Prostate CancerPhase 2ANABRAQNCT01374087
Study to Assess the Efficacy of Brachytherapy With or Without Hormone Therapy, Using Triptorelin 22.5mg in Patients With Recurrence of Prostate Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Triptorelin 22.5 mg and Brachytherapy in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Ipsen at 11 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of brachytherapy versus brachytherapy + triptorelin 22.5 mg (single injection) in subjects with recurrence of prostate cancer previously treated with radiotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Triptorelin 22.5 mg and Brachytherapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- Nov 2011to Dec 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A history of prostate cancer (T1-T2-T3 N0 M0), confirmed through histopathology and initially treated with radiotherapy.
- Age ≤ 75 years.
- Biochemical failure due to Phoenix criteria (nadir + 2) and local recurrence of the initial prostate cancer, confirmed by prostate biopsy, with neither regional involvement nor distant metastases.
- Late local recurrence of the initial prostate cancer. A recurrence is late when it appears after longer than 18 months post-radiotherapy.
- PSA < 10 ng/mL at the time of recurrence.
- The subject was required to be amenable to brachytherapy treatment.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Adequate urinary function according to the questionnaire (IPSS ≤ 20 points).
- Suitable bone marrow function, determined by:
- Haemoglobin > 10 g/dL.
- Neutrophil count > 1.5 x 10^9/L.
- Platelet count > 100 x 10^9/L.
- Suitable liver function determined by: serum bilirubin < 1.5 x Upper Normal Level (UNL), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) < 2.5xUNL.
- Suitable renal function determined by: serum creatinine < 1.5 x UNL, or creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min.
- The subject was required to be ≥ 18 years old.
- The subject had to give his written informed consent (personally signed and dated) before starting with any study-related procedure.
- Life expectancy > 5 years.
Who cannot join
- Evidence of metastatic disease.
- Previous evidence of hormone-resistant cancer.
- Lack of availability for performing regular follow-up.
- Subjects who were receiving or had received either luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonists, or antagonists, over the previous 12 months.
- Subjects who had been on treatment with other hormone therapies, including antagonists, megestrol acetate, finasteride, dutasteride, any herbaceous product known to reduce the PSA levels, or any systemic corticosteroid, over the previous 4 weeks.
- Subjects who had previously undergone a radiotherapy treatment that was completed within 18 months of inclusion.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Subjects with pre-existing heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV), or with a myocardial infarction within 6 months of inclusion.
- Subjects with a significant co-existing disease or an active infection.
- Subjects who had been treated with investigational therapies within 4 weeks prior to the brachytherapy ± triptorelin treatment.
- Subjects with known hypersensitivity to triptorelin, LH-RH, other LH-RH-analogous agonists, or any excipients in triptorelin 22.5 mg.
- Subjects with a mental condition that prevented them from understanding the nature, the scope and the potential consequences of this study, and/or subjects who showed an uncooperative attitude.
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 1 country.
11 sites in 1 country
Spain11 sites
Fundación IMOR
Barcelona
H. de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona
ICO Institut Català d'Oncologia-Hospitalet
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat
H. Ramón y Cajal
Madrid
H. Sanchinarro
Madrid
H. Carlos Haya
Málaga
Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
Pamplona
Instituto Oncológico
San Sebastián
H. Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander
IVO Instituto Valenciano de Oncología
Valencia
H. Do Meixoeiro
Vigo
About this study
Official title: Proof-of-concept Multicentre, Prospective, Randomised, Open-label- Parallel-group Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Brachytherapy With or Without Hormone Therapy Using Triptorelin 22.5 mg 6-month Formulation in Patients With Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With Radiotherapy
The primary objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of brachytherapy versus brachytherapy + triptorelin 22.5 mg (single injection) in subjects with recurrence of prostate cancer previously treated with radiotherapy. Efficacy was to be assessed by biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) curves from treatment initiation up to 5 years.
Secondary objectives included comparing the following: the differences in time to progression of subjects receiving brachytherapy + triptorelin 22.5 mg versus subjects receiving brachytherapy only, the BFFS percentages between both treatment groups at 5 years from treatment initiation, overall survival between both treatment groups, total testosterone changes (from baseline visit up to 12 months) and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels (from baseline visit up to 60 months of treatment) between both treatment groups, quality of life (QoL) modifications (Spanish version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire) between the baseline score and the rest of measurements, and to compare safety between both treatment groups.
