Healthy VolunteersPhase 1NCT01363063
Study of the Tolerability of Ketorolac Tromethamine Following Intranasal Administration in Healthy Volunteers
A Phase 1 study testing Ketorolac tromethamine in people with Healthy Volunteers, run by Egalet Ltd at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This was a Phase 1, double blind, two part study in healthy male and female volunteers. Each subject participated in only one part of the study. In Part A subjects received one dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine with a lidocaine hydrochloride free formulation in one nostril and one dose of 15 mg ketorolac… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy Volunteers
- What is being tested?
- Ketorolac tromethamine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Dec 2006to Jun 2007
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female volunteers, aged 18 to 60 years inclusive
- Female subjects of child bearing potential must have had a negative urine pregnancy test prior to entry into the study and must not have been breast feeding
- All female subjects of child bearing potential and all male subjects with female partners of child bearing potential must have consented to use a medically acceptable method of contraception (oral or implanted contraceptive hormones, condom or diaphragm with spermicidal agent, intrauterine device or surgical sterilization) throughout the study period
- Subject had given signed informed consent
- Subject was within 20% of normal weight for his/her height and body build according to the table of "Desirable Weights for Men and Women" (Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 1999)
- Subject's medical history was considered normal, with no clinically significant abnormalities
Show all 10Show fewer
- Subject was considered to be in good health in the opinion of the Investigator, as determined by a pre-study physical examination with no clinically significant abnormalities, vital signs within normal ranges and an electrocardiogram (ECG) with no clinically significant abnormalities
- Subject's pre-study clinical laboratory findings were within the normal range or if outside of the normal range were not deemed clinically significant in the opinion of the Investigator
- Subject had bilateral patent nasal airways at screening and Day 1 as assessed by the Investigator
- Body weight of at least 60 kg
Who cannot join
- Subject had had a clinically significant illness in the four weeks before screening
- Use of prescribed medications in the three weeks prior to dosing or over-the-counter preparations for seven days prior to dosing, except paracetamol which was allowed up to 48 hours prior to dosing. However, use of multivitamins and oral contraceptives were permitted
- Subject had a significant history of drug/solvent abuse, or a positive drugs of abuse test at screening
- Subject had a history of alcohol abuse or currently drank in excess of 28 units per week (males) or 21 units per week (females)
- Current tobacco use or a history of smoking within the past five years
- Subject was in the opinion of the Investigator not suitable to participate in the study
Show all 21Show fewer
- Subject had participated in any clinical study with an investigational drug/device within three months prior to dosing
- Subject had a positive result of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screen, Hepatitis B screen or Hepatitis C screen
- Subject had had a serious adverse reaction or significant hypersensitivity to any drug
- Subject had donated 500 mL or more of blood within the three months prior to screening
- Any history of co-existing nasal polyps, NSAID sensitivity and asthma
- Allergic reaction to aspirin or other NSAIDs
- Current upper respiratory tract infection or other respiratory tract condition that could have interfered with the absorption of the nasal spray or with the assessment of adverse events (AEs)
- Any suspicion of rhinitis medicamentosa (chronic daily use of topical decongestants)
- Use of a monoamine oxidase inhibitor in the 14 days prior to study entry
- Active peptic ulcer disease, gastrointestinal bleeding or perforation, or a history of peptic ulcer disease or gastrointestinal bleeding
- Anemia due to unexplained or known gastrointestinal bleeding
- History of asthma or any other chronic pulmonary disorder
- Renal impairment or a risk of renal failure due to volume depletion
- Known sensitivity to lidocaine hydrochloride
- Previous history of nasal surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Phase 1, Double-Blind, Study of the Tolerability of Formulations of Ketorolac Tromethamine Following Intranasal Administration in Healthy Volunteers
This was a Phase 1, double blind, two part study in healthy male and female volunteers. Each subject participated in only one part of the study. In Part A subjects received one dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine with a lidocaine hydrochloride free formulation in one nostril and one dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine containing 6% lidocaine hydrochloride in the other nostril, in a randomized manner. In Part B subjects were randomized to receive a single intranasal dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine containing 0% lidocaine hydrochloride into one nostril and either placebo or a single intranasal dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine containing 0%, 4% or 6% lidocaine hydrochloride into the other nostril. During the study, subjects remained resident from the morning of Day 1 until the afternoon of Day 1, when a post-study medical was performed prior to discharge.
The objective of this study was to compare the tolerability of formulations of ketorolac tromethamine with differing concentrations of lidocaine hydrochloride (0% and 6% in Part A and 0%, 4%, 6% and placebo in Part B) following intranasal administration to healthy volunteers.
