Prostate CancerPhase 3AIMSNCT01367418
Effects of Anesthetic Technique on Immune and Inflammatory Systems Following Radical Prostatectomy
A Phase 3 study testing Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA) in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Örebro University, Sweden at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
Several recently published retrospective studies show that regional anaesthesia (RA) can reduce cancer-related mortality following surgical treatment of colorectal, breast and prostate cancers and malignant melanoma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 78 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 26 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- Sep 2010to Mar 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 78 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ASA physical status 1-2
- Radical retropubic prostatectomy
Who cannot join
- Chronic use of opiates
- Contraindication to epidural analgesia
- Allergy to component drugs
- Chronic inflammatory diseases
- Use of steroids perioperatively
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison Between Epidural and Patient Controlled Analgesia on Immunological and Inflammatory Systems Following Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy
Several recently published retrospective studies show that regional anaesthesia (RA) can reduce cancer-related mortality following surgical treatment of colorectal, breast and prostate cancers and malignant melanoma. If these results are true, then the choice of perioperative pain management is as beneficial, or even better, than the current oncological therapies. This theory needs to be investigated in a prospective, randomized and controlled trail. We shall perform a prospective, randomized study comparing the effects of Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) or patient controlled analgesia (PCA) on postoperative immunological and inflammatory markers in order to understand whether the protective effects, if any, of regional analgesia are due to changes in these markers or whether the underlying mechanisms is not mediated via this stress signalling pathway.
Read the detailed description
Methods
Thirty patients (ASA status 1-2) in the age group 50 - 75 years, undergoing elective radical retropubic prostatectomy would be included in this pilot study. The exact type of cancer, its staging, degree of spread to proximal or distant sites and the pathologic type of cancer would be recorded. Patients on chronic analgesic medication, endocrinologic and immunologic diseases, those with known allergy to LA and those where epidural catheter placement was contraindicated would be excluded. Patients would be allocated to one of three groups: General anesthesia combined with Epidural anesthesia during and after the operation (Group GE; n = 12), General anesthesia combined with Epidural during anesthesia and local anesthesia postoperatively (Group GL; n = 12), General anesthesia alone (Group GO; n = 10)
Anesthesia and Surgery
All patients would be premedicated with midazolam 0.1 mg/kg 15-30 min before planned surgery, which is a routine in our hospital. Paracetamol 1 g was given orally every 6 h starting with the first dose at the time of premedication. IV access would be attained in the preoperative holding area and further anxiolytic would be given as necessary intravenously.
Epidural technique
In patients in Group GE, an 18 G epidural needle would be inserted at the Th10-12 inter-space using the 'hanging-drop' or loss of resistance technique with the patient in the sitting position in the holding area. The epidural catheter would be inserted and subsequently tested for subarachnoid or intravascular placement using 3 ml of mepivacaine 2% with adrenaline, which is standard practice in our hospital. A bolus dose of 3-4 ml mepivacaine 2% with adrenaline would subsequently be injected and a loss of sensation to cold determined after 10 min. If a sensory block to an upper level of Thoracic 8 dermatome and a minimal lower level of L2 is achieved, the patient would be considered to be ready for induction of anesthesia. If not, a further dose of 2-3 ml mepivacaine 2% with adrenaline would be injected epidurally. If this fails to achieve the desired block, it would be assumed that the catheter was incorrectly placed and the patient offered the choice of one more attempt at epidural catheter placement, or exclusion from the study.
Patients in Group GO would not have an epidural catheter placed. Following transfer to the operating room and routine monitoring, anesthesia would be induced in all patients with fentanyl 2 mg/kg i.v. and propofol 1-2mg/kg until loss of eyelash reflex. Tracheal intubation would be performed after muscle relaxation with rocuronium 0.5 mg/kg and anesthesia maintained with 1-3% sevoflurane and 33% oxygen in air. Mechanical ventilation would be used in a low-flow system in order to maintain an end-tidal CO2 of between 4.5-5.5 kPa. In all patients, sevoflurane concentration would be adjusted in order to maintain adequate anesthetic depth, which would be measured using Auditory evoked potentials (AEP) and maintained between 15-25 (A-line). Tachycardia, despite adequate anesthetic depth, would be treated by giving fentanyl intermittently IV as an analgesic when required during the operation. At the end of surgery, muscle relaxation would be reversed using glycopyrrolate (0.2 mg) and neostigmine (2.5 mg). Radical retropubic prostatectomy would be performed in a standardized way using a lower-abdominal midline incision.