Read the detailed description
This was a proof-of-concept, prospective, parallel, multicentre, randomised and open-label trial, including a follow-up of all subjects conducted at 11 centres in Spain. Study visits included an inclusion visit (Visit 1), a treatment administration visit (Visit 2), and 9 follow-up visits (Visit 3 to Visit 11) from 3 to 60 months after study treatment administration. All of the procedures performed at these visits were in accordance with routine clinical practice. Subjects were randomised to any one of the two treatment arms (Group 1: brachytherapy only, or Group 2: brachytherapy + triptorelin 22.5 mg). Randomisation was stratified according to the brachytherapy dose rate (low or high dose rate).
Visit 1 included the collection of demographic data, a review of clinical details of prostate cancer and its treatment, blood sampling (for Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), testosterone, and haematology and biochemistry parameters, as appropriate), administration of the QoL questionnaire and International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), and treatment group allocation. Visit 2 included a review of the eligibility criteria, recording of concomitant medications and adverse events (AEs) and study drug administration. Visits 3 to 11 included recording of AEs and concomitant medications, blood sampling and administration of the QoL questionnaire and IPSS.
Following the selection visit (Visit 1), all subjects were scheduled to brachytherapy. Those subjects who were randomised to the concomitant hormone therapy group received a single dose of triptorelin 22.5 mg by intramuscular injection at Visit 2, 2 weeks following the selection visit (Visit 1), and preferably 2 months before receiving brachytherapy. One week before and two weeks after triptorelin administration, subjects were permitted to receive an anti-androgen to counteract a transient increase in testosterone levels.
The study was prematurely stopped due to the slow enrolment of subjects. Of the planned 86 evaluable subjects, 35 were screened, and 32 were randomised between 3 November 2011 and 26 May 2014. The slow inclusion of subjects was due to several factors, among which there were changes in clinical practice which caused such subjects to be offered alternative treatments to brachytherapy. Due to the small number of subjects, none of the planned efficacy analyses were performed. Instead, the data were analysed as follows:
- Efficacy data and quality of life (QoL) outcomes were displayed only in listings.
- Safety information was displayed using listings and summary tables.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Triptorelin 22.5 mg, Brachytherapy
- Keywords
- Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma, Brachytherapy, Triptorelin, Hormone Therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Triptorelin 22.5 mgDrug
Triptorelin: A single, intramuscular injection (22.5 mg), preferably 2 months before brachytherapy.
BrachytherapyRadiation
Brachytherapy: Low or high dose rate.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Brachytherapy + Triptorelin 22.5 mg | Experimental | Brachytherapy: Low or high dose rate. Triptorelin: A single, intramuscular injection (22.5 mg), preferably 2 months before brachytherapy. Receives: Drug: Triptorelin 22.5 mg; Radiation: Brachytherapy |
| Brachytherapy | Active comparator | Brachytherapy: Low or high dose rate. Receives: Radiation: Brachytherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Biochemical Failure-free Survival (BFFS)
BFFS was determined by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) increase of 2 nanograms per millilitre (ng/mL) or more in comparison with the pre-study nadir PSA and confirmed in the course of follow-up by a second value 3 weeks later or longer over the 5 year follow-up. Time to BFFS was defined from treatment initiation to the first time when PSA increase of 2 ng/mL was observed.
As the study was prematurely terminated, no analyses were conducted. Data for BFFS are listed by subject for those individuals who reported biochemical failure. Time (in months) to biochemical failure is relative to the date of brachytherapy.
Measured: Up to 5 years
Secondary outcomes (6)
Time to Progression
Time to progression (in months) was measured from the informed consent date to the date of first event occurrence. Progression was defined as either: death from all causes or disease progression (defined as PSA increased by 2 ng/mL as compared to the pre-trial nadir PSA, confirmed during follow-up by a second value after 3 or more weeks, or the diagnosis of a new clinical recurrence of their prostate cancer (metastasis, new injury, etc.)).
As the study was prematurely terminated, no analyses were conducted. Data for time to progression are listed by subject for those individuals who reported progression.
