Colonic PolypsACEEMRNCT01368289
Australian Multicentre Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Study
An observational study of Colonic Polyps, run by Professor Michael Bourke at 1 site in Australia.
Trial summary
A prospective, multicentre, observational study of all patients referred for endoscopic resection of sessile colorectal polyps sized ≥20 mm conducted with intention to treat analysis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colonic Polyps
- What is being tested?
- Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 3,072 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustralia
- Study dates
- Sep 2008to Sep 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Any patient who presents to the Unit with the intention to treat large sessile colonic polyps equal to or greater than 20mm.
Who may be able to join
- Large sessile polyp (equal to or greater than 20mm)
- Intention to perform EMR
- Aged 18 years or older
Who cannot join
- Colonic polyps less than 20mm
- Aged younger then 18 years.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Australian Multicentre Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (ACE/EMR) Study
A prospective, multicentre, observational study of all patients referred for endoscopic resection of sessile colorectal polyps sized ≥20 mm conducted with intention to treat analysis.
Read the detailed description
A prospective, multicentre, observational study of all patients referred for endoscopic resection of sessile colorectal polyps sized ≥20 mm conducted with intention to treat analysis. Detailed data regarding lesion characteristics (size, location, Paris classification, granular or non-granular surface morphology and Kudo pit pattern), procedural, clinical and histological outcomes and complications are noted. Multivariate analysis will be performed to identify risk factors for Endoscopic Mucosal Resection failure and adenoma recurrence at follow-up colonoscopy.
- Conditions
- Colonic Polyps
- Being tested
- Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
- Medical subject headings
- Colonic Polyps
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionProcedure or surgery
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of large sessile colonic polyps.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Colonic Polyps | Patients who present with colonic polyps >20mm Receives: Procedure: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Technical success for Endoscopic resection
To determine the safety, efficacy and predictors of success for Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of large sessile colorectal polyps. The utility of endoscopic criteria to stratify for the risk of Submucosal Invasive Cancer was also assessed.
Measured: 6-60 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2008
- Primary completionNov 2016
- Study completionSep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colonic PolypsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 3,072 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Professor Michael Bourke
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Professor Michael Bourke, Western Sydney Local Health District
- Investigators
- Michael Bourke, Principal investigator, Westmead Hospital - Endoscopy Unit
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01368289
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACE/EMR
- Acronym
- ACEEMR
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 6 Jun 2011
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Gauci JL, Mandarino FV, Kerrison C, Whitfield AM, O'Sullivan T, Gupta S, Lam B, Perananthan V, Cronin O, Lee EY, Williams SJ, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Margin thermal ablation eliminates size as a risk factor for recurrence after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Gut. 2025 Apr 7;74(5):752-760. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333563.
PubMed 40044497Gauci JL, Whitfield A, Medas R, Kerrison C, Mandarino FV, Gibson D, O'Sullivan T, Cronin O, Gupta S, Lam B, Perananthan V, Hourigan L, Zanati S, Singh R, Raftopoulos S, Moss A, Brown G, Klein A, Desomer L, Tate DJ, Williams SJ, Lee EY, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Prevalence of Endoscopically Curable Low-Risk Cancer Among Large (>/=20 mm) Nonpedunculated Polyps in the Right Colon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Mar;23(4):555-563.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.07.017. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
PubMed 39089517Tate DJ, Vosko S, Bar-Yishay I, Desomer L, Shahidi N, Sidhu M, McLeod D, Bourke MJ. Incomplete mucosal layer excision during EMR: a potential source of recurrent adenoma (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Sep;100(3):501-509. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
PubMed 38280532Tate DJ, Desomer L, Argenziano ME, Mahajan N, Sidhu M, Vosko S, Shahidi N, Lee E, Williams SJ, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Treatment of adenoma recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection. Gut. 2023 Oct;72(10):1875-1886. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330300. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
PubMed 37414440Gupta S, Vosko S, Shahidi N, O'Sullivan T, Cronin O, Whitfield A, Kurup R, Sidhu M, Lee EYT, Williams SJ, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic resection-related colorectal strictures: risk factors, management, and long-term outcomes. Endoscopy. 2023 Nov;55(11):1010-1018. doi: 10.1055/a-2106-6494. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
PubMed 37279786O'Sullivan T, Tate D, Sidhu M, Gupta S, Elhindi J, Byth K, Cronin O, Whitfield A, Craciun A, Singh R, Brown G, Raftopoulos S, Hourigan L, Moss A, Klein A, Heitman S, Williams S, Lee E, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. The Surface Morphology of Large Nonpedunculated Colonic Polyps Predicts Synchronous Large Lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug;21(9):2270-2277.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.01.034. Epub 2023 Feb 12.