Postoperative Management
During the first 4 h postoperatively, patients in Group GO would receive morphine 1-2 mg IV intermittently for pain relief in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) in order that the numeric rating scale (NRS) (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) is < 3. Patients in Group GE would have an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% 5-10 ml/h epidurally. In the event of pain, morphine (1-2 mg) would be administered intravenously as needed in both groups in order to provide good pain relief and NRS < 3.
All patients would be observed in the PACU for 4 h before being transferred to the general urological ward. The epidural infusion/PCA pump would be continued as long as pain relief is needed using these techniques but for a minimum of 48 h. Subsequently, pain relief would be obtained using oral analgesics using a combination of paracetamol and NSAID drugs.
Recording and Measurements
The total amount of anesthetic and analgesic drugs required during the operation would be recorded. Anesthetic drug requirement would be determined by two methods: end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane recorded every 5 min and the weight of the vaporizer before and after each anesthetic. For all measurements, the time when the anesthetic gases were turned off was considered to be time zero (t = 0). In addition to the routine postoperative protocols, the following measurements were recorded:
Pain intensity: At the site of the incision, 'deep' (visceral) pain and pain on coughing at 1, 4, 12, 24 and 48 h was measured using the NRS.
Rescue analgesic (morphine) consumption: during 0-4 h, 4-24 h and 24-48 h. Supplementary analgesic consumption: Additional analgesics administered in order to relieve pain would be recorded/day.
Side effects: Nausea and/or vomiting (0-4 h, 4-24 h and 24-48 h), pruritus and all other complications were recorded.
Surgical complications: the surgical incision would be inspected daily for evidence of infection and graded as either no evidence of infection (= 0), evidence of inflammation (= 1), mild wound dehiscence or suspected infection (= 2) or pus formation with definite infection (= 3). After 48-72 h, the epidural catheter would be removed and the catheter tip sent for bacterial culture.
Blood sampling:
Patient serum or EDTA/Heparin plasma will be assessed for cytokine levels by a Luminex multiplex assay (Human Inflammation 12-Plex kit; GM.CSF, IFN-g, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-a and VEGF from R\&D system) and PGE2 levels will be measured by an ELISA kit from Cayman Chemicals Company. In addition, markers of systemic inflammatory response, including CRP, white blood cell count, differential count and total platelet count, will also be measured before and after surgery.
Natural Killer (NK) cell activity in the blood would be measured using the FANKIA assay. Clusters of differentiation (CD) markers would be measured.
Stress response would be measured using serum cortisol and prolactin levels.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Patient controlled analgesia (PCA), Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA)
- Keywords
- Analgesia: Thoracic epidural, patient controlled, Surgery: Radical retropubic prostatectomy, Immune system, Inflammation
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms, Inflammation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Patient controlled analgesia (PCA)Drug
Also called Morphine = morphine
Morphine 1 mg/ml
Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA)Drug
Also called Bupivacaine = Marcain, Ropivacaine = Narop, Sufentanil = Sufenta
Intra-operatively: Bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline Post-operatively: Ropivacaine 0.2% + sufentanil 1 ug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA) | Experimental | TEA is used for perioperative pain management, having been used both intra- and postoperatively, up to 48 h. Receives: Drug: Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA) |
| Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) | Active comparator | PCA is the standard of pain management and is usually used for up to 48 h postoperative for pain management following radical prostatectomy. Receives: Drug: Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Natural Killer Cell activity
NK cells are of primary importance in the elimination of tumor target cells at the early stage of tumor development, up to and including tumor metastasis. Decreased NK cell function during the perioperative period is associated with an increased risk of mortality in cancer patients. The NK cell activity would be measured using a special assay called FANKIA
Measured: 24 h postoperative
Secondary outcomes (4)
IL-2
Interleucine release is a response to injury and the amount of interleucine in the circulation is related to the degree of trauma. Intensity of trauma is in turn related to the degree of stress response, which is reduced by epidural analgesia
Measured: 24 h postoperatively
IL-6
Interleucine release is a response to injury and the amount of interleucine in the circulation is related to the degree of trauma. Intensity of trauma is in turn related to the degree of stress response, which is reduced by epidural analgesia
Measured: 24 h postoperatively
TNF alpha
Interleucine release is a response to injury and the amount of interleucine in the circulation is related to the degree of trauma. Intensity of trauma is in turn related to the degree of stress response, which is reduced by epidural analgesia
Measured: 24 h postoperatively
Serum cortisol
Serum cortisol is a marker for stress response which is an important factor in immune response