Measured: Up to 5 years
BFFS Percentage 5 Years From Treatment Initiation
A subject had a biochemical failure if there was an increase of PSA of 2 ng/mL or more in comparison with the pre-study nadir PSA confirmed in the course of follow-up by a second value after 3 or more weeks or with diagnosis of a new clinical recurrence of their prostate cancer over the 5 year follow-up.
Measured: 5 years
Overall Survival
Overall survival was defined as the time in months from diagnosis (biopsy date for local recurrence) to death due to any cause, the last visit or the loss to follow-up.
Measured: 5 years
Number of Participants With Change in Total Serum Testosterone Levels From Baseline at 3, 6 and 12 Months
Blood samples were drawn for serum testosterone at baseline (Visit 1) and then at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Changes from baseline in total serum testosterone levels in relation to the normal parameter ranges are indicated. WNR = Within Normal Range, BNR= Below Normal Range and ANR = Above Normal Range.
Measured: Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months
Number of Participants With Change in Total Serum PSA Levels From Baseline at 3, 6 and 12 Months
Blood samples were drawn for serum PSA at baseline (Visit 1) and at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Changes from baseline in total serum PSA levels in relation to the normal parameter ranges are indicated. WNR = Within Normal Range, BNR= Below Normal Range and ANR = Above Normal Range.
Measured: Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) Modifications (Spanish Version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Questionnaire) From Baseline at 5 Years
EPIC assessed the disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies and comprised four summary domains (Urinary, Bowel, Sexual and Hormonal). Factor analysis supported dividing the Urinary Domain Summary Score into two different Incontinence and Irritative/Obstructive subscales. In addition, each Domain Summary Score had measurable Function Subscale and Bother Subscale components. Response options for each EPIC item formed a Likert scale, and multi-item scale scores were transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores representing better Health-Related QoL.
Measured: Baseline and 5 years.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2011
- Primary completionDec 2014
- Study completionDec 2014
Why it stopped: Slow enrollment of patients.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IpsenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ipsen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ipsen Medical Director, Study director, Ipsen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01374087
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A-92-52014-177
- Other IDs
- 2010-019158-41
- Acronym
- ANABRAQ
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2011
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Proof-of-concept Multicentre, Prospective, Randomised, Open-label- Parallel-group Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Brachytherapy With or Without Hormone Therapy Using Triptorelin 22.5 mg 6-month Formulation in Patients With Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With Radiotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01374087
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ANABRAQ / A-92-52014-177
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma, Brachytherapy, Triptorelin, Hormone Therapy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Slow enrollment of patients.
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IpsenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2011
- Primary completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Feb 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of brachytherapy versus brachytherapy + triptorelin 22.5 mg (single injection) in subjects with recurrence of prostate cancer previously treated with radiotherapy. Efficacy was to be assessed by biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS) curves from treatment initiation up to 5 years.
Secondary objectives included comparing the following: the differences in time to progression of subjects receiving brachytherapy + triptorelin 22.5 mg versus subjects receiving brachytherapy only, the BFFS percentages between both treatment groups at 5 years from treatment initiation, overall survival between both treatment groups, total testosterone changes (from baseline visit up to 12 months) and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels (from baseline visit up to 60 months of treatment) between both treatment groups, quality of life (QoL) modifications (Spanish version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire) between the baseline score and the rest of measurements, and to compare safety between both treatment groups.
Detailed description
This was a proof-of-concept, prospective, parallel, multicentre, randomised and open-label trial, including a follow-up of all subjects conducted at 11 centres in Spain. Study visits included an inclusion visit (Visit 1), a treatment administration visit (Visit 2), and 9 follow-up visits (Visit 3 to Visit 11) from 3 to 60 months after study treatment administration. All of the procedures performed at these visits were in accordance with routine clinical practice. Subjects were randomised to any one of the two treatment arms (Group 1: brachytherapy only, or Group 2: brachytherapy + triptorelin 22.5 mg). Randomisation was stratified according to the brachytherapy dose rate (low or high dose rate).
Visit 1 included the collection of demographic data, a review of clinical details of prostate cancer and its treatment, blood sampling (for Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), testosterone, and haematology and biochemistry parameters, as appropriate), administration of the QoL questionnaire and International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), and treatment group allocation. Visit 2 included a review of the eligibility criteria, recording of concomitant medications and adverse events (AEs) and study drug administration. Visits 3 to 11 included recording of AEs and concomitant medications, blood sampling and administration of the QoL questionnaire and IPSS.
