AzTrials
AzTrials

Uterine CancerNCT01370122

Pelvic Floor Disorders in Survivors of Gynecologic Malignancies

An observational study of Uterine Cancer and Ovarian Cancer, run by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Pelvic Floor dysfunction affects the quality of life of women. However, the prevalence and risk factors for pelvic floor disorders (PFD) in survivors of gynecologic malignancies are not known. The investigators plan to perform an observational study including survivors of gynecologic malignancies. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
Survey
How many people
225 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2011to Sep 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Women over the age of 20 with a history of uterine, ovarian, fallopian tube, peritoneal, cervical, or vulvar cancers.

Who may be able to join

  • Women with documented surgery for gynecologic malignancies at any of the three UPHS associated hospitals in center city Philadelphia (e.g., HUP, Pennsylvania hospital) and an accessible electronic medical record from the time of cancer diagnosis and beyond.
  • Gynecologic cancer survivors at least 20 years of age diagnosed and treated for uterine, ovarian, peritoneal, fallopian tube, cervical, or vulvar tumors between 2008 to July 2010 will be included

Who cannot join

  • Women who are pregnant, with benign tumors, those lost to follow-up, or deceased will be excluded from this study.
  • Patients unable to complete a written survey due to physical or mental disabilities will also be excluded.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Prevalence and Predictive Factors of Pelvic Floor Disorders in Gynecologic Malignancy Survivors

Pelvic Floor dysfunction affects the quality of life of women. However, the prevalence and risk factors for pelvic floor disorders (PFD) in survivors of gynecologic malignancies are not known. The investigators plan to perform an observational study including survivors of gynecologic malignancies. Questionnaires for diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders will be mailed to survivors to generate prevalence rates and risk factors for PFD in women with a history of a gynecologic cancer diagnosis.

Read the detailed description

Pelvic floor disorders negatively impact the quality of life of those afflicted by pelvic organ prolapse, lower urinary tract symptoms, defecatory or sexual dysfunction, or pain. Women who present for routine gynecologic care often have undiagnosed pelvic floor disorders, and physicians may not specifically question women to elicit pelvic floor symptoms. In the United States 24% of women report at least one pelvic floor disorder, which increases with age, parity , obesity. Gynecologic cancer survivors are a unique population who undergo a variety treatment regimens including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. Radical hysterectomy, a common surgical treatment for gynecologic cancers, is a well-established cause for lower urinary tract dysfunction. In contrast, data are lacking regarding risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse or fecal incontinence. Survivors of gynecologic malignancies may be at increased risk for symptomatic pelvic floor disorders, but may not be diagnosed due to lack of inquiry of these symptoms by practitioners. In addition, a recent qualitative study found that survivors of gynecologic malignancies believed that pelvic floor symptoms were an inevitable, untreatable corollary to treatment for their cancer and thus did not seek treatment. Furthermore, the study participants reported that they felt healthy despite these symptoms because of their oncologists assessment of their remission status. The lack of diagnosis and treatment of pelvic floor disorders has clinical and quality of life implications for the growing numbers of gynecologic malignancy survivors. The objective of this study is to identify the prevalence of an risk factors for pelvic floor disorders in women after treatment for gynecologic cancer. Our rationale for this project is that the investigators believe that pelvic floor disorders affect the quality of life of gynecologic cancer survivors and should be quantified. Successful completion of this study will provide evidence for practitioners to screen and treat pelvic floor disorders in gynecologic malignancy survivors.

Being tested
Survey
Keywords
Women over the age of 20
Medical subject headings
Uterine Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms, Fallopian Tube Neoplasms, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Vulvar Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SurveyOther

Study groups in NCT01370122
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Subjects exposed to radiationNot described
Receives: Other: Survey
Subjects not exposed to radiationNot described
Receives: Other: Survey

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Urinary incontinence

    Urinary incontinence is the most common outcome of all symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in women

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jun 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2011
  3. Primary completionOct 2012
  4. Study completionSep 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
225 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01370122
Sponsor's protocol ID
UPCC 35810
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
2 Jun 2011
Last updated
29 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Uterine Cancer and Ovarian Cancer, run by Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Urinary incontinence. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in