AzTrials
AzTrials

Central Spinal Cord SyndromeCOSMICNCT01367405

Comparing Surgical Decompression Versus Conservative Treatment in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

A study testing Surgical decompression and Conservative treatment in people with Central Spinal Cord Syndrome, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome (TCCS) was until recent recognized as a separate clinical entity. The most characteristic feature is the disproportionate more motor impairment of the arms and especially the hands than the legs, bladder dysfunction and sensory. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Central Spinal Cord Syndrome
What is being tested?
Surgical decompression and Conservative treatment
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
Oct 2013to Jun 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • all patients with a history of a traumatic event to the cervical spine fulfilling the criteria of incomplete cervical spinal cord lesion. -

Who cannot join

  • cognitive impairments
  • a preexistent neurologic deficit of arms and/or legs
  • psychiatric illness
  • significant comorbidity interfering with the indication to perform surgery or not
  • use of anticoagulating drugs
  • addiction to drugs or alcohol (more than five units daily)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • not speaking Dutch language fluently
  • not willing to participate
  • participating in another trial

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center

    Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6500 HB

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: COSMIC: Conservative or Early Surgical Management of Incomplete Cervical Cord Syndrome Without Spinal Instability. Randomized Controlled Trial

Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome (TCCS) was until recent recognized as a separate clinical entity. The most characteristic feature is the disproportionate more motor impairment of the arms and especially the hands than the legs, bladder dysfunction and sensory.

Recently, it has been shown that the distinction of TCCS with an incomplete cervical spinal cord lesion (ICSCL) is artificial. It is the most frequent incomplete traumatic spinal cord lesion. It accounts for up to 70 % of all incomplete cervical spinal cord lesions. The exact incidence is not known.

Read more

Uncertainty about the treatment exists. A good recovery has been described after conservative treatment. Conservative treatment was usually considered when a fracture or dislocation of the spine were absent. It is often seen in hyperextension trauma in the elderly with degenerative spondylotic stenotic cervical spine. However, some reports suggest a better outcome after surgical decompression. Randomized trials have not been performed. To avoid discussion about possible confounding or effect modification related to the mechanism of trauma, this study will focus on ICSCL in patients without fracture or instability of the cervical spine on radiological examination. Also the problem of crossover from the conservative group to the surgical one due to the nature of spinal instability will be reduced.

Goal of the study: To compare the efficacy of early decompressive surgery to improve functional outcome in patients with ICSCL without a fracture or instability of the cervical spine compared to those receiving conservative treatment.

Definition of ICSCL in this study: ICSCL is an incomplete spinal cord lesion due to a cervical spine trauma. At CT scanning with reconstruction and at MRI signs are not seen that could indicate a fracture of the cervical spine or instability. An overt sequestrated herniated disc should not be present since this will always necessitate immediate surgery. Involvement of the cervical spinal cord should be established at physical examination (symptomatic arm or hand dysfunction is obligatory).

Read the detailed description

See Above. Further information in this registration ( Randomized controlled trial (RCT), sample size etc)

Being tested
Surgical decompression, Conservative treatment
Keywords
Surgical decompression, conservative treatment, incomplete spinal cord lesion, recovery
Medical subject headings
Central Cord Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Surgical decompressionProcedure or surgery

    Surgical decompression within 24 hour postinjury

  • Conservative treatmentProcedure or surgery

    Usual conservative treatment without surgery

Study groups in NCT01367405
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
surgical decompressionExperimentalsurgical decompression within 24 hours post-injury
Receives: Procedure: Surgical decompression
Conservative treatmentActive comparatorNormal conservative treatment without surgical intervention
Receives: Procedure: Conservative treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Dutch translation of mJOA

    functional outcome at two years measured by Dutch translation of mJOA

    Measured: two years post-injury

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. DASH

    arm/hand function assessed by the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH)

    Measured: two years post-injury

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jun 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2013
  3. Primary completionJun 2015
  4. Study completionJun 2015

Why it stopped: only 1 inclusion in 1.5 years due to strict exclusion criteria

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01367405
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL36977.091.11
Acronym
COSMIC
Status last verified
Nov 2013
First submitted
6 Jun 2011
Last updated
13 Oct 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Bartels RH, Hosman AJ, van de Meent H, Hofmeijer J, Vos PE, Slooff WB, Oner FC, Coppes MH, Peul WC, Verbeek AL. Design of COSMIC: a randomized, multi-centre controlled trial comparing conservative or early surgical management of incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jan 31;14:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-52.

    PubMed 23369169

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Surgical decompression and Conservative treatment in people with Central Spinal Cord Syndrome, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: only 1 inclusion in 1.5 years due to strict exclusion criteria). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Dutch translation of mJOA (time frame: two years post-injury). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01367405, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in