Following the selection visit (Visit 1), all subjects were scheduled to brachytherapy. Those subjects who were randomised to the concomitant hormone therapy group received a single dose of triptorelin 22.5 mg by intramuscular injection at Visit 2, 2 weeks following the selection visit (Visit 1), and preferably 2 months before receiving brachytherapy. One week before and two weeks after triptorelin administration, subjects were permitted to receive an anti-androgen to counteract a transient increase in testosterone levels.
The study was prematurely stopped due to the slow enrolment of subjects. Of the planned 86 evaluable subjects, 35 were screened, and 32 were randomised between 3 November 2011 and 26 May 2014. The slow inclusion of subjects was due to several factors, among which there were changes in clinical practice which caused such subjects to be offered alternative treatments to brachytherapy. Due to the small number of subjects, none of the planned efficacy analyses were performed. Instead, the data were analysed as follows:
- Efficacy data and quality of life (QoL) outcomes were displayed only in listings.
- Safety information was displayed using listings and summary tables.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Brachytherapy + Triptorelin 22.5 mg | Experimental | Drug: Triptorelin 22.5 mg, Radiation: BrachytherapyBrachytherapy: Low or high dose rate. Triptorelin: A single, intramuscular injection (22.5 mg), preferably 2 months before brachytherapy. |
| Brachytherapy | Active comparator | Radiation: BrachytherapyBrachytherapy: Low or high dose rate. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- A history of prostate cancer (T1-T2-T3 N0 M0), confirmed through histopathology and initially treated with radiotherapy.
- Age ≤ 75 years.
- Biochemical failure due to Phoenix criteria (nadir + 2) and local recurrence of the initial prostate cancer, confirmed by prostate biopsy, with neither regional involvement nor distant metastases.
- Late local recurrence of the initial prostate cancer. A recurrence is late when it appears after longer than 18 months post-radiotherapy.
- PSA < 10 ng/mL at the time of recurrence.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Evidence of metastatic disease.
- Previous evidence of hormone-resistant cancer.
- Lack of availability for performing regular follow-up.
- Subjects who were receiving or had received either luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonists, or antagonists, over the previous 12 months.
- Subjects who had been on treatment with other hormone therapies, including antagonists, megestrol acetate, finasteride, dutasteride, any herbaceous product known to reduce the PSA levels, or any systemic corticosteroid, over the previous 4 weeks.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Triptorelin 22.5 mgTriptorelin: A single, intramuscular injection (22.5 mg), preferably 2 months before brachytherapy. | Drug | Brachytherapy + Triptorelin 22.5 mg |
| BrachytherapyBrachytherapy: Low or high dose rate. | Radiation | Brachytherapy, Brachytherapy + Triptorelin 22.5 mg |
Primary outcome
Biochemical Failure-free Survival (BFFS)
Time frame: Up to 5 years
BFFS was determined by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) increase of 2 nanograms per millilitre (ng/mL) or more in comparison with the pre-study nadir PSA and confirmed in the course of follow-up by a second value 3 weeks later or longer over the 5 year follow-up. Time to BFFS was defined from treatment initiation to the first time when PSA increase of 2 ng/mL was observed. As the study was prematurely terminated, no analyses were conducted. Data for BFFS are listed by subject for those individuals who reported biochemical failure. Time (in months) to biochemical failure is relative to the date of brachytherapy.
6 secondary outcomes
Time to Progression
Time frame: Up to 5 years
BFFS Percentage 5 Years From Treatment Initiation
Time frame: 5 years
Overall Survival
Time frame: 5 years
Number of Participants With Change in Total Serum Testosterone Levels From Baseline at 3, 6 and 12 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months
Number of Participants With Change in Total Serum PSA Levels From Baseline at 3, 6 and 12 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) Modifications (Spanish Version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Questionnaire) From Baseline at 5 Years
Time frame: Baseline and 5 years.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ipsen Medical Director study director
Ipsen
11 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Triptorelin 22.5 mg and Brachytherapy in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Ipsen at 11 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Feb 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Biochemical Failure-free Survival (BFFS) (time frame: Up to 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2019.