AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 3NCT01368770

Stress Testing Compared to Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

A Phase 3 study testing Coronary CTA and Stress MPI SPECT in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by All India Institute of Medical Sciences at 1 site in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The use of coronary computed tomographic angiography(CTA)is rapidly increasing, but there is lack of data which supports their use in the initial evaluation of patients who are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
What is being tested?
Coronary CTA and Stress MPI SPECT
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
303 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
Jul 2011to Dec 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Consenting patients above 21 years who are mildly symptomatic (those in class II NYHA), who have an intermediate likelihood of CAD, or asymptomatic patients who are determined to be at intermediate or high risk of coronary events by the Framingham (ATP III) criteria

Who cannot join

  • Patients with prior documented CAD (by angiography), MI, coronary stenting or bypass surgery
  • Patients in class III or IV NYHA
  • Patients with chronic renal impairment to the extent of precluding contrast injection
  • Severe medical disease with limited expectancy of life
  • Contra-indication or allergy to pharmacologic stress agents or contrast agents
  • Patients with unstable cardiac rhythms (including persistent atrial fibrillation) which preclude good ECG gating
  • Weight limitations due to scanner design
  • Pregnant/ lactating women

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

India1 site
  • Department of cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences

    New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110029

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: Stress-rest Single Photon-Emission Computed Tomography(SPECT)Compared to Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in the Initial Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

The use of coronary computed tomographic angiography(CTA)is rapidly increasing, but there is lack of data which supports their use in the initial evaluation of patients who are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic. The hypothesis underlying this proposal is that the use of stress-rest myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) as an initial test for the evaluation of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients who are at intermediate risk of coronary events will result in less further non-invasive and invasive testing and result in reduced costs, without adversely affecting clinical outcomes in the short term.

Read the detailed description

Recently coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) has become increasingly popular as a means of investigating asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients, instead of stress-rest myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), despite the absence of long-term prognostic data. With its high negative predictive value, CTA has become useful for exclusion of CAD in patients with chest pain syndromes. However, the clinical management of a patient with an abnormal CTA is not well defined. Further, several caveats remain regarding the use of coronary CTA. Despite the anatomic data provided by CTA, it does not yield information regarding the functional consequences of the obstruction. Moreover, this technique may miss small vessel disease because of limited resolution and may not be useful in the presence of significant vessel calcium or coronary stents. Most importantly, there is no long-term data regarding the prognostic ability of coronary CTA in the initial evaluation of patients at intermediate risk of coronary events. An abnormal CTA result often leads to additional functional testing or invasive coronary angiography. The major drawback of performing two or more tests in tandem is that it greatly adds to cost that can be prohibitive in lower and middle income countries. Therefore, there is a need to determine if either stress MPI or CTA performed initially, results in meaningful differences in costs without adversely affecting clinical outcomes.

The primary objective of this pilot study is to compare the efficacy (in terms of reduced additional non-invasive or invasive testing) and costs of a strategy of initial stress-rest MPI, to a strategy of initial coronary CTA in the management of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients who are at intermediate risk of coronary events (death or nonfatal MI) by the Framingham criteria.

Being tested
Coronary CTA, Stress MPI SPECT
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Coronary CTAOther

    Coronary CTA using standard protocols

  • Stress MPI SPECTOther

    Stress MPI using standard protocols

Study groups in NCT01368770
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Coronary CTAExperimentalCoronary CTA using standard protocols
Receives: Other: Coronary CTA; Other: Stress MPI SPECT
Stress MPI SPECTActive comparatorStress-rest MPI SPECT using standard protocols
Receives: Other: Coronary CTA; Other: Stress MPI SPECT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of patients who have additional non-invasive testing with another modality, or invasive coronary angiography within 6 months of the first test.

    The primary objective is to compare the efficacy (in terms of reduced additional non-invasive or invasive testing) and costs (at 6 months) of a strategy of initial stress-rest MPI, to a strategy of initial coronary CTA in the management of asymptomatic patients at intermediate or high risk of coronary events by the Framingham criteria, or mildly symptomatic patients who are at intermediate likelihood of having CAD.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Costs of investigation and treatment in both groups

    To compare costs between a strategy of initial stress-rest MPI with a strategy of initial coronary CTA in the management of asymptomatic patients at intermediate or high risk of coronary events by the Framingham criteria, or mildly symptomatic patients who are at intermediate likelihood of having CAD.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Proportion of patients who have planned, elective invasive angiography, elective coronary revascularization, or MACE at 6 month and at 1-year follow up

    To compare these two strategies in terms of the incidence of planned coronary angiography, revascularization and adverse clinical outcomes at 1 year (death, nonfatal MI, recurrent ischemia or unplanned coronary revascularization)

    Measured: 6 months and 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jun 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2011
  3. Primary completionJun 2014
  4. Study completionDec 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
303 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01368770
Sponsor's protocol ID
Protocol version 1.1
Other IDs
CTRI/2010/091/001384
Status last verified
Apr 2015
First submitted
6 Jun 2011
Last updated
2 Apr 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Karthikeyan G, Guzic Salobir B, Jug B, Devasenapathy N, Alexanderson E, Vitola J, Kraft O, Ozkan E, Sharma S, Purohit G, Dolenc Novak M, Meave A, Trevethan S, Cerci R, Zier S, Gotthardtova L, Jonszta T, Altin T, Soydal C, Patel C, Gulati G, Paez D, Dondi M, Kashyap R. Functional compared to anatomical imaging in the initial evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease: An international, multi-center, randomized controlled trial (IAEA-SPECT/CTA study). J Nucl Cardiol. 2017 Apr;24(2):507-517. doi: 10.1007/s12350-016-0664-3. Epub 2016 Oct 28.

    PubMed 27796852

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Coronary CTA and Stress MPI SPECT in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by All India Institute of Medical Sciences at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of patients who have additional non-invasive testing with another modality, or invasive coronary angiography within 6 months of the first test. (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01368770, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in