Colorectal CancerPhase 2MAVERICCNCT01374425
Study of Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 Versus Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI With Biomarker Stratification in Participants With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC)
A Phase 2 study testing 5-Fluorouracil, Bevacizumab and Irinotecan in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Genentech, Inc. at 79 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
This will be a randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase II study with primary objectives to assess whether expression of select chemotherapy markers is associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in participants treated with bevacizumab plus leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- 5-Fluorouracil, Bevacizumab and Irinotecan
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 376 participants
- Where
- 79 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- Aug 2011to Jul 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed colorectal cancer (CRC) with at least one measurable metastatic lesion by RECIST Version 1.1
- Archival tumor tissue sample must be requested and available prior to study entry. If no archival tumor tissue sample is available, a fresh biopsy tissue sample must be obtained but should be discussed first with the medical monitor. A copy of the local pathology report must be submitted along with the specimens.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
- Participants with treated brain metastases are eligible for study participation. Participants may not receive ongoing treatment with steroids at Screening. Anticonvulsants (at stable dose) are allowed. Treatment for brain metastases may be whole-brain radiotherapy, radiosurgery, neurosurgery, or a combination as deemed appropriate by the treating physician. Radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery must be completed at least 28 days prior to randomization.
- Female participants should not be pregnant or breastfeeding. Female participants with childbearing potential should agree to use effective, non-hormonal means of contraception during the study and for a period of at least 6 months following the last administration of study drugs. Female participants with an intact uterus (unless amenorrheic for the last 24 months) must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to randomization into the study.
- Male participants must agree to use effective contraception during the study and for a period of at least 6 months following the last administration of study drugs, even if they have been surgically sterilized.
Who cannot join
- Any prior systemic treatment for mCRC
- Adjuvant chemotherapy for CRC completed <12 months
- Evidence of Gilbert's syndrome or of homozygosity for the UGT1A1*28 allele
- Known positivity for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
- Malignancies other than mCRC within 5 years prior to randomization, except for adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal or squamous cell skin cancer, localized prostate cancer treated surgically with curative intent, and ductal carcinoma in situ treated surgically with curative intent
- Radiotherapy to any site for any reason within 28 days prior to randomization, except for palliative radiotherapy to bone lesions within 14 days prior to randomization
- Clinically detectable third-space fluid collections that cannot be controlled by drainage or other procedures prior to study entry
- Treatment with any other investigational agent, or participation in another investigational drug trial within 28 days prior to randomization
Trial locations and contacts
79 sites in 7 countries.
79 sites in 7 countries
United States65 sites
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87110
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131-5636
Study site
Bellflower, California, 90706
Study site
Billings, Montana, 59102
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Study site
Boise, Idaho, 83712
Study site
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29414
Study site
Cherry Hill, New Jersey, 08003
Study site
Columbus, Ohio, 43219
Study site
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78404
Study site
Denver, Colorado, 80218
Study site
Duarte, California, 91010
Study site
Dunmore, Pennsylvania, 18512
Study site
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Study site
Elizabethtown, Kentucky, 42791
Study site
Fairway, Kansas, 66205
Study site
Farmington, New Mexico, 87401
Study site
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Study site
Fresno, California, 93720
Study site
Goshen, Indiana, 46526
Study site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27403
Study site
Hayward, California, 94545
Study site
High Point, North Carolina, 27262
Study site
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77090
Study site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46237
Study site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Study site
Joliet, Illinois, 60435
Study site
Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88011
Study site
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68506
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205-7199
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Study site
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Study site
Manasquan, New Jersey, 08736
Study site
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
Study site
Media, Pennsylvania, 19063
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33136
Study site
Oakland, California, 94611
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73142
Study site
Peoria, Illinois, 61615
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
Study site
Pleasant Hill, California, 94523
Study site
Port Saint Lucie, Florida, 34952
Study site
Rochester, New York, 14642
Study site
Roseville, California, 95661
Study site
Sacramento, California, 95817
Study site
Sacramento, California, 95825
Study site
San Francisco, California, 94115
Study site
San Jose, California, 95119
Study site
Santa Clara, California, 95051
Study site
Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87505
Study site
Scarborough, Maine, 04074
Study site
South San Francisco, California, 94080
Study site
Stamford, Connecticut, 06902
Study site
Terre Haute, Indiana, 47802
Study site
Toledo, Ohio, 43623
Study site
Trumbull, Connecticut, 06611
Study site
Vallejo, California, 94589
Study site
Walnut Creek, California, 94596
Study site
Washington, North Carolina, 27889
Study site
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 53226
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Switzerland4 sites
Study site
Aarau, 5000
Study site
Basel, 4031
Study site
Lucerne, 6004
Study site
Zurich, 8063
Portugal3 sites
Study site
Coimbra, 3000-075
Study site
Lisbon, 1649-035
Study site
Porto, 4200-072
About this study
Official title: MAVERICC (Marker Evaluation for Avastin Research in CRC): A Randomized Phase II Study of Bevacizumab+mFOLFOX6 Vs. Bevacizumab+FOLFIRI With Biomarker Stratification in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
This will be a randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase II study with primary objectives to assess whether expression of select chemotherapy markers is associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in participants treated with bevacizumab plus leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). The study population will consist of participants with first-line mCRC.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- 5-Fluorouracil, Bevacizumab, Irinotecan, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
5-FluorouracilDrug
5-Fluorouracil 400 milligrams per meter-squared (mg/m^2) by IV bolus and subsequent 2400 mg/m^2 by IV infusion over 46 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
BevacizumabDrug
Also called Avastin
Bevacizumab 5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of body weight via IV infusion will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. If participants are discontinued from oxaliplatin or irinotecan due to unacceptable toxicity, bevacizumab may be given in 3-week cycles with capecitabine.