- Conditions
- Healthy Volunteers
- Being tested
- Ketorolac tromethamine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ketorolac tromethamineDrug
One dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine with a lidocaine hydrochloride free formulation in one nostril and one dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine containing 6% lidocaine hydrochloride in the other nostril
Ketorolac tromethamineDrug
One dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine containing 0% lidocaine hydrochloride into one nostril and either placebo or a single intranasal dose of 15 mg Ketorolac tromethamine containing 0%, 4% or 6% lidocaine hydrochloride into the other nostril
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ketorolac tromethamine (Part A) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Ketorolac tromethamine |
| Ketorolac tromethamine (Part B) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Ketorolac tromethamine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Discomfort Measurement on a Visual Analogue Scale
Following administration of each treatment, subjects completed a visual analogue scale (VAS) (ranging from "no discomfort" to "severe discomfort") at 1, 5, 10 and 15 minutes post-dose. If after the 15 minute VAS assessment discomfort was still present the subject was asked to complete further VAS assessments, at 5 minute intervals, until the discomfort had dissipated.
Measured: 15 minutes post-dose
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2006
- Primary completionFeb 2007
- Study completionJun 2007
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Healthy VolunteersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Egalet Ltd
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Cyril Clarke, BSc, MB BS, MFPM, Principal investigator, ICON Developmental Solutions
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01363063
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ROX 2006-01
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 27 May 2011
- Last updated
- 6 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 1, Double-Blind, Study of the Tolerability of Formulations of Ketorolac Tromethamine Following Intranasal Administration in Healthy Volunteers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01363063
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ROX 2006-01
- Conditions
- Healthy Volunteers
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Egalet LtdIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2006
- Primary completion
- Feb 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2007 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This was a Phase 1, double blind, two part study in healthy male and female volunteers. Each subject participated in only one part of the study. In Part A subjects received one dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine with a lidocaine hydrochloride free formulation in one nostril and one dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine containing 6% lidocaine hydrochloride in the other nostril, in a randomized manner. In Part B subjects were randomized to receive a single intranasal dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine containing 0% lidocaine hydrochloride into one nostril and either placebo or a single intranasal dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine containing 0%, 4% or 6% lidocaine hydrochloride into the other nostril. During the study, subjects remained resident from the morning of Day 1 until the afternoon of Day 1, when a post-study medical was performed prior to discharge.
The objective of this study was to compare the tolerability of formulations of ketorolac tromethamine with differing concentrations of lidocaine hydrochloride (0% and 6% in Part A and 0%, 4%, 6% and placebo in Part B) following intranasal administration to healthy volunteers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ketorolac tromethamine (Part A) | Experimental | Drug: Ketorolac tromethamine |
| Ketorolac tromethamine (Part B) | Experimental | Drug: Ketorolac tromethamine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Male or female volunteers, aged 18 to 60 years inclusive
- Female subjects of child bearing potential must have had a negative urine pregnancy test prior to entry into the study and must not have been breast feeding
- All female subjects of child bearing potential and all male subjects with female partners of child bearing potential must have consented to use a medically acceptable method of contraception (oral or implanted contraceptive hormones, condom or diaphragm with spermicidal agent, intrauterine device or surgical sterilization) throughout the study period
- Subject had given signed informed consent
- Subject was within 20% of normal weight for his/her height and body build according to the table of "Desirable Weights for Men and Women" (Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 1999)
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Subject had had a clinically significant illness in the four weeks before screening
- Use of prescribed medications in the three weeks prior to dosing or over-the-counter preparations for seven days prior to dosing, except paracetamol which was allowed up to 48 hours prior to dosing. However, use of multivitamins and oral contraceptives were permitted
- Subject had a significant history of drug/solvent abuse, or a positive drugs of abuse test at screening
- Subject had a history of alcohol abuse or currently drank in excess of 28 units per week (males) or 21 units per week (females)
- Current tobacco use or a history of smoking within the past five years
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ketorolac tromethamineOne dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine with a lidocaine hydrochloride free formulation in one nostril and one dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine containing 6% lidocaine hydrochloride in the other nostril | Drug | Ketorolac tromethamine (Part A) |
| Ketorolac tromethamineOne dose of 15 mg ketorolac tromethamine containing 0% lidocaine hydrochloride into one nostril and either placebo or a single intranasal dose of 15 mg Ketorolac tromethamine containing 0%, 4% or 6% lidocaine hydrochloride into the other nostril | Drug | Ketorolac tromethamine (Part B) |
Primary outcome
Discomfort Measurement on a Visual Analogue Scale
Time frame: 15 minutes post-dose
Following administration of each treatment, subjects completed a visual analogue scale (VAS) (ranging from "no discomfort" to "severe discomfort") at 1, 5, 10 and 15 minutes post-dose. If after the 15 minute VAS assessment discomfort was still present the subject was asked to complete further VAS assessments, at 5 minute intervals, until the discomfort had dissipated.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Mar 2018.
Related trials for Healthy Volunteers
Not yet recruiting
Neuroergonomic Analysis of a Brain-Computer Interface Device (BCI)
Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Establishment of Biobank of Nasal Epithelium Samples From Healthy Volunteers
Healthy
RecruitingObservational study
Improved Methods of Cell Selection for Bone Marrow Transplant Alternatives
Graft-Versus-Host Disease, Graft-versus-leukemia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Screening Protocol
Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cyril Clarke, BSc, MB BS, MFPM principal investigator
ICON Developmental Solutions
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Ketorolac tromethamine in people with Healthy Volunteers, run by Egalet Ltd at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Discomfort Measurement on a Visual Analogue Scale (time frame: 15 minutes post-dose). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2018.