AzTrials
AzTrials

Primary Open Angle GlaucomaPhase 2NCT01379144

A Study Comparing The Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Of Latanoprost 75, 100 And 125 ug/ml To Xalatan In The Treatment Of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma And Ocular Hypertension

A Phase 2 study testing latanoprost 75 ug, latanoprost 100 ug and latanoprost 125 ug in people with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. at 25 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study was to compare the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) of three different doses of latanoprost (75, 100 and 125 ug/ml) to that of the marketed 50 ug/ml dose, in a dose ranging study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
latanoprost 75 ug, latanoprost 100 ug and latanoprost 125 ug
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
282 participants
Where
25 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
Jan 2003to Apr 2003
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female, 18 years of age or older.
  • Primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) requiring unilateral or bilateral administration of intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering treatment, including patients who were naïve to IOP lowering treatment.
  • IOP between ≥ 24 mmHg and ≤ 36 mmHg in at least one eye at the 8 AM time point at baseline/randomization.

Who cannot join

  • Closed/barely open anterior chamber angle or a history of acute angle closure.
  • A history of discontinued prostaglandin IOP lowering treatment, unless the reason for discontinuation was participation in a clinical study.
  • Ocular surgery or argon laser trabeculoplasty in one or both eyes within 3 months prior to the screening visit.
  • Use or anticipated requirement during the study of any topical medication that was known to affect IOP.
  • Anticipated need to modify systemic medication known to affect IOP (eg, beta-adrenergic antagonists, alpha-adrenergic agonists, calcium channel blockers, angiotension converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotension II receptor antagonists) during the study period.

Trial locations and contacts

25 sites in 8 countries.

25 sites in 8 countries

Czechia5 sites
  • University Hospital Brno-Bohunice

    Brno, CZ - 62500

  • Specializovana Glaukomova Poradna, Blanicka 25

    Prague, 120 00

  • VseobecnBfakultnf nemocnice

    Prague, 128 21

  • Private Ophthalmology, V Hurkach 1296

    Prague, 150 00

  • Institute of Aviation Medicine, Generalal Piky 1

    Prague, 160 60

Other trials in Czechia

France4 sites
  • Hopital De La Timone

    Marseille

  • Hopital Des Armees Laveran

    Marseille

  • Fondation Adolphe De Rothchild

    Paris, 75016

  • Hopital Civil

    Strasbourg

Other trials in France

Pakistan4 sites
  • Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi

    Karachi, Sindh

  • Civil Hospital Karachi

    Karachi, Sindh

  • Layton Rahmatullah Benevolent Trust (LRBT), Eye Hospital

    Lahore, Punjab Province

  • Services Hospital Lahore

    Lahore, Punjab Province

Other trials in Pakistan

Australia3 sites
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace

    Adelaide, South Australia, 5000

  • Eye Associates Pty Limited

    Sydney, New South Wales, 2000

  • Save Sight Institute

    Sydney, New South Wales, 2000

Other trials in Australia

Portugal3 sites
  • A.I.B.I.L.I.

    Coimbra, 3000

  • Hospital De S. Jose

    Lisbon

  • Hospital Pedro Hispano

    Matosinhos Municipality

Other trials in Portugal

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Birmingham Heartlands Hospital

    Birmingham, B9 5SS

  • Glasgow Royal Infirmary

    Glasgow, G4 0SF

  • Sunderland Eye Infirmary

    Sunderland, SR2 9HP

Other trials in United Kingdom

Thailand2 sites
  • Siriraj Hospital, Ophthalmology

    Bangkok, 10700

  • Chulalongkorn Hospital

    Bangkok

Other trials in Thailand

Greece1 site
  • Akadimos Ophthalmology Center of Northern Greece

    Thessaloniki

Other trials in Greece

About this study

Official title: A 4 Week, Dose-Ranging, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel Study Comparing The Efficacy, Safety, And Tolerability Of Latanoprost 75, 100 And 125 ug/ml To Xalatan In The Treatment Of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Aand Ocular Hypertension

The primary objective of this study was to compare the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) of three different doses of latanoprost (75, 100 and 125 ug/ml) to that of the marketed 50 ug/ml dose, in a dose ranging study.