IrinotecanDrug
Irinotecan 180 mg/m^2 via IV infusion over 2 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
LeucovorinDrug
Leucovorin 400 mg/m^2 or dose deemed appropriate by Investigator via IV infusion over 2 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
OxaliplatinDrug
Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2 via IV infusion over 2 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
CapecitabineDrug
Capecitabine 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 may be offered in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan, to be given orally twice a day on Days 1 to 14 in 3-week cycles.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 | Experimental | Participants will receive bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 by intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Receives: Drug: 5-Fluorouracil; Drug: Bevacizumab; Drug: Leucovorin; Drug: Oxaliplatin; Drug: Capecitabine |
| Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI | Experimental | Participants will receive bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI by IV infusion on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. Receives: Drug: 5-Fluorouracil; Drug: Bevacizumab; Drug: Irinotecan; Drug: Leucovorin; Drug: Capecitabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as greater than or equal to (≥) 20 percent (%) increase in sum of largest diameters (LD) of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 millimeters (mm). Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Secondary outcomes (32)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 and High VEGF-A Levels
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 and Low VEGF-A Levels
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 and High VEGF-A Levels
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 and Low VEGF-A Levels
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Overall Survival (OS)
Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
OS in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
OS in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
OS in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1
Objective response was defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to less than (<) 10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1
Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Wild-Type V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
OS in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
OS in Participants With Wild-Type KRAS Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS
Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. OS was defined as the time from randomization to death. The median duration of OS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
Measured: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Wild-Type KRAS Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS
Objective response was defined as CR or PR according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. The percentage of participants with CR or PR was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Disease control was defined as CR, PR, or SD according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and short-axis reduction to <10 mm of any pathological lymph nodes. PR was defined as ≥30% decrease in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to sum of LD at Baseline. Confirmation of response at a consecutive assessment was not required. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to quality for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for disease progression (≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions plus absolute increase ≥5 mm) in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study. The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or SD was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. R1 was defined as the presence of exposed tumor or histologically detected tumor cells at the line of transection, or <1 mm microscopic margins. In the case of use of radiofrequency ablation or cryotherapy, the resection was considered as R1. R2 was defined as macroscopic positive margins or incomplete resection at time of surgery. The percentage of participants with resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
The timing of resective surgery was not defined in the protocol and was left at the discretion of the Investigator. Resection was classified as R0, R1, or R2 following surgery. R0 was defined as complete resection with clear margins ≥1 mm. The percentage of participants with R0 resection of liver or liver plus lymph node metastases was reported. The 95% CI was computed using normal approximation to the binomial distribution.
Measured: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2011
- Primary completionMay 2015
- Study completionJul 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Genentech, Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 376 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Genentech, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christiane Langer, M.D., Study director, Genentech, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01374425
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML25710
- Other IDs
- 2011-004755-39
- Acronym
- MAVERICC
- Status last verified
- Jun 2016
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2011
- Last updated
- 11 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- MAVERICC (Marker Evaluation for Avastin Research in CRC): A Randomized Phase II Study of Bevacizumab+mFOLFOX6 Vs. Bevacizumab+FOLFIRI With Biomarker Stratification in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01374425
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MAVERICC / ML25710
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 376 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Genentech, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Aug 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This will be a randomized, open-label, multicenter, Phase II study with primary objectives to assess whether expression of select chemotherapy markers is associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in participants treated with bevacizumab plus leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). The study population will consist of participants with first-line mCRC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 | Experimental | Drug: 5-Fluorouracil, Drug: Bevacizumab, Drug: Leucovorin, Drug: Oxaliplatin, Drug: CapecitabineParticipants will receive bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 by intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. |
| Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI | Experimental | Drug: 5-Fluorouracil, Drug: Bevacizumab, Drug: Irinotecan, Drug: Leucovorin, Drug: CapecitabineParticipants will receive bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI by IV infusion on Day 1 of each 2-week cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may be transitioned to oral capecitabine in the event of unacceptable toxicity to irinotecan, with bevacizumab continued in 3-week cycles. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed colorectal cancer (CRC) with at least one measurable metastatic lesion by RECIST Version 1.1
- Archival tumor tissue sample must be requested and available prior to study entry. If no archival tumor tissue sample is available, a fresh biopsy tissue sample must be obtained but should be discussed first with the medical monitor. A copy of the local pathology report must be submitted along with the specimens.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
- Participants with treated brain metastases are eligible for study participation. Participants may not receive ongoing treatment with steroids at Screening. Anticonvulsants (at stable dose) are allowed. Treatment for brain metastases may be whole-brain radiotherapy, radiosurgery, neurosurgery, or a combination as deemed appropriate by the treating physician. Radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery must be completed at least 28 days prior to randomization.
