin SS. The role of platelet-rich plasma in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Clin. 2005 Dec;10(4):621-37, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2005.06.009.

    PubMed 16297823
  • Calori GM, Tagliabue L, Gala L, d'Imporzano M, Peretti G, Albisetti W. Application of rhBMP-7 and platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of long bone non-unions: a prospective randomised clinical study on 120 patients. Injury. 2008 Dec;39(12):1391-402. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.08.011. Epub 2008 Nov 22.

    PubMed 19027898
  • Cenni E, Savarino L, Perut F, Fotia C, Avnet S, Sabbioni G. Background and rationale of platelet gel in orthopaedic surgery. Musculoskelet Surg. 2010 May;94(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s12306-009-0048-9. Epub 2009 Nov 24.

    PubMed 19937168
  • Arvidson K, Abdallah BM, Applegate LA, Baldini N, Cenni E, Gomez-Barrena E, Granchi D, Kassem M, Konttinen YT, Mustafa K, Pioletti DP, Sillat T, Finne-Wistrand A. Bone regeneration and stem cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2011 Apr;15(4):718-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01224.x.

    PubMed 21129153
  • De Bari C, Dell'Accio F, Karystinou A, Guillot PV, Fisk NM, Jones EA, McGonagle D, Khan IM, Archer CW, Mitsiadis TA, Donaldson AN, Luyten FP, Pitzalis C. A biomarker-based mathematical model to predict bone-forming potency of human synovial and periosteal mesenchymal stem cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan;58(1):240-50. doi: 10.1002/art.23143.

    PubMed 18163504
  • Granchi D, Devescovi V, Baglio SR, Leonardi E, Donzelli O, Magnani M, Stilli S, Giunti A, Baldini N. Biological basis for the use of autologous bone marrow stromal cells in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Bone. 2010 Mar;46(3):780-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.10.044. Epub 2009 Nov 10.

    PubMed 19900596

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Nonunion of Fracture [Pseudarthrosis], Site Unspecified, run by Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Correlation between laboratory results at the surgery and clinical and radiographic results at 12 months, when patients will be considered as healed or not healed. (time frame: 13 months, for each patient). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01362413, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2015.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in