Measured: 0 h postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2010
- Primary completionMar 2012
- Study completionMar 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Örebro University, Sweden
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anil Gupta, Örebro University, Sweden
- Investigators
- Anil Gupta, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Orebro University, Sweden
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01367418
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20110601
- Acronym
- AIMS
- Status last verified
- Mar 2012
- First submitted
- 26 May 2011
- Last updated
- 19 Mar 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Mar 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Between Epidural and Patient Controlled Analgesia on Immunological and Inflammatory Systems Following Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01367418
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AIMS / 20110601
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- Analgesia: Thoracic epidural, patient controlled, Surgery: Radical retropubic prostatectomy, Immune system, Inflammation
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 26 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Örebro University, SwedenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2010
- Primary completion
- Mar 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Several recently published retrospective studies show that regional anaesthesia (RA) can reduce cancer-related mortality following surgical treatment of colorectal, breast and prostate cancers and malignant melanoma. If these results are true, then the choice of perioperative pain management is as beneficial, or even better, than the current oncological therapies. This theory needs to be investigated in a prospective, randomized and controlled trail. We shall perform a prospective, randomized study comparing the effects of Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) or patient controlled analgesia (PCA) on postoperative immunological and inflammatory markers in order to understand whether the protective effects, if any, of regional analgesia are due to changes in these markers or whether the underlying mechanisms is not mediated via this stress signalling pathway.
Detailed description
Methods
Thirty patients (ASA status 1-2) in the age group 50 - 75 years, undergoing elective radical retropubic prostatectomy would be included in this pilot study. The exact type of cancer, its staging, degree of spread to proximal or distant sites and the pathologic type of cancer would be recorded. Patients on chronic analgesic medication, endocrinologic and immunologic diseases, those with known allergy to LA and those where epidural catheter placement was contraindicated would be excluded. Patients would be allocated to one of three groups: General anesthesia combined with Epidural anesthesia during and after the operation (Group GE; n = 12), General anesthesia combined with Epidural during anesthesia and local anesthesia postoperatively (Group GL; n = 12), General anesthesia alone (Group GO; n = 10)
Anesthesia and Surgery
All patients would be premedicated with midazolam 0.1 mg/kg 15-30 min before planned surgery, which is a routine in our hospital. Paracetamol 1 g was given orally every 6 h starting with the first dose at the time of premedication. IV access would be attained in the preoperative holding area and further anxiolytic would be given as necessary intravenously.
Epidural technique
In patients in Group GE, an 18 G epidural needle would be inserted at the Th10-12 inter-space using the 'hanging-drop' or loss of resistance technique with the patient in the sitting position in the holding area. The epidural catheter would be inserted and subsequently tested for subarachnoid or intravascular placement using 3 ml of mepivacaine 2% with adrenaline, which is standard practice in our hospital. A bolus dose of 3-4 ml mepivacaine 2% with adrenaline would subsequently be injected and a loss of sensation to cold determined after 10 min. If a sensory block to an upper level of Thoracic 8 dermatome and a minimal lower level of L2 is achieved, the patient would be considered to be ready for induction of anesthesia. If not, a further dose of 2-3 ml mepivacaine 2% with adrenaline would be injected epidurally. If this fails to achieve the desired block, it would be assumed that the catheter was incorrectly placed and the patient offered the choice of one more attempt at epidural catheter placement, or exclusion from the study.
Patients in Group GO would not have an epidural catheter placed. Following transfer to the operating room and routine monitoring, anesthesia would be induced in all patients with fentanyl 2 mg/kg i.v. and propofol 1-2mg/kg until loss of eyelash reflex. Tracheal intubation would be performed after muscle relaxation with rocuronium 0.5 mg/kg and anesthesia maintained with 1-3% sevoflurane and 33% oxygen in air. Mechanical ventilation would be used in a low-flow system in order to maintain an end-tidal CO2 of between 4.5-5.5 kPa. In all patients, sevoflurane concentration would be adjusted in order to maintain adequate anesthetic depth, which would be measured using Auditory evoked potentials (AEP) and maintained between 15-25 (A-line). Tachycardia, despite adequate anesthetic depth, would be treated by giving fentanyl intermittently IV as an analgesic when required during the operation. At the end of surgery, muscle relaxation would be reversed using glycopyrrolate (0.2 mg) and neostigmine (2.5 mg). Radical retropubic prostatectomy would be performed in a standardized way using a lower-abdominal midline incision.
