AzTrials
AzTrials

PneumoniaPhase 1/2NCT01375426

Efficacy Study for Standard Versus Double Dose of Amoxicillin in WHO Defined Non-severe Pneumonia

A Phase 1/2 study testing Oral amoxicillin in people with Pneumonia, run by ARI Research Cell at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Over a period of years there have been numerous reports from many developing countries including Pakistan showing a rising treatment failure rate with first line drugs (amoxicillin and cotrimoxazole) in non-severe pneumonia in children. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 59 months
Conditions the study is for
Pneumonia
What is being tested?
Oral amoxicillin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
How many people
900 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
Sep 2003to Jun 2004
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 59 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • They are aged 2-59 months.
  • Diagnosed with WHO defined non-severe pneumonia (Table 1).

Who cannot join

  • Children with signs of WHO defined severe or very severe disease.
  • Known penicillin allergy, with a history of accelerated rash, urticaria, or anaphylactic symptoms. Complicating acute non-pulmonary or chronic illness .
  • The children living outside the municipal limits of the city who cannot be followed up .
  • Children who have taken the appropriate doses of WHO-recommended dose of anti microbial drug for 48 hours prior to presentation .
  • Children who have prior history of wheezing or bronchial asthma and are wheezing now .
  • Children whose parents or guardians refuse to give consent.
  • Previously enrolled patients in the present study.
  • Hospitalization in the past two weeks.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • ARI Research Cell, Children Hospital, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences

    Islamabad, Capital, 44000

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Standard Versus Double Dose of Amoxicillin in the Treatment of Non-Severe Pneumonia in Children Aged 2-59 Months: A Multi-centre Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial in Pakistan

Over a period of years there have been numerous reports from many developing countries including Pakistan showing a rising treatment failure rate with first line drugs (amoxicillin and cotrimoxazole) in non-severe pneumonia in children. The reasons for this rise in treatment failure rates are not entirely clear but one of the reasons is thought to be increasing antimicrobial resistance of H. influenzae and Strep. pneumoniae to first line drugs. There is microbiological data which suggests that this resistance can be overcome by increasing the dose of amoxicillin. The investigators propose to treat non-severe pneumonia with double dose amoxicillin in an attempt to demonstrate a decrease in treatment failure rates. This will be a multicentre, double blind randomized controlled trial in children 2-59 months of age with non-severe pneumonia comparing the clinical outcome between the standard and double dose groups.

It has been felt that the WHO criteria for treatment failure in children with pneumonia are too stringent and have never been systematically evaluated in the community. The investigators also propose to modify WHO criteria and field test them in this trial in an attempt to demonstrate that less stringent treatment failure criteria would have an impact on the overall treatment failure rates in pneumonia.

Read more

Hypothesis:

Therapy outcome with double dose of oral amoxicillin is not different than the standard dose of amoxicillin, when used for three days for the treatment of non-severe pneumonia in 2-59 months old children.

Read the detailed description

INTRODUCTION:

World Health Organization's (WHO) standard case management strategy for reducing ARI related mortality recommends oral cotrimoxazole and oral amoxicillin as first line drugs for the treatment of pneumonia. In 1989, the Pakistan Ministry of Health (MOH) adopted this strategy to control ARI mortality and recommended cotrimoxazole for treatment of outpatients pneumonia due to lower costs. A number of studies subsequently performed have shown significant in vivo and in vitro resistance of H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae, the commonest bacteria causing childhood pneumonia, to cotrimoxazole.

This increase in clinical failure with oral cotrimoxazole has put a lot of pressure both at national and international forums on the National ARI Control Programme of Pakistan to change its recommendations from cotrimoxazole to amoxicillin as the first line of therapy. Besides being efficacious for non-severe pneumonia amoxicillin has shown good efficacy in children with severe pneumonia and bacteremic children.

although on a case by case basis for pneumonia, in vitro resistance does not correlate very well with in vivo failures. One can hypothesize that if bacterial pneumonia is a certain proportion of all pneumonia cases, the rise in clinical failures may be related to increasing antimicrobial resistance of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae to amoxicillin.

It is felt that WHO criteria for treatment failure are too stringent. Improvement is defined as the return of respiratory rate to below the cut off for that particular age at 48 hours. Some of the children with viral pneumonia will continue to have respiratory rate above the cut off on the first follow-up. These children are otherwise well and show no signs of deterioration of the disease but according to WHO criteria they would be classified as treatment failure. The treatment failure rates hence are influenced by the definitions used.

The existing data shows that if we increase the dose of amoxicillin to achieve higher MICs then the eradication of causative organism tend to be much more complete. As yet, no clinical trial has been conducted to address this important question in the treatment of childhood pneumonia.

