AzTrials
AzTrials

Complications of Surgical and Medical Care: General TermsNCT01380067

a New Way for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Pediatric

An observational study of Complications of Surgical and Medical Care: General Terms, run by The Second People's Hospital of GuangDong Province.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

laparoscopic hernia sac high-ligation has a high recurrence rate laparoscopic hernia sac high-ligation and the lateral umbilicus ligament covering the hernia opening The investigators developed a method of laparoscopic hernia repair by applying a new concept in hernia repair. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 17 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
How many people
486 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2000to Dec 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Study population: The sample size was calculated such that a 4% difference (α = 0.05) in recurrence rate at 5 years between the groups could be detected with a power of 0.9. This required a sample size of 510 patients. Considering an estimated drop-out rate of 10%, we aimed to enroll 600 patients.

Who may be able to join

  • unilateral inguinal hernia age between 2 and 17 years the absence of a history of abdominal or inguinal operations. Of the male patients, only those with completely descended testes were included.

Who cannot join

  • the bilateral cases

About this study

Official title: Phase 3 Study of a New Way for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Pediatric

laparoscopic hernia sac high-ligation

  • has a high recurrence rate laparoscopic hernia sac high-ligation and the lateral umbilicus ligament covering the hernia opening
  • The investigators developed a method of laparoscopic hernia repair by applying a new concept in hernia repair. The hernia opening was tightened, and hernia opening region repaired with a lateral umbilicus ligament in a tension-free manner. This method combines the advantages of a secure repair achieved by the open method with the minimal invasiveness of the laparoscopic method. The investigators hypothesized that the lateral umbilicus ligament covering the internal hernia opening region after the laparoscopic purse-string knot would result in lower recurrence and the same operation relative complication.
Read the detailed description

The primary outcome measure was the recurrence rate after surgery, and the secondary outcome measures included degree of postoperative pain, the amount of postoperative analgesia, procedural duration, number of days to recovery normal activity, surgical complications, cosmetic results, and patient satisfaction. The outcome was recorded at the outpatient visits 10 days, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years after the surgery. The cosmetic result was scored (unsatisfactory = 0, satisfactory = 1, good = 2, and excellent = 3) by the patients or parents, the attending nurse, and the surgeon (maximum points = 9). The patient satisfaction was scored similarly (unsatisfactory = 0, satisfactory = 1, good = 2, and excellent = 3). The long axis of the testes was measured.

Keywords
Inguinal hernia, Lateral umbilicus ligament, Recurrence
Medical subject headings
Hernia, Inguinal, Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01380067
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group Athe patients were subjected laparoscopic purse-string knot for closing the internal hernia opening
Group Bthe lateral umbilicus ligament was used to cover the internal hernia opening after the laparoscopic purse-string knot

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. recurrence rate

    The outcome was recorded at the outpatient visits 10 days, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years after the surgery.

    Measured: five years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. degree of postoperative pain

    The outcome was recorded at the outpatient visits 10 days, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years and 5 years after the surgery.

    Measured: one year

  2. patient satisfaction.

    The patient satisfaction was scored similarly (unsatisfactory = 0, satisfactory = 1, good = 2, and excellent = 3). The long axis of the testes was measured.

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jun 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2000
  3. Primary completionDec 2005
  4. Study completionDec 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
486 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01380067
Sponsor's protocol ID
8808
Status last verified
Dec 2010
First submitted
17 Jun 2011
Last updated
27 Jun 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Complications of Surgical and Medical Care: General Terms, run by The Second People's Hospital of GuangDong Province.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

recurrence rate (time frame: five years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in