Postoperative Management
During the first 4 h postoperatively, patients in Group GO would receive morphine 1-2 mg IV intermittently for pain relief in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) in order that the numeric rating scale (NRS) (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) is < 3. Patients in Group GE would have an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% 5-10 ml/h epidurally. In the event of pain, morphine (1-2 mg) would be administered intravenously as needed in both groups in order to provide good pain relief and NRS < 3.
All patients would be observed in the PACU for 4 h before being transferred to the general urological ward. The epidural infusion/PCA pump would be continued as long as pain relief is needed using these techniques but for a minimum of 48 h. Subsequently, pain relief would be obtained using oral analgesics using a combination of paracetamol and NSAID drugs.
Recording and Measurements
The total amount of anesthetic and analgesic drugs required during the operation would be recorded. Anesthetic drug requirement would be determined by two methods: end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane recorded every 5 min and the weight of the vaporizer before and after each anesthetic. For all measurements, the time when the anesthetic gases were turned off was considered to be time zero (t = 0). In addition to the routine postoperative protocols, the following measurements were recorded:
Pain intensity: At the site of the incision, 'deep' (visceral) pain and pain on coughing at 1, 4, 12, 24 and 48 h was measured using the NRS.
Rescue analgesic (morphine) consumption: during 0-4 h, 4-24 h and 24-48 h. Supplementary analgesic consumption: Additional analgesics administered in order to relieve pain would be recorded/day.
Side effects: Nausea and/or vomiting (0-4 h, 4-24 h and 24-48 h), pruritus and all other complications were recorded.
Surgical complications: the surgical incision would be inspected daily for evidence of infection and graded as either no evidence of infection (= 0), evidence of inflammation (= 1), mild wound dehiscence or suspected infection (= 2) or pus formation with definite infection (= 3). After 48-72 h, the epidural catheter would be removed and the catheter tip sent for bacterial culture.
Blood sampling:
Patient serum or EDTA/Heparin plasma will be assessed for cytokine levels by a Luminex multiplex assay (Human Inflammation 12-Plex kit; GM.CSF, IFN-g, IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-a and VEGF from R\&D system) and PGE2 levels will be measured by an ELISA kit from Cayman Chemicals Company. In addition, markers of systemic inflammatory response, including CRP, white blood cell count, differential count and total platelet count, will also be measured before and after surgery.
Natural Killer (NK) cell activity in the blood would be measured using the FANKIA assay. Clusters of differentiation (CD) markers would be measured.
Stress response would be measured using serum cortisol and prolactin levels.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA) | Experimental | Drug: Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA)TEA is used for perioperative pain management, having been used both intra- and postoperatively, up to 48 h. |
| Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) | Active comparator | Drug: Patient controlled analgesia (PCA)PCA is the standard of pain management and is usually used for up to 48 h postoperative for pain management following radical prostatectomy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 78 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- ASA physical status 1-2
- Radical retropubic prostatectomy
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Chronic use of opiates
- Contraindication to epidural analgesia
- Allergy to component drugs
- Chronic inflammatory diseases
- Use of steroids perioperatively
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Patient controlled analgesia (PCA)Also: Morphine = morphineMorphine 1 mg/ml | Drug | Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) |
| Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA)Also: Bupivacaine = Marcain, Ropivacaine = Narop, Sufentanil = SufentaIntra-operatively: Bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline Post-operatively: Ropivacaine 0.2% + sufentanil 1 ug | Drug | Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA) |
Primary outcome
Natural Killer Cell activity
Time frame: 24 h postoperative
NK cells are of primary importance in the elimination of tumor target cells at the early stage of tumor development, up to and including tumor metastasis. Decreased NK cell function during the perioperative period is associated with an increased risk of mortality in cancer patients. The NK cell activity would be measured using a special assay called FANKIA
4 secondary outcomes
IL-2
Time frame: 24 h postoperatively
IL-6
Time frame: 24 h postoperatively
TNF alpha
Time frame: 24 h postoperatively
Serum cortisol
Time frame: 0 h postoperatively
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Mar 2012.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anil Gupta, MD PhD principal investigator
Orebro University, Sweden
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA) in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Örebro University, Sweden at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Natural Killer Cell activity (time frame: 24 h postoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2012.