- Female participants should not be pregnant or breastfeeding. Female participants with childbearing potential should agree to use effective, non-hormonal means of contraception during the study and for a period of at least 6 months following the last administration of study drugs. Female participants with an intact uterus (unless amenorrheic for the last 24 months) must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to randomization into the study.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Any prior systemic treatment for mCRC
- Adjuvant chemotherapy for CRC completed <12 months
- Evidence of Gilbert's syndrome or of homozygosity for the UGT1A1*28 allele
- Known positivity for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
- Malignancies other than mCRC within 5 years prior to randomization, except for adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix, basal or squamous cell skin cancer, localized prostate cancer treated surgically with curative intent, and ductal carcinoma in situ treated surgically with curative intent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Fluorouracil5-Fluorouracil 400 milligrams per meter-squared (mg/m^2) by IV bolus and subsequent 2400 mg/m^2 by IV infusion over 46 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. | Drug | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI, Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 |
| BevacizumabAlso: AvastinBevacizumab 5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of body weight via IV infusion will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. If participants are discontinued from oxaliplatin or irinotecan due to unacceptable toxicity, bevacizumab may be given in 3-week cycles with capecitabine. | Drug | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI, Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 |
| IrinotecanIrinotecan 180 mg/m^2 via IV infusion over 2 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. | Drug | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI |
| LeucovorinLeucovorin 400 mg/m^2 or dose deemed appropriate by Investigator via IV infusion over 2 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. | Drug | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI, Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 |
| OxaliplatinOxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2 via IV infusion over 2 hours will be administered every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. | Drug | Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 |
| CapecitabineCapecitabine 850 or 1000 mg/m^2 may be offered in the event of unacceptable toxicity to oxaliplatin or irinotecan, to be given orally twice a day on Days 1 to 14 in 3-week cycles. | Drug | Bevacizumab + FOLFIRI, Bevacizumab + mFOLFOX6 |
Primary outcome
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
Time frame: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as greater than or equal to (≥) 20 percent (%) increase in sum of largest diameters (LD) of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 millimeters (mm). Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Tumor assessments were performed according to RECIST Version 1.1. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of LD of target lesions in reference to the smallest sum of LD on study, in addition to an absolute increase ≥5 mm. Disease progression was further defined as the last documented progression determined by the Investigator no later than 1 day before initiation of second-line therapy. Death on study included death from any cause occurring no later than 3 months after the last component of study treatment. PFS was defined as the time from randomization to death or disease progression, whichever occurred first. The median duration of PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed in months. The 95% CI was computed using the method of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
32 secondary outcomes
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 and High VEGF-A Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 and Low VEGF-A Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 and High VEGF-A Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 and Low VEGF-A Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
OS in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
OS in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
OS in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1
Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1
Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection
Time frame: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection
Time frame: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High ERCC-1 Levels Versus Participants With Low ERCC-1 Levels
Time frame: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
PFS According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Wild-Type V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (KRAS) Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS
Time frame: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
OS in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
OS in Participants With Wild-Type KRAS Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS
Time frame: From Baseline until death (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With Wild-Type KRAS Versus Participants With Mutant KRAS
Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Control According to RECIST Version 1.1 in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Time frame: From Baseline until disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Time frame: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Percentage of Participants With Complete Liver Metastasis Resection in Participants With High VEGF-A Levels Versus Participants With Low VEGF-A Levels
Time frame: At time of resective surgery during study (maximum up to 45 months overall)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Aug 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christiane Langer, M.D. study director
Genentech, Inc.
79 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing 5-Fluorouracil, Bevacizumab and Irinotecan in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Genentech, Inc. at 79 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 79 sites in United States, Switzerland, Ireland, Portugal, Estonia and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Aug 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (time frame: From Baseline until death or disease progression; assessed every 6 weeks (maximum up to 45 months overall)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2016.