Being tested
latanoprost 75 ug, latanoprost 100 ug, latanoprost 125 ug, latanoprost 50 ug
Medical subject headings
Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Ocular Hypertension

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • latanoprost 75 ugDrug

    Eligible patients were randomized to receive 1 of 4 different doses of latanoprost (50, 75, 100 or 125 ug/mL).

    Study medication was supplied in clear bottles. Patients were instructed to instill one drop of study medication in one or both eyes (as instructed by their investigator) once daily in the evening between 7 PM and 9 PM during the entire treatment period. The first dose of study medication was instilled in the evening of the baseline visit and the last dose was instilled in the evening before the Week 4 (Day 28) visit.

  • latanoprost 100 ugDrug

    Eligible patients were randomized to receive 1 of 4 different doses of latanoprost (50, 75, 100 or 125 ug/mL).

    Study medication was supplied in clear bottles. Patients were instructed to instill one drop of study medication in one or both eyes (as instructed by their investigator) once daily in the evening between 7 PM and 9 PM during the entire treatment period. The first dose of study medication was instilled in the evening of the baseline visit and the last dose was instilled in the evening before the Week 4 (Day 28) visit.

  • latanoprost 125 ugDrug

    Eligible patients were randomized to receive 1 of 4 different doses of latanoprost (50, 75, 100 or 125 ug/mL).

    Study medication was supplied in clear bottles. Patients were instructed to instill one drop of study medication in one or both eyes (as instructed by their investigator) once daily in the evening between 7 PM and 9 PM during the entire treatment period. The first dose of study medication was instilled in the evening of the baseline visit and the last dose was instilled in the evening before the Week 4 (Day 28) visit.

  • latanoprost 50 ugDrug

    Eligible patients were randomized to receive 1 of 4 different doses of latanoprost (50, 75, 100 or 125 ug/mL).

    Study medication was supplied in clear bottles. Patients were instructed to instill one drop of study medication in one or both eyes (as instructed by their investigator) once daily in the evening between 7 PM and 9 PM during the entire treatment period. The first dose of study medication was instilled in the evening of the baseline visit and the last dose was instilled in the evening before the Week 4 (Day 28) visit.

Study groups in NCT01379144
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
latanoprost 75 ugExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: latanoprost 75 ug
latanoprost 100 ugExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: latanoprost 100 ug
latanoprost 125 ugExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: latanoprost 125 ug
latanoprost 50 ugActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: latanoprost 50 ug

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary endpoint was the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at 8 AM and 4 PM from baseline to Week 4 (Day 28).

    Measured: Baseline and Day 28

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. The change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at 8 AM and 4 PM from baseline across all clinic visits; comparisons were made by separate analyses for each time point and visit.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 28

  2. The percentage change in IOP from baseline at 8 AM to Week 4 (Day 28).

    Measured: Baseline and Day 28

  3. Ocular safety assessments (ie, ocular adverse events, assessment of conjunctival hyperemia, and ocular symptom evaluations) across all clinic visits.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 28

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jun 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2003
  3. Primary completionMar 2003
  4. Study completionApr 2003

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
282 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01379144
Sponsor's protocol ID
XALA-0091-166
Other IDs
A6111066
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
20 Jun 2011
Last updated
2 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Eveleth D, Starita C, Tressler C. A 4-week, dose-ranging study comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of latanoprost 75, 100 and 125 mug/mL to latanoprost 50 mug/mL (xalatan) in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. BMC Ophthalmol. 2012 May 18;12:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-12-9.

    PubMed 22607109

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing latanoprost 75 ug, latanoprost 100 ug and latanoprost 125 ug in people with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension, run by Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc. at 25 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 25 sites in Czechia, France, Pakistan, Australia, Portugal and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary endpoint was the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) at 8 AM and 4 PM from baseline to Week 4 (Day 28). (time frame: Baseline and Day 28). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01379144, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in