PubMed 36787836Cronin O, Sidhu M, Shahidi N, Gupta S, O'Sullivan T, Whitfield A, Wang H, Kumar P, Hourigan LF, Byth K, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Comparison of the morphology and histopathology of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps in the rectum and colon: implications for endoscopic treatment. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jul;96(1):118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.022. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
PubMed 35219724Shahidi N, Vosko S, Gupta S, van Hattem WA, Sidhu M, Tate DJ, Williams SJ, Lee EYT, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Previously Attempted Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps Are Effectively Managed by Endoscopic Mucosal Resection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 1;116(5):958-966. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001096.
PubMed 33625125Tate DJ, Sidhu M, Bar-Yishay I, Desomer L, Brown G, Hourigan LF, Lee EYT, Moss A, Raftopoulos S, Singh R, Williams SJ, Zanati S, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Impact of en bloc resection on long-term outcomes after endoscopic mucosal resection: a matched cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 May;91(5):1155-1163.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.025. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
PubMed 31887274Tate DJ, Desomer L, Hourigan LF, Moss A, Singh R, Bourke MJ. Two-stage endoscopic mucosal resection is a safe and effective salvage therapy after a failed single-session approach. Endoscopy. 2017 Sep;49(9):888-898. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-110671. Epub 2017 May 31.
PubMed 28564715Tate DJ, Desomer L, Klein A, Brown G, Hourigan LF, Lee EY, Moss A, Ormonde D, Raftopoulos S, Singh R, Williams SJ, Zanati S, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Adenoma recurrence after piecemeal colonic EMR is predictable: the Sydney EMR recurrence tool. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar;85(3):647-656.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.11.027. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
PubMed 27908600Burgess NG, Bassan MS, McLeod D, Williams SJ, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Deep mural injury and perforation after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a new classification and analysis of risk factors. Gut. 2017 Oct;66(10):1779-1789. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309848. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
PubMed 27464708Bahin FF, Rasouli KN, Williams SJ, Lee EY, Bourke MJ. Prophylactic clipping for the prevention of bleeding following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading colorectal lesions: an economic modeling study. Endoscopy. 2016 Aug;48(8):754-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-105558. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
PubMed 27110693Tutticci N, Klein A, Sonson R, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic resection of subtotal or completely circumferential laterally spreading colonic adenomas: technique, caveats, and outcomes. Endoscopy. 2016 May;48(5):465-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-101854. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
PubMed 27009082Pellise M, Burgess NG, Tutticci N, Hourigan LF, Zanati SA, Brown GJ, Singh R, Williams SJ, Raftopoulos SC, Ormonde D, Moss A, Byth K, P'Ng H, Mahajan H, McLeod D, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic mucosal resection for large serrated lesions in comparison with adenomas: a prospective multicentre study of 2000 lesions. Gut. 2017 Apr;66(4):644-653. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310249. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
PubMed 26786685
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Australian Multicentre Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (ACE/EMR) Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01368289
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACEEMR / ACE/EMR
- Conditions
- Colonic Polyps
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 3,072 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Professor Michael BourkeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2008
- Primary completion
- Nov 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A prospective, multicentre, observational study of all patients referred for endoscopic resection of sessile colorectal polyps sized ≥20 mm conducted with intention to treat analysis.
Detailed description
A prospective, multicentre, observational study of all patients referred for endoscopic resection of sessile colorectal polyps sized ≥20 mm conducted with intention to treat analysis. Detailed data regarding lesion characteristics (size, location, Paris classification, granular or non-granular surface morphology and Kudo pit pattern), procedural, clinical and histological outcomes and complications are noted. Multivariate analysis will be performed to identify risk factors for Endoscopic Mucosal Resection failure and adenoma recurrence at follow-up colonoscopy.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Colonic Polyps | – | Procedure: Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionPatients who present with colonic polyps >20mm |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Any patient who presents to the Unit with the intention to treat large sessile colonic polyps equal to or greater than 20mm.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Large sessile polyp (equal to or greater than 20mm)
- Intention to perform EMR
- Aged 18 years or older
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Colonic polyps less than 20mm
- Aged younger then 18 years.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionEndoscopic Mucosal Resection of large sessile colonic polyps. | Procedure or surgery | Colonic Polyps |
Primary outcome
Technical success for Endoscopic resection
Time frame: 6-60 months
