AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory FailurePhase 2R21 HL-110044NCT01372995

Vitamin D in Ventilated ICU Patients

A Phase 2 study testing Enteral Vitamin D3 50,000 IU, Enteral Vitamin D3 100,000IU and Inactive substance in people with Respiratory Failure, run by Emory University at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The increasing rate of hospital-acquired infection and antibiotic resistance are major causes of prolonged ICU stay and death in hospitalized patients. The enormous impact of ICU-related infection demands the need for cost-effective therapies that can be rapidly implemented to improve patient immune response to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Respiratory Failure
What is being tested?
Enteral Vitamin D3 50,000 IU, Enteral Vitamin D3 100,000IU and Inactive substance
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
31 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2011to Apr 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Receiving care in an intensive care unit (ICU)
  • Age greater than 18 years
  • Expected to require mechanical ventilation for at least 72 hours after entry
  • Expected to survive and remain in the ICU for at least 96 hours after study entry
  • To enable delivery of study drug, the subject has enteral access in place and is deemed able to tolerate enteral drug administration

Who cannot join

  • Inability to obtain or declined informed consent from the subject and/or legally authorized representative
  • Pregnancy
  • Ongoing shock
  • Current hypercalcemia (albumin-corrected serum calcium > 10.8 mg/dL or ionized calcium > 5.2 mg/dL)
  • History of therapy with high-dose vitamin D to treat vitamin D deficiency within previous 6 months
  • History of disorders associated with hypercalcemia; history of cancer with history of hypercalcemia within the past 1 year, hyperparathyroidism, sarcoidosis, nephrolithiasis]
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Chronic renal dysfunction requiring chronic dialysis
  • Known history of cirrhosis
  • History of AIDS
  • The patient has received any investigational drug within 60 days prior to study entry.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Emory University Hospital Midtown

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30308

  • Emory University Hospital

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: High-Dose Vitamin D and Antimicrobial Peptide Expression in Lung Failure

The increasing rate of hospital-acquired infection and antibiotic resistance are major causes of prolonged ICU stay and death in hospitalized patients. The enormous impact of ICU-related infection demands the need for cost-effective therapies that can be rapidly implemented to improve patient immune response to control infection. Unfortunately, little high-quality comparative effectiveness research has been performed on micronutrient treatment regimens as methods to decrease hospital-acquired infection in critically ill patients. Critically ill medical and surgical patients have an extremely high prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency.

We will perform a rigorous, double-blind, randomized, controlled, pilot clinical trial in ventilator-dependent ICU patients to test the clinical/metabolic safety and efficacy of two doses of oral high-dose vitamin D3 therapy versus standard therapy (no supplemental vitamin D). The primary endpoint is to test whether high-dose regimens [either 50,000 or 100,000 international units (IU) of enteral vitamin D3 given daily for 5 consecutive days (total dose = 250,000 or 500,000 IU, respectively) increase plasma 25(OH)D concentrations into a desirable range (> 30 ng/mL).

Read the detailed description
  1. We will evaluate, over 12 weeks, the safety and efficacy of two high-dose vitamin D3 regimens in severely ill ICU patients. Vitamin D or placebo ( depending on study arm) will be given sequentially in divided doses for 5 days
  2. We will explore whether these vitamin D regimens are capable of increasing the production of key antimicrobial peptides LL-37 and hBD-2 ( substances produced by our bodies to fight infections), in both the blood and in lung.
  3. We will determine whether a higher vitamin D level in the blood is associated with a decrease in hospital infection rates and other complications in high-risk ICU patients with respiratory failure.

Study Design:

Enrollment goal is 36 patients. Once consent is obtained subjects will be randomly assigned to one of three study groups. Each group consists of 12 patients with enteral access ; a placebo arm, an arm where subjects receive 50,000 IU of Vitamin D for 5 days, and a third arm where subjects receive 100,000 IU of Vitamin D for 5 days.