We propose a multicentre, randomized, controlled double blind trial in which we will compare standard versus double dose oral amoxicillin for three days for the treatment of non-severe pneumonia in children less than five years of age.

Primary Objectives:

  1. To compare the proportion of children 2 - 59 months of age presenting with non-severe pneumonia, who achieve clinical resolution on day 5 with standard (15 mg/kg/8hrly) versus double dose (30 mg/kg/8hrly) of oral amoxicillin therapy given for 3 days.

Secondary Objective:

To follow the clinical course of non-severe pneumonia with the alternative criteria of treatment failure (signs of deterioration i.e. lower chest indrawing and appearance of danger signs) on or before day 3 and compare them with other children who have persistent fast breathing (respiratory rate above the cut off for age) on day 3.

Null Hypothesis:

Therapy outcome with double dose of oral amoxicillin is not different than the standard dose of amoxicillin, when used for three days for the treatment of non-severe pneumonia in 2-59 months old children.

STUDY POPULATION AND SITE:

Patients:

They will be recruited from those coming to outpatient departments (OPD) in large tertiary care hospitals in Pakistan.

CONSENT:

The purpose of the study will be explained to parents and oral informed consent to participate obtained. A proposed consent form is attached (Annex. 1).

Study Design:

This will be a randomized, double blind, multi-centre trial.

Definitions:

ARI is defined according to the WHO ARI Programme guidelines 2 for children who have either a cough or difficult breathing.

A clinical resolution is defined as return of respiratory rate to normal (no pneumonia) according to WHO ARI standard case management classification 2.

Clinical Failure is defined as development of chest indrawing; or any other danger sign; or persistence of fast breathing at day 5 follow-up or thereafter leading to therapy change.

Improved will be defined as slower respiratory rate (either back to normal range for age, or lower by more than 5 compared to previous evaluation), feeding better according to mother and lower body temperature than previous assessment.

Same will be defined as still breathing fast (respiratory rate ± 5 breaths/minute compared to previous evaluation or higher than that), with no chest indrawing and or danger sign.

Worse will be defined as development of lower chest indrawing or any danger sign.

A relapse is defined as development of recurrence signs of pneumonia till day 14 after fast breathing has disappeared initially.

Follow-up:

All children will be followed-up on day 3, 5 and 14.

Sample size:

Keeping in mind the overall treatment failure rate of 20.9% with amoxicillin from the MASCOT study (1999 - 2001), it is expected that the proportion of patients who will fail to respond with standard dose amoxicillin will be around 21.0%.7 In order for double dose to be more efficacious there should be a difference of more than 5% in the treatment success rate as compared to the standard dose. We assume that the failure rate will not be more than 13% with double dose amoxicillin. By using the power of 80% and the confidence interval of 95%, the estimated sample size comes to 369 for each group. Assuming the loss to follow up to be 15% (as it is an out patient study and having day 14 follow-up) the estimated sample size will be 425 patients in each group, a total of 850 patients. Thus 900 patients will be enrolled in one and a half ARI season.

DATA ENTRY AND ANALYSIS:

Data forms will all be filled on auto copy forms and will be reviewed by the site co-ordinator.

Data will be entered using Epi Info 6 and will be entered twice by two separate operators and both data bases will be validated using Epi Info 6.

Outcome measures:

A clinical resolution is defined as return of respiratory rate to normal (no pneumonia) on day 5, according to WHO ARI standard case management classification.

Clinical/treatment Failure is defined as development of chest indrawing; or any other danger sign; or persistence of fast breathing at day 5 follow-up or thereafter leading to therapy change.

Data analysis:

Analysis will be carried out on intention to treat basis. For primary outcome proportion of therapy failures and their 95% CI will be calculated for both the two regimens. Then we will compare proportion of therapy failure using alternative criteria and WHO defined conventional therapy failure criteria.

Conditions
Pneumonia
Being tested
Oral amoxicillin
Keywords
Non-severe pneumonia, Treatment failure, Double dose amoxicillin, Children
Medical subject headings
Pneumonia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Oral amoxicillinDrug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of children with non-severe pneumonia failing treatment with standard and double dose amoxicillin

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. To measure the difference in treatment failure rates by day 5 by using the treatment failure definitions by WHO and the modified study definitions.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jun 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2003
  3. Study completionJun 2004

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Enrolment
900 participants
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01375426
Sponsor's protocol ID
DDAMOXI
Status last verified
Jun 2011
First submitted
16 Jun 2011
Last updated
17 Jun 2011
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Oral amoxicillin in people with Pneumonia, run by ARI Research Cell at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of children with non-severe pneumonia failing treatment with standard and double dose amoxicillin. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in