To determine the safety, efficacy and predictors of success for Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of large sessile colorectal polyps. The utility of endoscopic criteria to stratify for the risk of Submucosal Invasive Cancer was also assessed.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Mar 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40044497Gauci JL, Mandarino FV, Kerrison C, Whitfield AM, O'Sullivan T, Gupta S, Lam B, Perananthan V, Cronin O, Lee EY, Williams SJ, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Margin thermal ablation eliminates size as a risk factor for recurrence after piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps. Gut. 2025 Apr 7;74(5):752-760. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333563.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39089517Gauci JL, Whitfield A, Medas R, Kerrison C, Mandarino FV, Gibson D, O'Sullivan T, Cronin O, Gupta S, Lam B, Perananthan V, Hourigan L, Zanati S, Singh R, Raftopoulos S, Moss A, Brown G, Klein A, Desomer L, Tate DJ, Williams SJ, Lee EY, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Prevalence of Endoscopically Curable Low-Risk Cancer Among Large (>/=20 mm) Nonpedunculated Polyps in the Right Colon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Mar;23(4):555-563.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.07.017. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38280532Tate DJ, Vosko S, Bar-Yishay I, Desomer L, Shahidi N, Sidhu M, McLeod D, Bourke MJ. Incomplete mucosal layer excision during EMR: a potential source of recurrent adenoma (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Sep;100(3):501-509. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37414440Tate DJ, Desomer L, Argenziano ME, Mahajan N, Sidhu M, Vosko S, Shahidi N, Lee E, Williams SJ, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Treatment of adenoma recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection. Gut. 2023 Oct;72(10):1875-1886. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330300. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37279786Gupta S, Vosko S, Shahidi N, O'Sullivan T, Cronin O, Whitfield A, Kurup R, Sidhu M, Lee EYT, Williams SJ, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic resection-related colorectal strictures: risk factors, management, and long-term outcomes. Endoscopy. 2023 Nov;55(11):1010-1018. doi: 10.1055/a-2106-6494. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36787836O'Sullivan T, Tate D, Sidhu M, Gupta S, Elhindi J, Byth K, Cronin O, Whitfield A, Craciun A, Singh R, Brown G, Raftopoulos S, Hourigan L, Moss A, Klein A, Heitman S, Williams S, Lee E, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. The Surface Morphology of Large Nonpedunculated Colonic Polyps Predicts Synchronous Large Lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Aug;21(9):2270-2277.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.01.034. Epub 2023 Feb 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35219724Cronin O, Sidhu M, Shahidi N, Gupta S, O'Sullivan T, Whitfield A, Wang H, Kumar P, Hourigan LF, Byth K, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Comparison of the morphology and histopathology of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps in the rectum and colon: implications for endoscopic treatment. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jul;96(1):118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.02.022. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33625125Shahidi N, Vosko S, Gupta S, van Hattem WA, Sidhu M, Tate DJ, Williams SJ, Lee EYT, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Previously Attempted Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps Are Effectively Managed by Endoscopic Mucosal Resection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 1;116(5):958-966. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001096.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31887274Tate DJ, Sidhu M, Bar-Yishay I, Desomer L, Brown G, Hourigan LF, Lee EYT, Moss A, Raftopoulos S, Singh R, Williams SJ, Zanati S, Burgess N, Bourke MJ. Impact of en bloc resection on long-term outcomes after endoscopic mucosal resection: a matched cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 May;91(5):1155-1163.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.025. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28564715Tate DJ, Desomer L, Hourigan LF, Moss A, Singh R, Bourke MJ. Two-stage endoscopic mucosal resection is a safe and effective salvage therapy after a failed single-session approach. Endoscopy. 2017 Sep;49(9):888-898. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-110671. Epub 2017 May 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27908600Tate DJ, Desomer L, Klein A, Brown G, Hourigan LF, Lee EY, Moss A, Ormonde D, Raftopoulos S, Singh R, Williams SJ, Zanati S, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Adenoma recurrence after piecemeal colonic EMR is predictable: the Sydney EMR recurrence tool. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar;85(3):647-656.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.11.027. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27464708Burgess NG, Bassan MS, McLeod D, Williams SJ, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Deep mural injury and perforation after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a new classification and analysis of risk factors. Gut. 2017 Oct;66(10):1779-1789. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309848. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
Related trials for Colonic Polyps
Recruiting
Artificial Intelligence to Implement Cost-saving Strategies for Colonoscopy Screening Based on in Vivo Prediction of Polyp Histology
Colonic Neoplasms
RecruitingObservational study
Malignant Polyp Registry
Malignant Colorectal Polyp, Colorectal Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
KLF4 Epigenetic Modulation
KLF4 Methylation, Epigenetic
Active, not recruiting
Virtual Incision Robotically Assisted Surgical Device Use in Minimally Invasive Colectomy
Colon Cancer, Colon Polyp
Enrolling by invitation
Six Versus Twelve Month Index Follow-up After Large Colon Polyp Resection
Colon Polyp, Adenoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Bourke principal investigator
Westmead Hospital - Endoscopy Unit
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Colonic Polyps, run by Professor Michael Bourke at 1 site in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Technical success for Endoscopic resection (time frame: 6-60 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01368289, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2025.