Methods: Baseline blood samples (25-hydroxyvitamin D, vitamin D binding protein, ionized calcium, LL-37,and hBD-2) will be taken on study day 7,14,21,28,84 days. On study day 1 and 8, LL-37, hBD-2, cathelicidin from BAL fluid will also be analyzed. Patients will be given either placebo, Vitamin D3 50,000 IU x 5 days (total 250,000 IU) or Vitamin D3 100,000 IU x 5 days (total 500,000 IU) with an intention to treat model. Baseline data on the patients including demographic, laboratory, documented infections, severity illness score (APACHE II) and organ dysfunction score (SOFA) will be collected. ELISA assay on the serum and BAL will be performed.

Being tested
Enteral Vitamin D3 50,000 IU, Enteral Vitamin D3 100,000IU, Inactive substance
Keywords
critical care, nosocomial infection, antiAntimicrobial peptide expression, LL-37, hBD-2, cathelicidin, microbial peptide
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Insufficiency, Cross Infection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Enteral Vitamin D3 50,000 IUDrug

    Enteral Vitamin D3 50,000IU x 5 days (total dose 250,000IU)

  • Enteral Vitamin D3 100,000IUDrug

    Enteral Vitamin D3 100,000IU over 5 days (total 500,000IU)

  • Inactive substanceOther

    Inactive substance given enterally for 5 days.

Study groups in NCT01372995
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Enteral vitamin D3 50,000 IUExperimentalAn arm where subjects receive 50,000 IU of Vitamin D for 5 days.
Receives: Drug: Enteral Vitamin D3 50,000 IU
Enteral Vitamin D3 100,000 IUExperimentalArm where subjects receive 100,000 IU of Vitamin D for 5 days
Receives: Drug: Enteral Vitamin D3 100,000IU
Inactive SubstancePlacebo comparatorArm where patients receive inactive substance for 5 days.
Receives: Other: Inactive substance

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Plasma 25(OH)D Concentration >30ng/mL at Baseline

    The number of participants with a plasma 25(OH)D concentration in the desirable range (defined as greater than 30 ng/mL) at the baseline measurement.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Number of Participants With Plasma 25(OH)D Concentration >30ng/mL at Day 7

    The number of participants with a plasma 25(OH)D concentration in the desirable range (defined as greater than 30 ng/mL) at the Day 7 measurement.

    Measured: Day 7

  3. Number of Participants With Plasma 25(OH)D Concentration >30ng/mL at Day 14

    The number of participants with a plasma 25(OH)D concentration in the desirable range (defined as greater than 30 ng/mL) at the Day 14 measurement.

    Measured: Day 14

  4. Number of Participants With Plasma 25(OH)D Concentration >30ng/mL at Day 21

    The number of participants with a plasma 25(OH)D concentration in the desirable range (defined as greater than 30 ng/mL) at the Day 21 measurement.

    Measured: Day 21

  5. Number of Participants With Plasma 25(OH)D Concentration >30ng/mL at Day 28

    The number of participants with a plasma 25(OH)D concentration in the desirable range (defined as greater than 30 ng/mL) at the Day 28 measurement.

    Measured: Day 28

  6. Number of Participants With Plasma 25(OH)D Concentration >30ng/mL at Day 84

    The number of participants with a plasma 25(OH)D concentration in the desirable range (defined as greater than 30 ng/mL) at the Day 84 measurement.

    Measured: Day 84

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Change in Plasma LL-37 Levels

    Plasma LL-37 was measured at Baseline, Day 7 and Day 14.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 7, Day 14

  2. Duration of Time on Ventilator

    The number of days spent on mechanical ventilation was collected for all study participants and the average number of days for each study arm is reported.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. Duration of Time in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

    The number of days spent in the intensive care unit (ICU) was collected for each participant and the average number of days for each study arm is reported.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. Duration of Time in Hospital

    The number of days that each participant spent in the hospital was collected and the average number of days for each study arm is reported.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  5. Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score

    Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score between Baseline and Day 7. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is a mortality prediction score that is based on the degree of dysfunction of 6 organ systems (respiratory, nervous, cardiovascular, liver, coagulation, and kidneys). A score ranges from 0-24. 0 (normal) to 4 (high degree of dysfunction) is given for each organ system, with a higher score indicating greater severity. A score of 0-6 is associated with a mortality rate of less than 10% while a score between 16 and 24 is associated with a greater than 90% mortality rate. Scores decreasing between the Baseline and Day 7 measurements are represented as negative values for the change in SOFA score.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 7

  6. Number of Hospital Acquired Infections

    The number of study participants who had a hospital acquired infection.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  7. Number of Hospital Mortality Cases

    The number of study participants who died while in the hospital was collected.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  8. Day 84 Mortality

    The number of participants who died prior to the end of the study (Day 84) was collected.

    Measured: Day 84

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jun 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2011
  3. Primary completionApr 2014
  4. Study completionApr 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
31 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01372995
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00049610
Acronym
R21 HL-110044
Status last verified
Nov 2016
First submitted
13 Jun 2011
Last updated
9 Jan 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Tejada Artigas A, Bello Dronda S, Chacon Valles E, Munoz Marco J, Villuendas Uson MC, Figueras P, Suarez FJ, Hernandez A. Risk factors for nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill trauma patients. Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):304-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00015.

    PubMed 11246310
  • Winther B, Greve JM, Gwaltney JM Jr, Innes DJ, Eastham JR, McClelland A, Hendley JO. Surface expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 on epithelial cells in the human adenoid. J Infect Dis. 1997 Aug;176(2):523-5. doi: 10.1086/517280.

    PubMed 9237723
  • Urashima M, Segawa T, Okazaki M, Kurihara M, Wada Y, Ida H. Randomized trial of vitamin D supplementation to prevent seasonal influenza A in schoolchildren. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 May;91(5):1255-60. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.29094. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

    PubMed 20219962
  • Manaseki-Holland S, Qader G, Isaq Masher M, Bruce J, Zulf Mughal M, Chandramohan D, Walraven G. Effects of vitamin D supplementation to children diagnosed with pneumonia in Kabul: a randomised controlled trial. Trop Med Int Health. 2010 Oct;15(10):1148-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02578.x. Epub 2010 Aug 17.

    PubMed 20723187
  • Yim S, Dhawan P, Ragunath C, Christakos S, Diamond G. Induction of cathelicidin in normal and CF bronchial epithelial cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3). J Cyst Fibros. 2007 Nov 30;6(6):403-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 Apr 27.

    PubMed 17467345
  • De Smet K, Contreras R. Human antimicrobial peptides: defensins, cathelicidins and histatins. Biotechnol Lett. 2005 Sep;27(18):1337-47. doi: 10.1007/s10529-005-0936-5.

    PubMed 16215847
  • Barlow PG, Beaumont PE, Cosseau C, Mackellar A, Wilkinson TS, Hancock RE, Haslett C, Govan JR, Simpson AJ, Davidson DJ. The human cathelicidin LL-37 preferentially promotes apoptosis of infected airway epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2010 Dec;43(6):692-702. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0250OC. Epub 2010 Jan 22.

    PubMed 20097832
  • Jeng L, Yamshchikov AV, Judd SE, Blumberg HM, Martin GS, Ziegler TR, Tangpricha V. Alterations in vitamin D status and anti-microbial peptide levels in patients in the intensive care unit with sepsis. J Transl Med. 2009 Apr 23;7:28. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-7-28.

    PubMed 19389235
  • Han JE, Jones JL, Tangpricha V, Brown MA, Brown LAS, Hao L, Hebbar G, Lee MJ, Liu S, Ziegler TR, Martin GS. High Dose Vitamin D Administration in Ventilated Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Pilot Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2016 Jun;4:59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jcte.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 5.

    PubMed 27419080

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Enteral Vitamin D3 50,000 IU, Enteral Vitamin D3 100,000IU and Inactive substance in people with Respiratory Failure, run by Emory University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Jan 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Plasma 25(OH)D Concentration >30ng/mL at Baseline (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01372995, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in